Blood Coagulation DisorderNCT03821597
Sequential Compression Devices Effect on Fibrinolysis in Plastic Surgery Outpatients
A study testing Sequential compression devices (SCDs) and No sequential compression. in people with Blood Coagulation Disorder, run by Swanson Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study investigates a possible fibrinolytic effect of sequential compression devices (SCDs). These devices have been used for decades to reduce risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, a randomized study in plastic surgery outpatients has not been done. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Blood Coagulation Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Sequential compression devices (SCDs) and No sequential compression.
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2018to 27 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All healthy patients aged 18 or more.
Who cannot join
- These conditions include suspected active or untreated DVT, pulmonary edema, congestive heart failure, thrombophlebitis or an active infection, vein ligation, gangrene, dermatitis, open wounds, a recent skin graft, massive edema or extreme deformity of the leg, neuropathy, legs that are insensitive to pain, or when increased venous or lymphatic return is undesirable.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Intraoperative Sequential Compression Devices on Fibrinolysis in Plastic Surgery Outpatients: A Randomized Trial
This study investigates a possible fibrinolytic effect of sequential compression devices (SCDs). These devices have been used for decades to reduce risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, a randomized study in plastic surgery outpatients has not been done. This study is undertaken to remedy that deficiency in our knowledge base.
Read the detailed description
Protocol: The Effect of Intraoperative Sequential Compression Devices on Fibrinolysis in Plastic Surgery Outpatients
- Study Synopsis Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a serious and potentially life-threatening surgical complication. Sequential compression devices (SCDs), also called intermittent pneumatic compression, are widely used by surgeons in an effort to reduce risk. In addition to a possible mechanical effect, some investigators believe that these devices reduce the coagulability of blood by altering the fibrinolytic balance. This investigation is meant to evaluate any possible effect of these devices on fibrinolytic activity. The SCDs are not being investigated for a new indication. This study is meant to determine whether these commonly used devices have any effect on blood coagulability. This study is not intended to determine whether SCDs affect DVT rates.
- Background The investigator (ES) has conducted a literature search on this topic. There is no published prospective randomized study available investigating a possible fibrinolytic effect of SCDs in surgical patients. Therefore any clinical benefit remains speculative.
- Objective The use of this device is well-recognized. The rationale for using SCDs in this study is to investigate their potential effect on blood coagulability.
- Subject Selection The proposed study is a prospective randomized study involving 50 consecutive plastic surgery outpatients who consent to participate. Twenty-five patients will have sequential compression devices applied and 25 patients will not be treated with these devices and will serve as controls. All subjects are adults aged 18 or over undergoing elective cosmetic surgery, including both men and women. All patients, men and women, are included with no exclusion criteria (that go beyond exclusion criteria for elective outpatient surgery). Pregnant women are not surgical candidates and are excluded (women in the reproductive age group are routinely checked with a pregnancy test). There are no contraindications to SCDs among patients undergoing elective outpatient plastic surgery. Patients with coagulopathies that would represent a contraindication for surgery, or significant diseases (heart disease, uncontrolled diabetes) are excluded. Oral contraceptive use is permitted. The purpose of including patients who are not treated with SCDs is to have a control group, which is mandatory in a randomized study. The sample size of 50 was obtained from an a priori power analysis and sample size calculation to allow statistical significance at an alpha value of 0.05. The use of SCDs is not a standard of care requirement. Their efficacy remains controversial, with no high-level (i.e. Level 1) support. All patients receive measures to reduce the risk of DVT. No muscle relaxation is used during surgery to preserve the calf muscle pump. Patients ambulate immediately after surgery. In addition, patients are monitored with ultrasound surveillance to ensure the early detection and treatment of any DVTs that may develop postoperatively. Patients do not normally receive anti-platelet therapy because of the increased risk of bleeding. Patients with contraindications to the use of SCDs will be excluded from the study. These conditions include suspected active or untreated DVT, pulmonary edema, congestive heart failure, thrombophlebitis or an active infection, vein ligation, gangrene, dermatitis, open wounds, a recent skin graft, massive edema or extreme deformity of the leg, neuropathy, legs that are insensitive to pain, or when increased venous or lymphatic return is undesirable. None of these conditions is present in healthy patients undergoing elective cosmetic surgery, which form the study group.
- Study Procedures The duration of the study is 2 months, sufficient to obtain data for 50 consecutive patients. All patients are plastic surgery outpatients undergoing elective cosmetic procedures. The consent discussion will take place between the principal investigator and the patient. All surgery will be performed by the study author at a state-licensed ambulatory surgery center, the Surgery Center of Leawood, KS. Patients already have IV access at the time of surgery. A blood sample (2 cc) will be drawn immediately before surgery and at 1-hour intervals during surgery and in the recovery room. The blood samples will be analyzed at an outside laboratory for tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels at these time points. The number of blood draws will be determined by the length of the operation and time in the recovery room. The last blood sample is taken at the hourly interval that immediately precedes the patient's discharge from the recovery room. All patients will undergo ultrasound surveillance. This diagnostic test is painless, noninvasive, and highly accurate for detecting DVTs. Scans are performed before surgery, on the day after surgery, and 1 week after surgery.
- Risk/Safety Information There is no risk or discomfort to the patient and the amount of blood drawn is minuscule. There added risks associated with SCD sleeves are very rare, such as skin irritation, nerve compression, and patient falls, although the latter problem is impossible because the devices are removed prior to the patient waking up from surgery.
- Monitoring/Reporting of Adverse Events Any adverse event will be monitored by the principal investigator and reported to patients, although none is expected. The principal investigator will collect, assess, and follow-up on any adverse events. Any adverse events will be reported, including to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and regulatory authorities.
- Study Oversight There are no foreseeable circumstances that would abort the study. The study and data will be available for auditing. Data Management
- Data will be analyzed by a biostatistician.
- IRB Review/Ethics Informed Consent This study meets the standard of equipoise in that there is no known benefit of SCDs in preventing DVTs in plastic surgery outpatients. SCDs harmlessly compress the calves and are known to be extremely safe. Each subject will receive full and adequate verbal and written information. Consenting patients will read and sign the Informed Consent document prior to taking part in the study and prior to surgery. Any change in the protocol will be submitted for review. This study is undertaken in accordance with ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and are consistent with Good Clinical Practice and applicable regulatory requirements. This study will be conducted in accordance with the regulations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) applicable laws and IRB requirement.
- Confidentiality Pooled data will be evaluated without any identifying information by a Ph.D. biostatistician. There is no opportunity for violation of patient privacy. Blood samples will only include a number (Patient 1, patient 2, etc.) and the date and time of the blood draw with no patient identifying information sent to the lab (Quest Laboratories). Patient information is kept within a secure location within the office of the principal investigator in accordance with HIPAA requirements. No patient identification will accompany any publications of the study. The data are open to inspection by any regulatory authorities.
- Intended Use of the Data
The data will be evaluated to determine whether or not the null hypothesis is confirmed (i.e. whether SCDs affect blood coagulability). It is expected that the study findings will be published in the medical literature.
Disclosure
The author has no financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs used in this study. The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose. The investigator has no financial interest in ultrasound or the device used. There is no outside funding for this study.
- Conditions
- Blood Coagulation Disorder
- Being tested
- Sequential compression devices (SCDs), No sequential compression.
- Keywords
- Fibrinolysis, sequential compression devices
- Medical subject headings
- Blood Coagulation Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sequential compression devices (SCDs)Procedure or surgery
Application of sequential compression devices in surgery.
No sequential compression.Procedure or surgery
No sequential compression devices are applied.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential compression devices | Experimental | Sequential compression devices (SCDs) are applied during surgery. Receives: Procedure: Sequential compression devices (SCDs) |
| No sequential compression devices | Active comparator | No sequential compression devices are applied. Receives: Procedure: No sequential compression. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in plasma levels of tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1
Laboratory testing of serum levels
Measured: 1-2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2019
- Study start1 Nov 2018
- Primary completion31 Dec 2018
- Study completion27 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Blood Coagulation DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Swanson Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eric Swanson, M.D., Principal investigator, Swanson Cener
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03821597
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Swanson 010
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Comerota AJ, Chouhan V, Harada RN, Sun L, Hosking J, Veermansunemi R, Comerota AJ Jr, Schlappy D, Rao AK. The fibrinolytic effects of intermittent pneumatic compression: mechanism of enhanced fibrinolysis. Ann Surg. 1997 Sep;226(3):306-13; discussion 313-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00010.
PubMed 9339937Swanson E. Do Sequential Compression Devices Really Reduce the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Plastic Surgery Patients? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Oct;136(4):577e-578e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001587. No abstract available.
PubMed 26114974Murphy RX Jr, Alderman A, Gutowski K, Kerrigan C, Rosolowski K, Schechter L, Schmitz D, Wilkins E. Evidence-based practices for thromboembolism prevention: summary of the ASPS Venous Thromboembolism Task Force Report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jul;130(1):168e-175e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b4ee.
PubMed 22743901Swanson E. Ultrasound screening for deep venous thrombosis detection: a prospective evaluation of 200 plastic surgery outpatients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Apr 7;3(3):e332. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000311. eCollection 2015 Mar.
PubMed 25878943
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Intraoperative Sequential Compression Devices on Fibrinolysis in Plastic Surgery Outpatients: A Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03821597
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Swanson 010
- Conditions
- Blood Coagulation Disorder
- Keywords
- Fibrinolysis, sequential compression devices
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Swanson CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study investigates a possible fibrinolytic effect of sequential compression devices (SCDs). These devices have been used for decades to reduce risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, a randomized study in plastic surgery outpatients has not been done. This study is undertaken to remedy that deficiency in our knowledge base.
Detailed description
Protocol: The Effect of Intraoperative Sequential Compression Devices on Fibrinolysis in Plastic Surgery Outpatients
- Study Synopsis Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a serious and potentially life-threatening surgical complication. Sequential compression devices (SCDs), also called intermittent pneumatic compression, are widely used by surgeons in an effort to reduce risk. In addition to a possible mechanical effect, some investigators believe that these devices reduce the coagulability of blood by altering the fibrinolytic balance. This investigation is meant to evaluate any possible effect of these devices on fibrinolytic activity. The SCDs are not being investigated for a new indication. This study is meant to determine whether these commonly used devices have any effect on blood coagulability. This study is not intended to determine whether SCDs affect DVT rates.
- Background The investigator (ES) has conducted a literature search on this topic. There is no published prospective randomized study available investigating a possible fibrinolytic effect of SCDs in surgical patients. Therefore any clinical benefit remains speculative.
- Objective The use of this device is well-recognized. The rationale for using SCDs in this study is to investigate their potential effect on blood coagulability.
- Subject Selection The proposed study is a prospective randomized study involving 50 consecutive plastic surgery outpatients who consent to participate. Twenty-five patients will have sequential compression devices applied and 25 patients will not be treated with these devices and will serve as controls. All subjects are adults aged 18 or over undergoing elective cosmetic surgery, including both men and women. All patients, men and women, are included with no exclusion criteria (that go beyond exclusion criteria for elective outpatient surgery). Pregnant women are not surgical candidates and are excluded (women in the reproductive age group are routinely checked with a pregnancy test). There are no contraindications to SCDs among patients undergoing elective outpatient plastic surgery. Patients with coagulopathies that would represent a contraindication for surgery, or significant diseases (heart disease, uncontrolled diabetes) are excluded. Oral contraceptive use is permitted. The purpose of including patients who are not treated with SCDs is to have a control group, which is mandatory in a randomized study. The sample size of 50 was obtained from an a priori power analysis and sample size calculation to allow statistical significance at an alpha value of 0.05. The use of SCDs is not a standard of care requirement. Their efficacy remains controversial, with no high-level (i.e. Level 1) support. All patients receive measures to reduce the risk of DVT. No muscle relaxation is used during surgery to preserve the calf muscle pump. Patients ambulate immediately after surgery. In addition, patients are monitored with ultrasound surveillance to ensure the early detection and treatment of any DVTs that may develop postoperatively. Patients do not normally receive anti-platelet therapy because of the increased risk of bleeding. Patients with contraindications to the use of SCDs will be excluded from the study. These conditions include suspected active or untreated DVT, pulmonary edema, congestive heart failure, thrombophlebitis or an active infection, vein ligation, gangrene, dermatitis, open wounds, a recent skin graft, massive edema or extreme deformity of the leg, neuropathy, legs that are insensitive to pain, or when increased venous or lymphatic return is undesirable. None of these conditions is present in healthy patients undergoing elective cosmetic surgery, which form the study group.
- Study Procedures The duration of the study is 2 months, sufficient to obtain data for 50 consecutive patients. All patients are plastic surgery outpatients undergoing elective cosmetic procedures. The consent discussion will take place between the principal investigator and the patient. All surgery will be performed by the study author at a state-licensed ambulatory surgery center, the Surgery Center of Leawood, KS. Patients already have IV access at the time of surgery. A blood sample (2 cc) will be drawn immediately before surgery and at 1-hour intervals during surgery and in the recovery room. The blood samples will be analyzed at an outside laboratory for tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels at these time points. The number of blood draws will be determined by the length of the operation and time in the recovery room. The last blood sample is taken at the hourly interval that immediately precedes the patient's discharge from the recovery room. All patients will undergo ultrasound surveillance. This diagnostic test is painless, noninvasive, and highly accurate for detecting DVTs. Scans are performed before surgery, on the day after surgery, and 1 week after surgery.
- Risk/Safety Information There is no risk or discomfort to the patient and the amount of blood drawn is minuscule. There added risks associated with SCD sleeves are very rare, such as skin irritation, nerve compression, and patient falls, although the latter problem is impossible because the devices are removed prior to the patient waking up from surgery.
- Monitoring/Reporting of Adverse Events Any adverse event will be monitored by the principal investigator and reported to patients, although none is expected. The principal investigator will collect, assess, and follow-up on any adverse events. Any adverse events will be reported, including to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and regulatory authorities.
- Study Oversight There are no foreseeable circumstances that would abort the study. The study and data will be available for auditing. Data Management
- Data will be analyzed by a biostatistician.
- IRB Review/Ethics Informed Consent This study meets the standard of equipoise in that there is no known benefit of SCDs in preventing DVTs in plastic surgery outpatients. SCDs harmlessly compress the calves and are known to be extremely safe. Each subject will receive full and adequate verbal and written information. Consenting patients will read and sign the Informed Consent document prior to taking part in the study and prior to surgery. Any change in the protocol will be submitted for review. This study is undertaken in accordance with ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and are consistent with Good Clinical Practice and applicable regulatory requirements. This study will be conducted in accordance with the regulations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) applicable laws and IRB requirement.
- Confidentiality Pooled data will be evaluated without any identifying information by a Ph.D. biostatistician. There is no opportunity for violation of patient privacy. Blood samples will only include a number (Patient 1, patient 2, etc.) and the date and time of the blood draw with no patient identifying information sent to the lab (Quest Laboratories). Patient information is kept within a secure location within the office of the principal investigator in accordance with HIPAA requirements. No patient identification will accompany any publications of the study. The data are open to inspection by any regulatory authorities.
- Intended Use of the Data
The data will be evaluated to determine whether or not the null hypothesis is confirmed (i.e. whether SCDs affect blood coagulability). It is expected that the study findings will be published in the medical literature.
Disclosure
The author has no financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs used in this study. The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose. The investigator has no financial interest in ultrasound or the device used. There is no outside funding for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential compression devices | Experimental | Procedure: Sequential compression devices (SCDs)Sequential compression devices (SCDs) are applied during surgery. |
| No sequential compression devices | Active comparator | Procedure: No sequential compression.No sequential compression devices are applied. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All healthy patients aged 18 or more.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- These conditions include suspected active or untreated DVT, pulmonary edema, congestive heart failure, thrombophlebitis or an active infection, vein ligation, gangrene, dermatitis, open wounds, a recent skin graft, massive edema or extreme deformity of the leg, neuropathy, legs that are insensitive to pain, or when increased venous or lymphatic return is undesirable.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential compression devices (SCDs)Application of sequential compression devices in surgery. | Procedure or surgery | Sequential compression devices |
| No sequential compression.No sequential compression devices are applied. | Procedure or surgery | No sequential compression devices |
Primary outcome
Change in plasma levels of tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1
Time frame: 1-2 months
Laboratory testing of serum levels
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2019.
- Background: PubMed 9339937Comerota AJ, Chouhan V, Harada RN, Sun L, Hosking J, Veermansunemi R, Comerota AJ Jr, Schlappy D, Rao AK. The fibrinolytic effects of intermittent pneumatic compression: mechanism of enhanced fibrinolysis. Ann Surg. 1997 Sep;226(3):306-13; discussion 313-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00010.
- Background: PubMed 26114974Swanson E. Do Sequential Compression Devices Really Reduce the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Plastic Surgery Patients? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Oct;136(4):577e-578e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001587. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22743901Murphy RX Jr, Alderman A, Gutowski K, Kerrigan C, Rosolowski K, Schechter L, Schmitz D, Wilkins E. Evidence-based practices for thromboembolism prevention: summary of the ASPS Venous Thromboembolism Task Force Report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jul;130(1):168e-175e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b4ee.
- Background: PubMed 25878943Swanson E. Ultrasound screening for deep venous thrombosis detection: a prospective evaluation of 200 plastic surgery outpatients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Apr 7;3(3):e332. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000311. eCollection 2015 Mar.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Blood Coagulation Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Tafasitamab in Adult Participants With Primary Autoimmune Blood Cell Disorders
Immune Thrombocytopenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Follow-up Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study of INCA033989 Versus Best Available Therapy in Participants With Essential Thrombocythemia
Essential Thrombocythemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of INCA036978 in Participants With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Lentiviral FVIII Gene Therapy
Hemophilia A
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eric Swanson, M.D. principal investigator
Swanson Cener
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sequential compression devices (SCDs) and No sequential compression. in people with Blood Coagulation Disorder, run by Swanson Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in plasma levels of tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (time frame: 1-2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03821597, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2019.