AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseNCT03799354

Study on Impact of Maximal Strength Training in Patients With COPD

A study testing Maximal strenght training (MST) plus endurance training (ET) and Endurance training (ET) in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA at 1 site in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In the context of pulmonary rehabilitation of COPD patients, recent guidelines and metanalysis describe that Resistance Training (RT) can be successfully performed alone or in conjunction with Endurance Training (ET) without evidence of adverse events. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
What is being tested?
Maximal strenght training (MST) plus endurance training (ET) and Endurance training (ET)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
18 Sep 2019to 30 Jun 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • COPD clinical definition according to GOLD guidelines with forced expiratory volume (FEV1)/ forced vital capacity (FVC) < 70%, and FEV1 < 50% of predicted
  • stable clinical condition

Who cannot join

  • pulmonary diseases other than COPD
  • type II diabetes or other metabolic diseases
  • malign disease
  • a respiratory tract infection within the last 4 wks
  • long oxygen therapy use.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • ICS Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation of the Institute of Lumezzane

    Lumezzane, Brescia, 25065

    Mara Paneroni, MSc, PT, 0039+030+8253 ext. 122, mara.paneroni@icsmaugeri.it

    Michele Vitacca, MD, 0039+030+8253 ext. 182, michele.vitacca@icsmaugeri.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Study on Impact of Maximal Strength Training in Patients With COPD: Physiological and Clinical Implications

In the context of pulmonary rehabilitation of COPD patients, recent guidelines and metanalysis describe that Resistance Training (RT) can be successfully performed alone or in conjunction with Endurance Training (ET) without evidence of adverse events.

Maximal Strength Training (MST) is a kind of RT typically performed at ~85-90% of 1RM with maximal velocity to be developed in the concentric phase. Recent literature indicates a significant amelioration on the Rate of Force Development (RFD) after MST in healthy subjects, post-menopausal woman and older populations.

Read more

When comparing to the conventional ET, MST generates a little change in muscle mass (no hypertrophy), but a much greater improvement in the RFD. It has been described that neural adjustments play a major role in the MST-induced adaptations. MST is also well documented to improve aerobic endurance by improving walking work efficiency.

Only a small cohort study of COPD patients was conducted, describing that MST can meaningfully improve strength and RFD, with an increase of around 32% for mechanical efficiency and a decrease of the perceived effort during submaximal job. This improvement could determine best performances in daily activities and a best quality of life. The main aims of this physiological pilot randomized controlled trail will be to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of the MST compared to standard ET on strength, effort tolerance, fatigue, economy of walking, dyspnea and risk of falls in a populations of COPD patients, in a short and middle term (6 months).

Read the detailed description

Exercise intolerance is a cardinal problem existing in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Moreover, skeletal muscle dysfunction is a common extra-pulmonary manifestation, leading to fatigue, decrease in activity of daily living (ADL) performance and quality of life and increase of risk of falls, mainly in older patients. In the context of pulmonary rehabilitation, recent guidelines and metanalysis describe that Resistance Training (RT) can be successfully performed alone or in conjunction with Endurance Training (ET) without evidence of adverse events.

As concern the RT programs, metanalysis in COPD describe that training have been mainly performed with the lower limbs and the training intensities are heterogeneous, generally ranging from 40% to 70% of 1-Repetition Maximum (1-RM).

Maximal Strength Training (MST) is a RT typically performed at ~85-90% of 1RM with maximal velocity to be developed in the concentric phase. Recent literature indicates a significant amelioration on the Rate of Force Development (RFD) after MST in healthy subjects, post-menopausal woman and older populations.

When comparing to the conventional ET, MST generates a little change in muscle mass (no hypertrophy), but a much greater improvement in the RFD. It has been described that neural adjustments play a major role in the MST-induced adaptations. MST is also well documented to improve aerobic endurance by improving walking work efficiency.

Although the mechanisms at the base of MST effect on the mechanical efficiency have not been completely clarified, there is evidence that changes in the relationships between power and speed bring to a longer relaxation phase inside the cycle of job, improving the recovery between contractions.

In this field, only a small cohort study of COPD patients was conducted describing that MST can meaningfully improve the strength and the RFD, with an increase of around 32% for mechanical efficiency and a decrease of the perceived effort during submaximal job. This improvement could determine best performances in daily activities and a best quality of life. Nevertheless, this study has been conducted only in a small cohort (twelve patients) of patients with COPD and further studies are necessary to define the impact on the different components that determine the effort intolerance.

The main aim of this physiological pilot randomized controlled trail will be to test the feasibility and the efficacy of the MST compared to standard ET on strength, effort tolerance, fatigue, economy of walking, dyspnea and risk of falls in a populations of COPD patients, in a short and middle term (6 months).

Being tested
Maximal strenght training (MST) plus endurance training (ET), Endurance training (ET)
Keywords
rehabilitation, resistive training, exercise
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Maximal strenght training (MST) plus endurance training (ET)Other

    Patients will perform an addictive out-patients rehabilitative treatment of 8 weeks (3 times/week, ≥20 training sessions) consisting of:

    1. MST- It will consist of four sets of five repetitions on a leg-press with a focus on the rate of force development during the concentric contraction of the quadriceps from a 90° to legs complete extension. The load will be 85-90% of 1RM. When a patient will be able to perform more than five repetitions in a set, the load will be increased. All strength training will be performed on a seated horizontal leg press.
    2. ET - A cycling session will follow the MST and last 40 minutes at constant-load, starting from a load intensity corresponding to patient specific AT. The intensity will be gradually increased with a symptom-based progression.
  • Endurance training (ET)Other

    Patients will perform a usual out-patients rehabilitative treatment of 8 weeks (3 times/week, ≥20 training sessions). They will perform ET by cycling sessions that will last 40 minutes/each at constant-load, starting from a load intensity corresponding to patient specific AT, assessed during the baseline incremental test. The intensity will be gradually increased during the sessions with a symptom-based progression, according to the protocol by Maltais and coworkers. A 3-min warm-up and cool-down will be provided. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure, oxygen pulsoxymetry, and symptoms by Borg CR10 scale will be monitored at the beginning and end of each session.

    Out of the training-days, both groups will continue their normal daily living with modest regular activity, as recommended by their physician.

Study groups in NCT03799354
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment GroupExperimentalMaximal strenght training (MST) plus endurance training (ET)
Receives: Other: Maximal strenght training (MST) plus endurance training (ET)
Control groupActive comparatorEndurance training (ET)
Receives: Other: Endurance training (ET)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in walking efficiency

    The text will be executed using a portable metabolimeter detecting oxygen consumption (VO2).

    After a 10 min of warm up on a treadmill, the patient will walk 5 min at submaximal steady state walking at 4.5 km/h at 5% incline.

    Using the average of VO2 of the last minute of walking, the walking efficiency will be defined as percentage of change as follows: external work accomplished/ energy expenditure x 100.

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Change in Leg Strength by 1-Repetition Maximum on leg press

    1-Repetition Maximum (1RM) will be evaluated. 1RM will be measured on a horizontal leg press at a knee angle of 90°. 1RM will be recorded as the heaviest lifted load achieved, applying rest periods of ~4 min between test lifts and increments of 5 kg between each trial until failure.

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  2. Change in maximal Rate of Force Development (RFD)

    Immediately after the maximal test 1-RM (see above), using the same apparatus, maximal rate of Force Development (RFD) will be assessed using a force platform and applying a load corresponding to 75% of the participant's pre-test 1RM. The subjects will be instructed to execute the lift as rapidly as possible in the concentric phase. RFD will be analyzed as the time difference between 10% and 90% of Peak force.

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  3. Change in maximal effort tolerance

    It will be evaluated by VO2 consumption on maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on cycloergometer

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  4. Change in Constant Load Effort tolerance

    It will be evaluated by evaluated by time of execution of Cardiopulmonary Constant-Load Endurance Test

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  5. Change in Fatigue (physiological evaluation)

    To define peripheral and central component of fatigue, before and after CLET, the investigators will test the difference on force produced during a single twitch superimposed on the Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVC) and the force produced by the electrically evoked Resting Twitch (RT) produced, at rest, 5 seconds after the MVC.

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  6. Change in Fatigue (qualitative evaluation)

    Fatigue Severity Scale (scale measuring fatigue, 9-item scale ranging from 7 = absence of fatigue to 63= maximal presence of fatigue)

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  7. Change in Muscle volume

    Sagittal ultrasound images of the Vastus Lateralis (VL) muscle will be recorded with an 8-12 MHz linear transducer. Images will be obtained with a 90° flexion of hip and knee, at 50% of femur length. The pennation angle (hp) of the VL fascicles will be measured as the angle between the VL muscle fascicles and the deep aponeurosis of the insertion.

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  8. Change in Dyspnea

    Barthel Index Dyspnea (scale measuring dyspnea during basal ADL, 10-item scale ranging from 0 = absence of dyspnea to 100 = maximal dyspnea)

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  9. Concentration of CRP

    C reactive protein [CRP] (mg/dl)

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  10. Change in Low grade Inflammation

    Evaluation of neutrophils/ lymphocytes ratio

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  11. Concentration of Tumor necrosis factor alpha

    TNF-alpha (pg/ml)

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  12. Concentration of Interleukin-6

    IL6 (pg/ml)

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  13. Muscular proteolyses by 3-MeH concentration

    Evaluation of urinary 3 Methyl-Histine (3-MeH) (micromol/ml)

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  14. Change in Balance (qualitative measure)

    BERG scale ( scale measuring balance, composed by 14 balance related tasks, ranging from 0 = worse balance to 56= best balance)

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  15. Change in quality of life

    EuroQol 5-D (scale measuring quality of life, composed by 2 sessions: one of 5 questions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) with multiple choice ranging from 0 = no problem to 25= very low quality of life and one using Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) to quantify the health status ranging from 0 = worst health condition to 100 = best health condition. The two scale sessions are considered separately.

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

  16. Patient Satisfaction: Likert Scale

    Likert Scale 0-4 ( 0=completely unsatisfied, 4= very satisfied).

    Measured: at 8 weeks

  17. Change in Falls

    Evaluation of the rate of falls

    Measured: baseline and 8 months

  18. Hospitalizations

    Evaluation of the rate of hospitalizations

    Measured: baseline and 8 months

  19. Mortality

    Evaluation of deaths (number)

    Measured: baseline and 8 months

  20. Change in Balance (quantitative measure)

    The fall risk (FR) assessment will be evaluated by Balance Board.

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jan 2019
  2. Study start18 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Pilot randomized controlled trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03799354
Sponsor's protocol ID
ICS Maugeri CE 2241
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
4 Dec 2018
Last updated
4 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Maltais F, Decramer M, Casaburi R, Barreiro E, Burelle Y, Debigare R, Dekhuijzen PN, Franssen F, Gayan-Ramirez G, Gea J, Gosker HR, Gosselink R, Hayot M, Hussain SN, Janssens W, Polkey MI, Roca J, Saey D, Schols AM, Spruit MA, Steiner M, Taivassalo T, Troosters T, Vogiatzis I, Wagner PD; ATS/ERS Ad Hoc Committee on Limb Muscle Dysfunction in COPD. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: update on limb muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 May 1;189(9):e15-62. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0373ST.

    PubMed 24787074
  • Hoff J, Helgerud J, Wisloff U. Maximal strength training improves work economy in trained female cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Jun;31(6):870-7. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199906000-00016.

    PubMed 10378915
  • Hoff J, Tjonna AE, Steinshamn S, Hoydal M, Richardson RS, Helgerud J. Maximal strength training of the legs in COPD: a therapy for mechanical inefficiency. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Feb;39(2):220-6. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000246989.48729.39.

    PubMed 17277584
  • Wang E, Helgerud J, Loe H, Indseth K, Kaehler N, Hoff J. Maximal strength training improves walking performance in peripheral arterial disease patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Oct;20(5):764-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01014.x.

    PubMed 19804581

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Maximal strenght training (MST) plus endurance training (ET) and Endurance training (ET) in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Mara Paneroni, MSc, PT (0039+030+8253 ext. 122, mara.paneroni@icsmaugeri.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in walking efficiency (time frame: baseline and 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03799354, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in