AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck CancerNCT03828578

Comparison of AIRVO High Flow Oxygen Therapy With Standard Care for Prevention of PPCs After Major H&N Surgery

A study testing High flow oxygen therapy in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by Cardiff and Vale University Health Board at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients undergoing major head and neck surgery often develop breathing difficulties as a result of build up of sputum and difficulty taking deep breaths. Often as part of the surgery patients may also require a tracheotomy tube (a temporary tube placed into their airway) which is removed around 5-7 days after the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Head and Neck Cancer
What is being tested?
High flow oxygen therapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
1 Apr 2017to 1 Oct 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Undergoing head and neck surgery with microvascular reconstruction and involving insertion of a tracheostomy

Who cannot join

  • Under 18 years old
  • Lack of consent
  • Consultant request

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

    Cardiff, CF144XW

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Comparison of AIRVO High Flow Oxygen Therapy With Standard Care for Prevention of Post-operative Pulmonary Complications After Major Head and Neck Surgery Involving Insertion of a Tracheostomy - A Proof of Concept Study

Patients undergoing major head and neck surgery often develop breathing difficulties as a result of build up of sputum and difficulty taking deep breaths. Often as part of the surgery patients may also require a tracheotomy tube (a temporary tube placed into their airway) which is removed around 5-7 days after the operation. The presence of this tracheostomy tube increases the patient's risk of developing breathing problems, especially difficulty clearing sputum and reduced lung volumes. To reduce the risk of developing these problems, different forms of oxygen therapy and humidification are used. This normally involves using oxygen masks, nebulisers and other medications to help loosen the sputum and maintain blood oxygen levels. Another method of giving oxygen and humidification is through the use of AIRVO, which delivers the air / oxygen to the patient at higher rates as well as warming and humidifying the air.

The aim of this study is to compare the AIRVO system to standard care in a small sample of patients (20 patients) undergoing major head and neck surgery involving insertion of a tracheostomy tube.

The study will compare rates of breathing complications (e.g. pneumonia, reduced lung volume) as well as comparing the time to remove the tracheostomy tube and the time the patient is required to stay in hospital. These results will then be used to develop a larger funded study.

Read the detailed description

Major head and neck surgery involving micro-vascular reconstructions are prolonged procedures with considerable post operative risk. Not only do patients have prolonged time in theatre, the surgery involves two distinct surgical sites (head \& neck site and peripheral flap donor site), and requires the patient to be admitted to a high care area for overnight sedation and ventilation. This combined with the presence of significant co-morbidities such as hypertension, cardiomyopathy and respiratory disease, place the patient at significant risk of post-operative complications. A recent prospective cohort study reported complication rates in nearly 65% of cases, of which 29% were of pulmonary origin. Furthermore, of these, 14 patients required treatment in the intensive care or high dependency. Interestingly, and in contrast to other research3, neither pre-operative smoking nor the presence of pre-existing lung disease predicted pulmonary complications.

The risks of post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) seem to be further increased in those patients requiring a tracheostomy. This tracheostomy is required to facilitate access to the tumour location and to provide post-operative airway protection in the presence of significant swelling or oedema. The risks of tracheostomy are well known4. Patients are prone to increased rates of infection, poor sputum clearance and inadequate humidification. These complications lead to prolonged admissions, delays in tracheostomy weaning and considerable healthcare related costs. To overcome these issues national guidance documents have identified the need to provide adequate humidification to prevent mucus plugging, as well as the provision of increased nursing care for stoma site cleaning and inner tube care. Historically, humidification has been provided by heated systems however due to perceived increased infection risk this has fallen out of favour and now passive humidification systems such as heat moisture exchangers have become more popular.

Clearly, the combination of the risks of major head and neck surgery and those of a tracheostomy, place the patient at significant risk. As such it is essential to develop new post-operative management protocols to reduce the occurrence of post-operative complications.

AIRVOTM (a form of non-invasive high flow oxygen therapy, HFOT), which delivers high flow heated and humidified oxygen and air via a tracheostomy tube at a prescribed fraction of inspired oxygen and a maximum flow of 60 L/min, is an attractive alternative to conventional oxygen therapy. Previous studies have shown that HFOT therapy generates a flow-dependent positive airway pressure and improves oxygenation by increasing end-expiratory lung volume, thus suggesting a possible alveolar recruitment associated with high-flow therapy. Although widely used in other clinical areas including patients with tracheostomy tubes, HFOT delivered in the AIRVOTM system has yet to be evaluated in the Head and Neck surgery population.

This study aims to compare the effects of application of HFOT(delivered via AIRVOTM) therapy and conventional oxygen and humidification administration after major head and neck surgery involving insertion of a tracheostomy tube on postoperative pulmonary complications. The study will also compare post-operative length of stay, time to tracheostomy tube cuff deflation, tracheostomy tube decannulation, antibiotic use and post-operative physiotherapy requirements.

The results of this proof of concept study will be used to further develop local protocols and to inform a grant funded multi-centre trial.

Being tested
High flow oxygen therapy
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High flow oxygen therapyProcedure or surgery

    High flow oxygen therapy delivered via Airvo2

Study groups in NCT03828578
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High flow oxygen therapyExperimentalPatients allocated to the intervention group will receive high flow oxygen therapy via the tracheostomy tube from cessation of mechanical ventilation. The HFOT will provide oxygen therapy at a flow rate of 50-60 litres per minute at a FiO2 titrated by the bedside clinician to maintain a peripheral oxygen saturation of 95% of more (unless otherwise clinically indicated and documented by an appropriate consultant). Once transferred to the ward patients will continue to receive HFOT 24 hours per day at a rate of 50-60 litres per minute at a maximum oxygen concentration of 40% to achieve oxygen saturations 95% and above (unless otherwise documented). Patients may be disconnected from the HFOT for short periods for toileting, mobilising etc. Tracheostomy weaning will continue as per standard practice with an aim of cuff deflation followed by decannulation once clinically appropriate. systems. Following decannulation patients will resort to standard oxygen therapy as needed.
Receives: Procedure: High flow oxygen therapy
Standard CareNo interventionPatients randomised to the standard care study arm will receive routine post-operative care as currently performed within the host organisation. Following cessation of mechanical ventilation, oxygen therapy will be delivered using equipment and rates appropriate to the clinical picture. On transfer to the ward patients will continue with existing methods of oxygen therapy and will be weaned from these accordingly. Patients will continue to use heat moisture exchanges (e.g. Swedish nose or Buchannan protectors) as clinically indicated, as well as having saline nebulisers prescribed and administered as per standard. Tracheostomy weaning will continue in accordance with current practice. Data on all of the applied procedures will be recorded.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of participants diagnosed with post-operative Pulmonary Complications

    Measured: Up to 48hours post tracheostomy decannulation

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Time to decannulation

    Measured in days

    Measured: Up to 4 weeks

  2. Hospital length of stay

    Measured in days

    Measured: Up to 4 weeks

  3. Amount of physiotherapy intervention recieved by each participant

    Measured in minutes

    Measured: Up to 4 weeks

  4. Feasability of recruitment, randomisation, delivery of intervention, and completion of outcome measures

    Measured in percentages

    Measured: Up to 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Feb 2019
  2. Study start1 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03828578
Sponsor's protocol ID
223048
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
19 Jan 2019
Last updated
31 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing High flow oxygen therapy in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by Cardiff and Vale University Health Board at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of participants diagnosed with post-operative Pulmonary Complications (time frame: Up to 48hours post tracheostomy decannulation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in