AzTrials
AzTrials

Placenta Accreta, Third TrimesterNCT03813212

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI ) Versus Ultrasound in Placenta Accreta Diagnosis

An observational study of Placenta Accreta, Third Trimester, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aim to assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to gray-scale and colour Doppler ultrasound (US) for the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 40 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Placenta Accreta, Third Trimester
What is being tested?
MRI
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Jan 2019to Jan 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • Adult

Study population: Haemodynamically stable pregnant women, who attend the antenatal care clinic at Ain Shams University Hospital or are referred from other hospitals for further evaluation. The recruited patients have to fulfill the inclusion criteria,

Who may be able to join

  • Haemodynamically stable pregnant women who have the following risk factors for placenta accreta : persistent anterior placenta previa, prior uterine surgery (such as a previous cesarean section, uterine curettage, or myomectomy).
  • Maternal age : 20-40 years old.
  • BMI : 18-29.9 kg/m2.

Who cannot join

  • Exclusion criteria will be MRI contraindications, cardiac pacemaker, metal objects in the body, and patient's refusal for MRI evaluation.
  • Haemodynamically unstable patients.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Safaa Thabet, M.B.B.,Ch contact

01067593438

Safaathabet63@yahoo.com

Malames Faisal, Lecturer contact

01098958995

misofaisal@yahoo.co.uk

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Faculty of medicine ainshams university

    Cairo, 11865

    Safaa Thabet, 01157514436, remystar763@yahoo.com

    Malames Faisal, 01098958995, Misofaisal@yahoo.co.uk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Gray-scale , Colour Doppler Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta

This study aim to assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to gray-scale and colour Doppler ultrasound (US) for the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta.

Read the detailed description

Placenta accreta occurs when the chorionic villi abnormally invade the myometrium. Based on histopathology it is divided into three grades: placenta accreta (the chorionic villi are in contact with the myometrium), placenta increta (the chorionic villi invade the myometrium), and placenta percreta where the chorionic villi penetrate the uterine serosa. With increasing rate of cesarean delivery, the incidence of both placenta praevia and placenta accreta is steadily increasing in frequency.

Prenatal diagnosis of invasive placentation is associated with a reduced risk of maternal complications as it allows a preplanned treatment of the condition . Gray-scale and colour Doppler ultrasound (US) are valuable tools in the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta .However, if the ultrasound ( US ) findings suggest possible percreta or are inconclusive or negative in an at-risk woman, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be useful.

Multiple sonographic findings are seen with placenta accreta such as decrease in myometrial thickness, placenta previa, placental lacunae, abnormal pattern of color Doppler, loss of the retroplacental clear zone and placenta percreta irregularities in wall of urinary bladder ( UB ) have been detected .

The most magnetic resonance imaging characteristic findings seen in placenta accreta are nodular thickening in the dark zone of placenta-uterine interface together with extensions of dark bands through the placenta, outer uterine bulge causing from the mass effect of the placenta and heterogeneous signal intensity of placenta on the T2-weighted HASTE sequences due to large placental lakes and vessels.

Being tested
MRI
Medical subject headings
Placenta Accreta

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MRIDevice

    Also called Ultrasound

    Magnetic resonance imaging. Trans-abdominal sonography (TAS) and transvaginal sonography (TVS) will be performed using a 3.5 or 5 MHz transabdominal convex transducer and a 7 MHz trans-vaginal transducer.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Determination of degree of placental invasion

    Determination of degree of placental invasion by comparing the results obtained by ultrasound , MRI with the final pathological examination after operation ( the excised part of myometrium with the attached placenta or hysterectomy specimen ).

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change Maternal morbidity and mortality

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2019
  2. Study start1 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completionJan 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03813212
Sponsor's protocol ID
MRI placenta accreta
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
17 Nov 2018
Last updated
17 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Lopes ES, Feitosa FEL, Brazil AV, de Castro JDV, da Costa JIF, Araujo Junior E, Peixoto AB, Carvalho FHC. Assessment of Sensitivity and Specificity of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 Jan;41(1):17-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675803. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

    PubMed 30428490
  • Haunschild C, Yeaton-Massey A, Lyell DJ. Antenatal Management of Placenta Accreta. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;61(4):766-773. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000394.

    PubMed 30204620

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Placenta Accreta, Third Trimester, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Safaa Thabet, M.B.B.,Ch (01067593438, Safaathabet63@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Determination of degree of placental invasion (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03813212, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in