AzTrials
AzTrials

Intrahepatic CholangiocarcinomaLND for ICCNCT03796819

Routine Lymphadenectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

A study testing lymphadenectomy in people with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, run by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The role of routine lymphadenectomy (LND) in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains controversial. The investigators' multi-institutional retrospective study have showed an increasing adoption of LND among patients undergoing curative resection for ICC during the last decade. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
What is being tested?
lymphadenectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
260 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
10 Jan 2019to 1 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by imaging or biopsy
  • The tumor is limited in the liver with no distant metastasis, and the primary disease is resectable
  • Preoperative imaging (e.g. CT, MRI, PET-CT, etc.) and intraoperative exploration found no nodal swelling or enlargement

Who cannot join

  • The primary disease is unresectable with or without distant metastasis
  • The liver function or general condition of patients does not permit surgery
  • Preoperative imaging (e.g. CT, MRI, PET-CT, etc.) and intraoperative exploration found obvious nodal swelling or enlargement, which indicates lymphadenectomy should be performed
  • Patients aged below 18 or older than 65 would be excluded
  • Pregnant women would not be enrolled

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University

    Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Impact of Routine Lymphadenectomy on Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

The role of routine lymphadenectomy (LND) in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains controversial. The investigators' multi-institutional retrospective study have showed an increasing adoption of LND among patients undergoing curative resection for ICC during the last decade. The current prospective and randomized study based on a multi-institutional collaboration would investigate whether routine LND would benefit patients in short- and long-term survival remains.

Read the detailed description

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and its incidence is increasing worldwide.Resection of the primary ICC tumor site within the liver represents the best curative treatment option. However, the role of lymphadenectomy (LND) at the time of surgery remains controversial with some centers considering it standard while other surgeons perform LND only in select circumstances. The utilization of LND may not only vary among different institutions, but also by geographic region. Specifically, data from East and West centers have noted a variation in the utilization of LND ranging 27%-100%.While several case series from Asia have noted that most centers do not regularly perform LND,other data from the West suggest that LND may be becoming more routine. Despite the lack of consensus among surgeons, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging manual recommends that the nodal basin be staged. Disease-specific staging for ICC was first introduced in the 7th edition of the AJCC staging manual published in 2010. The newly updated 8th edition of the AJCC staging system now recommends that 6 lymph nodes be evaluated to stage a patient with ICC.

The previous multi-institutional retrospective study from the investigators have showed an increasing adoption of LND among patients undergoing curative resection for ICC during the last decade. The current prospective and randomized study based on a multi-institutional collaboration would investigate whether routine LND would benefit patients in short- and long-term survival remains.

Being tested
lymphadenectomy
Keywords
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, surgery, lymphadenectomy, lymph node metastasis, prognosis
Medical subject headings
Cholangiocarcinoma, Lymphatic Metastasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • lymphadenectomyProcedure or surgery

    Patients would undergo routine hepatoduodenal lymphadenectomy at the time of ICC resection

Study groups in NCT03796819
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
lymphadenectomyExperimentalThis group of patients would undergo routine hepatoduodenal lymphadenectomy combined with ICC resection
Receives: Procedure: lymphadenectomy
No lymphadenectomyNo interventionThis group of patients would not undergo hepatoduodenal lymphadenectomy when preoperative imaging and intraoperative exploration found no lymph node enlargement.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 1-year recurrence rate

    compare the 1-year recurrence rate of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and those not undergoing lymphadenectomy

    Measured: 1 year after surgery (up to 1 year)

  2. 3-year recurrence rate

    compare the 3-year recurrence rate of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and those not undergoing lymphadenectomy

    Measured: 3 years after surgery (up to 3 years)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Postoperative morbidity

    investigate the postoperative morbidity, such as hepatic failure, postoperative bleeding, superficial and deep site infection between lymphadenectomy and no lymphadenectomy groups

    Measured: From the date of surgery to stitches off (up to 1 month)

  2. 1-year overall survival

    compare the 1-year overall survival rate of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and those not undergoing lymphadenectomy

    Measured: 1 year after surgery (up to 1 year)

  3. 3-year overall survival

    compare the 3-year overall survival rate of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and those not undergoing lymphadenectomy

    Measured: 3 years after surgery (up to 3 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2019
  2. Study start10 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2021
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
routine hepatoduodenal lymphadenectomy
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
260 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03796819
Sponsor's protocol ID
XJTU1AFCRC2017SJ-007
Acronym
LND for ICC
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
6 Jan 2019
Last updated
9 Dec 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing lymphadenectomy in people with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, run by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

1-year recurrence rate (time frame: 1 year after surgery (up to 1 year)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in