Bronchial AsthmaPhase 3NCT03816267
Salbutamol Administration by Nebulizer Versus Metered Dose Inhaler With Spacer in Asthma in Children
A Phase 3 study testing Nebulizer, Salbutamol and Metered dose inhaler and spacer in people with Bronchial Asthma, run by Suez Canal University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Asthma is a problem that affects many children and affects their physical health in addition to having a social and financial burden on individuals, families and healthcare systems. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 14 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bronchial Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Nebulizer, Salbutamol and Metered dose inhaler and spacer
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 15 May 2018to 31 Mar 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 14 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children ranging from 2 - 14 years old.
- Both genders will be included.
- Patients with an acute exacerbation of asthma.
Who cannot join
- Patients with arrhythmia and cardiac diseases.
- Patients with thyroid diseases.
- Patients with bronchiolitis, pneumonia. Patients with status asthmaticus requiring immediate pediatric intensive care unit hospitalization.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Salbutamol Administration by Nebulizer Versus Metered Dose Inhaler With Spacer in Acute Asthma in Children in Suez Canal University Hospital Emergency Department: A Randomized Control Trial
Asthma is a problem that affects many children and affects their physical health in addition to having a social and financial burden on individuals, families and healthcare systems. In our pediatric emergency department, nebulizers are still used for the management of asthma and, with the poor resources of families, they have no option of treatment at home. In this study, the investigators will compare the effectiveness of treatment through nebulizer versus metered dose inhaler and spacer in children with an acute asthmatic attack seeking medical care at the Pediatric Emergency Department of Suez Canal University Hospital.
Read the detailed description
Primary Objective:
To determine whether the administration of a B2 agonist by metered dose inhaler with spacer is as effective as the administration of B2 agonist by nebulizer for the treatment of an acute asthmatic episode in children seeking medical care in the Pediatric Emergency Department of Suez Canal University Hospital.
Secondary Objectives:
- Comparison of patients' visit duration in the ER room between the two groups.
- Comparison of hospitalization rate between the two groups.
- Comparison of parent/patient satisfaction between the two groups. Study design Single-blinded randomized control trial.
Study location This study will be conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Department in Suez Canal University Hospital.
Study population This study will include patients presenting with an acute exacerbation of asthma at the Pediatric Emergency Department in Suez Canal University Hospital starting July 2017 until our sample size is fulfilled.
Inclusion criteria:
Children ranging from 2 - 14 years old. Both genders will be included. Patients with an acute exacerbation of asthma.
Exclusion criteria:
Patients with arrhythmia and cardiac diseases. Patients with thyroid diseases. Patients with bronchiolitis, pneumonia. Patients with status asthmaticus requiring immediate pediatric intensive care unit hospitalization.
Sampling All children fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be included consecutively until the calculated sample size has been reached.
Sample size
The sample size will be calculated using the following formula:
(Dawson \& Trapp, 2004)
Where:
n= sample size Zα/2 = 1.96 (The critical value that divides the central 95% of the Z distribution from the 5% in the tail) Zβ = 0.84 (The critical value that separates the lower 20% of the Z distribution from the upper 80%) σ = the estimate of the standard deviation = 1.5 (Rubilar et al., 2000) µ1 = mean in the nebulizer group = 4.4 (Rubilar et al., 2000) µ2 = mean in the metered-dose inhaler group = 3.3 (Rubilar et al., 2000) So, by calculation, the sample size will be equal to 30 cases per group, giving a total sample size of 60 cases.
Methods of data collection
Infants and children known to have asthma coming to the Pediatric Emergency Department of Suez Canal University Hospital and fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be assessed according to the following clinical respiratory score:
(Mild 0-3 moderate 4-7 severe 8-12)17
The target population is patients who presented with moderate to severe wheezing (score 4-12).
Randomization will take place through an online program for randomization of clinical trials. The patients will be divided into two groups, one of them treated by the available nebulizer and the other by MDI with spacer. The investigators cannot blind patients to the treatment as there is an obvious difference between the two modalities.
However, the assessment of the respiratory score before and after the treatment will be performed by an independent physician who will not be involved in the decision-making and randomization of treatment. This physician will be asked to assess initially and then reassess after the equipment has been removed to avoid any bias.
Dosage and administration:
The nebulizer group will receive salbutamol aerosol solution (0.25 mg/kg weight, up to a maximum of 5 mg in 3.5 mL of normal saline solution. Aerosols will be generated by jet nebulizers powered by oxygen and delivered via a face mask for 7 min every 20 min during the first hour (a total of three nebulizations/hr.). A flow rate of 7 L/min will be used.
The metered dose inhaler with spacer group will receive two puffs of salbutamol (100 mcg/puff) every 10 min 5 times over 1 hr. (a total of 10 puffs/hr.), using a spacer device with a face mask. Following each puff, the children will take breaths for a full minute from the spacer device held in place.
Assessment:
Patients will be reassessed after one hour and score <4 is considered a success while score>4 is failure of therapy.
Patients of same degree of severity of the attack will be compared together according to the following characteristics: duration of treatment preparation and delivery, clinical outcome, patient satisfaction after use and hospitalization rate.
Each patient will have a form: Page 1 will be an informed consent to be signed before randomization of treatment. Page 2 will include the following items
- personal data (name, age, address, telephone number to be in contact with the patient and know if there were repeated visits after this attack within the same week). In addition, the researcher's phone number will be accessible to the patients.
- Medical history (other illnesses, medications, degree of asthma either intermittent or persistent)
- Clinical assessment (clinical respiratory score before and after treatment)
- Patient satisfaction with given modality on a Likert scale from 1-5. This will be asked by the blinded assessor and will include questions regarding:
- Comfort with modality used
- Duration of modality used
- Ease of administration
- Confidence in repeating treatment on their own at home if required
- Conditions
- Bronchial Asthma
- Being tested
- Nebulizer, Salbutamol, Metered dose inhaler and spacer
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NebulizerDevice
Nebulization via mask
SalbutamolDrug
Also called Albuterol, Ventolin
Delivery of appropriate dose according to weight
Metered dose inhaler and spacerDevice
Also called MDI
Medication will be delivered through inhaler and spacer
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nebulizer | Active comparator | Containing salbutamol Receives: Device: Nebulizer; Drug: Salbutamol |
| Metered Dose Inhaler and spacer | Experimental | Containing Salbutamol Receives: Drug: Salbutamol; Device: Metered dose inhaler and spacer |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical improvement
Clinical respiratory score change (see Study Protocol for details)
Measured: 1 hour
Secondary outcomes (2)
Rate of Hospitalization
Admission into inpatient or intensive care unit
Measured: 4 hours
Patient satisfaction
Patient or parent satisfaction using Likert scale (see Study Protocol for details)
Measured: 1 hour
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jan 2019
- Study start15 May 2018
- Primary completion15 Mar 2019
- Study completion31 Mar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bronchial AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Suez Canal UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mona Azzam, Suez Canal University
- Investigators
- Alaa Zeitoun, Prof, Study chair, Suez Canal University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03816267
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3244
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 4 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rubilar L, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Girardi G. Randomized trial of salbutamol via metered-dose inhaler with spacer versus nebulizer for acute wheezing in children less than 2 years of age. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000 Apr;29(4):264-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(200004)29:43.0.co;2-s.
PubMed 10738013
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Salbutamol Administration by Nebulizer Versus Metered Dose Inhaler With Spacer in Acute Asthma in Children in Suez Canal University Hospital Emergency Department: A Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03816267
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3244
- Conditions
- Bronchial Asthma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Asthma is a problem that affects many children and affects their physical health in addition to having a social and financial burden on individuals, families and healthcare systems. In our pediatric emergency department, nebulizers are still used for the management of asthma and, with the poor resources of families, they have no option of treatment at home. In this study, the investigators will compare the effectiveness of treatment through nebulizer versus metered dose inhaler and spacer in children with an acute asthmatic attack seeking medical care at the Pediatric Emergency Department of Suez Canal University Hospital.
Detailed description
Primary Objective:
To determine whether the administration of a B2 agonist by metered dose inhaler with spacer is as effective as the administration of B2 agonist by nebulizer for the treatment of an acute asthmatic episode in children seeking medical care in the Pediatric Emergency Department of Suez Canal University Hospital.
Secondary Objectives:
- Comparison of patients' visit duration in the ER room between the two groups.
- Comparison of hospitalization rate between the two groups.
- Comparison of parent/patient satisfaction between the two groups. Study design Single-blinded randomized control trial.
Study location This study will be conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Department in Suez Canal University Hospital.
Study population This study will include patients presenting with an acute exacerbation of asthma at the Pediatric Emergency Department in Suez Canal University Hospital starting July 2017 until our sample size is fulfilled.
Inclusion criteria:
Children ranging from 2 - 14 years old. Both genders will be included. Patients with an acute exacerbation of asthma.
Exclusion criteria:
Patients with arrhythmia and cardiac diseases. Patients with thyroid diseases. Patients with bronchiolitis, pneumonia. Patients with status asthmaticus requiring immediate pediatric intensive care unit hospitalization.
Sampling All children fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be included consecutively until the calculated sample size has been reached.
Sample size
The sample size will be calculated using the following formula:
(Dawson \& Trapp, 2004)
Where:
n= sample size Zα/2 = 1.96 (The critical value that divides the central 95% of the Z distribution from the 5% in the tail) Zβ = 0.84 (The critical value that separates the lower 20% of the Z distribution from the upper 80%) σ = the estimate of the standard deviation = 1.5 (Rubilar et al., 2000) µ1 = mean in the nebulizer group = 4.4 (Rubilar et al., 2000) µ2 = mean in the metered-dose inhaler group = 3.3 (Rubilar et al., 2000) So, by calculation, the sample size will be equal to 30 cases per group, giving a total sample size of 60 cases.
Methods of data collection
Infants and children known to have asthma coming to the Pediatric Emergency Department of Suez Canal University Hospital and fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be assessed according to the following clinical respiratory score:
(Mild 0-3 moderate 4-7 severe 8-12)17
The target population is patients who presented with moderate to severe wheezing (score 4-12).
Randomization will take place through an online program for randomization of clinical trials. The patients will be divided into two groups, one of them treated by the available nebulizer and the other by MDI with spacer. The investigators cannot blind patients to the treatment as there is an obvious difference between the two modalities.
However, the assessment of the respiratory score before and after the treatment will be performed by an independent physician who will not be involved in the decision-making and randomization of treatment. This physician will be asked to assess initially and then reassess after the equipment has been removed to avoid any bias.
Dosage and administration:
The nebulizer group will receive salbutamol aerosol solution (0.25 mg/kg weight, up to a maximum of 5 mg in 3.5 mL of normal saline solution. Aerosols will be generated by jet nebulizers powered by oxygen and delivered via a face mask for 7 min every 20 min during the first hour (a total of three nebulizations/hr.). A flow rate of 7 L/min will be used.
The metered dose inhaler with spacer group will receive two puffs of salbutamol (100 mcg/puff) every 10 min 5 times over 1 hr. (a total of 10 puffs/hr.), using a spacer device with a face mask. Following each puff, the children will take breaths for a full minute from the spacer device held in place.
Assessment:
Patients will be reassessed after one hour and score <4 is considered a success while score>4 is failure of therapy.
Patients of same degree of severity of the attack will be compared together according to the following characteristics: duration of treatment preparation and delivery, clinical outcome, patient satisfaction after use and hospitalization rate.
Each patient will have a form: Page 1 will be an informed consent to be signed before randomization of treatment. Page 2 will include the following items
- personal data (name, age, address, telephone number to be in contact with the patient and know if there were repeated visits after this attack within the same week). In addition, the researcher's phone number will be accessible to the patients.
- Medical history (other illnesses, medications, degree of asthma either intermittent or persistent)
- Clinical assessment (clinical respiratory score before and after treatment)
- Patient satisfaction with given modality on a Likert scale from 1-5. This will be asked by the blinded assessor and will include questions regarding:
- Comfort with modality used
- Duration of modality used
- Ease of administration
- Confidence in repeating treatment on their own at home if required
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nebulizer | Active comparator | Device: Nebulizer, Drug: SalbutamolContaining salbutamol |
| Metered Dose Inhaler and spacer | Experimental | Drug: Salbutamol, Device: Metered dose inhaler and spacerContaining Salbutamol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Children ranging from 2 - 14 years old.
- Both genders will be included.
- Patients with an acute exacerbation of asthma.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with arrhythmia and cardiac diseases.
- Patients with thyroid diseases.
- Patients with bronchiolitis, pneumonia. Patients with status asthmaticus requiring immediate pediatric intensive care unit hospitalization.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NebulizerNebulization via mask | Device | Nebulizer |
| SalbutamolAlso: Albuterol, VentolinDelivery of appropriate dose according to weight | Drug | Metered Dose Inhaler and spacer, Nebulizer |
| Metered dose inhaler and spacerAlso: MDIMedication will be delivered through inhaler and spacer | Device | Metered Dose Inhaler and spacer |
Primary outcome
Clinical improvement
Time frame: 1 hour
Clinical respiratory score change (see Study Protocol for details)
2 secondary outcomes
Rate of Hospitalization
Time frame: 4 hours
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 1 hour
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Apr 2019.
- Background: PubMed 10738013Rubilar L, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Girardi G. Randomized trial of salbutamol via metered-dose inhaler with spacer versus nebulizer for acute wheezing in children less than 2 years of age. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000 Apr;29(4):264-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(200004)29:43.0.co;2-s.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bronchial Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare Safety of 4 Weeks Exposure to Propellants Hydrofluoroalkane 1,1-difluoroethane (HFA-152a) and HFA-1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (134a)
Asthma
RecruitingObservational study
Asthma and Primary Arterial Hypertension: an Inflammatory Link?
Asthma Bronchial
Recruiting
BREATHE: An Efficacy-implementation Trial Among Black Adults With Uncontrolled Asthma
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacology and Efficacy of WIN378 in Adults With Moderate or Severe Asthma
Asthma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
TEZSPIRE (Tezepelumab) Asthma Japan Post-Marketing Study (PMS)
Bronchial Asthma (Only the Patients With Severe or Intractable Bronchial Asthma Which Could Not be Controlled With the Existing Therapy)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alaa Zeitoun, Prof study chair
Suez Canal University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Nebulizer, Salbutamol and Metered dose inhaler and spacer in people with Bronchial Asthma, run by Suez Canal University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical improvement (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03816267, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.