Respiratory Tract InfectionsPhase 2/3NCT03812900
Superiority of Newly Developed Over Basic Echinacea Formulations for the Treatment of Respiratory Tract Infections
A Phase 2/3 study testing Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract in people with Respiratory Tract Infections, run by A. Vogel AG at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
This is a comparative, conceptual, randomized clinical study to investigate newly developed over basic Echinacea formulations for the treatment of acute symptoms of respiratory tract infections. 400 adults will be recruited, of which approximately 300 will develop a common cold or a influenza-like infection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Tract Infections
- What is being tested?
- Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 246 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 27 Nov 2018to 7 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 18 years old
- Signed Informed Consent
Who cannot join
- Younger than 18 years
- Participation in another clinical study in the past 30 days
- Permanent intake of antimicrobial, antiviral, immune suppressive substances
- Surgical intervention in the 3 months prior to inclusion or planned surgery during period of observation
- Known diabetes melitus
- Known and treated atopy or asthma bronchiale
Show all 14Show fewer
- Cystic fibrosis, bronchopulmonale dysplasia, COPD
- Known diseases of the immune system, degenerative illnesses (e.g. auto-immune disorders like AIDS or leukemia, myeloma)
- Known metabolic or resorptive disorders
- Known chronic liver diseases (chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis)
- Known chronic kidney insufficiency
- Serious health issues (reduced health status, autoimmune illness, tumorous illness)
- Known allergy to plants of compositae family (camomille, dandelion) or to any substances of the investigational product
- At inclusion known pregnancy or planned pregnancy during period of investigation (required: active contraception for women of childbearing year)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparative, Conceptual, Randomized Clinical Study to Investigate Superiority of Newly Developed Over Basic Echinacea Formulations for the Treatment of Acute Symptoms of Respiratory Tract Infections
This is a comparative, conceptual, randomized clinical study to investigate newly developed over basic Echinacea formulations for the treatment of acute symptoms of respiratory tract infections. 400 adults will be recruited, of which approximately 300 will develop a common cold or a influenza-like infection. Two newly developed and two existing Echinacea formulations (solid/liquid) will be randomly dispensed at inclusion for treatment of maximal 3 infections. Treatment starts at first signs of infection and lasts for a maximum of 10 days or until symptom resolution. Nasopharynx samples will be collected for analysis of common viral respiratory agents throughout treatment. Safety and efficacy variables will be assessed.
Read the detailed description
The monocentre trial compares two newly developed pharmaceutical forms of Echinacea (extract from Echinacea purpurea Herba and Radix; lozenges or spray) with two basic and authorised pharmaceutical forms (tablets or drops; comparator groups) for the treatment of acute symptoms of the common cold and/or influenza-like illness (ILI) in adults. Trial subjects are preventatively screened and included in the study (n = 400). If they show acute symptoms of a common cold or ILI during the study period, they are instructed to call the study centre to have confirmed the indication for treatment and begin with the treatment, they are randomized to (1:1:1:1 randomization into one of four groups). The primary endpoint is the time until remission of respiratory symptoms with the new pharmaceutical forms compared to the basic forms during the first episode. Secondary endpoints include remission of all treated episodes (max. 3 episodes), remission times comparison between different pharmaceutical forms (e.g. lozenges vs. spray, lozenges vs. drops etc), reduction of viral load on day 5 and 9 compared to day 1 of treatment (nasopharyngeal swabs), differences in safety (blood parameters before and during treatment), differences in number of adverse events, tolerance and efficacy assessed by the patients.
- Conditions
- Respiratory Tract Infections
- Being tested
- Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Tract Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extractDrug
Different galenic forms with Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract from herb and roots (95:5%)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Formulation A | Experimental | Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract lozenges (novel formulation) Receives: Drug: Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract |
| Formulation B | Experimental | Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract spray (novel formulation) Receives: Drug: Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract |
| Formulation C | Active comparator | Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract tablet (basic formulation, reference) Receives: Drug: Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract |
| Formulation D | Active comparator | Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract, drops (basic formulation, reference) Receives: Drug: Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to remission from initial episodes
duration until respiratory symptoms are solved
Measured: maximally 10 days
Secondary outcomes (16)
Time to remission from overall episodes
duration until respiratory symptoms are solved
Measured: maximally 10 days
Cross-comparison of remissions between formulations
duration until respiratory symptoms are solved
Measured: maximally 10 days
Development of single respiratory symptoms
Comparison of respiratory symptom scores between formulations, adapted Jackson Score [0-3, 0=absent, 3=severe]
Measured: maximally 10 days
Development of respiratory symptom sum score
Comparison of symptom sum scores between formulations, adapted Jackson Score [0-27, each 0=absent, 3=severe]
Measured: maximally 10 days
Absence from School/Work
Number of days absent from work or school
Measured: during acute respiratory episodes, 7 days each
Reduction of viral load in nasopharyngeal samples
Comparison of virus titer at day 5 and 9 i.c. to day 1
Measured: day 1, day 5, day 9
Subjective assessment of efficacy by patient
Comparisons of subjective efficacy assessments between patients [0=poor; 1=moderate; 2=good; 3=very good]. Inofficial scale and and global method of assessing patients satisfaction re efficacy.
Measured: At end of treatment cycle of 10 days
Blood safety (red and white cell count)
Change of blood parameters before (V1) and after treatment (V2)
Measured: At Inclusion visit and day 5 of infection
Blood safety (creatinin [umol/l])
Change of blood parameters before (V1) and after treatment (V2)
Measured: At Inclusion visit and day 5 of infection
Blood safety (ALT [ukat/l])
Change of blood parameters before (V1) and after treatment (V2)
Measured: At Inclusion visit and day 5 of infection
Blood safety (AST [ukat/l])
Change of blood parameters before (V1) and after treatment (V2)
Measured: At Inclusion visit and day 5 of infection
Blood safety (Bilirubin [umol/l])
Change of blood parameters before (V1) and after treatment (V2)
Measured: At Inclusion visit and day 5 of infection
Acceptance of treatment
Question:"would you use the medicament again?"
Measured: At end of treatment cycle of 10 days
Concomitant medication and -therapy
Incidence of concomitant medication and -therapy
Measured: during acute respiratory episodes of 10 days
adverse events
occurrence of adverse events during treatment with Echinacea
Measured: during acute respiratory episodes, from day 1 until follow up at day 17 - 21
Subjective assessment of tolerability by patient
Comparisons of subjective tolerability assessments between patients [0=poor; 1=moderate; 2=good; 3=very good]. Inofficial scale and and global method of assessing patients satisfaction re tolerability.
Measured: At day 10 of every treatment cycle
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2019
- Study start27 Nov 2018
- Primary completion5 Jun 2019
- Study completion7 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory Tract InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 246 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- A. Vogel AG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Labormedizinisches Zentrum Dr. Risch
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03812900
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5'000'155
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 7 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 4 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sumer J, Keckeis K, Scanferla G, Frischknecht M, Notter J, Steffen A, Kohler P, Schmid P, Roth B, Wissel K, Vernazza P, Klein P, Schoop R, Albrich WC. Novel Echinacea formulations for the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in adults-A randomized blinded controlled trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 17;10:948787. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.948787. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 37138742
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative, Conceptual, Randomized Clinical Study to Investigate Superiority of Newly Developed Over Basic Echinacea Formulations for the Treatment of Acute Symptoms of Respiratory Tract Infections
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03812900
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 5'000'155
- Conditions
- Respiratory Tract Infections
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 246 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- A. Vogel AGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Labormedizinisches Zentrum Dr. Risch
- Study start
- 27 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a comparative, conceptual, randomized clinical study to investigate newly developed over basic Echinacea formulations for the treatment of acute symptoms of respiratory tract infections. 400 adults will be recruited, of which approximately 300 will develop a common cold or a influenza-like infection. Two newly developed and two existing Echinacea formulations (solid/liquid) will be randomly dispensed at inclusion for treatment of maximal 3 infections. Treatment starts at first signs of infection and lasts for a maximum of 10 days or until symptom resolution. Nasopharynx samples will be collected for analysis of common viral respiratory agents throughout treatment. Safety and efficacy variables will be assessed.
Detailed description
The monocentre trial compares two newly developed pharmaceutical forms of Echinacea (extract from Echinacea purpurea Herba and Radix; lozenges or spray) with two basic and authorised pharmaceutical forms (tablets or drops; comparator groups) for the treatment of acute symptoms of the common cold and/or influenza-like illness (ILI) in adults. Trial subjects are preventatively screened and included in the study (n = 400). If they show acute symptoms of a common cold or ILI during the study period, they are instructed to call the study centre to have confirmed the indication for treatment and begin with the treatment, they are randomized to (1:1:1:1 randomization into one of four groups). The primary endpoint is the time until remission of respiratory symptoms with the new pharmaceutical forms compared to the basic forms during the first episode. Secondary endpoints include remission of all treated episodes (max. 3 episodes), remission times comparison between different pharmaceutical forms (e.g. lozenges vs. spray, lozenges vs. drops etc), reduction of viral load on day 5 and 9 compared to day 1 of treatment (nasopharyngeal swabs), differences in safety (blood parameters before and during treatment), differences in number of adverse events, tolerance and efficacy assessed by the patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Formulation A | Experimental | Drug: Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extractEchinacea purpurea alcoholic extract lozenges (novel formulation) |
| Formulation B | Experimental | Drug: Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extractEchinacea purpurea alcoholic extract spray (novel formulation) |
| Formulation C | Active comparator | Drug: Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extractEchinacea purpurea alcoholic extract tablet (basic formulation, reference) |
| Formulation D | Active comparator | Drug: Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extractEchinacea purpurea alcoholic extract, drops (basic formulation, reference) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- At least 18 years old
- Signed Informed Consent
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Younger than 18 years
- Participation in another clinical study in the past 30 days
- Permanent intake of antimicrobial, antiviral, immune suppressive substances
- Surgical intervention in the 3 months prior to inclusion or planned surgery during period of observation
- Known diabetes melitus
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extractDifferent galenic forms with Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract from herb and roots (95:5%) | Drug | Formulation A, Formulation B, Formulation C, Formulation D |
Primary outcome
Time to remission from initial episodes
Time frame: maximally 10 days
duration until respiratory symptoms are solved
16 secondary outcomes
Time to remission from overall episodes
Time frame: maximally 10 days
Cross-comparison of remissions between formulations
Time frame: maximally 10 days
Development of single respiratory symptoms
Time frame: maximally 10 days
Development of respiratory symptom sum score
Time frame: maximally 10 days
Absence from School/Work
Time frame: during acute respiratory episodes, 7 days each
Reduction of viral load in nasopharyngeal samples
Time frame: day 1, day 5, day 9
Subjective assessment of efficacy by patient
Time frame: At end of treatment cycle of 10 days
Blood safety (red and white cell count)
Time frame: At Inclusion visit and day 5 of infection
Blood safety (creatinin [umol/l])
Time frame: At Inclusion visit and day 5 of infection
Blood safety (ALT [ukat/l])
Time frame: At Inclusion visit and day 5 of infection
Blood safety (AST [ukat/l])
Time frame: At Inclusion visit and day 5 of infection
Blood safety (Bilirubin [umol/l])
Time frame: At Inclusion visit and day 5 of infection
Acceptance of treatment
Time frame: At end of treatment cycle of 10 days
Concomitant medication and -therapy
Time frame: during acute respiratory episodes of 10 days
adverse events
Time frame: during acute respiratory episodes, from day 1 until follow up at day 17 - 21
Subjective assessment of tolerability by patient
Time frame: At day 10 of every treatment cycle
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37138742Sumer J, Keckeis K, Scanferla G, Frischknecht M, Notter J, Steffen A, Kohler P, Schmid P, Roth B, Wissel K, Vernazza P, Klein P, Schoop R, Albrich WC. Novel Echinacea formulations for the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in adults-A randomized blinded controlled trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 17;10:948787. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.948787. eCollection 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Respiratory Tract Infections
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
VIRal Pulmonary Infections in Older AGE
Viral Pulmonary Infections
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Echinacea purpurea alcoholic extract in people with Respiratory Tract Infections, run by A. Vogel AG at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to remission from initial episodes (time frame: maximally 10 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03812900, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2021.