AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasal Valve IncompetenceNCT03793218

Alar Batten Graft vs Latera for Nasal Valve Collapse

A study testing Latera Device and Alar Batten Graft in people with Nasal Valve Incompetence, run by University of Virginia.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Nasal obstruction is a common complaint for the patient presenting to the Otolaryngologist and/or the Facial Plastic surgeon. There are numerous potential causes of nasal obstruction, with more easily addressed pathologies such as posterior septal deviation and inferior turbinate hypertrophy often being… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Nasal Valve Incompetence
What is being tested?
Latera Device and Alar Batten Graft
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
28 Aug 2018to 1 Sep 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Documented physical exam findings of septal deviation
  • Bilateral nasal sidewall collapse on inspiration
  • Subjective improvement in nasal obstruction with use of the modified Cottle maneuver

Who cannot join

  • Prior septorhinoplasty
  • Obvious trauma to the nose causing nasal obstruction
  • Inflammatory conditions such as chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis
  • Patients using chronic topical nasal decongestants or illicit intranasal drug use
  • Prisoners, cognitively impaired, non-English speaking subjects

About this study

Official title: A Comparison of Alar Batten Graft to the Latera Nasal Implant for the Treatment of Nasal Valve Collapse

Nasal obstruction is a common complaint for the patient presenting to the Otolaryngologist and/or the Facial Plastic surgeon. There are numerous potential causes of nasal obstruction, with more easily addressed pathologies such as posterior septal deviation and inferior turbinate hypertrophy often being over-diagnosed. Nasal valve obstruction, particularly dynamic nasal sidewall collapse, is of significant interest to the rhinoplasty surgeon. Traditionally, collapse of the nasal sidewall has been addressed via structural cartilage grafting, with alar batten grafting being the most commonly used method to provide support to the weak nasal sidewall. Recently, an absorbable nasal implant, comprised of a polylactic acid copolymer, has been advocated for supporting the nasal sidewall and relieving nasal obstruction. There are several proposed advantages of the implant over traditional operative techniques, namely the ease of endonasal insertion, which can be performed in the outpatient clinic setting. Preliminary investigations demonstrate subjective improvement in nasal obstruction with use of the implant, however, there has been no direct comparison with traditional techniques utilizing cartilage grafting.

This study is being done at both UVa and in Oregon. This prospective study will randomize patients with nasal obstruction and documented dynamic nasal sidewall collapse into one of two groups undergoing treatment with either endonasal batten grafting or the absorbable Latera nasal valve implant. Preoperative and postoperative nasal obstruction will be assessed with a validated survey for nasal obstructive symptoms, the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score. The mean preoperative and postoperative NOSE score between the groups will be compared at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively to compare the efficacy of both techniques. Subjects will be blinded to the surgical intervention they receive.

Being tested
Latera Device, Alar Batten Graft

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Latera DeviceDevice

    This study seeks to compare a "gold standard" functional rhinoplasty maneuver, the alar batten graft, to the LATERA implant

  • Alar Batten GraftProcedure or surgery

    This study seeks to compare a "gold standard" functional rhinoplasty maneuver, the alar batten graft, to the LATERA implant

Study groups in NCT03793218
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Latera DeviceExperimentalThe LATERA (Spirox Inc., Menlo Park, CA) device, an absorbable nasal implant comprised of a 70:30 blend of poly(L-lactide) and poly(D-lactide), is designed to provide support to the upper and lower lateral cartilages, thereby correcting nasal wall collapse. The implant was first used in the US and cleared by the FDA in 2016. It is designed as a ribbed cylindrical structure with a forked distal end. The implant is delivered endonasally, with a 16-gauge catheter, lateral to the upper and lower lateral cartilages and over the ascending process of the maxilla. The forked end rests on the ascending process of the maxilla and the flexible implant provides support the nasal sidewall soft tissue and cartilage. This non-toxic, biocompatible co-polymer has an extensive use in a variety of medical devices including suture materials and implants. In vivo studies demonstrate the copolymer to reliably decompose over an 18-24 month period.
Receives: Device: Latera Device
Alar Batten GraftActive comparatorThis study seeks to compare a "gold standard" functional rhinoplasty maneuver, the alar batten graft, to the LATERA implant
Receives: Procedure: Alar Batten Graft

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 12 Month NOSE Score

    Mean change in Nose score at 12 month post-op visit

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. 1 Month NOSE Score

    Mean change in Nose score at 1 month post-op visit

    Measured: 1 month

  2. 6 Month NOSE Score

    Mean change in Nose score at 6 month post-op visit

    Measured: 6 months

  3. 24 Month NOSE Score

    Mean change in Nose score at 24 month post-op visit

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jan 2019
  2. Study start28 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2019

Why it stopped: PI left institution before participants were enrolled.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03793218
Sponsor's protocol ID
20859
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
2 Jan 2019
Last updated
11 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Latera Device and Alar Batten Graft in people with Nasal Valve Incompetence, run by University of Virginia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

12 Month NOSE Score (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in