Rheumatoid ArthritisTOPRANCT03815578
Evaluation of Pain Sensitization in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Analysis on a Cohort of Tofacitinib Treated Patients
A study testing Clinical examination, Pain assessment and blood sample in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
Persistent pain and chronic fatigue are very common complaints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, whatever the anti-inflammatory treatment response. Interestingly, pain remaining despite good clinical response was associated with high disability and low inflammation at baseline, suggesting a mechanism of pain… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Clinical examination, Pain assessment and blood sample
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 17 Jun 2019to 28 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged over 18 year-old ;
- Diagnosis of RA according to the ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria ;
- Active rheumatoid arthritis defined by a Disease Activity Score (DAS28) > 3.2 at inclusion ;
- Patient eligible for tofacitinib treatment in agreement with European treatment labelling and French recommendation for RA treatment ;
- Oral prednisone intake is allowed until 10 mg, stable for at least 1 week at study entry ;
- Starting tofacitinib treatment for an active RA defined by a DAS28-ESR > 3.2 ;
- Affiliated person or beneficiary of a social security scheme ;
- Having signed an informed consent (at the latest on the day of inclusion and before any examination required by research).
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of a systemic autoimmune disease other than RA ;
- Peripheral neuropathy ;
- Centrally-acting pain medications use within 3 months of enrolment (amitriptyline, gabapentin, duloxetine), or during the study ;
- Any opioid use within 1 month of enrolment or during the study ;
- Corticosteroid treatment over 10 mg of prednisone or equivalent ;
- Patient who present contraindications to tofacitinib treatment ;
Show all 13Show fewer
- Patient presenting with a history of active tuberculosis or chronic infectious disease with a need of regular use of antibiotic ;
- Patients with active bacterial or viral infection, or presenting with an episode of infection that required treatment with antibiotics within 30 days prior to screening ;
- Patient presenting with a history of lymphoma or leukaemia or other malignancy besides non-melanoma skin cancer within 5 years ;
- Patient presenting with any uncontrolled medical condition ;
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding ;
- Patient unable to understand and follow recommendations or unable to perform self-evaluation ;
- Patient who refuse to participate to the study.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
France2 sites
CHU de Bordeaux - Service de rhumatologie
Bordeaux
CHU de Limoges - service de rhumatologie
Limoges
About this study
Persistent pain and chronic fatigue are very common complaints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, whatever the anti-inflammatory treatment response. Interestingly, pain remaining despite good clinical response was associated with high disability and low inflammation at baseline, suggesting a mechanism of pain independent of inflammation in these patients. Such patients, with discordantly high patient-reported DAS28 components, fatigue and mood disturbance might represent a subgroup of RA patients who have specific clinical needs, not resolved by classical conventional or biologic DMARDs. In this way, neuropathic pain and pain sensitization have been demonstrated in 20 to 30% of RA patients, neuropathic pain scores being associated with worsen disease activity scores. Thus, pain sensitization may contribute to amplification of pain in active RA, and should be responsible for persisting pain and fatigue even after inflammation has resolved.
Pain sensitization is associated with neuroplastic changes in sensory pathways at peripheral and central levels. Interestingly, major mediators responsible for this neuroplasticity operate via a JAK/STAT signaling pathway, which is specifically targeted by new RA treatments. New drug targeting JAK/STAT signalling pathway have been recently designed for RA treatment, based on the implication of this pathway on the signaling of various cytokines implicated in the pathophysiology of RA, such as IL-6, IL-12, IL-23 and IFNs. Two Jak-inhibitors have been put on the market: Tofacitinib and Baricitinib. In randomized clinical trials, Tofacitinib have shown a remarkable efficacy on pain and other patient reported outcomes, suggesting a specific effect or jak-inhibitors on pain control. Recent data suggest that Jak-inhibitors could have a direct effect on sensory neurons.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Clinical examination, Pain assessment, blood sample, Patient Reported Outcomes
- Keywords
- pain sensitization, Tofacitinib, miRNA
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clinical examinationOther
- Number of painful joints,
- Number of swollen joints,
- Patient Global assessment VAS (0 - 100)
- and Physician Global assessment VAS (0 - 100)
Pain assessmentOther
- Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs),
- Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS)
- and Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC)
blood sampleOther
18 ml whole blood for ELISA analysis and miRNAs detection
Patient Reported OutcomesOther
- Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ),
- Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score (RAID),
- Daily joint pain intensity VAS (0-100),
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
- and Coping Strategy Questionnaire.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients | Experimental | RA according to the ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria Receives: Other: Clinical examination; Other: Pain assessment; Other: blood sample; Other: Patient Reported Outcomes |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Variation of the mean Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs)
Measured: At 6 months from baseline
Secondary outcomes (14)
Variation of Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS)
Measured: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Variation of Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs)
Measured: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Variation of Diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) values
Measured: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Variation of Daily joint pain intensity
daily evaluation of the previous 24h pain on a numeric pain scale 0 to 100
Measured: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Disease activity evaluated by the Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28)
which take into account the number of painful joints (on 28 joints), the number of swollen joints (on 28 joints), the patient global assessment of disease activity (between 0 and 100), and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Measured: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Disease activity evaluated by the Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI)
which take into account the number of painful joints (on 28 joints), the number of swollen joints (on 28 joints), the patient global assessment of disease activity (between 0 and 100), the physician global assessment of disease activity (between 0 and 100), and the C-reactive protein level.
Measured: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Disease activity evaluated by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI)
which take into account the number of painful joints (on 28 joints), the number of swollen joints (on 28 joints), the patient global assessment of disease activity (between 0 and 100), and the physician global assessment of disease activity (between 0 and 100).
Measured: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)
Measured: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score (RAID)
Measured: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
HAD scale aims at evaluating anxiety and depression symptoms with two separate scores (between 0 and 21) estimated grace to 14 items (7 for anxiety and 7 for depression) ranged between 0 and 3
Measured: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Coping Strategy Questionnaire: a 21-items self-report
Measured: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Levels of cytokines
Measured: At 3 and 6 months from baseline
Levels of neurotrophins
Measured: At 3 and 6 months from baseline
Levels of miR21, miR-124, miR-146a and miR-155
Measured: At 3 and 6 months from baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jan 2019
- Study start17 Jun 2019
- Primary completion28 Apr 2023
- Study completion28 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, BordeauxThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thierry SCHAEVERBEKE, Prof, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Bordeaux
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03815578
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUBX 2017/39
- Acronym
- TOPRA
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 6 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Pain Sensitization in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Analysis on a Cohort of Tofacitinib Treated Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03815578
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TOPRA / CHUBX 2017/39
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- pain sensitization, Tofacitinib, miRNA
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BordeauxUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Study start
- 17 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Persistent pain and chronic fatigue are very common complaints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, whatever the anti-inflammatory treatment response. Interestingly, pain remaining despite good clinical response was associated with high disability and low inflammation at baseline, suggesting a mechanism of pain independent of inflammation in these patients. Such patients, with discordantly high patient-reported DAS28 components, fatigue and mood disturbance might represent a subgroup of RA patients who have specific clinical needs, not resolved by classical conventional or biologic DMARDs. In this way, neuropathic pain and pain sensitization have been demonstrated in 20 to 30% of RA patients, neuropathic pain scores being associated with worsen disease activity scores. Thus, pain sensitization may contribute to amplification of pain in active RA, and should be responsible for persisting pain and fatigue even after inflammation has resolved.
Pain sensitization is associated with neuroplastic changes in sensory pathways at peripheral and central levels. Interestingly, major mediators responsible for this neuroplasticity operate via a JAK/STAT signaling pathway, which is specifically targeted by new RA treatments. New drug targeting JAK/STAT signalling pathway have been recently designed for RA treatment, based on the implication of this pathway on the signaling of various cytokines implicated in the pathophysiology of RA, such as IL-6, IL-12, IL-23 and IFNs. Two Jak-inhibitors have been put on the market: Tofacitinib and Baricitinib. In randomized clinical trials, Tofacitinib have shown a remarkable efficacy on pain and other patient reported outcomes, suggesting a specific effect or jak-inhibitors on pain control. Recent data suggest that Jak-inhibitors could have a direct effect on sensory neurons.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients | Experimental | Other: Clinical examination, Other: Pain assessment, Other: blood sample, Other: Patient Reported OutcomesRA according to the ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients aged over 18 year-old ;
- Diagnosis of RA according to the ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria ;
- Active rheumatoid arthritis defined by a Disease Activity Score (DAS28) > 3.2 at inclusion ;
- Patient eligible for tofacitinib treatment in agreement with European treatment labelling and French recommendation for RA treatment ;
- Oral prednisone intake is allowed until 10 mg, stable for at least 1 week at study entry ;
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Diagnosis of a systemic autoimmune disease other than RA ;
- Peripheral neuropathy ;
- Centrally-acting pain medications use within 3 months of enrolment (amitriptyline, gabapentin, duloxetine), or during the study ;
- Any opioid use within 1 month of enrolment or during the study ;
- Corticosteroid treatment over 10 mg of prednisone or equivalent ;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical examination* Number of painful joints, * Number of swollen joints, * Patient Global assessment VAS (0 - 100) * and Physician Global assessment VAS (0 - 100) | Other | Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients |
| Pain assessment* Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs), * Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS) * and Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) | Other | Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients |
| blood sample18 ml whole blood for ELISA analysis and miRNAs detection | Other | Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients |
| Patient Reported Outcomes* Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), * Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score (RAID), * Daily joint pain intensity VAS (0-100), * Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale * and Coping Strategy Questionnaire. | Other | Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients |
Primary outcome
Variation of the mean Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs)
Time frame: At 6 months from baseline
14 secondary outcomes
Variation of Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS)
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Variation of Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs)
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Variation of Diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC) values
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Variation of Daily joint pain intensity
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Disease activity evaluated by the Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28)
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Disease activity evaluated by the Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI)
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Disease activity evaluated by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI)
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score (RAID)
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Coping Strategy Questionnaire: a 21-items self-report
Time frame: At 1, 3 and 6 months from baseline
Levels of cytokines
Time frame: At 3 and 6 months from baseline
Levels of neurotrophins
Time frame: At 3 and 6 months from baseline
Levels of miR21, miR-124, miR-146a and miR-155
Time frame: At 3 and 6 months from baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thierry SCHAEVERBEKE, Prof principal investigator
University Hospital, Bordeaux
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Clinical examination, Pain assessment and blood sample in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Variation of the mean Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs) (time frame: At 6 months from baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2023.