Type2 DiabetesNCT03792399
Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Immediate or Delayed Counseling Feedback
A study testing feedback counseling in people with Type2 Diabetes, run by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital.
Trial summary
This study is designed to explore the effect of feedback counseling using professional continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control, self-efficacy, and self-management behaviors among middle aged and older adults with poor controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type2 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- feedback counseling
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 7 Mar 2016to 12 Oct 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 45 years old or more at recent outpatient visits;
- Type 2 diabetic patients followed up at National Cheng Kung University Hospital;
- Patients planned to receive CGM suggested by primary care physician due to inadequate controlled blood glucose.
Who cannot join
- Patients with diagnosis of generalized inflammation, advanced malignancy, end-stage renal disease on regular dialysis, status post renal transplantation, end-stage liver, heart or pulmonary disease;
- Patients who are taking systemic glucocorticoids;
- Any acute or chronic inflammatory disease as determined by a leukocyte count over 10,000/mm3 or clinical signs of infection;
- Patients who could not complete the questionnaires or who could not follow order due to cognitive impairment or in bed-ridden status;
- Patients diagnosed as thalassemia, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, and any other hemoglobinopathies that may influence the accuracy of hemoglobulin A1c measurement were also excluded. Patients who received blood transfusion in recent 3 months were also excluded.
About this study
Official title: Impact of Innovative Technology on Geriatric Diabetic Patients: Evaluation of Quality of Life, Self Efficacy and Glycemic Control Among Patients With Experience of Continuous Glucose Monitoring
This study is designed to explore the effect of feedback counseling using professional continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control, self-efficacy, and self-management behaviors among middle aged and older adults with poor controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study also explores the difference on timing of feedback after continuous glucose monitoring exam.
Read the detailed description
After scheduled routine professional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) exam, participants in both the intervention and control group receive ordinary education and regimen adjustment as indicated based on CGM results. For participants in the intervention group, they will also receive CGM counseling immediately on the day of CGM sensor removal. For participants in the control group, they will receive CGM counseling on the day of routine 3 months outpatient visit.
Qualitative data are collected through in-depth interview: User expectation, acceptability and satisfaction of CGM are also explored during in-depth interview with a semi-structured questionnaire.
Quantitative data were collected through validated questionnaires, including evaluation of depression by a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CES-D-R), emotional stress by Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID), self efficacy by Stanford Self-Efficacy for Diabetes (SES), at pretest and 3 months after CGM counseling.
Anthropometric Measurements. Body height, body weight, body mass index, and blood pressure were recorded at pre-test and post-test interview.
Blood Tests. Routine biochemistry, fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are collected within 2 weeks of pretest and posttest day.
- Conditions
- Type2 Diabetes
- Being tested
- feedback counseling
- Keywords
- continuous glucose monitoring, immediate feedback counseling, delayed feedback counseling
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
feedback counselingBehavioural
Professoinal CGM in combination with diet and exercise record is used as teaching material to help patient realize their blood glucose pattern and to modify their behavior after counseling feedback.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate feedback counseling | Experimental | Professional CGM calibrate blood glucose via a glucsoe-oxidase-impregnated membrane during a 5 day period. The patient wearing professional CGM is randomized to immediate feedback after data downloaded into computer. Receives: Behavioral: feedback counseling |
| Delayed feedback counseling | Other | Professional CGM calibrate blood glucose via a glucsoe-oxidase-impregnated membrane during a 5 day period. The patient wearing professional CGM is randomized to delayed feedback (standard care, i.e., CGM graphs interpretation at scheduled 3 months outpatient visit). Receives: Behavioral: feedback counseling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of HbA1c
Change of HbA1c in 3 months after CGM counseling.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change of score for self efficacy
Change of Stanford Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SES) in 3 months after CGM counseling. The score for each item ranged from 1-10. The score of the scale is the mean of the eight items. Higher number indicated higher self-efficacy.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change of score for diabetes associated stress
Change of score for Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) in 3 months after CGM counseling. PAID is a 20-item self-reported questionnaire with scale 0-4 for each question, generating a total score of 0-100. A score of ≥ 40 is defined as emotional burnout.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change of score for depression
Change of score for Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESD-R) in 3 months after CGM counseling. With 10-ietm CESD-R scale scoring 10 or more defined as having depression (range 0 to 30).
Measured: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change in diet composition
Change of carbohydrate amounts, fruits amount in 3 months after CGM counseling.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change in exercise amount, time spent in light activity
Exercise amount recorded by acelerometers, built in sports bracelet (Fitbit Charge HRTM Wireless Heart Rate + Activity Wristband). Time spent in light activity per day in 3 months after CGM counseling feedback is compared with baseline.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change in exercise amount, time spent in moderate activity
Exercise amount recorded by acelerometers, built in sports bracelet (Fitbit Charge HRTM Wireless Heart Rate + Activity Wristband). Time spent in moderate activity per day in 3 months after CGM counseling feedback is compared with baseline.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change in exercise amount, time spent in intense activity
Exercise amount recorded by acelerometers, built in sports bracelet (Fitbit Charge HRTM Wireless Heart Rate + Activity Wristband). Time spent in intense activity per day in 3 months after CGM counseling feedback is compared with baseline.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change in exercise amount (time spent in sedentary behavior)
Exercise amount recorded by acelerometers, built in sports bracelet (Fitbit Charge HRTM Wireless Heart Rate + Activity Wristband). Time spent in sedentary behavior in 3 months after CGM counseling feedback is compared with baseline.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jan 2019
- Study start7 Mar 2016
- Primary completion12 Oct 2017
- Study completion12 Oct 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type2 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Cheng-Kung University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ching-Ju Chiu, Ph.D., Study director, Institute of Gerontology, NCKUYe-Fong Du, M.D., Principal investigator, NCKUH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03792399
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NCKUH-10508011
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 8 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 3 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The study protocol will be shared after study publication.
Publications
Allen NA, Fain JA, Braun B, Chipkin SR. Continuous glucose monitoring counseling improves physical activity behaviors of individuals with type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Jun;80(3):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
PubMed 18304674
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Innovative Technology on Geriatric Diabetic Patients: Evaluation of Quality of Life, Self Efficacy and Glycemic Control Among Patients With Experience of Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03792399
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NCKUH-10508011
- Conditions
- Type2 Diabetes
- Keywords
- continuous glucose monitoring, immediate feedback counseling, delayed feedback counseling
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Cheng-Kung University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to explore the effect of feedback counseling using professional continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control, self-efficacy, and self-management behaviors among middle aged and older adults with poor controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study also explores the difference on timing of feedback after continuous glucose monitoring exam.
Detailed description
After scheduled routine professional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) exam, participants in both the intervention and control group receive ordinary education and regimen adjustment as indicated based on CGM results. For participants in the intervention group, they will also receive CGM counseling immediately on the day of CGM sensor removal. For participants in the control group, they will receive CGM counseling on the day of routine 3 months outpatient visit.
Qualitative data are collected through in-depth interview: User expectation, acceptability and satisfaction of CGM are also explored during in-depth interview with a semi-structured questionnaire.
Quantitative data were collected through validated questionnaires, including evaluation of depression by a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CES-D-R), emotional stress by Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID), self efficacy by Stanford Self-Efficacy for Diabetes (SES), at pretest and 3 months after CGM counseling.
Anthropometric Measurements. Body height, body weight, body mass index, and blood pressure were recorded at pre-test and post-test interview.
Blood Tests. Routine biochemistry, fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are collected within 2 weeks of pretest and posttest day.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate feedback counseling | Experimental | Behavioral: feedback counselingProfessional CGM calibrate blood glucose via a glucsoe-oxidase-impregnated membrane during a 5 day period. The patient wearing professional CGM is randomized to immediate feedback after data downloaded into computer. |
| Delayed feedback counseling | Other | Behavioral: feedback counselingProfessional CGM calibrate blood glucose via a glucsoe-oxidase-impregnated membrane during a 5 day period. The patient wearing professional CGM is randomized to delayed feedback (standard care, i.e., CGM graphs interpretation at scheduled 3 months outpatient visit). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 45 years old or more at recent outpatient visits;
- Type 2 diabetic patients followed up at National Cheng Kung University Hospital;
- Patients planned to receive CGM suggested by primary care physician due to inadequate controlled blood glucose.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with diagnosis of generalized inflammation, advanced malignancy, end-stage renal disease on regular dialysis, status post renal transplantation, end-stage liver, heart or pulmonary disease;
- Patients who are taking systemic glucocorticoids;
- Any acute or chronic inflammatory disease as determined by a leukocyte count over 10,000/mm3 or clinical signs of infection;
- Patients who could not complete the questionnaires or who could not follow order due to cognitive impairment or in bed-ridden status;
- Patients diagnosed as thalassemia, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, and any other hemoglobinopathies that may influence the accuracy of hemoglobulin A1c measurement were also excluded. Patients who received blood transfusion in recent 3 months were also excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| feedback counselingProfessoinal CGM in combination with diet and exercise record is used as teaching material to help patient realize their blood glucose pattern and to modify their behavior after counseling feedback. | Behavioural | Delayed feedback counseling, Immediate feedback counseling |
Primary outcome
Change of HbA1c
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change of HbA1c in 3 months after CGM counseling.
Change of score for self efficacy
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change of Stanford Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SES) in 3 months after CGM counseling. The score for each item ranged from 1-10. The score of the scale is the mean of the eight items. Higher number indicated higher self-efficacy.
7 secondary outcomes
Change of score for diabetes associated stress
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change of score for depression
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change in diet composition
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change in exercise amount, time spent in light activity
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change in exercise amount, time spent in moderate activity
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change in exercise amount, time spent in intense activity
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Change in exercise amount (time spent in sedentary behavior)
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jan 2019.
- Background: PubMed 18304674Allen NA, Fain JA, Braun B, Chipkin SR. Continuous glucose monitoring counseling improves physical activity behaviors of individuals with type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Jun;80(3):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The study protocol will be shared after study publication.
Related trials for Type2 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ching-Ju Chiu, Ph.D. study director
Institute of Gerontology, NCKU
Ye-Fong Du, M.D. principal investigator
NCKUH
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing feedback counseling in people with Type2 Diabetes, run by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of HbA1c (time frame: Baseline and 3 months after CGM counseling). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03792399, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2019.