TetraplegiaNCT03811301
[BrainConnexion] - Neurodevice Phase I Trial
A study testing BrainConnexion in people with Tetraplegia and Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis, run by National Neuroscience Institute at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the safety of a wireless implantable neurodevice microsystem in tetraplegic patients, as well as the efficacy of the electrodes for long-term recording of neural activities and the successful control of an external device. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tetraplegia, Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis, Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- BrainConnexion
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- 21 Nov 2017to 27 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 21 years old and older
- Tetraparesis
- Written informed consent obtained from the patient or legal representative (in the event where the patient is unable to provide consent) prior to entry into the study in accordance with local EC/IRB regulations and/or other application regulations for surrogate consent.
- Able to perform the pre-operation Brain Computer Interface training as judged by the research team.
Who cannot join
- Significant medical co-morbidities e.g. cardiac disease
- Bleeding disorders
- Any contraindication to surgery
- Other concomitant intracranial pathologies
- History of seizures or epilepsy disorder
- Complications of coagulopathy
Show all 13Show fewer
- Surgically unfit
- Significant psychological issues e.g. Depression
- Poor psychological support
- Pregnancy
- No means of communication
- Any disease, in the opinion of the Investigator, that is unstable or which could jeopardise the safety of the patient
- If applicable, psychological assessment may be performed prior to selection as the implantation process will be a long a stressful event, requiring a significant degree of patient cooperation and resilience.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Neurodevice Phase I: Wireless Implantable Neurodevice Microsystem for Neuroprosthesis and Neuroscience
This study aims to evaluate the safety of a wireless implantable neurodevice microsystem in tetraplegic patients, as well as the efficacy of the electrodes for long-term recording of neural activities and the successful control of an external device.
Read the detailed description
The goal of this study is to develop a miniaturized wireless implantable neurodevice microsystem that records and transmits signals from the motor cortex of tetraplegic patients, bypassing the damaged nervous tissue, to control an external assistive device that restores some form of independence to patients in terms of communication or mobility.
- Conditions
- Tetraplegia, Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis, Spinal Cord Injuries, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Motor Neuron Disease, Locked-in Syndrome
- Being tested
- BrainConnexion
- Medical subject headings
- Quadriplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Motor Neuron Disease, Locked-In Syndrome, Muscular Dystrophies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BrainConnexionDevice
Also called Neurodevice, NeuroPort
A 4.4mm by 4.2mm electrode array is placed onto the surface of the motor cortex which is then connected to a miniaturized neural recording microsystem that transmits signals wirelessly to control an external assistive device. Neural signals are recorded at least once every week for 12 months or longer.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional | Experimental | Wireless Implantable Neurodevice Microsystem Receives: Device: BrainConnexion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The number of serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) reported per patient 12 months post-implantation.
The primary objective of this study is to determine the safety of the device. This will be assessed based on the number of SAEs and AEs reported for each patient during the 12 months post-implantation evaluation. This measure will considered a success if the device is not removed for safety reasons within 12-months after implantation.
Measured: 6 months post-implant
Secondary outcomes (4)
The signal quality of the electrodes for long-term recording of neural signals.
Signal quality will be measured by the number of channels with identifiable single units tracked across each day for 12 months.
Measured: Day 1 to Day 365 post-implant
Decoding accuracy per training session.
Decoding accuracy will be measured in percentage (%).
Measured: Day 1 to Day 365 post-implant
Number of successful trials per session
The number of successful trials per training session will be measured in percentage (%).
Measured: Day 1 to Day 365 post-implant
Time taken to complete each trial per session
This will be measured in seconds (s).
Measured: Day 1 to Day 365 post-implant
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2019
- Study start21 Nov 2017
- Primary completion27 Jan 2023
- Study completion27 Aug 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TetraplegiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Neuroscience Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute of Microelectronics, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Institute for Infocomm Research, Nanyang Technological University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03811301
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BrainConnexion
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 6 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Libedinsky C, So R, Xu Z, Kyar TK, Ho D, Lim C, Chan L, Chua Y, Yao L, Cheong JH, Lee JH, Vishal KV, Guo Y, Chen ZN, Lim LK, Li P, Liu L, Zou X, Ang KK, Gao Y, Ng WH, Han BS, Chng K, Guan C, Je M, Yen SC. Independent Mobility Achieved through a Wireless Brain-Machine Interface. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0165773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165773. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27802344Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, Mukand JA, Saleh M, Caplan AH, Branner A, Chen D, Penn RD, Donoghue JP. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature. 2006 Jul 13;442(7099):164-71. doi: 10.1038/nature04970.
PubMed 16838014Hochberg LR, Bacher D, Jarosiewicz B, Masse NY, Simeral JD, Vogel J, Haddadin S, Liu J, Cash SS, van der Smagt P, Donoghue JP. Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature. 2012 May 16;485(7398):372-5. doi: 10.1038/nature11076.
PubMed 22596161Collinger JL, Wodlinger B, Downey JE, Wang W, Tyler-Kabara EC, Weber DJ, McMorland AJ, Velliste M, Boninger ML, Schwartz AB. High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet. 2013 Feb 16;381(9866):557-64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61816-9. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
PubMed 23253623Aflalo T, Kellis S, Klaes C, Lee B, Shi Y, Pejsa K, Shanfield K, Hayes-Jackson S, Aisen M, Heck C, Liu C, Andersen RA. Neurophysiology. Decoding motor imagery from the posterior parietal cortex of a tetraplegic human. Science. 2015 May 22;348(6237):906-10. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5417.
PubMed 25999506Schwarz DA, Lebedev MA, Hanson TL, Dimitrov DF, Lehew G, Meloy J, Rajangam S, Subramanian V, Ifft PJ, Li Z, Ramakrishnan A, Tate A, Zhuang KZ, Nicolelis MA. Chronic, wireless recordings of large-scale brain activity in freely moving rhesus monkeys. Nat Methods. 2014 Jun;11(6):670-6. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2936. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
PubMed 24776634Yin M, Borton DA, Komar J, Agha N, Lu Y, Li H, Laurens J, Lang Y, Li Q, Bull C, Larson L, Rosler D, Bezard E, Courtine G, Nurmikko AV. Wireless neurosensor for full-spectrum electrophysiology recordings during free behavior. Neuron. 2014 Dec 17;84(6):1170-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
PubMed 25482026Zaaroor M, Kosa G, Peri-Eran A, Maharil I, Shoham M, Goldsher D. Morphological study of the spinal canal content for subarachnoid endoscopy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2006 Aug;49(4):220-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-948000.
PubMed 17041833Lee, K., Singh, A., He, J., Massia, S., Kim, B., & Raupp, G. (2004). Polyimide based neural implants with stiffness improvement. Sensors Actuators B Chem,102(1), 67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2003.10.018.
Cheng, M. Y., Je, M., Tan, K. L., et al. (2013). A low-profile three-dimensional neural probe array using a silicon lead transfer structure. J Micromechanics Microengineering, 23(9), 095013. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/23/9/095013.
Cheng, M. Y., Yao, L., Tan, K. L., Lim, R., Li, P., & Chen, W. (2014). 3D probe array integrated with a front-end 100-channel neural recording ASIC. J Micromechanics Microengineering, 24(12), 125010. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/24/12/125010.
Zou, X., Liu, L., Cheong, J. H., et al. (2013). A 100-Channel 1-mW implantable neural recording IC. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap, 60(10), 2584-2596. doi:10.1109/TCSI.2013.2249175.
Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation. Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation. https://www.christopherreeve.org/. Published 2016.
Technical specifications for short range devices - Issue 1 Rev 7, Apr 2013. https://www.ida.gov.sg/~/media/Files/PCDG/Licensees/StandardsQoS/RadiocomEquipStd/TSSRD.pdf
Liu X, Zhou J, Wang C, et al. An Ultralow-Voltage Sensor Node Processor With Diverse Hardware Acceleration and Cognitive Sampling for Intelligent Sensing. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Express Briefs. 2015;62(12):1149-1153. doi:10.1109/TCSII.2015.2468927.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neurodevice Phase I: Wireless Implantable Neurodevice Microsystem for Neuroprosthesis and Neuroscience
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03811301
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BrainConnexion
- Conditions
- Tetraplegia, Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis, Spinal Cord Injuries, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Motor Neuron Disease, Locked-in Syndrome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Neuroscience InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute of Microelectronics, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Institute for Infocomm Research, Nanyang Technological University
- Study start
- 21 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Aug 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the safety of a wireless implantable neurodevice microsystem in tetraplegic patients, as well as the efficacy of the electrodes for long-term recording of neural activities and the successful control of an external device.
Detailed description
The goal of this study is to develop a miniaturized wireless implantable neurodevice microsystem that records and transmits signals from the motor cortex of tetraplegic patients, bypassing the damaged nervous tissue, to control an external assistive device that restores some form of independence to patients in terms of communication or mobility.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional | Experimental | Device: BrainConnexionWireless Implantable Neurodevice Microsystem |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 21 years old and older
- Tetraparesis
- Written informed consent obtained from the patient or legal representative (in the event where the patient is unable to provide consent) prior to entry into the study in accordance with local EC/IRB regulations and/or other application regulations for surrogate consent.
- Able to perform the pre-operation Brain Computer Interface training as judged by the research team.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Significant medical co-morbidities e.g. cardiac disease
- Bleeding disorders
- Any contraindication to surgery
- Other concomitant intracranial pathologies
- History of seizures or epilepsy disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BrainConnexionAlso: Neurodevice, NeuroPortA 4.4mm by 4.2mm electrode array is placed onto the surface of the motor cortex which is then connected to a miniaturized neural recording microsystem that transmits signals wirelessly to control an external assistive device. Neural signals are recorded at least once every week for 12 months or longer. | Device | Interventional |
Primary outcome
The number of serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) reported per patient 12 months post-implantation.
Time frame: 6 months post-implant
The primary objective of this study is to determine the safety of the device. This will be assessed based on the number of SAEs and AEs reported for each patient during the 12 months post-implantation evaluation. This measure will considered a success if the device is not removed for safety reasons within 12-months after implantation.
4 secondary outcomes
The signal quality of the electrodes for long-term recording of neural signals.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 365 post-implant
Decoding accuracy per training session.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 365 post-implant
Number of successful trials per session
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 365 post-implant
Time taken to complete each trial per session
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 365 post-implant
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2023.
- Background: PubMed 27802344Libedinsky C, So R, Xu Z, Kyar TK, Ho D, Lim C, Chan L, Chua Y, Yao L, Cheong JH, Lee JH, Vishal KV, Guo Y, Chen ZN, Lim LK, Li P, Liu L, Zou X, Ang KK, Gao Y, Ng WH, Han BS, Chng K, Guan C, Je M, Yen SC. Independent Mobility Achieved through a Wireless Brain-Machine Interface. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0165773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165773. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 16838014Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, Mukand JA, Saleh M, Caplan AH, Branner A, Chen D, Penn RD, Donoghue JP. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature. 2006 Jul 13;442(7099):164-71. doi: 10.1038/nature04970.
- Background: PubMed 22596161Hochberg LR, Bacher D, Jarosiewicz B, Masse NY, Simeral JD, Vogel J, Haddadin S, Liu J, Cash SS, van der Smagt P, Donoghue JP. Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature. 2012 May 16;485(7398):372-5. doi: 10.1038/nature11076.
- Background: PubMed 23253623Collinger JL, Wodlinger B, Downey JE, Wang W, Tyler-Kabara EC, Weber DJ, McMorland AJ, Velliste M, Boninger ML, Schwartz AB. High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet. 2013 Feb 16;381(9866):557-64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61816-9. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
- Background: PubMed 25999506Aflalo T, Kellis S, Klaes C, Lee B, Shi Y, Pejsa K, Shanfield K, Hayes-Jackson S, Aisen M, Heck C, Liu C, Andersen RA. Neurophysiology. Decoding motor imagery from the posterior parietal cortex of a tetraplegic human. Science. 2015 May 22;348(6237):906-10. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5417.
- Background: PubMed 24776634Schwarz DA, Lebedev MA, Hanson TL, Dimitrov DF, Lehew G, Meloy J, Rajangam S, Subramanian V, Ifft PJ, Li Z, Ramakrishnan A, Tate A, Zhuang KZ, Nicolelis MA. Chronic, wireless recordings of large-scale brain activity in freely moving rhesus monkeys. Nat Methods. 2014 Jun;11(6):670-6. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2936. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 25482026Yin M, Borton DA, Komar J, Agha N, Lu Y, Li H, Laurens J, Lang Y, Li Q, Bull C, Larson L, Rosler D, Bezard E, Courtine G, Nurmikko AV. Wireless neurosensor for full-spectrum electrophysiology recordings during free behavior. Neuron. 2014 Dec 17;84(6):1170-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
- Background: PubMed 17041833Zaaroor M, Kosa G, Peri-Eran A, Maharil I, Shoham M, Goldsher D. Morphological study of the spinal canal content for subarachnoid endoscopy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2006 Aug;49(4):220-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-948000.
- BackgroundLee, K., Singh, A., He, J., Massia, S., Kim, B., & Raupp, G. (2004). Polyimide based neural implants with stiffness improvement. Sensors Actuators B Chem,102(1), 67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2003.10.018.
- BackgroundCheng, M. Y., Je, M., Tan, K. L., et al. (2013). A low-profile three-dimensional neural probe array using a silicon lead transfer structure. J Micromechanics Microengineering, 23(9), 095013. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/23/9/095013.
- BackgroundCheng, M. Y., Yao, L., Tan, K. L., Lim, R., Li, P., & Chen, W. (2014). 3D probe array integrated with a front-end 100-channel neural recording ASIC. J Micromechanics Microengineering, 24(12), 125010. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/24/12/125010.
- BackgroundZou, X., Liu, L., Cheong, J. H., et al. (2013). A 100-Channel 1-mW implantable neural recording IC. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap, 60(10), 2584-2596. doi:10.1109/TCSI.2013.2249175.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Transspinal Stimulation With and Without Blood Flow Restricted Exercise Via Telehealth in Persons With Tetraplegia
Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis
Recruiting
A Neuroprosthesis for Seated Posture and Balance
Spinal Cord Injury, Paralysis
Recruiting
Feasibility of the BrainGate2 Neural Interface System in Persons With Tetraplegia (BG-Tablet-01)
Brainstem Stroke, ALS
Recruiting
Augmenting Upper Limb Function and Functional Neuroplasticity Using Epidural Stimulation of the Cervical Spinal Cord
Spinal Cord Injuries, Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Nerve Transfer Surgery to Restore Upper-limb Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing BrainConnexion in people with Tetraplegia and Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis, run by National Neuroscience Institute at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The number of serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) reported per patient 12 months post-implantation. (time frame: 6 months post-implant). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03811301, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2023.