AzTrials
AzTrials

Uterine FibroidPALAPANCT03792009

Paracervical Block in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

A study testing Paracervical block, 5% bupivacaine and Normal saline in people with Uterine Fibroid and Adenomyosis, run by Kangbuk Samsung Hospital at 3 sites in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

It remains controversial whether paracervical block should be performed as a powerful strategy for pain relief in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), because convincing conclusions are difficult to draw because of the heterogeneous and contradictory nature of the literature. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Uterine Fibroid, Adenomyosis
What is being tested?
Paracervical block, 5% bupivacaine and Normal saline
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
86 participants
Where
3 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
21 Feb 2019to 1 Feb 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age between 18 and 65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASAPS) classification I-II
  • the absence of pregnancy at the time of surgery

Who cannot join

  • history of cervical surgery such as conization or cerclage
  • inability to perform the paracervical block due to anatomical abnormalities (i.e., very atrophic or small cervix)
  • allergy to bupivacaine, planned concomitant surgical procedures involving extensive additional tissue manipulation such as pelvic lymph node dissection
  • any concomitant surgery of pelvic floor repair (uterosacral ligament suspension or sacrocolpopexy) or vaginal procedures (anterior or posterior colporrhaphy or mid-urethral slings), previously taking opioids for chronic pain
  • inability to accurately express their pain

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Taejong Song, M.D., Ph.D. contact

+821040358405

taejong.song@gmail.com

South Korea3 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, 03181

    Suspended
  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

    Seoul, 110-746

    Taejong Song, MD PhD, 82-2-2001-2582, taejong.song@gmail.com

    Taejong Song, MD, PhD

    Recruiting
  • Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

    Wŏnju

    San-Hui Lee, M.D., +821040358405, saniarami@gmail.com

    San-Hui Lee, M.D.

    Recruiting

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Multi-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Paracervical Block Before Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Postoperative Pain Control (PALAPA):

It remains controversial whether paracervical block should be performed as a powerful strategy for pain relief in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), because convincing conclusions are difficult to draw because of the heterogeneous and contradictory nature of the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of paracervical blocks using with 0.5% bupivacaine prior to TLHs for benign gynecologic conditions on postoperative pain relief.

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pain management is an important component of patient care and satisfaction after surgery. Although contemporary changes such as a shift to minimally invasive approaches and an introduction of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program have resulted in improved outcomes, a large number of patients undergoing surgery have still inadequate pain control. Paracervical block is a single-injection of anesthetic around the cervix at a depth of about 1 cm, diffusing anesthetic into the second to fourth sacral nerve roots passing through Frankenhäuser plexus. Moreover, recent randomized trials demonstrated that patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and received a paracervical block had lower postoperative pain in the first 3-6 hours compared with placebo.

However, it remains controversial whether paracervical block should be performed as a powerful strategy for pain relief in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), because convincing conclusions are difficult to draw because of the heterogeneous and contradictory nature of the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of paracervical blocks using with 0.5% bupivacaine prior to TLHs for benign gynecologic conditions on postoperative pain relief.

Being tested
Paracervical block, 5% bupivacaine, Normal saline
Medical subject headings
Leiomyoma, Adenomyosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Paracervical blockDevice

    Also called Experimental arm, Control arm

    The paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine or normal saline was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

  • 5% bupivacaineDrug

    Also called Experimental arm

    The paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

  • Normal salineDrug

    Also called Control arm

    The paracervical injection with 10 mL of normal saline was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

Study groups in NCT03792009
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Paracervical block with 5% bupivacaineExperimentalThe paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.
Receives: Device: Paracervical block; Drug: 5% bupivacaine
Paracervical block with normal salinePlacebo comparatorThe paracervical injection with 10 mL of normal saline was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.
Receives: Device: Paracervical block; Drug: Normal saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative pain

    The scale was presented as a 10-cm line with verbal descriptors ranging from "no pain" to "worst imaginable pain".

    Measured: at 6-hour after surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Frequency of pills/injections requested

    Narcotic and non-narcotic use were measured by number of pills/injections requested within 24-hour after surgery.

    Measured: Within 24-hour after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jan 2019
  2. Study start21 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
86 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03792009
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019-01-001
Acronym
PALAPA
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
28 Dec 2018
Last updated
25 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Paracervical block, 5% bupivacaine and Normal saline in people with Uterine Fibroid and Adenomyosis, run by Kangbuk Samsung Hospital at 3 sites in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Taejong Song, M.D., Ph.D. (+821040358405, taejong.song@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative pain (time frame: at 6-hour after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in