Major Depressive DisorderPhase 4NCT03812588
Contact: Developing New Clinical Management Strategies
A Phase 4 study testing Escitalopram in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by New York State Psychiatric Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to develop new methods of administering antidepressant medications that will result in improved drug/placebo separation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and enhanced medication response in open clinical treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Depressive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Escitalopram
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Jan 2019to 1 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Inclusion Criteria Method of Ascertainment
- Men and women aged 18-75 years 1. Clinical interview
- Diagnosis with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) V Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) 2. Clinical interview, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V
- 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score ≥ 16 and ≤ 28; 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score < 25 3. HRSD by trained rater
- Capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures 4. Clinical interview
- Using appropriate contraceptive method if woman of child-bearing age and not currently pregnant 5. Clinical interview
Who cannot join
- Current comorbid Axis I DSM V disorder other than Mild Substance Use Disorder, Adjustment Disorder, Anxiety Disorder or Personality Disorder 1. Clinical interview, SCID
- Diagnosis of Moderate to Severe Substance Use Disorder within the past 12 months 2. Clinical interview, SCID, Urine tox
- present or past history of psychosis, psychotic disorder, mania, or bipolar disorder 3. Clinical interview, SCID
- baseline HRSD 24-item score > 28 or HRSD suicide item > 2 or baseline HRSD 17-item score ≥ 25 4. HRSD by trained rater
- History of allergic or adverse reaction to escitalopram, or non-response to adequate trial of escitalopram (at least 4 weeks at dose of 20mg) during the current episode 5. Clinical interview
- Current treatment with psychotherapy, antidepressants, antipsychotics, or mood stabilizers 6. Clinical interview
- CGI-Severity score of 6 or greater at baseline 7. CGI based on Clinical interview
- Acute, severe, or unstable medical illness 8. Clinical interview, Physical Exam, Screening Labs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
New York State Psychiatric Institute
New York, New York, 10032
About this study
Official title: Developing New Clinical Management Strategies for Antidepressant Treatments
The goal of this study is to develop new methods of administering antidepressant medications that will result in improved drug/placebo separation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and enhanced medication response in open clinical treatment. The highly intensive, weekly visit schedule followed in most antidepressant RCTs radically differs from how antidepressant medications are prescribed in standard clinical practice and is believed to be a major reason why the majority of studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fail to show a significant difference between medication and placebo. Moreover, a "one size fits all" approach to psychopharmacologic management (i.e., weekly visits for all patients) does not take into account differences between patients that may predispose some individuals to respond positively to frequent follow-up visits, while others may respond negatively or not at all. Clinic visits comprise multiple components that may be therapeutic for depression, including activating patients' behavior, exposing them to medical procedures, permitting social interactions with research staff, and providing supportive meetings with clinicians. Two independent meta-analyses have associated more frequent study visits with increased antidepressant and placebo response as well as decreased separation between medication and placebo. Despite the high costs and potential disadvantages of weekly follow-up visits for patients receiving antidepressant medication, this clinical management strategy has not been studied prospectively to date. It is unknown whether weekly follow-up visits are needed to ensure treatment compliance and patient safety in clinical trials and to what degree contacts with clinicians influence medication and placebo response.
Read the detailed description
This study utilizes a 2 x 2, double-blind, acute, prospective design randomizing adult
outpatients with MDD to "Research Frequency Management" (RFM, weekly study visits) vs. "Community Frequency Management" (CFM, every 4 weeks study visits) and antidepressant medication vs. placebo. Specifying visit frequency as the independent variable in this study has the distinct advantages of being easily operationalized for research purposes avoiding a priori assumptions about which components of study visits influence antidepressant and placebo response (i.e., behavioral activation vs. doctor-patient relationship vs. medical procedures). Close monitoring of all subjects will be assured by telephone evaluations of individuals randomized to CFM at intervals between monthly visits, and additional study contacts will be scheduled as necessary to maintain patient safety (all extra-protocol contacts will be recorded and included as a variable in outcome analyses). Additionally, subjects will be characterized extensively on clinical, demographic, and psychological measures to pilot the study assessment battery and search for predictor variables influencing the effects of contact frequency on medication and placebo response.
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Being tested
- Escitalopram, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Major
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EscitalopramDrug
Also called Lexapro
Escitalopram is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) medication that appears to help with symptoms of depression by increasing the availability of specific chemicals in the brain.
PlaceboDrug
A placebo (or dummy pill) is an inert (inactive) substance, typically a tablet, capsule or other dose form that does not contain an active drug ingredient.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Frequency Management: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Research Frequency Management: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Clinical Frequency Management: Escitalopram | Active comparator | Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. Receives: Drug: Escitalopram |
| Research Frequency Management: Escitalopram | Active comparator | Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. Receives: Drug: Escitalopram |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks)
Scale for depressive symptoms administered by trained rater. The Hamilton is the standard measure of depression severity for clinical trials of antidepressants and was chosen as the primary outcome measure over other depression rating scales to ensure compatibility of study results with our meta-analyses and ongoing studies of expectancy. The scoring is based on the first 24 items of the Hamilton.
Sum of the scores of the first 24 items (range from 0 to 74):
0-7 = NORMAL 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression >=23 = Very Severe Depression
Measured: Up to 8 Weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 14-item Scale
Scale for anxiety symptoms administered by trained rater. The Hamilton Anxiety is a standard measure of anxiety severity in pharmacotherapy studies that has been shown to have acceptable reliability and validity in studies of depressed patients. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
Measured: Up to 8 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2019
- Study start30 Jan 2019
- Primary completion27 May 2020
- Study completion1 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Major Depressive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- New York State Psychiatric Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Haifa
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bret Rutherford, New York State Psychiatric Institute
- Investigators
- Bret Rutherford, MD, Principal investigator, New York State Psychiatric Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03812588
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 7738
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 21 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Developing New Clinical Management Strategies for Antidepressant Treatments
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03812588
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 7738
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- New York State Psychiatric InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Haifa
- Study start
- 30 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 Apr 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to develop new methods of administering antidepressant medications that will result in improved drug/placebo separation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and enhanced medication response in open clinical treatment. The highly intensive, weekly visit schedule followed in most antidepressant RCTs radically differs from how antidepressant medications are prescribed in standard clinical practice and is believed to be a major reason why the majority of studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fail to show a significant difference between medication and placebo. Moreover, a "one size fits all" approach to psychopharmacologic management (i.e., weekly visits for all patients) does not take into account differences between patients that may predispose some individuals to respond positively to frequent follow-up visits, while others may respond negatively or not at all. Clinic visits comprise multiple components that may be therapeutic for depression, including activating patients' behavior, exposing them to medical procedures, permitting social interactions with research staff, and providing supportive meetings with clinicians. Two independent meta-analyses have associated more frequent study visits with increased antidepressant and placebo response as well as decreased separation between medication and placebo. Despite the high costs and potential disadvantages of weekly follow-up visits for patients receiving antidepressant medication, this clinical management strategy has not been studied prospectively to date. It is unknown whether weekly follow-up visits are needed to ensure treatment compliance and patient safety in clinical trials and to what degree contacts with clinicians influence medication and placebo response.
Detailed description
This study utilizes a 2 x 2, double-blind, acute, prospective design randomizing adult
outpatients with MDD to "Research Frequency Management" (RFM, weekly study visits) vs. "Community Frequency Management" (CFM, every 4 weeks study visits) and antidepressant medication vs. placebo. Specifying visit frequency as the independent variable in this study has the distinct advantages of being easily operationalized for research purposes avoiding a priori assumptions about which components of study visits influence antidepressant and placebo response (i.e., behavioral activation vs. doctor-patient relationship vs. medical procedures). Close monitoring of all subjects will be assured by telephone evaluations of individuals randomized to CFM at intervals between monthly visits, and additional study contacts will be scheduled as necessary to maintain patient safety (all extra-protocol contacts will be recorded and included as a variable in outcome analyses). Additionally, subjects will be characterized extensively on clinical, demographic, and psychological measures to pilot the study assessment battery and search for predictor variables influencing the effects of contact frequency on medication and placebo response.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Frequency Management: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboStudy visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. |
| Research Frequency Management: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboWeekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. |
| Clinical Frequency Management: Escitalopram | Active comparator | Drug: EscitalopramStudy visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. |
| Research Frequency Management: Escitalopram | Active comparator | Drug: EscitalopramWeekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Inclusion Criteria Method of Ascertainment
- Men and women aged 18-75 years 1. Clinical interview
- Diagnosis with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) V Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) 2. Clinical interview, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V
- 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score ≥ 16 and ≤ 28; 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score < 25 3. HRSD by trained rater
- Capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures 4. Clinical interview
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Current comorbid Axis I DSM V disorder other than Mild Substance Use Disorder, Adjustment Disorder, Anxiety Disorder or Personality Disorder 1. Clinical interview, SCID
- Diagnosis of Moderate to Severe Substance Use Disorder within the past 12 months 2. Clinical interview, SCID, Urine tox
- present or past history of psychosis, psychotic disorder, mania, or bipolar disorder 3. Clinical interview, SCID
- baseline HRSD 24-item score > 28 or HRSD suicide item > 2 or baseline HRSD 17-item score ≥ 25 4. HRSD by trained rater
- History of allergic or adverse reaction to escitalopram, or non-response to adequate trial of escitalopram (at least 4 weeks at dose of 20mg) during the current episode 5. Clinical interview
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EscitalopramAlso: LexaproEscitalopram is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) medication that appears to help with symptoms of depression by increasing the availability of specific chemicals in the brain. | Drug | Clinical Frequency Management: Escitalopram, Research Frequency Management: Escitalopram |
| PlaceboA placebo (or dummy pill) is an inert (inactive) substance, typically a tablet, capsule or other dose form that does not contain an active drug ingredient. | Drug | Clinical Frequency Management: Placebo, Research Frequency Management: Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks)
Time frame: Up to 8 Weeks
Scale for depressive symptoms administered by trained rater. The Hamilton is the standard measure of depression severity for clinical trials of antidepressants and was chosen as the primary outcome measure over other depression rating scales to ensure compatibility of study results with our meta-analyses and ongoing studies of expectancy. The scoring is based on the first 24 items of the Hamilton. Sum of the scores of the first 24 items (range from 0 to 74): 0-7 = NORMAL 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression >=23 = Very Severe Depression
1 secondary outcome
Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 14-item Scale
Time frame: Up to 8 Weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Apr 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 1
Neuropharmacologic Imaging and Biomarker Assessments of Response to Acute and Repeated-Dosed Ketamine Infusions in Major Depressive Disorder
Healthy Volunteer, Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Vortioxetine in Japanese Pediatric Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of Wearable Core Body Temperature-Based Circadian Rhythm Digital Biomarkers
Mood Disorders, Major Depressive Diorder
Recruiting
Digital Intervention for Physical Activity
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety
RecruitingPhase 2
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bret Rutherford, MD principal investigator
New York State Psychiatric Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Escitalopram in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by New York State Psychiatric Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Apr 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks) (time frame: Up to 8 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.