CirrhosisPhase 1/2NCT03796598
FMT in Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy
A Phase 1/2 study testing Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules and Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema in people with Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Patients with end stage of liver disease or cirrhosis can develop confusion due to high ammonia and inflammation. This confusion is brought upon by changes in the bacteria in the bowels and may not respond to current standard of care treatments. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cirrhosis, Hepatic Encephalopathy
- What is being tested?
- Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules and Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 29 Jul 2019to 20 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Cirrhosis diagnosed by either of the following in a patient with chronic liver disease
- Liver Biopsy
- Radiologic evidence of varices, cirrhosis or portal hypertension
- Laboratory evidence of platelet count <100,000 or AST/ALT ratio>1
- Endoscopic evidence of varices or portal gastropathy
- Fibroscan values suggestive of cirrhosis
Show all 10Show fewer
- On treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (patient can be on lactulose and rifaximin)
- Able to give written, informed consent (demonstrated by mini-mental status exam>25 at the time of consenting)
- Women of child bearing potential must agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study and for 10 days prior and 30 days after the study
- Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age
Who cannot join
- MELD score >22
- WBC count <1000 cells/mm3
- Platelet count<25,000/mm3
- TIPS in place for less than a month
- Currently on antibiotics apart from rifaximin
- Infection at the time of the FMT (diagnosed by blood culture positivity, urinalysis, paracentesis as needed)
Show all 39Show fewer
- Hospitalization for any non-elective cause within the last 1 month
- Patients who are pregnant or nursing (will be checked using a urine pregnancy test)
- Patients who are incarcerated
- Patients who are incapable of giving their own informed consent
- Patients who are immuno-compromised due to the following reasons:
- HIV infection (any CD4 count)
- Inherited/primary immune disorders
- Current or recent (<3 mos) treatment with anti-neoplastic agent
- Current or recent (<3 mos) treatment with any immunosuppressant medications [including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies to B and T cells, anti-TNF agents, glucocorticoids, antimetabolites (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil].
- Subjects who are otherwise immunocompetent and have discontinued any immunosuppressant medications 3 or more months prior to enrollment may be eligible to enroll
- Patients on renal replacement therapy
- Patients with untreated, in-situ colorectal cancer
- Patients with a history of chronic intrinsic GI diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease
- ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or microscopic colitis
- eosinophilic gastroenteritis or celiac disease
- Major gastro-intestinal or intra-abdominal surgery in the last three months
- Other Exclusion Criteria:
- Enema-related
- Platelet count<25,000
- Grade IV hemorrhoids
- Safety-related:
- Dysphagia
- History of aspiration, gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction
- Ongoing antibiotic use (except for Rifaximin)
- Severe anaphylactic food allergy
- Allergy to ingredients Generally Recognized As Safe in the FMT capsules (glycerol, sodium chloride, hypromellose, gellan gum, titanium dioxide, theobroma oil)
- Adverse event attributable to prior FMT
- ASA Class IV or V
- Pregnant or nursing patients
- Acute illness or fever within 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
- Immunocompromised due to medical conditions
- Probiotics use within the last 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
- Any condition that the physician investigators deem unsafe, including other conditions or medications that the investigator determines puts the participant at greater risk from FMT
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
Richmond, Virginia, 23249-0001
About this study
Official title: Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Veterans With Cirrhosis
Patients with end stage of liver disease or cirrhosis can develop confusion due to high ammonia and inflammation. This confusion is brought upon by changes in the bacteria in the bowels and may not respond to current standard of care treatments. Repeated episodes of confusion can make it difficult for patients to function and may result in multiple admissions to the hospital and burden on the family. The investigators have studied using a healthy person's stool to replace the bowel bacteria, called fecal microbial transplant, in small studies with good results. In this trial the investigators propose to perform these procedures using an upper and lower route in Veterans who suffer from this condition and follow them for safety and HE and related hospitalizations over 6 months. The investigators will compare this to placebo treatments and hope that this intervention can improve the health and daily functioning of affected patients.
Read the detailed description
Indication: Cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
Study Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
Rationale and Supporting Evidence:
Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut flora through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However, there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore, the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal.
The investigators' group and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients.
Therefore, a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance.
The investigators' preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. In the investigators' published experience, a single enema from a rationally-derived donor was associated with significantly lower total and HE-related hospitalizations compared to patients who were randomized to standard of care, with a stable long-term course over >1 year. The investigators' data show that FMT was associated with favorable changes in fecal bile acid (BA) profile with a decrease in proportions of fecal secondary BAs, conjugated BAs and increase in sulfated BAs, indicating a healthier milieu. The investigators also have preliminary data defining the safety of oral FMT capsules in patients with cirrhosis and HE in a current trial led by us. The use of combined oral and rectal routes of FMT, which can potentially alleviate both small bowel and colonic translocation are likely to be better than either alone.
Overall aim: To determine the effect of dual oral and rectal administration of FMT from a rational donor on clinical outcomes (HE and related hospitalizations, brain function, quality of life) and host-microbiota interactions (microbial composition and bile acid composition with systemic and intestinal inflammation), compared to single route of administration and placebo, along with a second oral capsular FMT vs placebo administration in patients with cirrhosis and HE using a randomized, phase II clinical trial.
Design overview: Four groups of outpatients with cirrhosis will be randomized using random sequence generator into placebo and FMT groups and followed for 6 months under an FDA IND double-blind clinical trial.
- Conditions
- Cirrhosis, Hepatic Encephalopathy
- Being tested
- Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules, Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema, Placebo
- Keywords
- fecal microbial transplant, cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy
- Medical subject headings
- Fibrosis, Hepatic Encephalopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fecal Microbial transplant CapsulesDrug
Oral capsules of FMT
Fecal Microbial Transplant EnemaDrug
FMT enema
PlaceboOther
Placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Oral and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30 Receives: Other: Placebo |
| Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT | Active comparator | Oral placebo and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30 Receives: Drug: Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema; Other: Placebo |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo | Active comparator | Oral FMT and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30 Receives: Drug: Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and rectal FMT | Experimental | Dual Oral and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30 Receives: Drug: Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules; Drug: Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT
Number of patients with serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Adverse Events Related to FMT
Number of patients with adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT
Measured: 6 months
Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10, higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
Measured: 6 months
Sickness Impact Profile Change
Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100. A higher score indicates worse quality of life related to the participant's health within 24 hours.
Measured: 30 days and 6 months
Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change
Cognitive assessment change using the Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score between groups at 60 days Range is -15 to +5 and higher is better
Measured: 60 days
EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change
Cognitive assessment change using the Stroop Off and On Time change at 60 days and 6 months. This is in seconds. EncephalApp stroop is a computerized test of attention, psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility. A higher time required to complete 5 correct runs in both Off and On stages is the measure here. There no maximum values but the lower amount of time that is needed, the better is the cognitive function.
Measured: 60 days
Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10. Higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
Measured: 60 days
HE Related Events
Number of patients with Hepatic encephalopathy related events
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jan 2019
- Study start29 Jul 2019
- Primary completion19 Dec 2023
- Study completion20 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CirrhosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Subjects will be divided into 4 groups via randomization Group 1: Dual oral and rectal FMT, Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo, Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT and Group 4: Oral and rectal placebo
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jasmohan S. Bajaj, MD MS, Principal investigator, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03796598
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GAST-001-18S
- Other IDs
- CX001076
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 25 May 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bajaj JS, Fagan A, Sterling RK, Sikaroodi M, Gallagher ML, Lee H, Matherly SC, Bartels A, Mousel T, Davis BC, Puri P, Fuchs M, Thacker LR, McGinley JP, Khoruts A, Gillevet PM. The multi-omic basis for hepatic encephalopathy recurrence: Analysis of the THEMATIC trial. JHEP Rep. 2025 Oct 18;8(1):101634. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101634. eCollection 2026 Jan.
PubMed 41503571Bloom PP, Bajaj JS. The Current and Future State of Microbiome Therapeutics in Liver Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 1;119(1S):S36-S41. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002581. No abstract available.
PubMed 38153225
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Veterans With Cirrhosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03796598
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GAST-001-18S
- Conditions
- Cirrhosis, Hepatic Encephalopathy
- Keywords
- fecal microbial transplant, cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 29 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 25 May 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with end stage of liver disease or cirrhosis can develop confusion due to high ammonia and inflammation. This confusion is brought upon by changes in the bacteria in the bowels and may not respond to current standard of care treatments. Repeated episodes of confusion can make it difficult for patients to function and may result in multiple admissions to the hospital and burden on the family. The investigators have studied using a healthy person's stool to replace the bowel bacteria, called fecal microbial transplant, in small studies with good results. In this trial the investigators propose to perform these procedures using an upper and lower route in Veterans who suffer from this condition and follow them for safety and HE and related hospitalizations over 6 months. The investigators will compare this to placebo treatments and hope that this intervention can improve the health and daily functioning of affected patients.
Detailed description
Indication: Cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
Study Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
Rationale and Supporting Evidence:
Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut flora through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However, there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore, the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal.
The investigators' group and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients.
Therefore, a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance.
The investigators' preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. In the investigators' published experience, a single enema from a rationally-derived donor was associated with significantly lower total and HE-related hospitalizations compared to patients who were randomized to standard of care, with a stable long-term course over >1 year. The investigators' data show that FMT was associated with favorable changes in fecal bile acid (BA) profile with a decrease in proportions of fecal secondary BAs, conjugated BAs and increase in sulfated BAs, indicating a healthier milieu. The investigators also have preliminary data defining the safety of oral FMT capsules in patients with cirrhosis and HE in a current trial led by us. The use of combined oral and rectal routes of FMT, which can potentially alleviate both small bowel and colonic translocation are likely to be better than either alone.
Overall aim: To determine the effect of dual oral and rectal administration of FMT from a rational donor on clinical outcomes (HE and related hospitalizations, brain function, quality of life) and host-microbiota interactions (microbial composition and bile acid composition with systemic and intestinal inflammation), compared to single route of administration and placebo, along with a second oral capsular FMT vs placebo administration in patients with cirrhosis and HE using a randomized, phase II clinical trial.
Design overview: Four groups of outpatients with cirrhosis will be randomized using random sequence generator into placebo and FMT groups and followed for 6 months under an FDA IND double-blind clinical trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- Subjects will be divided into 4 groups via randomization Group 1: Dual oral and rectal FMT, Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo, Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT and Group 4: Oral and rectal placebo
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboOral and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30 |
| Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT | Active comparator | Drug: Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema, Other: PlaceboOral placebo and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30 |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo | Active comparator | Drug: Fecal Microbial transplant CapsulesOral FMT and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30 |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and rectal FMT | Experimental | Drug: Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules, Drug: Fecal Microbial Transplant EnemaDual Oral and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Cirrhosis diagnosed by either of the following in a patient with chronic liver disease
- On treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (patient can be on lactulose and rifaximin)
- Able to give written, informed consent (demonstrated by mini-mental status exam>25 at the time of consenting)
- Women of child bearing potential must agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study and for 10 days prior and 30 days after the study
- Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age
Key exclusion criteria (39 listed)
- MELD score >22
- WBC count <1000 cells/mm3
- Platelet count<25,000/mm3
- TIPS in place for less than a month
- Currently on antibiotics apart from rifaximin
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fecal Microbial transplant CapsulesOral capsules of FMT | Drug | Group 1: Dual Oral and rectal FMT, Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo |
| Fecal Microbial Transplant EnemaFMT enema | Drug | Group 1: Dual Oral and rectal FMT, Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT |
| PlaceboPlacebo | Other | Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT
Time frame: 6 months
Number of patients with serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE
7 secondary outcomes
Adverse Events Related to FMT
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool
Time frame: 6 months
Sickness Impact Profile Change
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months
Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change
Time frame: 60 days
EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change
Time frame: 60 days
Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva
Time frame: 60 days
HE Related Events
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 May 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41503571Bajaj JS, Fagan A, Sterling RK, Sikaroodi M, Gallagher ML, Lee H, Matherly SC, Bartels A, Mousel T, Davis BC, Puri P, Fuchs M, Thacker LR, McGinley JP, Khoruts A, Gillevet PM. The multi-omic basis for hepatic encephalopathy recurrence: Analysis of the THEMATIC trial. JHEP Rep. 2025 Oct 18;8(1):101634. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101634. eCollection 2026 Jan.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38153225Bloom PP, Bajaj JS. The Current and Future State of Microbiome Therapeutics in Liver Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 1;119(1S):S36-S41. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002581. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cirrhosis
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Long-term Bulevirtide Monotherapy in Patients With HDV-related Compensated Cirrhosis
Hepatitis D
Recruiting
Optimal Treatment Strategy for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis, Paracentesis
RecruitingObservational study
The Value of Spleen Thickness and Spleen Diameter for Gastroesophageal Varices Diagnosis in Compensated Cirrhosis
Liver Cirrhosis, Gastroesophageal Varices
Recruiting
CirrhosisRx CDS System
Cirrhosis, Decision Support Systems, Clinical
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial to Evaluate ALN-CIDEB in Adults With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, MASLD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jasmohan S. Bajaj, MD MS principal investigator
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules and Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema in people with Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 39 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03796598, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2025.