AzTrials
AzTrials

Muscle DisorderNCT03813485

Electromyographic´s Differences Between Dry Needling in Tonic or Phasic Skeletal Muscle Fibers.

A study testing Dry Needling in upper trapezius and Dry Needling in lower trapezius in people with Muscle Disorder and Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial, run by Universidad Francisco de Vitoria at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the surface electromyography (EGM) changes between dry needling in the upper trapezius, is a prevalence tonic fiber or lower trapezius is a prevalence phasic fiber. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Dry Needling in upper trapezius and Dry Needling in lower trapezius
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
11 Feb 2019to 10 Jun 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Presence latent myofascial trigger point in the upper/lower trapezius asymptomatic subjects

Who cannot join

  • neck or shoulder pain at the moment or 6 month ago. whiplash injury previous spine or shoulder surgery pregnancy diagnosis of radiculopathy or myelopathy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sandra Sánchez Jorge, Pt, PhD contact

+34 91 7091887

s.sjorge.prof@ufv.es

Jaime Salom Moreno, Pt, PhD contact

+34 91 7091905

jaime.salom@ufv.es

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

    Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223

    Sandra Sancjez, PhD, s.sjorge.prof@ufv.es

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Electromyographic´s Differences Between Dry Needling in Latent Myofascial Trigger Point in Tonic or Phasic Skeletal Muscle Fibers of Trapezius

The aim of this study is to compare the surface electromyography (EGM) changes between dry needling in the upper trapezius, is a prevalence tonic fiber or lower trapezius is a prevalence phasic fiber.

Read the detailed description

Several studies already found a disturbed surface electromyography activity in myalgic muscle tissue and in the vicinity of myofascial trigger points, however studies about the effect of dry needling in this fibers type on these disturbances in EMG activity are scarce.

The surface electromyography of upper trapezius is related with a tonic muscle dysfunction, for example muscle contracture; and the lower fiber of trapezius is related with atrophy muscle.

Dry needling is an effective method for the treatment of myofascial trigger points for immediate reduction of pain. There are some studies about latent myofascial trigger point and motor activity, but we don't know any research about the effect of dry needling in the differences fibers.

Being tested
Dry Needling in upper trapezius, Dry Needling in lower trapezius
Keywords
surface electromyographic, dry needling
Medical subject headings
Muscular Diseases, Myofascial Pain Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dry Needling in upper trapeziusOther

    The following criteria are required for a patient to have latent TrPs: the presence of a palpable taut band in the upper trapezius muscle, the presence of a hypersensitive spot in the taut band, a palpable or visible local twitch on snapping palpation, and a no familiar reproduction of referred pain elicited by palpation of the sensitive spot.

    Dry needling is performed with solid filiform needles (0.30x30 mm), these needles are sterile and separately packaged. Needles are not reused and are immediately deposited in a needle container after usage. Patients receive dry needling in latent myofascial trigger point (LTRs) in upper trapezius. The needle is penetrated into the muscle fibers of the taut band and was moved upward and downward ("fast in, fast out") in different directions with the aim to elicit LTRs

  • Dry Needling in lower trapeziusOther

    The following criteria are required for a patient to have latent TrPs: the presence of a palpable taut band in the lower trapezius muscle, the presence of a hypersensitive spot in the taut band, a palpable or visible local twitch on snapping palpation, and a no familiar reproduction of referred pain elicited by palpation of the sensitive spot.

    Dry needling is performed with solid filiform needles (0.30x 30 mm), these needles are sterile and separately packaged. Needles are not reused and are immediately deposited in a needle container after usage. Patients receive dry needling in latent myofascial trigger point (LTRs) in lower trapezius. The needle is penetrated into the muscle fibers of the taut band and was moved upward and downward ("fast in, fast out") in different directions with the aim to elicit LTRs

Study groups in NCT03813485
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dry needling in upper trapeziusActive comparatorPatients receive dry needling in latent myofascial trigger point in upper trapezius. The needle was penetrated into the muscle fibers of the taut band and was moved upward and downward ("fast in, fast out") in different directions with the aim to elicit LTRs
Receives: Other: Dry Needling in upper trapezius
Dry needling in lower trapeziusExperimentalPatients receive dry needling in latent myofascial trigger point in lower trapezius. The needle was penetrated into the muscle fibers of the taut band and was moved upward and downward ("fast in, fast out") in different directions with the aim to elicit LTRs
Receives: Other: Dry Needling in lower trapezius

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in surface electromyographic before and after the intervention.

    Root mean square values (RMS)

    Measured: Baseline and 10 minutes after the intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2019
  2. Study start11 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion10 Apr 2019
  4. Study completion10 Jun 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
24 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03813485
Sponsor's protocol ID
5/2018
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
22 Jan 2019
Last updated
16 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dry Needling in upper trapezius and Dry Needling in lower trapezius in people with Muscle Disorder and Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial, run by Universidad Francisco de Vitoria at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sandra Sánchez Jorge, Pt, PhD (+34 91 7091887, s.sjorge.prof@ufv.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in surface electromyographic before and after the intervention. (time frame: Baseline and 10 minutes after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in