Heparin-induced ThrombocytopeniaPhase 3HITSOVANCT03809481
Open-Label, Randomised, Active Controlled, Multi-Centre Phase 3 Study Safety and Efficacy of Danaparoid vs Argatroban
A Phase 3 study testing Danaparoid Sodium and Argatroban in people with Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia, run by Aspen Global Incorporated at 35 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
An Open-Label, Randomised, Active Controlled, Multi-Centre Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Danaparoid vs Argatroban in Treatment of Subjects with Acute HIT (HITSOVA study) Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 weeks to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia
- What is being tested?
- Danaparoid Sodium and Argatroban
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 7 participants
- Where
- 35 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- 16 May 2019to 10 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 weeks to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- At the time of enrollmentsubjects are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:
- Premature infants (corrected age <37 weeks gestational age)
- Subjects undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) treatment
- Fibrinolytic therapy <24 hours before enrollment
- Lumbar puncture or spinal/epidural catheter placement within the past 48 hours
- Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C) Note: in patients with suspected/confirmed severe liver disease, Child-Pugh C stage of liver disease must be excluded before start of treatment. For calculating Child-Pugh score, laboratory parameters in the patient file on INR, prothrombin time, serum albumin and total bilirubin taken can be taken, if they have been obtained within the last 48 hours before randomization. In all other patients these parameters have to be measured before start of treatment to identify potential exclusion criteria.
Show all 21Show fewer
- Active bleeding
- Subjects with the following conditions to be excluded if alternative antithrombotic treatments are available:
- Severe hemorrhagic diathesis, (ii) Traumatic damage to the central nervous system (iii) Brain, spinal or ophthalmologic surgery (iv) Active stomach/duodenal ulcers or active peptic ulcer unless this ulcer is the cause of the surgical procedure
- An unexplained activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) > 2 x the normal range
- A hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident within the previous 3 months
- Severe, uncontrolled hypertension defined as blood pressure >180/110 mmHg
- Diabetic retinopathy
- Acute bacterial endocarditis
- Expectation of a long-term (> 3 weeks) hemodialysis requirement before the end of the acute treatment
- Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients
- Hypersensitivity to sulphite
- Any investigational drug(s) use within 4 weeks preceding screening or anticipated use during the course of the study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Use of intra-aortic balloon pump, or ventricular assist device
- Use of any non-heparin anticoagulant treatment for suspected HIT for more than 48 hours before enrollment.
Trial locations and contacts
35 sites in 9 countries.
35 sites in 9 countries
Germany6 sites
Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichhain Hämophiliezentrum, Gerinnungssprechstunde Landsberger Allee 49
Berlin, Berlin-Brandenburg, 10249
Städtisches Klinkum Dresden
Dresden, Saxony, 1067
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Klinik für Herz-, Kinderherz- und Gefäßchirurgie Standort Gießen
Giesen, Lower Saxony, 35392
University Hospital Greifswald Dpt. of Hematology
Greifswald, 17489
Universitatstklinikum Halle (Saale), Medizinische Klinik III
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, 06120
Zentrum für Klinische Transfusionsmedizin
Tübingen, 72076
United States5 sites
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Shands University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32068
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77004
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Bosnia and Herzegovina5 sites
Clinical Center of the Republic of Srpska, Medical Intesnive Care Unit
Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, 78000
University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska, Clinic for cardiology
Banja Luka
University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska, Lung Clinic
Banja Luka
Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Clinic for Heart, Blood Vessels and Rheumatic Diseases
Sarajevo, 71000
Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Clinic for Lung Diseases
Sarajevo, 78000
Russia5 sites
First City Hospital N.A. E.E. Volosevich
Arkhangelsk, 163001
Moscow City Hospital 67
Moscow, 123423
Oncology Center
Omsk, 644013
Regional Hospital after N.N Burdenko
Penza, 440026
Clinical Hospital № 122 N. A. L.G. Sokolov
Saint Petersburg, 194291
Italy4 sites
ASST Papa Giovanni XIII, Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale
Bergamo, Lombardy, 24127
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S.Orsola-Malpighi - UO Angiologia e Malattie della Coagulazione
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138
AOU Careggi, SOD Malattie Aterotrombotiche
Florence, Florence, 50134
Instituto Scientifico San Raffaele- Servizio Coagulazione e Centro Trombosi
Milan, 20132
Serbia4 sites
Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Emergency Internal Medicine
Belgrade, 11000
Clinical centre of Serbia, Clinic for Pulmonology
Belgrade, 11000
Instiute of Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje"
Belgrade, 11040
The Institute for Pulmonary Disease of Vojvodina, Pulmonary thromboembolism department
Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, 21204
France3 sites
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens Picardie
Amiens, Somme, 80054
DIJON University Hospital
Dijon, Burgundy, 2100
CHU St Etienne; Avenue Albert Raimond
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 42270
Poland2 sites
Centrum Medyczne HCP Sp. z o.o. Szpital im. Św. Jana Pawła II
Poznan, 61485
Wojewódzki Szpital Zespolony im. L. Rydygiera
Torun, 87100
About this study
Official title: Open-Label, Randomised, Active Controlled, Multi-Centre Ph 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Danaparoid vs Argatroban in Acute HIT
An Open-Label, Randomised, Active Controlled, Multi-Centre Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Danaparoid vs Argatroban in Treatment of Subjects with Acute HIT (HITSOVA study)
Read the detailed description
Objectives:
Primary:
To show that for the treatment of subjects with acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) danaparoid use is not inferior to argatroban in terms of efficacy. The primary efficacy endpoint (composite endpoint) is defined as treatment response at Day 44.
A subject will be considered a treatment responder, if none of the following events occur by Day 44:
- New or extended venous and/or arterial thrombosis, including gangrene/skin necrosis Note: 'thrombosis' denotes venous and/or arterial here and throughout the protocol
- All-cause mortality
- Unplanned amputation, including ischemic gut resection
Secondary/Exploratory:
To collect additional efficacy data
- Percentage of subjects with increase in platelet count to values ≥ 100,000/ μL at day 14
- Deaths due to TE or bleeding up until Day 44
- Incidence of fatal or non-fatal major bleeding up until Day 44
Note: As outlined by the Control of Anticoagulation Subcommittee major bleeding in non-surgical subjects is defined as:
- Fatal bleeding, and/or
- Symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome, and/or
- Bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 20 g/L (1.24 mmol/ L) or more, or leading to transfusion of two or more units of whole blood or red cells
- New or extended thrombosis, including gangrene/skin necrosis
- Unplanned amputation, including ischemic gut resection
- All-cause mortality
Exploratory
- Time to first event (new/extended thrombosis, all cause mortality, unplanned amputation)
- Time to reach consistent increase in 3 consecutive alternate day platelet count measurements during acute treatment
- Incidence of new or extended TE events, including gangrene/skin necrosis up until Day 14
- Incidence of all-cause mortality up until Day 14
- Incidence of unplanned amputation up until Day 14
- Incidence of fatal or non-fatal major bleeding up until Day 14
To describe the safety of danaparoid in comparison to argatroban
- All-cause mortality
- Incidence of fatal and non-fatal major bleeding events (as defined above) during the acute treatment and then the entire follow-up period (until Day 44)
- Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)
- Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
- Changes in vital parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate) and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
- Incidence of positive pre-danaparoid cross reactivity in the Heparin-induced Platelet Activation (HIPA) assay (Greinacher. 1991)
- Safety laboratory parameters
Design:
This is a Phase 3, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of danaparoid versus argatroban in treatment of subjects with acuteHIT.
Subjects who develop a reduction in platelet count (PC) greater than or equal to 30% compared with the higher of their pre-heparin treatment count or their highest platelet count after the start of heparin either
- Between Days 4 and 14 of the start of heparin treatment with or without thrombosis or
- At Day 1 of heparin treatment and recent heparin exposure (within the last 30 days with or without thrombosis) and who have a score on the 4Ts test of >3 will be considered for study enrollment as a Suspected HIT.
Subjects who have tested negative in available screening tests for HIT within the last 48 hours before enrollment will not be considered for study enrollment, unless new clinical symptoms occurred.The following will occur for all subjects (regardless of whether they had a screening HIT test performed in the enrolling hospital or not):
- All heparin administration must be ceased after strong clinical suspicion of HIT, based on clinical evaluation of the subject, including the use of heparin-bonded vascular access catheters and circuits as well as heparin flushes.
- Subject must be randomized into the study and treated with the study drug or transferred to alternative non-heparin anticoagulant in situations where study drug cannot be started within 2 hours after stop of heparin.
- A blood sample may be taken at the same time for HIT testing according to local practice.
- The investigator will assess the subject for eligibility for the HITSOVA study by clinical criteria (4T score >3) and inclusion and exclusion criteria.
- If eligible, written informed consent will be obtained from the subject or a legal guardian and the subject will be randomized to receive study drug. .
- A new blood sample for HIPA/ PF4/heparin IgG ELISA and anti-danaparoid antibodies and cross reactivity has to be obtained to allow consistent blood sample labelling and documentation before start of study drug, regardless whether another blood sample for HIT testing according to local practice had been obtained at the time of suspicion of HIT
Note, although use of non-heparin treatment for suspected HIT is allowed before enrollment of the subject into the HITSOVA study, the study drug should be started as soon as possible, but no later than 48 hours. In such situation, all time points specified in this protocol, will be calculated from the time of first dose of study drug.
HIT diagnosis will be confirmed serologically by the HIPA assay and a specific PF4/heparin IgG ELISA test for the HIT IgG by the nominated central laboratory based in Greifswald, Germany Subjects with a positive HIPA assay and a positive HIT IgG antigen test with optical density (OD) > 0.5 will be classified as confirmed HIT, and treatment with randomized study drug will continue.Subjects with negative HIPA assay and a positive HIT IgG antigen test with an optical density (OD) >0.5 and subjects with a positive HIPA assay but a negative HIT IgG antigen test OD ≤0.5 will be classified as suspected HIT and treatment with randomized study drug will continue. These subjects will later be adjudicated retrospectively by the Adjudication Committee (AdjC) and then grouped into highly likely HIT or non-HIT.
All other subjects will be considered as non-HIT and the subjects will be removed from the protocol, study drug will be discontinued, and further procedures and treatment will be given at the discretion of the Investigator according to local standard practice. These subjects will be followed to Day 44 after their first dose of study drug for assessment of safety.
During the treatment period if it becomes necessary for an operation, invasive vascular procedure or acute kidney injury requiring the use of an extracorporeal circulation machine develops, then specific dosing instructions are available.
If the acute kidney injury does not recover during the treatment period and the use of an extracorporeal circulation machine is required longer, then the subject will not be eligible to be included in the per protocol set (PPS), but will still be eligible to be included in the full analysis set (FAS).
Study Population:
All subjects who develop a reduction in platelet count (PC) ≥ 30% compared to the higher of their pre-heparin treatment count or their highest platelet count after the start of heparin at either
- between Days 4 and 14 of the start of heparin treatment with or without thrombosis or b) at Day 1 of heparin treatment (and recent heparin exposure within the last 30 days) with or without thrombosis and who have a score on the 4Ts test of >3 and who are later suspected HIT by the HIPA assay or HIT IgG..
Clinical signs of HIT are
- New thrombosis, on either side (arterial or venous) of the circulation
- Acute systemic reaction when heparin infusion was given:
- Fever
- Chills
- High blood pressure
- Tachycardia
- Shortness of breath
- Chest pain
- Transient global amnesia
- White clot syndrome
- Skin necrosis
- Occlusion of an extracorporeal circuit
Pediatric subjects will not be included in every country in this study. The countries that allow inclusion of pediatric patients are France, USA,and Italy.
It is anticipated that some subjects will be dosed with alternative non-heparin anti-coagulants prior to completing enrollment steps for this study. These subjects can be enrolled in the study as long as the exposure to those treatments is less than 48 hours.
Baseline/screening (Day 0) and enrollment into the study (Day1) can occur on the same day. In this case the assesments for Day 0 and Day 1, should only be performed once.
- Conditions
- Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia
- Being tested
- Danaparoid Sodium, Argatroban
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Danaparoid SodiumDrug
Also called Orgaran
inhibits thrombin generation by indirect anti-Xa inhibition and direct inhibition of factor IX activation
ArgatrobanDrug
Synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Danaparoid Sodium | Experimental | Subjects will receive danaparoid via IV infusion for at least 7 days then transition to a VKA. IV loading bolus injection of 2250 U, followed by 400 U/h for 4 hours, then 300 U/h for 4 hours, then a maintenance infusion of 150-200 U/h. Receives: Drug: Danaparoid Sodium |
| Argatroban | Active comparator | Subjects will receive argatroban 2 microgram/kg/min as a continuous infusion, titrated to an aPTT that is 1.5 to 3.0 x initial baseline value, but not exceeding 100 seconds. Receives: Drug: Argatroban |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composite Efficacy Response
Efficacy will be assessed by the number of subjects with suspected HIT who respond to treatment. A responder is defined as a subject who has not experienced any of the following from Day 1 to Day 44:
- New or extended venous and/or arterial thrombosis, including gangrene/skin necrosis
- All-cause mortality
- Unplanned amputation, including ischemic gut resection
Efficacy endpoints as defined above will be assessed by clinical exam with special attention to assessments for thromboses, gangrene, and skin necrosis. Clinically suspected thrombosis will be confirmed/ruled out by objective measures, e.g. compression ultrasound.
Measured: Day 44
Secondary outcomes (6)
Consistent increases in platelet count
Percentage of subjects with increase in platelet count to values ≥ 100,000/ μL
Measured: Days 14
Death due to TE or bleeding
Death due to TE or bleeding
Measured: Day 44
Major Bleeding
Incidence of fatal or non-fatal major bleeding
Measured: Day 44
New or extended thrombosis
New of extended thrombosis, including gangrene/skin necrosis
Measured: Day 44
Unplanned amputation
Unplanned amputation, including ischemic gut resection
Measured: Day 44
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality
Measured: Day 44
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2019
- Study start16 May 2019
- Primary completion10 Jun 2022
- Study completion10 Jun 2022
Why it stopped: Prolonged delay as a result of impact of Covid19 pandemic
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Heparin-induced ThrombocytopeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Open-label, randomized, active-controlled
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aspen Global Incorporated
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03809481
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ERGCR-18-ORGHIT-001
- Acronym
- HITSOVA
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 17 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 8 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Open-Label, Randomised, Active Controlled, Multi-Centre Ph 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Danaparoid vs Argatroban in Acute HIT
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03809481
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HITSOVA / ERGCR-18-ORGHIT-001
- Conditions
- Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Prolonged delay as a result of impact of Covid19 pandemic
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aspen Global IncorporatedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
An Open-Label, Randomised, Active Controlled, Multi-Centre Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Danaparoid vs Argatroban in Treatment of Subjects with Acute HIT (HITSOVA study)
Detailed description
Objectives:
Primary:
To show that for the treatment of subjects with acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) danaparoid use is not inferior to argatroban in terms of efficacy. The primary efficacy endpoint (composite endpoint) is defined as treatment response at Day 44.
A subject will be considered a treatment responder, if none of the following events occur by Day 44:
- New or extended venous and/or arterial thrombosis, including gangrene/skin necrosis Note: 'thrombosis' denotes venous and/or arterial here and throughout the protocol
- All-cause mortality
- Unplanned amputation, including ischemic gut resection
Secondary/Exploratory:
To collect additional efficacy data
- Percentage of subjects with increase in platelet count to values ≥ 100,000/ μL at day 14
- Deaths due to TE or bleeding up until Day 44
- Incidence of fatal or non-fatal major bleeding up until Day 44
Note: As outlined by the Control of Anticoagulation Subcommittee major bleeding in non-surgical subjects is defined as:
- Fatal bleeding, and/or
- Symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome, and/or
- Bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 20 g/L (1.24 mmol/ L) or more, or leading to transfusion of two or more units of whole blood or red cells
- New or extended thrombosis, including gangrene/skin necrosis
- Unplanned amputation, including ischemic gut resection
- All-cause mortality
Exploratory
- Time to first event (new/extended thrombosis, all cause mortality, unplanned amputation)
- Time to reach consistent increase in 3 consecutive alternate day platelet count measurements during acute treatment
- Incidence of new or extended TE events, including gangrene/skin necrosis up until Day 14
- Incidence of all-cause mortality up until Day 14
- Incidence of unplanned amputation up until Day 14
- Incidence of fatal or non-fatal major bleeding up until Day 14
To describe the safety of danaparoid in comparison to argatroban
- All-cause mortality
- Incidence of fatal and non-fatal major bleeding events (as defined above) during the acute treatment and then the entire follow-up period (until Day 44)
- Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)
- Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
- Changes in vital parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate) and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
- Incidence of positive pre-danaparoid cross reactivity in the Heparin-induced Platelet Activation (HIPA) assay (Greinacher. 1991)
- Safety laboratory parameters
Design:
This is a Phase 3, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of danaparoid versus argatroban in treatment of subjects with acuteHIT.
Subjects who develop a reduction in platelet count (PC) greater than or equal to 30% compared with the higher of their pre-heparin treatment count or their highest platelet count after the start of heparin either
- Between Days 4 and 14 of the start of heparin treatment with or without thrombosis or
- At Day 1 of heparin treatment and recent heparin exposure (within the last 30 days with or without thrombosis) and who have a score on the 4Ts test of >3 will be considered for study enrollment as a Suspected HIT.
Subjects who have tested negative in available screening tests for HIT within the last 48 hours before enrollment will not be considered for study enrollment, unless new clinical symptoms occurred.The following will occur for all subjects (regardless of whether they had a screening HIT test performed in the enrolling hospital or not):
- All heparin administration must be ceased after strong clinical suspicion of HIT, based on clinical evaluation of the subject, including the use of heparin-bonded vascular access catheters and circuits as well as heparin flushes.
- Subject must be randomized into the study and treated with the study drug or transferred to alternative non-heparin anticoagulant in situations where study drug cannot be started within 2 hours after stop of heparin.
- A blood sample may be taken at the same time for HIT testing according to local practice.
- The investigator will assess the subject for eligibility for the HITSOVA study by clinical criteria (4T score >3) and inclusion and exclusion criteria.
- If eligible, written informed consent will be obtained from the subject or a legal guardian and the subject will be randomized to receive study drug. .
- A new blood sample for HIPA/ PF4/heparin IgG ELISA and anti-danaparoid antibodies and cross reactivity has to be obtained to allow consistent blood sample labelling and documentation before start of study drug, regardless whether another blood sample for HIT testing according to local practice had been obtained at the time of suspicion of HIT
Note, although use of non-heparin treatment for suspected HIT is allowed before enrollment of the subject into the HITSOVA study, the study drug should be started as soon as possible, but no later than 48 hours. In such situation, all time points specified in this protocol, will be calculated from the time of first dose of study drug.
HIT diagnosis will be confirmed serologically by the HIPA assay and a specific PF4/heparin IgG ELISA test for the HIT IgG by the nominated central laboratory based in Greifswald, Germany Subjects with a positive HIPA assay and a positive HIT IgG antigen test with optical density (OD) > 0.5 will be classified as confirmed HIT, and treatment with randomized study drug will continue.Subjects with negative HIPA assay and a positive HIT IgG antigen test with an optical density (OD) >0.5 and subjects with a positive HIPA assay but a negative HIT IgG antigen test OD ≤0.5 will be classified as suspected HIT and treatment with randomized study drug will continue. These subjects will later be adjudicated retrospectively by the Adjudication Committee (AdjC) and then grouped into highly likely HIT or non-HIT.
All other subjects will be considered as non-HIT and the subjects will be removed from the protocol, study drug will be discontinued, and further procedures and treatment will be given at the discretion of the Investigator according to local standard practice. These subjects will be followed to Day 44 after their first dose of study drug for assessment of safety.
During the treatment period if it becomes necessary for an operation, invasive vascular procedure or acute kidney injury requiring the use of an extracorporeal circulation machine develops, then specific dosing instructions are available.
If the acute kidney injury does not recover during the treatment period and the use of an extracorporeal circulation machine is required longer, then the subject will not be eligible to be included in the per protocol set (PPS), but will still be eligible to be included in the full analysis set (FAS).
Study Population:
All subjects who develop a reduction in platelet count (PC) ≥ 30% compared to the higher of their pre-heparin treatment count or their highest platelet count after the start of heparin at either
- between Days 4 and 14 of the start of heparin treatment with or without thrombosis or b) at Day 1 of heparin treatment (and recent heparin exposure within the last 30 days) with or without thrombosis and who have a score on the 4Ts test of >3 and who are later suspected HIT by the HIPA assay or HIT IgG..
Clinical signs of HIT are
- New thrombosis, on either side (arterial or venous) of the circulation
- Acute systemic reaction when heparin infusion was given:
- Fever
- Chills
- High blood pressure
- Tachycardia
- Shortness of breath
- Chest pain
- Transient global amnesia
- White clot syndrome
- Skin necrosis
- Occlusion of an extracorporeal circuit
Pediatric subjects will not be included in every country in this study. The countries that allow inclusion of pediatric patients are France, USA,and Italy.
It is anticipated that some subjects will be dosed with alternative non-heparin anti-coagulants prior to completing enrollment steps for this study. These subjects can be enrolled in the study as long as the exposure to those treatments is less than 48 hours.
Baseline/screening (Day 0) and enrollment into the study (Day1) can occur on the same day. In this case the assesments for Day 0 and Day 1, should only be performed once.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Open-label, randomized, active-controlled
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Danaparoid Sodium | Experimental | Drug: Danaparoid SodiumSubjects will receive danaparoid via IV infusion for at least 7 days then transition to a VKA. IV loading bolus injection of 2250 U, followed by 400 U/h for 4 hours, then 300 U/h for 4 hours, then a maintenance infusion of 150-200 U/h. |
| Argatroban | Active comparator | Drug: ArgatrobanSubjects will receive argatroban 2 microgram/kg/min as a continuous infusion, titrated to an aPTT that is 1.5 to 3.0 x initial baseline value, but not exceeding 100 seconds. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 weeks to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- At the time of enrollmentsubjects are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:
- Premature infants (corrected age <37 weeks gestational age)
- Subjects undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) treatment
- Fibrinolytic therapy <24 hours before enrollment
- Lumbar puncture or spinal/epidural catheter placement within the past 48 hours
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Danaparoid SodiumAlso: Orgaraninhibits thrombin generation by indirect anti-Xa inhibition and direct inhibition of factor IX activation | Drug | Danaparoid Sodium |
| ArgatrobanSynthetic direct thrombin inhibitor | Drug | Argatroban |
Primary outcome
Composite Efficacy Response
Time frame: Day 44
Efficacy will be assessed by the number of subjects with suspected HIT who respond to treatment. A responder is defined as a subject who has not experienced any of the following from Day 1 to Day 44: 1. New or extended venous and/or arterial thrombosis, including gangrene/skin necrosis 2. All-cause mortality 3. Unplanned amputation, including ischemic gut resection Efficacy endpoints as defined above will be assessed by clinical exam with special attention to assessments for thromboses, gangrene, and skin necrosis. Clinically suspected thrombosis will be confirmed/ruled out by objective measures, e.g. compression ultrasound.
6 secondary outcomes
Consistent increases in platelet count
Time frame: Days 14
Death due to TE or bleeding
Time frame: Day 44
Major Bleeding
Time frame: Day 44
New or extended thrombosis
Time frame: Day 44
Unplanned amputation
Time frame: Day 44
All-cause mortality
Time frame: Day 44
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Prolonged delay as a result of impact of Covid19 pandemic). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Dec 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cangrelor As Treatment for Cardiac Surgery Associated With Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia
Recruiting
Characterization and Quantification of Platelet/Leukocyte Aggregates in Patients With Suspected Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia
Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia, HIT
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
35 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Danaparoid Sodium and Argatroban in people with Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia, run by Aspen Global Incorporated at 35 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 35 sites in Germany, United States, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Russia, Italy and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Prolonged delay as a result of impact of Covid19 pandemic). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composite Efficacy Response (time frame: Day 44). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2022.