Arthritis, PsoriaticPhase 3COSMOSNCT03796858
A Study of Guselkumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (Anti-TNF Alpha) Therapy
A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab 100 mg in people with Arthritis, Psoriatic, run by Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium at 117 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate guselkumab efficacy versus placebo in participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and an inadequate response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-alpha) therapy by assessing the reduction in signs and symptoms of joint disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
- What is being tested?
- Guselkumab 100 mg
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 285 participants
- Where
- 117 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 22 Mar 2019to 11 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study intervention and meet classification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) at screening
- Have active PsA as defined by at least 3 swollen joints and at least 3 tender joints at screening and at baseline
- Have at least 1 of the PsA subsets: distal interphalangeal joint involvement, polyarticular arthritis with absence of rheumatoid nodules, arthritis mutilans, asymmetric peripheral arthritis, or spondylitis with peripheral arthritis
- Have an inadequate response to anti-TNF alpha therapy, defined as presence of active PsA despite previous treatment with either 1 or 2 anti-TNF alpha agents and either of the following: a) Lack of benefit of an anti-TNF alpha therapy, as documented in the participant history by the treating physician, after at least 12 weeks of etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, or certolizumab pegol therapy (or biosimilars) and/or at least a 14-week dosage regimen (i.e., at least 4 doses) of infliximab (or biosimilars). Documented lack of benefit may include inadequate improvement in joint counts, skin response, physical function, or disease activity, b) Intolerance to an anti-TNF alpha therapy, as documented in the patient history by the treating physician, to etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol, or infliximab (or biosimilars, if available)
- Be willing to refrain from the use of complementary therapies for PsA or psoriasis including ayurvedic medicine, traditional Taiwanese, Korean, or Chinese medications and acupuncture within 2 weeks before the first study intervention administration and through Week 48
Who cannot join
- Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit of guselkumab therapy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (this does not include a primary diagnosis of PsA with spondylitis), systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
- Has ever received more than 2 different anti-TNF alpha agents
- Has previously received any biologic treatment (other than anti-TNF Alpha agents), including, but not limited to ustekinumab, abatacept, secukinumab, tildrakizumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, risankizumab, or other investigative biologic treatment
- Has previously received tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib (ASP015K), decernotinib (VX 509), or any other a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
- Has previously received any systemic immunosuppressants (for example, azathioprine, cyclosporine, 6 thioguanine, mercaptopurine, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxyurea, tacrolimus) within 4 weeks of the first administration of study intervention
Trial locations and contacts
117 sites in 14 countries.
117 sites in 14 countries
Russia19 sites
Chelyabinck Regional Clinical Hospital
Chelyabinsk, 454076
Kemerovo State Medical University
Kemerovo, 650000
Medical Centre Maximum Health
Kemerovo, 650066
Family polyclinic #4
Korolyov, 141060
Krasnodar Clinical Dermatovenerologic Dispensary
Krasnodar, 350020
Krasnoyarsk State Medical University
Krasnoyarsk, 660022
Orenburg State Medical Academy
Orenburg, 460000
Rostov Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary
Rostov-on-Don, 344007
Ryazan Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary
Ryazan, 390046
Leningrad region clinical hospital
Saint Petersburg, 194291
Samara Regional Clinical Hospital Named After V.D.Seredavin
Samara, 443095
Sararov Regional Clinical Hospital
Saratov, 410053
Smolensk regional hospital on Smolensk railway station
Smolensk, 214025
Tula Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary
Tula, 300053
Republican Clinical Hospital - G.G. Kuvatov
Ufa, 450005
Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Ulyanovsk, 432063
Regional Clinical Hospital
Velikiy Novgorod, 173008
Clinical Emergency Hospital n.a. N.V. Solovyev
Yaroslavl, 150003
Clinical Hospital #3
Yaroslavl, 150007
Spain15 sites
Hosp Univ A Coruna
A Coruña, 15006
Hosp. Univ. de Cruces
Barakaldo, 48902
Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol
Barcelona, 08916
Hosp. Univ. de Basurto
Bilbao, 48013
Hosp Reina Sofia
Córdoba, 14004
Hosp. Univ. Ramon Y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hosp. Univ. de Getafe
Madrid, 28905
Hosp Regional Univ de Malaga
Málaga, 29009
Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Hosp. Virgen Macarena
Seville, 41009
Hosp. Infanta Luisa
Seville, 41010
Hosp. Virgen Del Rocio
Seville, 41013
Hosp. Ntra. Sra. de Valme
Seville, 41014
Hosp. Do Meixoeiro
Vigo, 36312
Ukraine15 sites
Communal Noncommercial Enterprise Cherkasy Regional Hospital of Cherkasy Regional Council
Cherkasy, 18009
Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Ivano-Frankivsk City Clinical Hospital
Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018
City Multifield Hospital #18, Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology of NAMS
Kharkiv, 61029
Municipal non-commercial enterprise of Kharkiv Regional Council Regional Clinical Hospital
Kharkiv, 61058
Khmelnitckiy regional hospital
Khmelnytsky, 29000
Kyiv City Clinical Hospital #3, National Medical University
Kyiv, 02125
Medical Center 'Consylium Medical'
Kyiv, 04050
Kyiv Railway Station Clinical Hospital #2
Kyiv
SI National Scientific Center Institute of Cardiology of M.D. Strazhesko of NAMS of Ukraine
Kyiv
ME Poltava Regional Clinical Hospital named after M.V. Sklifosovsky of Poltava Regional Consuil
Poltava, 36011
Municipal Institution of Sumy Regional Council Sumy Regional Clinical Hospital
Sumy, 40031
Municipal Non-commercial Enterprise Ternopil University Hospital of Ternopil Regional Council
Ternopil, 46002
Medical Center LTD Health Clinic Department of Cardiology and Rheumatology
Vinnytsia, 21009
VNMUn.af.Pyrogova,CNE Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Hospital n.af.Pyrogova Vinnytsia Regional Council
Vinnytsia, 21018
Municipal institution Central Clinical Hospital #1 Zhytomir
Zhytomyr, 10002
United Kingdom10 sites
Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases
Bath, BA1 1RL
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
Cannock Chase Hospital
Cannock, WS11 5XY
Chapel Allerton Hospital
Leeds, LS7 4SA
Barts Health NHS Trust Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust
London, E11 1NR
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust - Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Clinic
London, SE1 9RS
North Tyneside General Hospital
Newcastle, NE29 8NH
Peterborough City Hospital
Peterborough, PE3 9GZ
Haywood Hospital
Stoke-on-Trent, ST6 7AG
Torbay Hospital-Devon
Torquay, TQ2 7AA
France8 sites
Hopital Pellegrin Tripode - CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33076
CHU Lapeyronie
Montpellier, 34295
Centre Hospitalier Regional d'Orleans (CHRO) - Hopital La Source
Orléans, 45067
Hopital Lariboisiere
Paris, 75010
Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière
Paris, 75013
Hopital Cochin
Paris, 75014
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse - Hopital Purpan
Toulouse, 30159
CHU Trousseau - Service de Rhumatologie
Tours, 37044
Poland8 sites
Szpital Uniwersytecki Nr 2 w Bydgoszczy
Bydgoszcz, 85 168
Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze
Elblag, 82-300
Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o
Lodz, 90 265
Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J M Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo Akcyjna
Lodz, 90-242
NZOZ Lecznica MAK MED S C
Nadarzyn, 05 830
Medycyna Kliniczna
Warsaw, 00-874
Mazowieckie Centrum Reumatologii i Osteoporozy
Warsaw, 04-030
WroMedica I Bielicka A Strzalkowska s c
Wroclaw, 51 685
Bulgaria7 sites
Diagnostic - Consulting Center II-Pleven
Pleven, 5800
Medical Center Medconsult-Pleven
Pleven, 5800
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Plovdiv
Plovdiv, 4003
Multiprofile Hosptal for Active Treatment Eurohospital Plovdiv
Plovdiv, 4004
Medical Center Teodora
Rousse, 7003
Diagnostic Consulting Center No 17
Sofia, 1505
Military Medical Academy
Sofia, 1606
Portugal7 sites
Uls Almada Seixal - Hosp. Garcia de Orta
Almada, 2805 267
Uls Regiao Aveiro - Hosp. Infante D. Pedro
Aveiro, 3814-501
Uls Braga - Hosp. Braga
Braga, 4710 243
Ipr Inst Port de Reumatologia
Lisbon, 1050 034
Uls Lisboa Ocidental - Hosp. Egas Moniz
Lisbon, 1349 019
Uls Santa Maria - Hosp. Santa Maria
Lisbon, 1649 035
Ulsam - Hosp. Conde de Bertiandos
Ponte de Lima, 4990-041
Germany6 sites
Universitatsklinikum Dusseldorf
Düsseldorf, 40225
Hamburger Rheuma Forschungszentrum II
Hamburg, 20095
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, 30625
Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
Herne, 44649
Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis
Rendsburg, 24768
Krankenhaus St. Josef
Wuppertal, 42105
Hungary6 sites
Betegapolo Irgalmas Rend Budai Irgalmasrendi Korhaz
Budapest, 1023
Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz Pandy Kalman Tagkorhaz
Gyula, 5700
Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg Megyei Korhazak es Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz
Nyíregyháza, 4400
Fejer Varmegyei Szent Gyorgy Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz
Székesfehérvár, 8000
MAV Korhaz es Rendelointezet
Szolnok, 5000
Vital Medical Center Orvosi es Fogaszati Kozpont
Veszprém, 8200
Israel6 sites
Barzilai Medical Center
Ashkelon, 7830604
Bnai Zion Medical Center
Haifa, 31048
Carmel Medical Center
Haifa, 34362
Hadassah Medical Center
Jerusalem, 91120
Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, 5265601
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 64239
Italy5 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II
Naples, 80131
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone
Palermo, 90127
Policlinico Tor Vergata
Roma, 00133
Complesso Integrato Columbus
Rome, 00168
Humanitas Hospital
Rozzano (MI), 20089
Belgium4 sites
CHU Saint Pierre BXL
Brussels, 1000
Reuma Clinic
Genk, 3600
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, 9000
UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000
About this study
Official title: Phase 3b, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab Administered Subcutaneously in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (Anti-TNFα) Therapy
The purpose of this study is to evaluate guselkumab efficacy versus placebo in participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and an inadequate response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-alpha) therapy by assessing the reduction in signs and symptoms of joint disease.
Read the detailed description
Psoriatic arthritis is a multi-faceted disease that impacts the joints, soft tissues, and skin, all of which not only results in functional disability and impaired quality of life, but participants with this disease also have increased mortality. Guselkumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to human interleukin 23 (IL-23) and inhibits IL-23 specific intracellular signaling and subsequent activation and cytokine production. Investigation of guselkumab in this Phase 3b PsA clinical study is supported by the favorable efficacy and safety results from Phase 2 study of guselkumab in PsA and Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies in psoriasis including the subset of participants with PsA. The primary hypothesis is that guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter is superior to placebo which will be assessed by the proportion of participants achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR 20) response at Week 24. The study includes 2 periods: A 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period for the primary analysis of the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, compared with placebo and a 32-week active-treatment and safety follow-up period for additional analysis of the efficacy and safety of guselkumab. Safety will be monitored throughout the study (Up to Week 56).
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
- Being tested
- Guselkumab 100 mg, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Guselkumab 100 mgDrug
Also called CNTO 1959
Participants will receive guselkumab 100mg as SC injection.
PlaceboDrug
Participants will receive placebo as SC injection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Guselkumab | Experimental | Participants will receive guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) Subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and placebo SC at Week 24 to maintain the blind. At Week 16, Participants who meet the early escape criteria will receive placebo at Week 16 and guselkumab at Week 20, then guselkumab every 8 weeks (q8w). Receives: Drug: Guselkumab 100 mg; Drug: Placebo |
| Group 2: Placebo followed by Guselkumab | Experimental | Participants will receive placebo SC injection at Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 20, and will crossover to receive guselkumab 100 mg SC injection at Weeks 24, 28, 36, and 44. At Week 16, Participants who meet the early escape criteria will receive guselkumab at Weeks 16 and 20, then guselkumab q8w. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab 100 mg; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants who Achieve an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
The ACR 20 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: participant's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change from Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24
The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 to 3 (0=no difficulty and 3=inability to perform a task in that area). Overall score is computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants who Achieve an ACR 50 Response at Week 24
The ACR 50 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=50 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: participant's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Measured: Week 24
Change from Baseline in 36-Item Short form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 24
The SF-36 is a generic health survey with 36 items that measure functional health and well-being from the participant's perspective. The survey is summarized into 8 dimensions/scales: physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). The physical component summary measure is derived from 4 of the 8 health dimensions (aggregate of PF, RP, BP, and GH scales). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. A higher score indicates a better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants who Achieve Psoriatic Area and Severity Index (PASI) 100 Response at Week 24 Among Participants with >=3% body Surface area Psoriatic Involvement and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of >=2 (Mild) at Baseline
PASI 100 response is defined as 100% improvement in PASI score from baseline (PASI score of 0). The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI scoring system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Measured: Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jan 2019
- Study start22 Mar 2019
- Primary completion11 Nov 2020
- Study completion11 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthritis, PsoriaticStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 285 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03796858
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR108573
- Other IDs
- 2018-003214-41, CNTO1959PSA3003, 2018
- Acronym
- COSMOS
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 3 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials\\transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale open Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Publications
Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Galloway J, Oke V, Sfikakis P, Rampakakis E, Sharaf M, Lavie F, McInnes IB. Guselkumab Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Participants with Psoriatic Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in the COSMOS Study. Rheumatol Ther. 2026 Apr;13(2):347-360. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00821-2. Epub 2026 Jan 23.
PubMed 41575731Gladman DD, Eder L, Selmi C, Mease PJ, Ogdie A, Lozenski K, Adamson E, Sharaf M, Rampakakis E, Pina Vegas L, Coates LC. Influence of Biological Sex on Participant Characteristics, Guselkumab Efficacy and Radiographic Progression in Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of Three Randomized Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2026 Feb;13(1):213-229. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00812-3. Epub 2025 Dec 15.
PubMed 41396391Tillett W, Coates LC, Vis M, Zimmermann M, Lozenski K, Rampakakis E, Soriano ER, Merola JF, Sharaf M, Nash P, Helliwell PS. Validity and Psychometric Properties of 3 and 4 Visual Analog Scale in Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis Treated With Guselkumab. J Rheumatol. 2026 Apr 1;53(4):400-408. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0695.
PubMed 41326161Warren RB, McInnes IB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, Mease PJ. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00659-0. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
PubMed 38488975Strober B, Coates LC, Lebwohl MG, Deodhar A, Leibowitz E, Rowland K, Kollmeier AP, Miller M, Wang Y, Li S, Chakravarty SD, Chan D, Shawi M, Yang YW, Thaҫi D, Rahman P. Long-Term Safety of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Eleven Phase II/III Clinical Studies in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;47(1):39-57. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01361-w. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
PubMed 37906417Schett G, Chen W, Gao S, Chakravarty SD, Shawi M, Lavie F, Zimmermann M, Sharaf M, Coates LC, Siebert S. Effect of guselkumab on serum biomarkers in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the COSMOS phase 3b study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023 Aug 16;25(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03125-4.
PubMed 37587493Rahman P, Boehncke WH, Mease PJ, Gottlieb AB, McInnes IB, Shawi M, Wang Y, Sheng S, Kollmeier AP, Theander E, Yu J, Leibowitz E, Marrache AM, Coates LC. Safety of Guselkumab With and Without Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment: Pooled Results Across 4 Studies in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2023 Jun;50(6):769-780. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.220928. Epub 2023 Jan 15.
PubMed 36642439Coates LC, Gossec L, Theander E, Bergmans P, Neuhold M, Karyekar CS, Shawi M, Noel W, Schett G, McInnes IB. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who are inadequate responders to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results through one year of a phase IIIb, randomised, controlled study (COSMOS). Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Mar;81(3):359-369. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220991. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
PubMed 34819273
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 3b, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab Administered Subcutaneously in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (Anti-TNFα) Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03796858
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COSMOS / CR108573
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 285 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., BelgiumIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate guselkumab efficacy versus placebo in participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and an inadequate response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-alpha) therapy by assessing the reduction in signs and symptoms of joint disease.
Detailed description
Psoriatic arthritis is a multi-faceted disease that impacts the joints, soft tissues, and skin, all of which not only results in functional disability and impaired quality of life, but participants with this disease also have increased mortality. Guselkumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to human interleukin 23 (IL-23) and inhibits IL-23 specific intracellular signaling and subsequent activation and cytokine production. Investigation of guselkumab in this Phase 3b PsA clinical study is supported by the favorable efficacy and safety results from Phase 2 study of guselkumab in PsA and Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies in psoriasis including the subset of participants with PsA. The primary hypothesis is that guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter is superior to placebo which will be assessed by the proportion of participants achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR 20) response at Week 24. The study includes 2 periods: A 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period for the primary analysis of the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, compared with placebo and a 32-week active-treatment and safety follow-up period for additional analysis of the efficacy and safety of guselkumab. Safety will be monitored throughout the study (Up to Week 56).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Guselkumab | Experimental | Drug: Guselkumab 100 mg, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) Subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and placebo SC at Week 24 to maintain the blind. At Week 16, Participants who meet the early escape criteria will receive placebo at Week 16 and guselkumab at Week 20, then guselkumab every 8 weeks (q8w). |
| Group 2: Placebo followed by Guselkumab | Experimental | Drug: Guselkumab 100 mg, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive placebo SC injection at Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 20, and will crossover to receive guselkumab 100 mg SC injection at Weeks 24, 28, 36, and 44. At Week 16, Participants who meet the early escape criteria will receive guselkumab at Weeks 16 and 20, then guselkumab q8w. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Have a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study intervention and meet classification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) at screening
- Have active PsA as defined by at least 3 swollen joints and at least 3 tender joints at screening and at baseline
- Have at least 1 of the PsA subsets: distal interphalangeal joint involvement, polyarticular arthritis with absence of rheumatoid nodules, arthritis mutilans, asymmetric peripheral arthritis, or spondylitis with peripheral arthritis
- Have an inadequate response to anti-TNF alpha therapy, defined as presence of active PsA despite previous treatment with either 1 or 2 anti-TNF alpha agents and either of the following: a) Lack of benefit of an anti-TNF alpha therapy, as documented in the participant history by the treating physician, after at least 12 weeks of etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, or certolizumab pegol therapy (or biosimilars) and/or at least a 14-week dosage regimen (i.e., at least 4 doses) of infliximab (or biosimilars). Documented lack of benefit may include inadequate improvement in joint counts, skin response, physical function, or disease activity, b) Intolerance to an anti-TNF alpha therapy, as documented in the patient history by the treating physician, to etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol, or infliximab (or biosimilars, if available)
- Be willing to refrain from the use of complementary therapies for PsA or psoriasis including ayurvedic medicine, traditional Taiwanese, Korean, or Chinese medications and acupuncture within 2 weeks before the first study intervention administration and through Week 48
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit of guselkumab therapy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (this does not include a primary diagnosis of PsA with spondylitis), systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
- Has ever received more than 2 different anti-TNF alpha agents
- Has previously received any biologic treatment (other than anti-TNF Alpha agents), including, but not limited to ustekinumab, abatacept, secukinumab, tildrakizumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, risankizumab, or other investigative biologic treatment
- Has previously received tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib (ASP015K), decernotinib (VX 509), or any other a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
- Has previously received any systemic immunosuppressants (for example, azathioprine, cyclosporine, 6 thioguanine, mercaptopurine, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxyurea, tacrolimus) within 4 weeks of the first administration of study intervention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Guselkumab 100 mgAlso: CNTO 1959Participants will receive guselkumab 100mg as SC injection. | Drug | Group 1: Guselkumab, Group 2: Placebo followed by Guselkumab |
| PlaceboParticipants will receive placebo as SC injection. | Drug | Group 1: Guselkumab, Group 2: Placebo followed by Guselkumab |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants who Achieve an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
The ACR 20 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: participant's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and C-reactive protein (CRP).
4 secondary outcomes
Change from Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants who Achieve an ACR 50 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Change from Baseline in 36-Item Short form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants who Achieve Psoriatic Area and Severity Index (PASI) 100 Response at Week 24 Among Participants with >=3% body Surface area Psoriatic Involvement and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of >=2 (Mild) at Baseline
Time frame: Week 24
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Feb 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41575731Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Galloway J, Oke V, Sfikakis P, Rampakakis E, Sharaf M, Lavie F, McInnes IB. Guselkumab Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Participants with Psoriatic Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in the COSMOS Study. Rheumatol Ther. 2026 Apr;13(2):347-360. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00821-2. Epub 2026 Jan 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41396391Gladman DD, Eder L, Selmi C, Mease PJ, Ogdie A, Lozenski K, Adamson E, Sharaf M, Rampakakis E, Pina Vegas L, Coates LC. Influence of Biological Sex on Participant Characteristics, Guselkumab Efficacy and Radiographic Progression in Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of Three Randomized Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2026 Feb;13(1):213-229. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00812-3. Epub 2025 Dec 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41326161Tillett W, Coates LC, Vis M, Zimmermann M, Lozenski K, Rampakakis E, Soriano ER, Merola JF, Sharaf M, Nash P, Helliwell PS. Validity and Psychometric Properties of 3 and 4 Visual Analog Scale in Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis Treated With Guselkumab. J Rheumatol. 2026 Apr 1;53(4):400-408. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0695.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38488975Warren RB, McInnes IB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, Mease PJ. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00659-0. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37906417Strober B, Coates LC, Lebwohl MG, Deodhar A, Leibowitz E, Rowland K, Kollmeier AP, Miller M, Wang Y, Li S, Chakravarty SD, Chan D, Shawi M, Yang YW, Thaҫi D, Rahman P. Long-Term Safety of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Eleven Phase II/III Clinical Studies in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;47(1):39-57. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01361-w. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37587493Schett G, Chen W, Gao S, Chakravarty SD, Shawi M, Lavie F, Zimmermann M, Sharaf M, Coates LC, Siebert S. Effect of guselkumab on serum biomarkers in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the COSMOS phase 3b study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023 Aug 16;25(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03125-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36642439Rahman P, Boehncke WH, Mease PJ, Gottlieb AB, McInnes IB, Shawi M, Wang Y, Sheng S, Kollmeier AP, Theander E, Yu J, Leibowitz E, Marrache AM, Coates LC. Safety of Guselkumab With and Without Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment: Pooled Results Across 4 Studies in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2023 Jun;50(6):769-780. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.220928. Epub 2023 Jan 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34819273Coates LC, Gossec L, Theander E, Bergmans P, Neuhold M, Karyekar CS, Shawi M, Noel W, Schett G, McInnes IB. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who are inadequate responders to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results through one year of a phase IIIb, randomised, controlled study (COSMOS). Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Mar;81(3):359-369. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220991. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
- Link to results on EudraCT registry.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials\transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale open Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Related trials for Arthritis, Psoriatic
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
Impact of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Analogs on Disease Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Guselkumab vs Golimumab in PsA TNF Inadequate Responder Patients
Psoriatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium
117 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab 100 mg in people with Arthritis, Psoriatic, run by Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium at 117 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 117 sites in Russia, Spain, Ukraine, United Kingdom, France and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants who Achieve an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03796858, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2025.