AzTrials
AzTrials

HemiplegiaNCT03811106

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) in Stroke-diagnosed Individuals

A study testing NeuromuscularElectricalStimulation+ConventionalPhysiotherapy and Conventional physiotherapy and rehabilitation in people with Hemiplegia, run by Firat University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Specific clinical tools and treatment variables have a key role on the results to be obtained. Therefore, there is a need for well-planned studies on the effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on stroke patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Hemiplegia
What is being tested?
NeuromuscularElectricalStimulation+ConventionalPhysiotherapy and Conventional physiotherapy and rehabilitation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
4 Mar 2019to 4 Nov 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Having a chart of hemiplegia or hemiparesis due to the first story of cerebrovascular accident (SVO)
  • At least 3 months after SVO
  • Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) value ≥ 15
  • Being in the 30 to 80 age range
  • Back extensor muscle spasticity value <4 according to modified Ashworth Scale

Who cannot join

  • Ataxia, dystonia, dyskinesia
  • The presence of lower motor neuron or peripheral nerve lesion
  • Degraded deep senses
  • Detection disorder and dementia
  • Skin and peripheral circulatory disorder
  • History of CVO, bilateral hemiplegia

About this study

Official title: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) Applied to Back Extensors in Stroke Patients; Effects on Functional Capacity and Mobility

Specific clinical tools and treatment variables have a key role on the results to be obtained. Therefore, there is a need for well-planned studies on the effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on stroke patients. Although NMES is frequently used in patients with stroke, scientific evidence regarding back extensor muscle stimulation, functional capacity, balance and mobility efficiency in this patient group is not sufficient. This study was planned to compare controlled individuals with neurological rehabilitation. According to the definition of World Health Organization (WHO) stroke; It is a rapidly developing clinical condition due to local or general impairment of brain functions, without apparent cause other than vascular causes. In the world, the loss of disability and labor force is known as the first and the second cause of deaths.

Post-stroke intensive care and rehabilitation processes vary between countries. For example, in Australia, $ 2.14 billion is spent each year for the treatment of stroke-diagnosed individuals, while US $ 65 million is spent annually. For these reasons, it is very important to choose low-cost, effective and evidence-based physiotherapy approaches for people with stroke. Hemiparesis, which is characterized by a loss of power on one side of the body, is the most common neurological loss after stroke. Patients with hemiparetic stroke often have impaired balance, mobility and functional capacity. This results in a high economic burden and social problem in this person. Among the functional problems after stroke; impaired balance, abnormal walking pattern with abnormal asymmetry, abnormal body and spinal movement can be shown. The most important problem is the loss of mobility; bed activities include sitting and standing. The most important goal of stroke rehabilitation is the recovery of mobility and balance. Changes in walking pattern and balance abilities occur due to motor control loss, spasticity, muscle weakness, joint motion deficit, abnormal movement patterns and sensory dysfunction. In addition to neurophysiological treatment techniques such as Bobath, conventional exercise programs, Brunnstrom and proprioceptive neuromuscular parasilication, with the aim of improving the quality of movement and maintaining the balance in rehabilitation of stroke-diagnosed patients, electrical stimulation is also used.Although the importance of back extensor muscle strength is documented in the literature, it is observed that studies focusing on back extensor muscle strength in limb rehabilitation are limited.

Read more

Control disorders in the posterior extensor muscles after stroke are found to be significantly associated with balance, gait and upper extremity dysfunctions.

Based on this idea, our study was planned to examine the effect of NMEs application on functional capacity, balance and mobility in stroke individuals.

Read the detailed description

Our study will be carried out in Fırat University Training and Research Hospital. Individuals who are diagnosed with stroke by the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Specialist and who are directed to the physiotherapy program will be included. 20 hemiparesis patients who underwent stimulation and conventional physiotherapy and rehabilitation of the back extensors, will constitute 20 volunteer patients who only provided conventional physiotherapy and rehabilitation applications. 20 cases were included in the study and 20 cases as control group. All cases will be informed and approved before they start working.

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Having a chart of hemiplegia or hemiparesis due to the first story of cerebrovascular accident (SVO)
  2. At least 3 months after SVO
  3. Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) value ≥ 15
  4. Being in the 30 to 80 age range
  5. Back extensor muscle spasticity value <4 according to modified Ashworth Scale

Criteria for Inclusion of Patients in the Study

  1. Ataxia, dystonia, dyskinesia
  2. The presence of lower motor neuron or peripheral nerve lesion
  3. Degraded deep senses
  4. Detection disorder and dementia
  5. Skin and peripheral circulatory disorder
  6. History of CVO, bilateral hemiplegia

As demographic characteristics; age, gender, body weight, height of the patients, the hand (dominant hemisphere), occupation and educational status, as a history of the disease; It will be noted whether the patient has undergone SVO or transient ischemic attack. Our neurological evaluation form; Reflexes, sensory defects, cranial nerve lesion, visual disturbances, speech problem and type will be recorded.

All patients will be evaluated after treatment (TS). Spasticity will be graded from 0 to 5 according to the Modified Ashworth Scale.

Postural Assesment of Stroke Scale (PASS), Short Form-36, Adapted Patient Evaluation and Conference System, Stroke Rehabilitation Assesment of Movement (STREAM), Brunel Balance Assessment (BBA), Functional Ambulation Scale(FAS) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) surveys and scales will be used.

Stimulation program, symmetrical biphasic waveform, 50 Hz frequency, 400 μs width flow characteristics are used and the duration of treatment should be 30 min.

The current density will be adjusted to give full contraction of the back extensor muscle at each warning. It will be adjusted separately in each session without any discomfort or pain. In cases where contraction is reduced, the intensity of the current will be increased to achieve the same quality contraction. However, the target muscles outside the muscles will spread to the muscles strong enough to be created.

Statistical analysis of the study will be done with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version IBM Statistic 20. Mann Whitney U test will be used for the differences between the two groups. Comparisons between the pre-treatment and post-treatment values of the patients will be done by Wilcoxon Signed Rank test in dependent groups.

The obtained values will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The differences below p <0.05 would be considered significant.

Conditions
Hemiplegia
Being tested
NeuromuscularElectricalStimulation+ConventionalPhysiotherapy, Conventional physiotherapy and rehabilitation
Keywords
Electrotherapy, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, Stroke
Medical subject headings
Hemiplegia, Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NeuromuscularElectricalStimulation+ConventionalPhysiotherapyDevice

    Sırt ekstansör kaslarına nöromusküler elektrik stimülasyonu uygulanacaktır

  • Conventional physiotherapy and rehabilitationOther

    Konvansiyonel fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon uygulamaları yapılacaktır.

Study groups in NCT03811106
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NMES + PTActive comparatorNMES will be applied to the back muscles with the chattanooga intelect advanced device. In addition, conventional physiotherapy and rehabilitation applications will be made.
Receives: Device: NeuromuscularElectricalStimulation+ConventionalPhysiotherapy
PTOtherConventional physiotherapy and rehabilitation practices will be carried out.
Receives: Other: Conventional physiotherapy and rehabilitation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Effects on Functional Capacity and Mobility

    Survey reviews

    Measured: 8 Months

  2. Brunnel Balance Scale:

    It was developed to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation approaches in stroke patients. Balance performance will be evaluated by 12 tests based on functional performance

    Measured: 8 Months

  3. Stroke Rehabilitation Assesment of Movement (STREAM)

    Specially designed by physiotherapists to ensure the quantitative assessment of motor function in patients with stroke. It is easy to perform in the clinic. The most important advantage of this scale is not only the breadth of active movement but also the quality of the movement. Evaluates voluntary movement and basic mobility separately

    Measured: 8 Months

  4. Functional Ambulation Classification

    Ambulation categories will be determined according to the Functional Ambulation Classification (FAS) developed by Massachusetts General Hospital

    Measured: 8 Months

  5. Adapted Patient Evaluation and Conference System

    The balance states of the patients will be evaluated with the evaluation form of Adapted Patient Evaluation and Conference System (APECS).

    Measured: 8 Months

  6. Postural Assesment of Stroke Scale (PASS)

    It is the scale used to evaluate postural control in stroke. It will be used to evaluate the static and dynamic balance of stroke patients

    Measured: 8 Months

  7. Short Form-36

    Quality of life is evaluated by the Short Form-36 health screening form.

    Measured: 8 Months

  8. Mini Mental State Examination Test

    Cognitive functions will be evaluated on a total of 30 points

    Measured: 8 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jan 2019
  2. Study start4 Mar 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion3 Jul 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion4 Nov 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized Controlled
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
2 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03811106
Sponsor's protocol ID
Firat University
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
15 Jan 2019
Last updated
27 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Marigold DS, Eng JJ. The relationship of asymmetric weight-bearing with postural sway and visual reliance in stroke. Gait Posture. 2006 Feb;23(2):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.03.001.

    PubMed 16399522
  • De Bujanda E, Nadeau S, Bourbonnais D. Pelvic and shoulder movements in the frontal plane during treadmill walking in adults with stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004 Mar-Apr;13(2):58-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.02.006.

    PubMed 17903951
  • Esquenazi A, Ofluoglu D, Hirai B, Kim S. The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on temporal spatial parameters and asymmetry of gait in hemiparetic patients. PM R. 2009 Nov;1(11):1014-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.09.012.

    PubMed 19942187
  • Hummelsheim H, Mauritz KH. [The neurophysiological basis of exercise physical therapy in patients with central hemiparesis]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1993 Jun;61(6):208-16. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999089. German.

    PubMed 8330831
  • Linn SL, Granat MH, Lees KR. Prevention of shoulder subluxation after stroke with electrical stimulation. Stroke. 1999 May;30(5):963-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.5.963.

    PubMed 10229728
  • Karthikbabu S, Nayak A, Vijayakumar K, Misri Z, Suresh B, Ganesan S, Joshua AM. Comparison of physio ball and plinth trunk exercises regimens on trunk control and functional balance in patients with acute stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2011 Aug;25(8):709-19. doi: 10.1177/0269215510397393. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

    PubMed 21504955
  • Dragin AS, Konstantinovic LM, Veg A, Schwirtlich LB. Gait training of poststroke patients assisted by the Walkaround (body postural support). Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Mar;37(1):22-8. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328363ba30.

    PubMed 23820295
  • Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Van de Winckel A, De Weerdt W. Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2007 May;21(5):387-94. doi: 10.1177/0269215507074055.

    PubMed 17613559
  • Saeys W, Vereeck L, Truijen S, Lafosse C, Wuyts FP, Heyning PV. Randomized controlled trial of truncal exercises early after stroke to improve balance and mobility. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(3):231-8. doi: 10.1177/1545968311416822. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

    PubMed 21844283
  • Verheyden G, Vereeck L, Truijen S, Troch M, Lafosse C, Saeys W, Leenaerts E, Palinckx A, De Weerdt W. Additional exercises improve trunk performance after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(3):281-6. doi: 10.1177/1545968308321776. Epub 2008 Oct 27.

    PubMed 18955513
  • Tyson SF, DeSouza LH. Development of the Brunel Balance Assessment: a new measure of balance disability post stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004 Nov;18(7):801-10. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr744oa.

    PubMed 15573837
  • Daley K, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Reliability of scores on the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) measure. Phys Ther. 1999 Jan;79(1):8-19; quiz 20-3.

    PubMed 9920188
  • Huang YC, Wang WT, Liou TH, Liao CD, Lin LF, Huang SW. Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients Scores as a predictor of stroke patient ambulation at discharge from the rehabilitation ward. J Rehabil Med. 2016 Mar;48(3):259-64. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2046.

    PubMed 26667386
  • English C, Hillier S. Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;43(7):565-71. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0824.

    PubMed 21584485
  • de Oliveira CB, de Medeiros IR, Frota NA, Greters ME, Conforto AB. Balance control in hemiparetic stroke patients: main tools for evaluation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(8):1215-26.

    PubMed 19235121

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing NeuromuscularElectricalStimulation+ConventionalPhysiotherapy and Conventional physiotherapy and rehabilitation in people with Hemiplegia, run by Firat University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Effects on Functional Capacity and Mobility (time frame: 8 Months). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03811106, which also lists 17 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in