BronchiolitisPhase 2NCT03799406
Vitamin D Supplementation for Acute Bronchiolitis
A Phase 2 study testing Cholecalciferol in people with Bronchiolitis, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of oral vitamin D supplementation on the clinical course of acute bronchiolitis, and to investigate whether vitamin D deficiency among infants who required hospital-based care for bronchiolitis is associated with the severity of the acute episode. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 24 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Bronchiolitis
- What is being tested?
- Cholecalciferol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2016to 1 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 24 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Infants aged 1-24 months of age, diagnosed clinically as acute bronchiolitis and presented with any of the following:
- Persistent resting oxygen saturation below 92% in room air.
- Marked tachypnea.
- Intercostal retractions indicating respiratory distress.
- Inability to maintain oral hydration.
- Parent unable to care for child at home.
Who cannot join
- Infants with history of prematurity (< 37 weeks), chronic cardiopulmonary disease, immunodeficiency, neuromuscular disease, and any other chronic medical condition.
- Patients receiving any micronutrient supplementation or therapies containing vitamin D for 4 weeks prior to the study period.
- Infants with previous episodes of wheezing or a physician's diagnosis of asthma.
- Patients with acute bronchiolitis having very severe clinical score.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Does Oral Vitamin D Supplementation in Egyptian Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis Improve the Outcome? A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of oral vitamin D supplementation on the clinical course of acute bronchiolitis, and to investigate whether vitamin D deficiency among infants who required hospital-based care for bronchiolitis is associated with the severity of the acute episode.
Read the detailed description
This is a double blind randomized controlled trial which was conducted on 60 infants who required hospital-based care for acute bronchiolitis. The patients were recruited in the period from October 2018 to January 2019. Informed consents were obtained from all caregivers, and approved by Institutional Research Board of our University.
The diagnosis of acute bronchiolitis was based on a first episode of respiratory distress with wheezing and/ or crackles, preceded by an infection of the upper airways (rhinorrhea, coryza, cough, fever). Disease severity was evaluated using Modified-Tal scoring systems for bronchiolitis, since it is repeatable and can reliably be used in research and clinical practice
Sample size:
Our hospital data have shown that the mean LOS for cases admitted with acute bronchiolitis was 3 ± 2 days. Assuming a reduction in length of hospital stay by 50% and study power of 80% to detect a clinical significance (α error) of 0.05 between interventional groups, we calculated a sample size of 30 patients in each treatment group.
Randomization and Enrollment:
Patients were randomized to receive vitamin D3 treatment [100 IU/Kg/day in acute bronchiolitis] (vitamin D group) or placebo (placebo group) all through the period of admission as a previous cohort observational study has postulated that vitamin D daily dose close to 100 IU/kg body weight is favorable for infants up to age 12 months. Both groups were equal in number. Both vitamin D3 and placebo were in drop form and were identical in shape and nearly the same taste and color. The assignments were kept in sealed envelopes till data analysis. The randomization and allocation process were done by a higher nursing staff blinded to the study. Throughout the study, the medical staff, and parents were blind to assignments.
All patients were hospitalized and received treatment. The treatment consisted of intravenous fluids, oxygenation, and antipyretics if needed, and nebulized hypertonic saline. Nebulized adrenaline or salbutamol was added in severe cases according to the decision of a senior pediatrician. The validated clinical score for acute bronchiolitis were taken after a period of adjustment of at least 5 min and with the child quiet, not crying, without fever, and breathing room air. Respiratory rate were determined by observation of the thoracic movement over a full minute. The degree of accessory muscle use was based on the degree of intercostal or subcostal retraction. Physical examination as well as clinical severity score was recorded for each case at admission and every 12 hours, and at discharge. On discharge, all caregivers of breastfed, partially breastfed and bottle fed infants were advised to continue vitamin D supplementation at dose 400 IU per day
All patients were submitted to careful history taking, complete clinical examination and the following laboratory investigations.
- Complete blood count
- Basal serum vitamin D3 (The 25-hydroxy vitamin D): was done before enrollment of patients in the randomized trial.
Venous blood samples were collected from every subject by sterile venipuncture using disposable syringes. Each sample was then distributed as follows:
- One ml of blood was disposed into a plastic tube containing EDTA solution for performing complete blood count using electronic cell counter (sysmex kx-21,Japon).
- |Two ml blood was delivered into plain tube and centrifuged to obtain a clear non hemolyzed serum which was used for performing 25 (OH) vitamin D assays. The specimens were stored at - 20 until the time of the analysis. The serum 25 (OH) D levels were measured using the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) method.
- Conditions
- Bronchiolitis
- Being tested
- Cholecalciferol, Placebo
- Keywords
- Acute bronchiolitis, Vitamin D, Modified Tal score, Randomized, Controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Bronchiolitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CholecalciferolDrug
Also called Vitamin D
Therapeutic trial of vitamin D supplementation during acute episode of bronchiolitis
PlaceboOther
Placebo supplementation during acute episode of bronchiolitis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Active comparator | cholecalciferol at dose of 100 IU/Kg/day Receives: Drug: Cholecalciferol |
| Placebo group | Placebo comparator | placebo Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
length of hospital stay
Length of hospital stay in days
Measured: 3 to 5 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jan 2019
- Study start1 Oct 2016
- Primary completion1 Mar 2017
- Study completion1 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BronchiolitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mansoura UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amal Osman, Mansoura University
- Investigators
- amal osman, M.D., Principal investigator, Mansoura University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03799406
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MS/16.01.38
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 29 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 11 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Huey SL, Acharya N, Silver A, Sheni R, Yu EA, Pena-Rosas JP, Mehta S. Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD012875. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012875.pub2.
PubMed 33305842
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does Oral Vitamin D Supplementation in Egyptian Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis Improve the Outcome? A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03799406
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MS/16.01.38
- Conditions
- Bronchiolitis
- Keywords
- Acute bronchiolitis, Vitamin D, Modified Tal score, Randomized, Controlled trial
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of oral vitamin D supplementation on the clinical course of acute bronchiolitis, and to investigate whether vitamin D deficiency among infants who required hospital-based care for bronchiolitis is associated with the severity of the acute episode.
Detailed description
This is a double blind randomized controlled trial which was conducted on 60 infants who required hospital-based care for acute bronchiolitis. The patients were recruited in the period from October 2018 to January 2019. Informed consents were obtained from all caregivers, and approved by Institutional Research Board of our University.
The diagnosis of acute bronchiolitis was based on a first episode of respiratory distress with wheezing and/ or crackles, preceded by an infection of the upper airways (rhinorrhea, coryza, cough, fever). Disease severity was evaluated using Modified-Tal scoring systems for bronchiolitis, since it is repeatable and can reliably be used in research and clinical practice
Sample size:
Our hospital data have shown that the mean LOS for cases admitted with acute bronchiolitis was 3 ± 2 days. Assuming a reduction in length of hospital stay by 50% and study power of 80% to detect a clinical significance (α error) of 0.05 between interventional groups, we calculated a sample size of 30 patients in each treatment group.
Randomization and Enrollment:
Patients were randomized to receive vitamin D3 treatment [100 IU/Kg/day in acute bronchiolitis] (vitamin D group) or placebo (placebo group) all through the period of admission as a previous cohort observational study has postulated that vitamin D daily dose close to 100 IU/kg body weight is favorable for infants up to age 12 months. Both groups were equal in number. Both vitamin D3 and placebo were in drop form and were identical in shape and nearly the same taste and color. The assignments were kept in sealed envelopes till data analysis. The randomization and allocation process were done by a higher nursing staff blinded to the study. Throughout the study, the medical staff, and parents were blind to assignments.
All patients were hospitalized and received treatment. The treatment consisted of intravenous fluids, oxygenation, and antipyretics if needed, and nebulized hypertonic saline. Nebulized adrenaline or salbutamol was added in severe cases according to the decision of a senior pediatrician. The validated clinical score for acute bronchiolitis were taken after a period of adjustment of at least 5 min and with the child quiet, not crying, without fever, and breathing room air. Respiratory rate were determined by observation of the thoracic movement over a full minute. The degree of accessory muscle use was based on the degree of intercostal or subcostal retraction. Physical examination as well as clinical severity score was recorded for each case at admission and every 12 hours, and at discharge. On discharge, all caregivers of breastfed, partially breastfed and bottle fed infants were advised to continue vitamin D supplementation at dose 400 IU per day
All patients were submitted to careful history taking, complete clinical examination and the following laboratory investigations.
- Complete blood count
- Basal serum vitamin D3 (The 25-hydroxy vitamin D): was done before enrollment of patients in the randomized trial.
Venous blood samples were collected from every subject by sterile venipuncture using disposable syringes. Each sample was then distributed as follows:
- One ml of blood was disposed into a plastic tube containing EDTA solution for performing complete blood count using electronic cell counter (sysmex kx-21,Japon).
- |Two ml blood was delivered into plain tube and centrifuged to obtain a clear non hemolyzed serum which was used for performing 25 (OH) vitamin D assays. The specimens were stored at - 20 until the time of the analysis. The serum 25 (OH) D levels were measured using the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) method.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Active comparator | Drug: Cholecalciferolcholecalciferol at dose of 100 IU/Kg/day |
| Placebo group | Placebo comparator | Other: Placeboplacebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 24 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Infants aged 1-24 months of age, diagnosed clinically as acute bronchiolitis and presented with any of the following:
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Infants with history of prematurity (< 37 weeks), chronic cardiopulmonary disease, immunodeficiency, neuromuscular disease, and any other chronic medical condition.
- Patients receiving any micronutrient supplementation or therapies containing vitamin D for 4 weeks prior to the study period.
- Infants with previous episodes of wheezing or a physician's diagnosis of asthma.
- Patients with acute bronchiolitis having very severe clinical score.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CholecalciferolAlso: Vitamin DTherapeutic trial of vitamin D supplementation during acute episode of bronchiolitis | Drug | Intervention group |
| PlaceboPlacebo supplementation during acute episode of bronchiolitis | Other | Placebo group |
Primary outcome
length of hospital stay
Time frame: 3 to 5 days
Length of hospital stay in days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jan 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33305842Huey SL, Acharya N, Silver A, Sheni R, Yu EA, Pena-Rosas JP, Mehta S. Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD012875. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012875.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bronchiolitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Axatilimab and Corticosteroids as Initial Treatment for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Chronic Graft-versus-host-disease
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating and Promoting Resilience in Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome
Tourette Syndrome, Tic Disorders
Recruiting
RSV Burden in Outpatient and Hospital Settings
RSV Infection, Children, Only
RecruitingPhase 1
Ex Vivo-Expanded Regulatory T Cells Plus Low-Dose Interleukin-2 for Steroid-Refractory Chronic GVHD
Graft Versus Host Disease (cGvHD)
Not yet recruiting
Short-Term Enteral Nutrition for Infants With Bronchiolitis in Pediatric Emergency Departments
Bronchiolitis, Clinical Phenotype
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
amal osman, M.D. principal investigator
Mansoura University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cholecalciferol in people with Bronchiolitis, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
length of hospital stay (time frame: 3 to 5 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03799406, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2019.