Decision MakingNCT03825978
Efficacy of Counseling for Prenatal Screening and Diagnostic Tests on Pregnant Women: Randomised Controlled Study
A study testing Prenatal Genetic Counseling in people with Decision Making and Chromosome Abnormality, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of counseling for prenatal screening and diagnostic tests on pregnant women's decisional conflict, being sure of the decision, anxiety levels, and attitudes towards the tests. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 46 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Decision Making, Chromosome Abnormality, Anxiety
- What is being tested?
- Prenatal Genetic Counseling
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 260 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 10 Jun 2017to 5 Mar 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 46 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- taking first antenatal follow-up in 8-11. gestational weeks in where the study is conducted to have a single pregnancy
- to continue take the antenatal care in the hospital where the research was conducted
- at least primary school graduation,
- voluntary to participate the research.
Who cannot join
- want to exit from the study at her own request
- continue to antenatal follow-up in another hospital.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Health Science University
Ankara, 06010
University Of Health Sciences
Ankara, 06010
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Efficacy of Counseling for Prenatal Screening and Diagnostic Tests on Pregnant Women's Decisional Conflict, Being Sure of the Decision, Anxiety Levels and Attitudes Towards the Tests: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Study
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of counseling for prenatal screening and diagnostic tests on pregnant women's decisional conflict, being sure of the decision, anxiety levels, and attitudes towards the tests. This prospective randomized controlled intervention study was conducted between the dates June 2017 and March 2018 in a training and research hospital, department of obstetrics and gynecology. The sample of the study consisted of 210 pregnant women who took antenatal care between the 8-11th gestational weeks of whom 112 were in the intervention group and 98 were in the control group. The data were collected by using Data Collection Form, The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI I-II), Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Sure Scale (SURE), Knowledge Evaluation Form about Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Tests, Prenatal Counseling Satisfaction Form, Decision Satisfaction Form and Attitudes towards the tests Scale. The study carried out in two stages. In the first stage; women's data were collected before and after participating prenatal genetic screening tests. After the results of the screening test were taken, the data were collected again. Counseling was provided for 112 pregnant women about prenatal screening and diagnostic tests before participating tests. Routine clinical information was given for 98 pregnant women who were in control group. Both groups were pre and post-tested at the same times. In the second phase, pregnant women who had diagnostic tests were evaluated. Counseling for prenatal genetic diagnosis tests was provided for 31 pregnant women in inetervetion group women and routine clinical information was providen for 26 pregnant women who were in control group. Data were collected again with data collection tools before and after the diagnostic test.
Read the detailed description
Pregnant Women Who Had Only Prenatal Genetic Screening Tests In intervention group, pregnant women, who were in 8-11th gestational weeks, before prenatal genetic counseling, answered the questions in "Descriptive Features Data Collection Form", "Decisional Conflict Scale", "The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scale", "Information Evaluation Form about Prenatal Screening Tests ","Decision Satisfaction Scale", "Attitudes towards the tests Scale". Later, individual interviews were made with pregnant women education was given with slide show about prenatal diagnosis and screening tests to pregnant women. In addition a training brochure which was prepared by the researcher was given to the pregnant women. It took about 20 minutes for the data collection forms to be answered and counseling was took about 25 minutes. After counseling, pregnant women were interviewed again at 14th week. The pregnant women were asked whether they had a screening test and the results were recorded. Then pregnant women were answered "Decisional Conflict Scale", "The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scale", "Information Evaluation Form about Prenatal Screening Tests ","Decision Satisfaction Scale", "Attitudes towards the tests Scale" again. At the following antenatal visits (16-20th weeks), the pregnant women were asked whether they had triple, quadruple or NIPT and the test results were recorded in the data collection form. At the end of the 20th week, the data collection process of pregnant women who did not have any problems related to fetus and who were recommended to continue routine follow-up was terminated. In control group pregnant women answered same data collection forms in same weeks, but counseling was not given to this group. For this group routine clinical procedure was performed.
Pregnant Women Who Had Also Prenatal Genetic Diagnostic Tests Prenatal genetic diagnostic tests were recommended to pregnant women who had high risk results according to prenatal screening test. Pregnant women with high risk and diagnostic test were referred to genetic consultation in both intervention and control groups. After genetic consultation, pregnant women were answered "Decisional Conflict Scale", "The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scale", "Information Evaluation Form about Prenatal Diagnostic Tests", "Decision Satisfaction Scale", "Attitudes towards the tests Scale". Then specific counseling was given to invasive test recommended by the doctor. The pregnant woman was asked if she would like to have a diagnostic test and if she didn't want to, the reason was recorded in the data collection form.
If the pregnant woman decided to have a diagnostic test, "The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scale" was applied again after the procedure. Then pregnant women were interviewed again after about three weeks and their results were evaluated and they answered "Decisional Conflict Scale", "Information Evaluation Form about Prenatal Diagnostic Tests", "Decision Satisfaction Scale", "Attitudes towards the tests Scale". Their decision about to continue or terminate pregnancy was recorded in the data collection form. In control group pregnant women answered same data collection forms in same weeks, but counseling was not given to this group. For this group routine clinical procedure was performed.
- Being tested
- Prenatal Genetic Counseling
- Keywords
- prenatal genetic screening, prenatal diagnosis, counseling, decision, anxiety, nursing
- Medical subject headings
- Chromosome Aberrations, Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prenatal Genetic CounselingBehavioural
Also called Counseling
In this study prenatal genetic screening counseling was provided from the begining of the pregnancy, different from the other studies in the literature. In the literature, most of the study evaluated pregnant women's anxiety, information status about the test and decisional conflicts, only prenatal screening process or prenatal diagnosis process. In this study pregnant women were evaluated both in prenatal screening test and prenatal diagnosis procedures.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Active comparator | An individual and comprehensive prenatal genetic counseling was given to all pregnant women in the intervention group, including all screening tests and diagnostic tests for prenatal diagnosis and screening tests at the first antenatal visit. Receives: Behavioral: Prenatal Genetic Counseling |
| Control | No intervention | There was no intervention from the first antenatal visit in the control group. Routine clinical information was given about prenatal screening and diagnostic tests. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Anxiety
The State Anxiety Scale evaluates the current state of anxiety. The expressions (1) in the articles are rated as (2) slightly, (3) very, (4) completely, and the scale is answered by marking the ones that meet the current situation of the person. The total point value obtained from scale may vary between 20 and 80 points. High score indicates high anxiety level and low score indicates low anxiety level
Measured: In 8-11th gestational weeks
Decisional Conflict
Pregnant women's decisional conflict scale points: 5-point Likert type and 16 questions.
Each item varies between "Strongly Agree ıy and" Strongly Disagree Her. Each item contains direct expressions, and I absolutely agree with = 0 points, Agree = 1 points, Undecided = 2 points, Disagree = 3 points and Strongly Disagree = 4 points. While calculating the total scale score; points are awarded to all items. The score is divided by the total number of items and is multiplied by 25 and the scale score is obtained. There is no cut-off point in the scale evaluating decision conflict scores. As the score obtained from the scale increases, the level of decision conflict increases.
Measured: In 8-11th gestational weeks
SURE Scale
Pregnant women's SURE Scale points: It is double likert type. Items Yes = 1 point No = 0 points. Zero points mean that there is a very high decision-making conflict, while 4 points mean that there is no conflict. Scores of 3 points or less indicate a conflict of interest.
Measured: In 8-11th gestational weeks
Knowledge Form About Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Tests
Pregnant Women's Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Tests Form points: The information evaluation form for prenatal screening tests was developed by the researcher as a result of literature review. The information evaluation form for prenatal screening tests consists of 12 statements. The aim of the prenatal screening tests is to provide information about the diseases, the weeks of screening tests, risk values and what they mean. For each phrase there are yes, I don't know and no options.Twelve is Highest, 0 is the lowest scores.
Measured: In 8-11th gestational weeks
Attitudes Towards The Tests Scale
Pregnant women's Attitudes Towards The Tests scale points: Good idea to participate in testing for prenatal screening and diagnostic tests on the scale (7 points), bad idea (1 point); useful (7 points), not useful (1 point); harmful (1 point), not harmful (7 points); a bad idea (1 point), not a bad idea (7 points) were asked to rank between 1 and 7 points. One point represents negative attitude and 7 points represent a very positive attitude. According to the opinions of the pregnant women about the prenatal screening and diagnostic tests, it was stated that they could give the expressions between 1 and 7, and they were asked to answer the scale. The highest score to be obtained from this scale is 28 and the lowest score is 4.
Measured: In 8-11th gestational weeks
Decision Satisfaction Form
Pregnant women's Decision Satisfaction Form points: Developed by researchers. The participants were asked to evaluate whether they were satisfied with their decisions, to make an informed decision, to make informed decisions, to make the same decision if they had experienced the same situation again. In this form, which consists of five questions and has a five-point Likert type, the expressions are evaluated with 5 (strongly agree), 4 (agree), 3 (unclear), 2 (disagree), 1 (strongly disagree) options. The highest 25 points are the lowest 5 points. High score shows high satisfaction.
Measured: In 8-11th gestational weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Anxiety
The State Anxiety Scale evaluates the current state of anxiety. The expressions (1) in the articles are rated as (2) slightly, (3) very, (4) completely, and the scale is answered by marking the ones that meet the current situation of the person. The total point value obtained from scale may vary between 20 and 80 points. High score indicates high anxiety level and low score indicates low anxiety level
Measured: In 13-14th gestational weeks
Decisional Conflict Scale
Pregnant women's decisional conflict scale points: 5-point Likert type and 16 questions.
Each item varies between "Strongly Agree ıy and" Strongly Disagree Her. Each item contains direct expressions, and I absolutely agree with = 0 points, Agree = 1 points, Undecided = 2 points, Disagree = 3 points and Strongly Disagree = 4 points. While calculating the total scale score; points are awarded to all items. The score is divided by the total number of items and is multiplied by 25 and the scale score is obtained. There is no cut-off point in the scale evaluating decision conflict scores. As the score obtained from the scale increases, the level of decision conflict increases.
Measured: In 13-14th gestational weeks
SURE Scale
Pregnant women's SURE Scale points: It is double likert type. Items Yes = 1 point No = 0 points. Zero points mean that there is a very high decision-making conflict, while 4 points mean that there is no conflict. Scores of 3 points or less indicate a conflict of interest.
Measured: In 13-14th gestational weeks
Knowledge Form About Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Tests
Pregnant women's Knowledge About Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Tests Form Points: The information evaluation form for prenatal screening tests was developed by the researcher as a result of literature review. The information evaluation form for prenatal screening tests consists of 12 statements. The aim of the prenatal screening tests is to provide information about the diseases, the weeks of screening tests, risk values and what they mean. For each phrase there are yes, I don't know and no options. Twelve is Highest, 0 is the lowest scores.
Measured: In 13-14th gestational weeks
Attitudes Towards The Tests Scale
Pregnant women's Attitudes Towards The Tests Scale Points: Good idea to participate in testing for prenatal screening and diagnostic tests on the scale (7 points), bad idea (1 point); useful (7 points), not useful (1 point); harmful (1 point), not harmful (7 points); a bad idea (1 point), not a bad idea (7 points) were asked to rank between 1 and 7 points. One point represents negative attitude and 7 points represent a very positive attitude. According to the opinions of the pregnant women about the prenatal screening and diagnostic tests, it was stated that they could give the expressions between 1 and 7, and they were asked to answer the scale. The highest score to be obtained from this scale is 28 and the lowest score is 4.
Measured: In 13-14th gestational weeks
Decision Satisfaction Form
Pregnant Women's Decision Satisfaction Form Points: Developed by researchers. The participants were asked to evaluate whether they were satisfied with their decisions, to make an informed decision, to make informed decisions, to make the same decision if they had experienced the same situation again. In this form, which consists of five questions and has a five-point Likert type, the expressions are evaluated with 5 (strongly agree), 4 (agree), 3 (unclear), 2 (disagree), 1 (strongly disagree) options. The highest 25 points are the lowest 5 points. High score shows high satisfaction.
Measured: In 13-14th gestational weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Feb 2019
- Study start10 Jun 2017
- Primary completion5 Mar 2018
- Study completion5 Mar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Decision MakingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ilknur Yesilcinar, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi
- Investigators
- İlknur Yeşilçınar, PhD. RN., Study director, Health Science UniversityGülten Güvenç, Assoc. Prof., Study director, Health Science University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03825978
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Ilknur Yesilcinar
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 23 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 1 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Martin L, Gitsels-van der Wal JT, de Boer MA, Vanstone M, Henneman L. Introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing as a first-tier aneuploidy screening test: A survey among Dutch midwives about their role as counsellors. Midwifery. 2018 Jan;56:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
PubMed 29024868Amel S.H., Ali A, Hassan S.A, Momtaz M., Abdelhaleem Z., Negm S. Impact of A Structured Prenatal Counseling on Anxiety Level Among Women Undergoing Amniocentesis. American Journal of Research Communication, 2014; 2(6): 97-108} www.usa-journals.com, ISSN: 2325-4076.
Long S, O'Leary P, Lobo R, Dickinson JE. Women's Understanding and Attitudes towards Down Syndrome and Other Genetic Conditions in the Context of Prenatal Screening. J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun;27(3):647-655. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0167-7. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
PubMed 29067542
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Efficacy of Counseling for Prenatal Screening and Diagnostic Tests on Pregnant Women's Decisional Conflict, Being Sure of the Decision, Anxiety Levels and Attitudes Towards the Tests: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03825978
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Ilknur Yesilcinar
- Keywords
- prenatal genetic screening, prenatal diagnosis, counseling, decision, anxiety, nursing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip FakultesiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of counseling for prenatal screening and diagnostic tests on pregnant women's decisional conflict, being sure of the decision, anxiety levels, and attitudes towards the tests. This prospective randomized controlled intervention study was conducted between the dates June 2017 and March 2018 in a training and research hospital, department of obstetrics and gynecology. The sample of the study consisted of 210 pregnant women who took antenatal care between the 8-11th gestational weeks of whom 112 were in the intervention group and 98 were in the control group. The data were collected by using Data Collection Form, The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI I-II), Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Sure Scale (SURE), Knowledge Evaluation Form about Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Tests, Prenatal Counseling Satisfaction Form, Decision Satisfaction Form and Attitudes towards the tests Scale. The study carried out in two stages. In the first stage; women's data were collected before and after participating prenatal genetic screening tests. After the results of the screening test were taken, the data were collected again. Counseling was provided for 112 pregnant women about prenatal screening and diagnostic tests before participating tests. Routine clinical information was given for 98 pregnant women who were in control group. Both groups were pre and post-tested at the same times. In the second phase, pregnant women who had diagnostic tests were evaluated. Counseling for prenatal genetic diagnosis tests was provided for 31 pregnant women in inetervetion group women and routine clinical information was providen for 26 pregnant women who were in control group. Data were collected again with data collection tools before and after the diagnostic test.
Detailed description
Pregnant Women Who Had Only Prenatal Genetic Screening Tests In intervention group, pregnant women, who were in 8-11th gestational weeks, before prenatal genetic counseling, answered the questions in "Descriptive Features Data Collection Form", "Decisional Conflict Scale", "The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scale", "Information Evaluation Form about Prenatal Screening Tests ","Decision Satisfaction Scale", "Attitudes towards the tests Scale". Later, individual interviews were made with pregnant women education was given with slide show about prenatal diagnosis and screening tests to pregnant women. In addition a training brochure which was prepared by the researcher was given to the pregnant women. It took about 20 minutes for the data collection forms to be answered and counseling was took about 25 minutes. After counseling, pregnant women were interviewed again at 14th week. The pregnant women were asked whether they had a screening test and the results were recorded. Then pregnant women were answered "Decisional Conflict Scale", "The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scale", "Information Evaluation Form about Prenatal Screening Tests ","Decision Satisfaction Scale", "Attitudes towards the tests Scale" again. At the following antenatal visits (16-20th weeks), the pregnant women were asked whether they had triple, quadruple or NIPT and the test results were recorded in the data collection form. At the end of the 20th week, the data collection process of pregnant women who did not have any problems related to fetus and who were recommended to continue routine follow-up was terminated. In control group pregnant women answered same data collection forms in same weeks, but counseling was not given to this group. For this group routine clinical procedure was performed.
Pregnant Women Who Had Also Prenatal Genetic Diagnostic Tests Prenatal genetic diagnostic tests were recommended to pregnant women who had high risk results according to prenatal screening test. Pregnant women with high risk and diagnostic test were referred to genetic consultation in both intervention and control groups. After genetic consultation, pregnant women were answered "Decisional Conflict Scale", "The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scale", "Information Evaluation Form about Prenatal Diagnostic Tests", "Decision Satisfaction Scale", "Attitudes towards the tests Scale". Then specific counseling was given to invasive test recommended by the doctor. The pregnant woman was asked if she would like to have a diagnostic test and if she didn't want to, the reason was recorded in the data collection form.
If the pregnant woman decided to have a diagnostic test, "The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scale" was applied again after the procedure. Then pregnant women were interviewed again after about three weeks and their results were evaluated and they answered "Decisional Conflict Scale", "Information Evaluation Form about Prenatal Diagnostic Tests", "Decision Satisfaction Scale", "Attitudes towards the tests Scale". Their decision about to continue or terminate pregnancy was recorded in the data collection form. In control group pregnant women answered same data collection forms in same weeks, but counseling was not given to this group. For this group routine clinical procedure was performed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Active comparator | Behavioral: Prenatal Genetic CounselingAn individual and comprehensive prenatal genetic counseling was given to all pregnant women in the intervention group, including all screening tests and diagnostic tests for prenatal diagnosis and screening tests at the first antenatal visit. |
| Control | No intervention | –There was no intervention from the first antenatal visit in the control group. Routine clinical information was given about prenatal screening and diagnostic tests. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 46 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- taking first antenatal follow-up in 8-11. gestational weeks in where the study is conducted to have a single pregnancy
- to continue take the antenatal care in the hospital where the research was conducted
- at least primary school graduation,
- voluntary to participate the research.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- want to exit from the study at her own request
- continue to antenatal follow-up in another hospital.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prenatal Genetic CounselingAlso: CounselingIn this study prenatal genetic screening counseling was provided from the begining of the pregnancy, different from the other studies in the literature. In the literature, most of the study evaluated pregnant women's anxiety, information status about the test and decisional conflicts, only prenatal screening process or prenatal diagnosis process. In this study pregnant women were evaluated both in prenatal screening test and prenatal diagnosis procedures. | Behavioural | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Anxiety
Time frame: In 8-11th gestational weeks
The State Anxiety Scale evaluates the current state of anxiety. The expressions (1) in the articles are rated as (2) slightly, (3) very, (4) completely, and the scale is answered by marking the ones that meet the current situation of the person. The total point value obtained from scale may vary between 20 and 80 points. High score indicates high anxiety level and low score indicates low anxiety level
Decisional Conflict
Time frame: In 8-11th gestational weeks
Pregnant women's decisional conflict scale points: 5-point Likert type and 16 questions. Each item varies between "Strongly Agree ıy and" Strongly Disagree Her. Each item contains direct expressions, and I absolutely agree with = 0 points, Agree = 1 points, Undecided = 2 points, Disagree = 3 points and Strongly Disagree = 4 points. While calculating the total scale score; points are awarded to all items. The score is divided by the total number of items and is multiplied by 25 and the scale score is obtained. There is no cut-off point in the scale evaluating decision conflict scores. As the score obtained from the scale increases, the level of decision conflict increases.
SURE Scale
Time frame: In 8-11th gestational weeks
Pregnant women's SURE Scale points: It is double likert type. Items Yes = 1 point No = 0 points. Zero points mean that there is a very high decision-making conflict, while 4 points mean that there is no conflict. Scores of 3 points or less indicate a conflict of interest.
Knowledge Form About Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Tests
Time frame: In 8-11th gestational weeks
Pregnant Women's Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Tests Form points: The information evaluation form for prenatal screening tests was developed by the researcher as a result of literature review. The information evaluation form for prenatal screening tests consists of 12 statements. The aim of the prenatal screening tests is to provide information about the diseases, the weeks of screening tests, risk values and what they mean. For each phrase there are yes, I don't know and no options.Twelve is Highest, 0 is the lowest scores.
Attitudes Towards The Tests Scale
Time frame: In 8-11th gestational weeks
Pregnant women's Attitudes Towards The Tests scale points: Good idea to participate in testing for prenatal screening and diagnostic tests on the scale (7 points), bad idea (1 point); useful (7 points), not useful (1 point); harmful (1 point), not harmful (7 points); a bad idea (1 point), not a bad idea (7 points) were asked to rank between 1 and 7 points. One point represents negative attitude and 7 points represent a very positive attitude. According to the opinions of the pregnant women about the prenatal screening and diagnostic tests, it was stated that they could give the expressions between 1 and 7, and they were asked to answer the scale. The highest score to be obtained from this scale is 28 and the lowest score is 4.
Decision Satisfaction Form
Time frame: In 8-11th gestational weeks
Pregnant women's Decision Satisfaction Form points: Developed by researchers. The participants were asked to evaluate whether they were satisfied with their decisions, to make an informed decision, to make informed decisions, to make the same decision if they had experienced the same situation again. In this form, which consists of five questions and has a five-point Likert type, the expressions are evaluated with 5 (strongly agree), 4 (agree), 3 (unclear), 2 (disagree), 1 (strongly disagree) options. The highest 25 points are the lowest 5 points. High score shows high satisfaction.
6 secondary outcomes
Anxiety
Time frame: In 13-14th gestational weeks
Decisional Conflict Scale
Time frame: In 13-14th gestational weeks
SURE Scale
Time frame: In 13-14th gestational weeks
Knowledge Form About Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Tests
Time frame: In 13-14th gestational weeks
Attitudes Towards The Tests Scale
Time frame: In 13-14th gestational weeks
Decision Satisfaction Form
Time frame: In 13-14th gestational weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Feb 2019.
- Background: PubMed 29024868Martin L, Gitsels-van der Wal JT, de Boer MA, Vanstone M, Henneman L. Introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing as a first-tier aneuploidy screening test: A survey among Dutch midwives about their role as counsellors. Midwifery. 2018 Jan;56:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
- BackgroundAmel S.H., Ali A, Hassan S.A, Momtaz M., Abdelhaleem Z., Negm S. Impact of A Structured Prenatal Counseling on Anxiety Level Among Women Undergoing Amniocentesis. American Journal of Research Communication, 2014; 2(6): 97-108} www.usa-journals.com, ISSN: 2325-4076.
- Results publication: PubMed 29067542Long S, O'Leary P, Lobo R, Dickinson JE. Women's Understanding and Attitudes towards Down Syndrome and Other Genetic Conditions in the Context of Prenatal Screening. J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun;27(3):647-655. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0167-7. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Decision Making
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Developing Transcranial Neuromodulation Protocols for Learning and Decision-Making
Normal Physiology
RecruitingObservational study
Structural Stressors, Reward Related Decision Making and Substance Use Risk
Substance Use Risk, Structural Stressors
Recruiting
Decision Support for Chemoprevention
Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Survey to Determine Incarcerated Persons' Views on Surrogate Decision Making
Healthy Volunteers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
İlknur Yeşilçınar, PhD. RN. study director
Health Science University
Gülten Güvenç, Assoc. Prof. study director
Health Science University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prenatal Genetic Counseling in people with Decision Making and Chromosome Abnormality, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Anxiety (time frame: In 8-11th gestational weeks). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03825978, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2019.