AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerNCT03811262

Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With PECS II Block in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

A study testing ESP BLOCK and PECS BLOCK in people with Breast Cancer and Anesthesia, Local, run by University of Padova at 1 site in Italy.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Backgroung:Regional anesthesia in breast surgery is of paramount importance to reduce pain in perioperative period. PECS II block is an interfascial block that has been used widely as regional anesthesia technique in breast surgery. ESP block is a novel interfascial block proposed in 2016 by Forero. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer, Anesthesia, Local
What is being tested?
ESP BLOCK and PECS BLOCK
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Jan 2022to Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Mastectomy program with axillary clearence

Who cannot join

  • bilateral surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • University of Padova

    Padova, Veneto, 35127

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With PECS II Block in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery:a Randomized Controlled Trial

Backgroung:Regional anesthesia in breast surgery is of paramount importance to reduce pain in perioperative period.

PECS II block is an interfascial block that has been used widely as regional anesthesia technique in breast surgery.

ESP block is a novel interfascial block proposed in 2016 by Forero. Several reports used this technique in breast surgery to provide analgesia but to date no studies comparing these technique exists.

Our hypotesis is that this two technique are equally able to provide analgesia in breast surgery.

Study type: RCT, single blind.

Being tested
ESP BLOCK, PECS BLOCK
Keywords
PECS, ESP, RCT
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ESP BLOCKProcedure or surgery

    local anesthetic will be injected between transverous process and erector spinae muscle

  • PECS BLOCKProcedure or surgery

    Also called 30 ml 0.25% Levobupivacaine

    local anesthetic will be injected between pectoralis minor and pectoralis major (10 ml) and between pectoralis minor and serratus (20 ml)

Study groups in NCT03811262
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ESP BLOCKActive comparatorIntervention:30 ml of 0.25% Levobupivacaine where: ESP block as described by Forero at T5 level (single injection between transversour process and erector spinae muscles)
Receives: Procedure: ESP BLOCK
PECS blockActive comparatorIntervention:30 ml of 0.25% Levobupivacaine where:PECS II block as described by Blanco.
Receives: Procedure: PECS BLOCK

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intraoperative Fentanyl consumption

    Intraoperative fentanyl dose (mcg) difference between ESP group and PECS group.

    Measured: Intraoperative

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. NRS at 6 hour

    NRS (0-10) difference at sixth postoperative hour between ESP group and PECS group

    Measured: sixth postoperative hour

  2. NRS at 12 hour

    NRS (0-10) difference at twelth postoperative hour between ESP group and PECS group

    Measured: twelth postoperative hour

  3. NRS at 24 hour

    NRS (0-10) difference at twentyfourth postoperative hour between ESP group and PECS group

    Measured: twentyfourth postoperative hour

  4. Patient satisfaction at 24 hour

    Patient satisfaction (0-10) difference regarding anesthesia management at twentyfourth postoperative hour between ESP group and PECS group

    Measured: postoperative period (24h)

  5. Time to first opioid consumption in the postoperative period

    Time (minutes) to first opioid consumption in the postoperative period

    Measured: postoperative period (24h)

  6. Postoperative morphine consumption

    postoperative morphine dose (mg) difference between ESP group and PECS group.

    Measured: postoperative period (24h)

  7. Nausea and vomit incidence

    Incidence of nausea and vomiting in postoperative period

    Measured: postoperative period (24h)

  8. Other complication incidence

    Incidence of other complcations linked to anesthesia in postoperative period

    Measured: postoperative period (24h)

  9. Intraoperative Fentanyl consumption(mcg/kg/h)

    Intraoperative fentanyl dose (mcg/kg/h) difference between ESP group and PECS group.

    Measured: Intraoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jan 2019
  2. Study start1 Jan 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJan 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2023 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Logistic reasons (Operating room performing the surgery investigated moved to another structure)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a single-centre, prospective; double blinded randomised interventional clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to group "PECS" or "ESP" using a closed envelope technique. Group "PECS" will receive PECS II block as described by Blanco using 30 ml Levobupivacaine 0.25% Group "ESP" will receive ESP block as described by forero using 30 ml Levobupivacaine 0.25% at T5 level. Blocks will be executed after general anesthesia induction. All partecipants will receive Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg and Propofol 2 mg/kg for induction. Anesthesia will be mantained with Propofol to obtain a BIS level between 40-50. Patients will receive Fentanyl 33 mcg whenever blood pressure and/or hear rate raise more than 20% from baseline after surgical stimulation. At the end of the surgery patients will receive acetominophen 1 g. postoperative therapy: acetominophen 1g/8hr and ketoprofen 100 mg/12hr. Patients will receive 2 mg Morphine whenever a NRS \> 3.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03811262
Sponsor's protocol ID
ESPvsPECS/AOP
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
17 Jan 2019
Last updated
23 May 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Probably data will be shared at the end of the study

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ESP BLOCK and PECS BLOCK in people with Breast Cancer and Anesthesia, Local, run by University of Padova at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intraoperative Fentanyl consumption (time frame: Intraoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in