AzTrials
AzTrials

Fecal IncontinenceNCT03811821

Fecal Incontinence Treatment (FIT) Study

A study testing Biofeedback and Injection in people with Fecal Incontinence and Bowel Incontinence, run by Mayo Clinic at 6 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients with severe fecal incontinence (FI), defined as two or more episodes of staining, solid or liquid FI per week, and who meet the inclusion criteria for Injection of Solesta (INJ; an inert bulking agent), or Biofeedback (BIO) will be enrolled. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Fecal Incontinence, Bowel Incontinence
What is being tested?
Biofeedback and Injection
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
275 participants
Where
6 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2019to 27 Jan 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Physician diagnosis of FI (R15) for the past 6 months or longer.
  • Able to ambulate independently on level surfaces. Patient may use assistive devices other than parallel bars.
  • Average >2 staining, solid or liquid FI episodes per week by self-report and during the two-week baseline
  • Meets criteria for dextranomer treatment except an internal anal sphincter defect of 180 degrees or less is acceptable.
  • Less than 75% reduction in the number of FI episodes after 4 weeks of conservative treatment.
  • Age >=18 years

Who cannot join

  • Dementia, assessed using the Six-Item Screener to Identify Cognitive Impairment.
  • Obstetrical injuries including third and fourth degree tears in the anal sphincter within the past 6 months.
  • Pregnant or planning pregnancy in next 2 years
  • Internal anal sphincter separation >180 degrees on ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging
  • Spinal cord injury or spina bifida
  • Congenital malformation of anus or rectum
Show all 23Show fewer
  • Complete rectal prolapse or grade III/IV hemorrhoids
  • History of ileoanal pouch; history of anal sphincteroplasty, rectopexy, or rectocele repair within the past 6 months; or history of pelvic surgery with synthetic graft and suspected graft erosion into the anus, rectum, or skin or if the graft ends less than approximately 1" above the upper limit of the anal canal.
  • Established diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Intestinal stoma present
  • History of pelvic radiation within previous 12 months or presence of active radiation proctitis.
  • Patients who cannot expel the rectal balloon during the balloon expulsion test and who have constipation most of the time.
  • Anatomic limitations to placement of dextranomer injections.
  • Presence of existing implant in the anal or rectal region
  • Allergy to hyaluronic acid-based products
  • Active anal or rectal conditions in the last 6 months including abscess, fissures, sepsis, significant bleeding, proctitis, colovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas, anal or rectal tumors, or other infections.
  • The patient's physician believes it is unsafe for the patient to temporarily stop anticoagulants for any test procedures and treatments associated with the study.
  • Patients who have 4 or more days with 4 or more bowel movements classed as a 6 or 7 on the Bristol Stool Scale per day in either (any) week bowel movements classed as a 6 or 7 during the Baseline will be excluded.
  • Patients with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, severe diabetic neuropathy documented by electromyography (EMG), and neurodegenerative disorder.
  • Patients currently receiving immunotherapy or chemotherapy.
  • Significant anal pain in the last 6 months.
  • Unwillingness of participant to stop using over-the-counter medications, herbal supplements, or prescribed medications for the purpose of modifying stool consistency, that are not included in the approved medications list (loperamide, laxatives, fiber supplements, and Questran are approved medications), for the duration of the research study.
  • Medical history will be documented to test for predictors of response.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

United States6 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Augusta University Medical College of Georgia

    Augusta, Georgia, 30912

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35801

  • The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Ltd.

    Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparative Effectiveness of Biofeedback and Injectable Bulking Agents for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Treatment (FIT) Study

Patients with severe fecal incontinence (FI), defined as two or more episodes of staining, solid or liquid FI per week, and who meet the inclusion criteria for Injection of Solesta (INJ; an inert bulking agent), or Biofeedback (BIO) will be enrolled. The baseline rate of FI will be assessed using a 2-week daily stool diary. All participants will initially be enrolled into a 4-week trial of Enhanced Medical Management (EMM; education, pelvic floor exercises, and use of non-prescription drugs to normalize stool consistency). Those who demonstrate at least a 75% reduction in FI frequency will not be randomized to one of the two treatment groups but will be followed-up for two years. Those not showing a 75% reduction in FI frequency will be randomized to BIO or INJ and will be evaluated three months later with respect to efficacy for reducing the frequency of fecal incontinence, safety of the interventions, and cost of providing care. All participants who experience a 75% decrease in FI after three months of treatment, compared to baseline, will be followed-up for a further 21 months, for a total of 24 months from the time of treatment initiation. To assess the long-term response to treatment, those who improve less than 75% in FI episodes will be offered an additional treatment with either the treatment to which they were not randomized or sacral nerve stimulation (SNS). Anorectal manometry and Magnetic Evoked Potentials will be used to subtype the physiological basis for FI. Quality of life and psychological factors will be used to assess outcomes.

Read the detailed description

This is an unmasked, multisite, randomized, parallel group study comparing the effectiveness of two treatments [BIO and INJ] for moderate to severe FI:

  1. Baseline: Participants will keep a daily symptom diary for two weeks to (a) document that they meet the minimum frequency required for inclusion in the study and (b) provide a reference value for assessing treatment response at the end of EMM and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up points.
  2. EMM: All participants meeting inclusion criteria will first be treated with EMM for 4 weeks. The key components of treatment are patient education about the basic physiological mechanisms for defecation, diet and medication to normalize stool consistency, and pelvic floor exercises taught by printed instructions. Additional goals of the EMM protocol are (a) to ensure that participants randomized to BIO or INJ meet the accepted criteria for these treatments by failing to respond to EMM, and (b) to document the efficacy and the durability of systematically applied, optimized EMM. Patients who are responders to EMM will be followed up 3 months later; those who remain responders will be continued on EMM and followed for the remaining 24 months of the study. However, those who are no longer responders to this conservative treatment after 3 months will be invited to be randomized to BIO or INJ and all outcome measures will be assessed at 3 months from initiation of the treatment arm to which they are randomized. They will be pooled with other patients randomly assigned to the same treatment for the primary analyses and will be assessed at 6 months.
  3. Randomly assigned treatment: Each participant who fails the EMM will be randomly assigned to BIO or INJ and treated as follows:
  • BIO will consist of 5-6 one-hour training sessions spaced at weekly intervals. These will occur in the first 5-6 weeks of treatment. Treatment approaches will include strength training in all participants, sensory training for participants with hyposensitivity, and/or urge-resistance training for participants with hypersensitivity to the sensations caused by rectal distention. Home exercises will be assigned to participants to practice these skills, and these will be guided by a brochure.
  • INJ will include a preparation for treatment and a treatment visit. The preparation will involve prophylactic antibiotics for the day of the procedure and minimal restrictions on food intake. On the day of the procedure, a physician will inject 1 ml of dextranomer into each of 4 quadrants of the rectum proximal to the dentate line. Ten seconds will be allowed to pass before the injection needle is withdrawn to minimize drainage of the dextranomer. The participant will be scheduled to return in 6 weeks for possible repeat injection of a second 4 ml of dextranomer. At this second appointment, if FI has improved by 75% or more compared to baseline, the participant will be continued without a second injection. However, if the rate of FI is greater than 75% of baseline, the participant will be offered a second injection of dextranomer.
  1. Combination therapy: The primary assessment of efficacy is at 3 months following the first treatment visit completed, and participants who have not achieved at least a 75% reduction in FI frequency compared to baseline will be classified as treatment failures; they will be invited to choose the treatment to which they were not randomized or SNS as an adjunctive treatment for the remaining months of the study. One reason for this is to increase the likelihood that participant will consent to be randomized despite possibly having a priori preferences for one of the two treatments. Thus, the participants who add a second treatment and continue to be monitored up to 24 months will constitute a pragmatic clinical trial (i.e., the study design for these participants going forward emulates the clinical situation in which patients who have an unsatisfactory response to a treatment are offered a new treatment or an ancillary treatment).
  2. Long-term follow-up: An intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy will be carried out at 6, 12 and 24 months. For these analyses, all participants randomized to treatment will be included in the analysis. All treatments will continue to be active. The bulking agents injected in the INJ treatment will remain in place. For BIO, participants will be encouraged to continue to practice pelvic floor exercises and enhanced awareness of rectal sensations following the initial training period. Participants who withdraw from the study or who fail treatment at 3 months will be evaluated as treatment failures in follow-up analyses of efficacy. Data will be collected from participants who add an alternative treatment at 3 months, but these data will not be considered in this analysis. Safety data will be collected at every visit. Participants who are responders at 3 months will continue to monitor symptoms for an additional 21 months (2 years total) whereas participants who are non-responders at 3 months will be retained as treatment failures in the long-term analysis of the comparative effectiveness of the BIO and INJ treatments. For longitudinal assessments of safety, cost, and secondary outcomes such as quality of life and FI severity scales, statistical models will include data from follow up time points through 24 months.
  3. Adjust for Expectation of Benefit: In a trial comparing behavioral and medical therapy, participants cannot be masked. The validated Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire was developed to assess the patient's expectation of benefit after initial exposure to treatment and was used in previous studies to determine whether there is equipoise between the active and control conditions in behavioral treatment trials.
  4. Characterization of Enhanced Medical Treatment - Durability of improvement and predictors of response: The primary purpose of treating all participants with an EMM run-in is to be able to exclude participants who do not require more costly interventions. However, the investigators will take advantage of the opportunity provided by this run-in study to identify predictors of response to EMM and to assess the durability of improvements. EMM will not be "usual care" but will follow a written protocol that is intended to optimize EMM, which is why this is labelled enhanced medical management. Participants who are treatment responders at the end of the EMM run-in will be scheduled for 3-month follow-up, and those who are no longer treatment responders at 3 months follow-up will be offered an opportunity to be randomized to one of the 3 treatments at this point. However, those who remain responders to EMM at 3 months follow-up will continue to be followed for an additional 21 months. All participants, regardless of their outcomes at the end of EMM, will be encouraged to continue using the treatment approaches learned during the EMM phase.

Each participant will be studied for 24-27 months after completing the month of EMM and the anticipated duration of the study is 4.5 years from first enrollment to completion of the last participant. Approximately 285 adult participants, both male and female, will be recruited for EMM to ensure that 194 participants who did not benefit from EMM will be available for randomization to the two treatment arms (97 per treatment arm). The participants may be referred by clinicians or may respond to posted advertisements about the study.

Being tested
Biofeedback, Injection
Keywords
Accidental Bowel Leakage, Fecal Incontinence, Biofeedback, Sacral Nerve Stimulation, Injectable Bulking Agents, Enhanced Medical Management
Medical subject headings
Fecal Incontinence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BiofeedbackBehavioural

    The participant will learn how to improve strength and rectal sensation during five (5) - six (6) visits each lasting 60 minutes.

  • InjectionDevice

    The participant will have a bulking agent injected into rectal wall to narrow opening. Two visits each lasting 45 minutes at weeks 0 and 6 respectively.

Study groups in NCT03811821
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Biofeedback (BIO)Active comparatorParticipants will receive biofeedback intervention during five (5) required weekly 1-hour sessions. A 6th treatment session will be made available for participants if it is shown through anorectal manometry that they are having trouble understanding directions given during the first five sessions.
Receives: Behavioral: Biofeedback
Injection (INJ)Active comparatorBulking agent injected into rectal wall to narrow opening. Two visits each lasting 45 minutes at weeks 0 and 6 respectively.
Receives: Device: Injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Treatment Response Defined as a 75% or Greater Change in Number of Average Weekly FI Episodes at Month 3 Follow-Up Compared to Baseline

    FI episodes will be assessed using a validated symptom diary at Baseline and at three months follow-up.

    Measured: 3-month follow-up

  2. Proportion of Participants With Specified Adverse Events at Month 3 Follow-Up

    Adverse events of pelvic pain of grade II or higher based on Common Terminology Criteria for AE (CTCAE) criteria, treatment site infection, or serious adverse events (SAEs) requiring hospitalization.

    Measured: 3-month follow-up

  3. Treatment Costs at Month 3 Follow-Up

    Costs will be measured in three categories: (a) Procedure costs based on number of treatment visits and Medicare reimbursement rates. (b) Patient direct costs for travel and parking for visits. (c) Indirect costs of time losses resulting from attending visits. These costs will be combined to establish overall societal costs.

    Measured: 3-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change in the Severity of FI as Assessed Using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Scale

    Treatment effect on the severity of FI at 3-month follow-up, compared to baseline, will be assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Scale, a validated FI severity scale which incorporates the frequency of different types of stool loss (solid, liquid, staining and a combination), the circumstances surrounding FI (urgency, passive, combined, or neither), and volume of leakage. Higher scores indicate more severe fecal incontinence. Assessed at Baseline, Months 6, 12, and 24.

    Measured: up to 24 months

  2. Change in Quality of Life as Assessed Using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale

    Treatment effect on the impact of FI on quality of life will be assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale which contains 29 items and is scored for four subscales: Lifestyle, Coping/Behavior, Depression/Self-Perception, and Embarrassment. Scores for each item range from 1 - 4 with 1 indicating a lower functional status of quality of life. Scale scores are the average (mean) response to all items after adjusting for missing and not applicable items. Assessed at Baseline, Months 6, 12, and 24.

    Measured: up to 24 months

  3. Change in Psychological Distress as Assessed Using the 7-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Scale

    One of the measures of psychological distress is the 7-item PROMIS Anxiety Scale for which higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. The Anxiety Scale (SF 7a) has a score range of 5 - 35. Assessed at Baseline, Months 6, 12, and 24.

    Measured: up to 24 months

  4. Change in Psychological Distress as Assessed Using the 8-item PROMIS Depression Scale

    One of the measures of psychological distress is the 8-item PROMIS Depression Scale for which higher scores indicate higher levels of depression. The Depression Scale (SF 8a) has a score range of 5 - 40. Assessed at Baseline, Months 6, 12, and 24.

    Measured: up to 24 months

  5. Change in Psychological Distress as Assessed Using the 8-item PROMIS Self-Efficacy Symptom Management Scale

    One of the measures of psychological distress is the 8-item PROMIS Self-Efficacy Symptom Management Scale for which higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy. The Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms Scale (SF 8a) has a score range of 5 - 40. Assessed at Baseline, Months 6, 12, and 24.

    Measured: up to 24 months

  6. Number of Participants With Reduction of 50% or More in Average Weekly FI Episodes

    Assessed at Baseline, Months 6, 12, and 24.

    Measured: up to 24 months

  7. Proportion of Participants Who Are Continent

    Assessed at Baseline, Months 6, 12, and 24.

    Measured: up to 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jan 2019
  2. Study start1 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion16 May 2024
  4. Study completion27 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants who do not demonstrate at least a 75% reduction in FI following a 4-week trial of EMM will be randomized to one of two treatments (INJ or BIO) and assessed after three months. All participants who experience a 75% decrease in FI after three months of treatment, compared to baseline, will then be followed-up for two years. To assess the long-term response to treatment, those who demonstrate an improvement of less than 75% in FI episodes will be offered an additional treatment with either the treatment to which they were not initially randomized or SNS. An anticipated 285 participants will be enrolled in the EMM to ensure a sample size of 97 in each of the two treatments arms.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
275 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03811821
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-004651
Other IDs
1U01DK115575-01
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
17 Jan 2019
Last updated
6 Apr 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina (UNC).

Publications

  • Bharucha AE, Rao SSC, Whitehead WE, Meyer I, Chey WD, Gantz MG, Richter HE, Chua HK, Heymen S, Lu TT, Menees SB, Perry WRG, Sridhar A, Szarka LA, Busby-Whitehead J, Hamilton FA. Comparative Effectiveness of Biofeedback vs Dextranomer-Hyaluronate Injection for Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Oct 6:S1542-3565(26)00746-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2026.09.040. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42838314
  • Rehman MA, Heymen S, Rao SSC, Chey WD, Whitehead WE, Meyer I, Gantz MG, Richter HE, Menees SB, Oblizajek NR, Szarka LA, Busby-Whitehead J, Bailey KR, Hamilton FA, Bharucha AE. Effectiveness of Medical-Behavioral Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Sep 25:S1542-3565(26)00727-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2026.09.024. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42790838
  • Butt MF, Rao SSC, Meyer I, Chey WD, Whitehead WE, Richter HE, Menees SB, Busby-Whitehead J, Lamichhane R, Chen J, Hamilton FA, Bharucha AE. Cluster Analysis of Fecal Incontinence Symptoms: Associations With Anorectal Physiology and Quality of Life. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Jul;24(7):1981-1994. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.11.015. Epub 2025 Nov 24.

    PubMed 41297739

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Biofeedback and Injection in people with Fecal Incontinence and Bowel Incontinence, run by Mayo Clinic at 6 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Treatment Response Defined as a 75% or Greater Change in Number of Average Weekly FI Episodes at Month 3 Follow-Up Compared to Baseline (time frame: 3-month follow-up). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03811821, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in