Executive FunctionNCT03828734
Modulation of Cognitive Control Signals in Prefrontal Cortex by Rhythmic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
A study testing Theta TMS, Alpha TMS and Arrhythmic TMS in people with Executive Function, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Purpose: In this study, the investigators will provide causal evidence for the role of alpha and theta oscillations in cognitive control. Participants: Participants must be healthy, between the ages of 18 and 35, right handed, able to provide informed consent, willing to comply with all study procedures, and be… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Executive Function
- What is being tested?
- Theta TMS, Alpha TMS and Arrhythmic TMS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Feb 2019to 22 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy
- Between the ages of 18 and 35
- Right handed
- Able to provide informed consent
- Willing to comply with all study procedures
- Available for the duration of the study
- Speak and understand English.
Who cannot join
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (currently under treatment)
- Neurological disorders and conditions, including, but not limited to: History of epilepsy Seizures (except childhood febrile seizures) -Dementia
- History of stroke
- Parkinson's disease
- Multiple sclerosis
- Cerebral aneurysm
Show all 9Show fewer
- Brain tumors
- Medical or neurological illness or treatment for a medical disorder that could interfere with study participation (e.g., unstable cardiac disease, HIV/AIDS, malignancy, liver or renal impairment)
- Prior brain surgery -Any brain devices/implants, including cochlear implants and aneurysm clips -Cardiac pacemaker -Any other implanted electronic device -History of current traumatic brain injury -(For females) Pregnancy or breast feeding -Anything that, in the opinion of the investigator, would place the participant at increased risk or preclude the participant's full compliance with or completion of the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516
About this study
Official title: Modulation of Alpha and Theta Oscillations in a Cognitive Control Retrospective Cue Task With Frequency Specific Rhythmic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Purpose: In this study, the investigators will provide causal evidence for the role of alpha and theta oscillations in cognitive control.
Participants: Participants must be healthy, between the ages of 18 and 35, right handed, able to provide informed consent, willing to comply with all study procedures, and be available for the duration of the study, speak and understand English.
Procedures: Alpha and theta brain oscillations will be measured and then entrained using frequency specific rhythmic TMS during a retrospective cued cognitive control task.
Read the detailed description
Neural oscillations are proposed to be a mechanism of coordinating information processing across distributed regions of cortex. Different neural oscillations may correspond to different underlying neural computations. Noninvasive brain stimulation allows experimenters to modulate specific neural oscillations by targeting particular frequency bands. By collecting simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG), rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been previously demonstrated to entrain neural oscillations at the frequency of stimulation. Furthermore, when the frequency of entrained neural oscillations is matched to the frequency of endogenous activity in a cognitive task, the brain stimulation improves behavioral performance. Therefore, noninvasive brain stimulation is a promising tool for improving cognition by inducing optimal neural activity via externally applied electromagnetic fields; e.g. cognitive control improvements.
Previous evidence has implicated neural activity in the alpha band (8-12 Hz) in information suppression and activity in the theta band (4-7 Hz) in information prioritization. Cognitive control task paradigms have been shown to elicit distinct activity in both of these bands. In this task, the stimuli are lateralized to the right and left visual field during encoding. After a short delay, a cue informs participants which stimuli (right or left) will be tested. Previous evidence found that alpha activity in parietal cortex is generated contralateral to irrelevant stimuli-supporting the role of alpha in information suppression-while theta activity in frontal cortex increases with the number of stimuli to be remembered-supporting the role of theta in information prioritization.
For the current study, the investigators propose to deliver rhythmic trains of TMS in either alpha frequency, theta frequency, or an arrhythmic control to modulate neural processing during a cognitive control task. By collecting simultaneous EEG with TMS, the investigators will be able to measure the entrained oscillations from rhythmic TMS. The goal of this experiment is to enhance the observed theta and alpha activity that is seen with the successful prioritization and suppression of information. To provide causal evidence that parietal cortex generates alpha activity and frontal cortex generates theta activity, the investigators will apply rhythmic TMS stimulation to two scalp locations: the anterior middle frontal gyrus and inferior intraparietal sulcus. By applying alpha frequency, theta frequency, and arrhythmic TMS at each location, the investigators will be able to examine the causal relationship of frontal theta oscillations in information prioritization and parietal alpha oscillations in information suppression.
- Conditions
- Executive Function
- Being tested
- Theta TMS, Alpha TMS, Arrhythmic TMS
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Theta TMSDevice
Also called MagProX100
TMS will be administered at the frequency of each subject's endogenous theta oscillation (4-7Hz)
Alpha TMSDevice
Also called MagProX100
TMS will be administered at the frequency of each subject's endogenous alpha oscillation (8-12 Hz)
Arrhythmic TMSDevice
Also called MagProX100
TMS will be administered arrhythmically; i.e. a sequence of pulses with randomized timing
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TMS to frontal cortex followed by TMS to parietal cortex | Experimental | Participants will receive TMS while performing a cognitive control task. In their first stimulation session, the TMS coil will be placed over the frontal cortex on the scalp. In their second session, the TMS coil will be placed over the parietal cortex on the scalp. During every session, subjects receive Theta TMS, Alpha TMS, and Arrhythmic TMS. Receives: Device: Theta TMS; Device: Alpha TMS; Device: Arrhythmic TMS |
| TMS to parietal cortex followed by TMS to frontal cortex | Experimental | Participants will receive TMS while performing a cognitive control task. In their first stimulation session, the TMS coil will be placed over the parietal cortex on the scalp. In their second session, the TMS coil will be placed over the frontal cortex on the scalp. During every session, subjects receive Theta TMS, Alpha TMS, and Arrhythmic TMS. Receives: Device: Theta TMS; Device: Alpha TMS; Device: Arrhythmic TMS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Remembered Items
Participants make a button press on a keyboard to indicate if the probed items are matched or non-matched to the items held in memory after a retrospective cue is presented. The investigators calculate the percent correct for non-match conditions, defined as the hit rate, and the percent incorrect for match conditions, defined as the false alarm rate. The number of remembered items, often referred to as working memory capacity, is calculated as the number of items to be remembered (2, 3, or 4) times the hit rate minus the false alarm rate, divided by one minus the false alarm rate. The range of values is 0 to 4 where larger values mean better performance. For TMS to frontal cortex, working memory capacity is reported when the participant was cued to the right. For TMS to parietal cortex, working memory capacity is reported when the participant was cued to the left.
Measured: 1 week
Amplitude of Neural Oscillations
The electrical activity of the brain is recorded during performance of the task and brain stimulation. The investigators will perform Morlet wavelet convolution on the recorded electrical signal to calculate the amplitude of neural oscillations in the frequency bands: theta (4-7 hertz) and alpha (8-12 hertz). The amplitude of neural oscillations is reported during the second half of stimulation in the region that is being stimulated. The amplitude is normalized for each participant as the percent change from the amplitude during the baseline period (before the task begins). For TMS to frontal cortex the amplitude of theta oscillations are reported and for TMS to parietal cortex the amplitude of alpha oscillations are reported.
Measured: 1 week
Response Time
Participants make a button press on a keyboard to indicate if the probe items are matched or non-matched to the items held in memory after a retrospective cue is presented. The investigators will calculate the response time of this choice as the difference between the time of the button press and presentation of the probe. For TMS to frontal cortex, response time is reported when the participant was cued to the right. For TMS to parietal cortex, response time is reported when the participant was cued to the left.
Measured: 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Feb 2019
- Study start13 Feb 2019
- Primary completion22 Nov 2019
- Study completion22 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Executive FunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Flavio Frohlich, PhD, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03828734
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18-1789
- Other IDs
- R01MH111889
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Albouy P, Weiss A, Baillet S, Zatorre RJ. Selective Entrainment of Theta Oscillations in the Dorsal Stream Causally Enhances Auditory Working Memory Performance. Neuron. 2017 Apr 5;94(1):193-206.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
PubMed 28343866Roux F, Uhlhaas PJ. Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha-gamma versus theta-gamma codes for distinct WM information? Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jan;18(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
PubMed 24268290Fries P. Rhythms for Cognition: Communication through Coherence. Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):220-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.034.
PubMed 26447583Hanslmayr S, Matuschek J, Fellner MC. Entrainment of prefrontal beta oscillations induces an endogenous echo and impairs memory formation. Curr Biol. 2014 Apr 14;24(8):904-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
PubMed 24684933Klimesch W, Sauseng P, Hanslmayr S. EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Res Rev. 2007 Jan;53(1):63-88. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
PubMed 16887192Popov T, Popova P, Harkotte M, Awiszus B, Rockstroh B, Miller GA. Cross-frequency interactions between frontal theta and posterior alpha control mechanisms foster working memory. Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 1;181:728-733. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.067. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
PubMed 30075276Reinhart RMG. Disruption and rescue of interareal theta phase coupling and adaptive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 24;114(43):11542-11547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710257114. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
PubMed 29073084Romei V, Thut G, Silvanto J. Information-Based Approaches of Noninvasive Transcranial Brain Stimulation. Trends Neurosci. 2016 Nov;39(11):782-795. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
PubMed 27697295Thut G, Veniero D, Romei V, Miniussi C, Schyns P, Gross J. Rhythmic TMS causes local entrainment of natural oscillatory signatures. Curr Biol. 2011 Jul 26;21(14):1176-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.049. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
PubMed 21723129Wallis G, Stokes M, Cousijn H, Woolrich M, Nobre AC. Frontoparietal and Cingulo-opercular Networks Play Dissociable Roles in Control of Working Memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Oct;27(10):2019-34. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00838. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
PubMed 26042457Wang XJ. Neurophysiological and computational principles of cortical rhythms in cognition. Physiol Rev. 2010 Jul;90(3):1195-268. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00035.2008.
PubMed 20664082Wolinski N, Cooper NR, Sauseng P, Romei V. The speed of parietal theta frequency drives visuospatial working memory capacity. PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 14;16(3):e2005348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005348. eCollection 2018 Mar.
PubMed 29538384Rouder JN, Morey RD, Morey CC, Cowan N. How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):324-30. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0055-3.
PubMed 21331668
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Modulation of Alpha and Theta Oscillations in a Cognitive Control Retrospective Cue Task With Frequency Specific Rhythmic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03828734
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18-1789
- Conditions
- Executive Function
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Study start
- 13 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Nov 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Purpose: In this study, the investigators will provide causal evidence for the role of alpha and theta oscillations in cognitive control.
Participants: Participants must be healthy, between the ages of 18 and 35, right handed, able to provide informed consent, willing to comply with all study procedures, and be available for the duration of the study, speak and understand English.
Procedures: Alpha and theta brain oscillations will be measured and then entrained using frequency specific rhythmic TMS during a retrospective cued cognitive control task.
Detailed description
Neural oscillations are proposed to be a mechanism of coordinating information processing across distributed regions of cortex. Different neural oscillations may correspond to different underlying neural computations. Noninvasive brain stimulation allows experimenters to modulate specific neural oscillations by targeting particular frequency bands. By collecting simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG), rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been previously demonstrated to entrain neural oscillations at the frequency of stimulation. Furthermore, when the frequency of entrained neural oscillations is matched to the frequency of endogenous activity in a cognitive task, the brain stimulation improves behavioral performance. Therefore, noninvasive brain stimulation is a promising tool for improving cognition by inducing optimal neural activity via externally applied electromagnetic fields; e.g. cognitive control improvements.
Previous evidence has implicated neural activity in the alpha band (8-12 Hz) in information suppression and activity in the theta band (4-7 Hz) in information prioritization. Cognitive control task paradigms have been shown to elicit distinct activity in both of these bands. In this task, the stimuli are lateralized to the right and left visual field during encoding. After a short delay, a cue informs participants which stimuli (right or left) will be tested. Previous evidence found that alpha activity in parietal cortex is generated contralateral to irrelevant stimuli-supporting the role of alpha in information suppression-while theta activity in frontal cortex increases with the number of stimuli to be remembered-supporting the role of theta in information prioritization.
For the current study, the investigators propose to deliver rhythmic trains of TMS in either alpha frequency, theta frequency, or an arrhythmic control to modulate neural processing during a cognitive control task. By collecting simultaneous EEG with TMS, the investigators will be able to measure the entrained oscillations from rhythmic TMS. The goal of this experiment is to enhance the observed theta and alpha activity that is seen with the successful prioritization and suppression of information. To provide causal evidence that parietal cortex generates alpha activity and frontal cortex generates theta activity, the investigators will apply rhythmic TMS stimulation to two scalp locations: the anterior middle frontal gyrus and inferior intraparietal sulcus. By applying alpha frequency, theta frequency, and arrhythmic TMS at each location, the investigators will be able to examine the causal relationship of frontal theta oscillations in information prioritization and parietal alpha oscillations in information suppression.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TMS to frontal cortex followed by TMS to parietal cortex | Experimental | Device: Theta TMS, Device: Alpha TMS, Device: Arrhythmic TMSParticipants will receive TMS while performing a cognitive control task. In their first stimulation session, the TMS coil will be placed over the frontal cortex on the scalp. In their second session, the TMS coil will be placed over the parietal cortex on the scalp. During every session, subjects receive Theta TMS, Alpha TMS, and Arrhythmic TMS. |
| TMS to parietal cortex followed by TMS to frontal cortex | Experimental | Device: Theta TMS, Device: Alpha TMS, Device: Arrhythmic TMSParticipants will receive TMS while performing a cognitive control task. In their first stimulation session, the TMS coil will be placed over the parietal cortex on the scalp. In their second session, the TMS coil will be placed over the frontal cortex on the scalp. During every session, subjects receive Theta TMS, Alpha TMS, and Arrhythmic TMS. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Healthy
- Between the ages of 18 and 35
- Right handed
- Able to provide informed consent
- Willing to comply with all study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (currently under treatment)
- Neurological disorders and conditions, including, but not limited to: History of epilepsy Seizures (except childhood febrile seizures) -Dementia
- History of stroke
- Parkinson's disease
- Multiple sclerosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Theta TMSAlso: MagProX100TMS will be administered at the frequency of each subject's endogenous theta oscillation (4-7Hz) | Device | TMS to frontal cortex followed by TMS to parietal cortex, TMS to parietal cortex followed by TMS to frontal cortex |
| Alpha TMSAlso: MagProX100TMS will be administered at the frequency of each subject's endogenous alpha oscillation (8-12 Hz) | Device | TMS to frontal cortex followed by TMS to parietal cortex, TMS to parietal cortex followed by TMS to frontal cortex |
| Arrhythmic TMSAlso: MagProX100TMS will be administered arrhythmically; i.e. a sequence of pulses with randomized timing | Device | TMS to frontal cortex followed by TMS to parietal cortex, TMS to parietal cortex followed by TMS to frontal cortex |
Primary outcome
Number of Remembered Items
Time frame: 1 week
Participants make a button press on a keyboard to indicate if the probed items are matched or non-matched to the items held in memory after a retrospective cue is presented. The investigators calculate the percent correct for non-match conditions, defined as the hit rate, and the percent incorrect for match conditions, defined as the false alarm rate. The number of remembered items, often referred to as working memory capacity, is calculated as the number of items to be remembered (2, 3, or 4) times the hit rate minus the false alarm rate, divided by one minus the false alarm rate. The range of values is 0 to 4 where larger values mean better performance. For TMS to frontal cortex, working memory capacity is reported when the participant was cued to the right. For TMS to parietal cortex, working memory capacity is reported when the participant was cued to the left.
Amplitude of Neural Oscillations
Time frame: 1 week
The electrical activity of the brain is recorded during performance of the task and brain stimulation. The investigators will perform Morlet wavelet convolution on the recorded electrical signal to calculate the amplitude of neural oscillations in the frequency bands: theta (4-7 hertz) and alpha (8-12 hertz). The amplitude of neural oscillations is reported during the second half of stimulation in the region that is being stimulated. The amplitude is normalized for each participant as the percent change from the amplitude during the baseline period (before the task begins). For TMS to frontal cortex the amplitude of theta oscillations are reported and for TMS to parietal cortex the amplitude of alpha oscillations are reported.
Response Time
Time frame: 1 week
Participants make a button press on a keyboard to indicate if the probe items are matched or non-matched to the items held in memory after a retrospective cue is presented. The investigators will calculate the response time of this choice as the difference between the time of the button press and presentation of the probe. For TMS to frontal cortex, response time is reported when the participant was cued to the right. For TMS to parietal cortex, response time is reported when the participant was cued to the left.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Nov 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 28343866Albouy P, Weiss A, Baillet S, Zatorre RJ. Selective Entrainment of Theta Oscillations in the Dorsal Stream Causally Enhances Auditory Working Memory Performance. Neuron. 2017 Apr 5;94(1):193-206.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
- Background: PubMed 24268290Roux F, Uhlhaas PJ. Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha-gamma versus theta-gamma codes for distinct WM information? Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jan;18(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
- Background: PubMed 26447583Fries P. Rhythms for Cognition: Communication through Coherence. Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):220-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.034.
- Background: PubMed 24684933Hanslmayr S, Matuschek J, Fellner MC. Entrainment of prefrontal beta oscillations induces an endogenous echo and impairs memory formation. Curr Biol. 2014 Apr 14;24(8):904-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
- Background: PubMed 16887192Klimesch W, Sauseng P, Hanslmayr S. EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Res Rev. 2007 Jan;53(1):63-88. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
- Background: PubMed 30075276Popov T, Popova P, Harkotte M, Awiszus B, Rockstroh B, Miller GA. Cross-frequency interactions between frontal theta and posterior alpha control mechanisms foster working memory. Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 1;181:728-733. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.067. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
- Background: PubMed 29073084Reinhart RMG. Disruption and rescue of interareal theta phase coupling and adaptive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 24;114(43):11542-11547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710257114. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
- Background: PubMed 27697295Romei V, Thut G, Silvanto J. Information-Based Approaches of Noninvasive Transcranial Brain Stimulation. Trends Neurosci. 2016 Nov;39(11):782-795. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 21723129Thut G, Veniero D, Romei V, Miniussi C, Schyns P, Gross J. Rhythmic TMS causes local entrainment of natural oscillatory signatures. Curr Biol. 2011 Jul 26;21(14):1176-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.049. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
- Background: PubMed 26042457Wallis G, Stokes M, Cousijn H, Woolrich M, Nobre AC. Frontoparietal and Cingulo-opercular Networks Play Dissociable Roles in Control of Working Memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Oct;27(10):2019-34. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00838. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
- Background: PubMed 20664082Wang XJ. Neurophysiological and computational principles of cortical rhythms in cognition. Physiol Rev. 2010 Jul;90(3):1195-268. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00035.2008.
- Background: PubMed 29538384Wolinski N, Cooper NR, Sauseng P, Romei V. The speed of parietal theta frequency drives visuospatial working memory capacity. PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 14;16(3):e2005348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005348. eCollection 2018 Mar.
Related trials for Executive Function
Not yet recruiting
Executive Function Play Opportunities for Children With Down Syndrome
Down Syndrome, Trisomy 21
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Correlation Between Forward Head Posture and Executive Functions in Cervical Radiculopathy
Cervical Radiculopathy, Forward Head Posture
Not yet recruiting
Cognitive-Motor Training for Gait Adaptability in Parkinson Disease
Parkinson Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
Acute Effects of Cannabis on Cognition and Affect
Cannabis Use
Recruiting
Sleep Coach for Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Flavio Frohlich, PhD principal investigator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Theta TMS, Alpha TMS and Arrhythmic TMS in people with Executive Function, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Nov 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Remembered Items (time frame: 1 week). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03828734, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2020.