Prostate CancerTEMPOSNCT03830788
Erectile Dysfunction in Good Prognosis Prostate Cancer : Comparison Between Brachytherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
A study testing Radiation by brachytherapy and Radiation by SBRT in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Center Eugene Marquis at 20 sites in France.
Trial summary
The TEMPOS-GEniToUrinary Group (GETUG) study is a multicenter, medico-economic study comparing brachytherapy to SBRT in low and intermediate risk prostate cancer, particularly focused on the issue of erectile dysfunction. A total of 240 potent patients are randomized in two arms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Radiation by brachytherapy and Radiation by SBRT
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 20 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 4 Oct 2019to 4 Apr 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Main inclusion criteria
- Biopsy proven prostate adenocarcinoma,
- Low risk prostate cancer according to d'Amico (T1-T2a and PSA <10 ng/ml, and Gleason score 6) or intermediate risk prostate cancer according d'Amico but excluding tumor with Gleason score 7 (4 + 3),
- Indication of a curative treatment by brachytherapy validated in multidisciplinary consultation meeting,
Main exclusion criteria
- Androgen deprivation therapy,
- Contraindication for prostate Iodine 125 brachytherapy (Prostate volume > 50 cc, impossibility if general anesthesia).
- Contraindication for Resonance Magnetic Imagery (RMI) (claustrophobia, pacemaker)
- Participation to another research which could have an impact on the study treatment and the outcomes
Trial locations and contacts
20 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
20 sites in 1 country
France20 sites, 18 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Clinique Claude Bernard
Albi
Laurent Votron, MD
- Recruiting
ICO Paul Papin
Angers, 49055
COLLIAUX Jérémy, Dr
- Not yet recruiting
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux
Paul Sargos, MD
Paul Sargos
- Recruiting
Polyclinique Bordeaux-Aquitaine
Bordeaux
François Guichard, MD
- Recruiting
CLCC Georges-François Leclerc
Dijon
Magali Quivrin, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Amethys - Charlebourg - La Défense
La Garenne-Colombes, 92250
BOSSI Alberto, Dr
- Not yet recruiting
Centre de Cobalthérapie Hartman
Levallois-Perret
Laurent Chauveinc, MD
- Terminated
CH Lyon Sud
Lyon
- Not yet recruiting
Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier
Montpellier
Carmen Llacer-Moscardo, MD
- Recruiting
Institut Curie
Paris, 75005
CRÉHANGE Gilles, Pr
- Terminated
Hôpital Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite
- Not yet recruiting
Institut Jean Godinot
Reims
Grégoire Bouché, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Eugene Marquis
Rennes, 35042
Renaud De Crevoisier, MD, +33 (0)2 99 25 30 31, r.de-crevoisier@rennes.unicancer.fr
Renaud De Crevoisier, MD
- Recruiting
Centre d'oncologie et de radiothérapie Saint Jean
Saint-Doulchard
FREDERIC-MOREAU Thomas, DR
- Recruiting
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Gauducheau
Saint-Herblain
Stéphane Supiot, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez
Julien Langrand-Escure, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Institut Claudius Régaud
Toulouse
Pierre Graff-Cailleaud, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Tours - Hôpital Bretonneau
Tours
Gilles Calais, Pr
- Recruiting
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy
Nicolas DEMOGEOT, Dr
- Recruiting
Gustave Roussy
Villejuif
Pierre Blanchard, MD
About this study
Official title: Erectile Dysfunction in Good Prognosis Prostate Cancer: a Phase III Medico-economic Study Comparing Brachytherapy to Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
The TEMPOS-GEniToUrinary Group (GETUG) study is a multicenter, medico-economic study comparing brachytherapy to SBRT in low and intermediate risk prostate cancer, particularly focused on the issue of erectile dysfunction. A total of 240 potent patients are randomized in two arms. The experimental arm consists of SBRT delivering 7.25 Gy per fraction, in five fractions, corresponding to a total dose of 36.25 Gy to the prostate. The control arm consists of brachytherapy by Iodine 125 delivering 144 Gy to the prostate. The main objective of this health economics study is to perform a cost-utility analysis of SBRT compared to "standard" Iodine 125 brachytherapy in low-risk prostate cancer, 3 years after treatment. The endpoint is the Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) between SBRT and brachytherapy as primary criterion, expressed in cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Cost-effectiveness analyses are performed as secondary objective with Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) expressed as cost per erectile dysfunction avoided and cost per Life Year Gained. A long term evaluation is also performed, including a cost-utility, cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis at 5 years, a comprehensive assessment of the erectile dysfunction up to 5 years after treatment, an evaluation of acute and late genito-urinary (GU) and Gastro-Intestinal (GI) toxicities, and of quality of life up to 5 years after treatment.
Eight patients/year/center are expected to be recruited in 2 years in about twenty participating centers.
In total, to our knowledge, this study will be the first health economic evaluation which compares SBRT versus Iodine 125 brachytherapy in low risk and intermediate risk prostate cancer. Both cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses will also provide useful and complementary information to decision makers in order (i) to recommend the best strategy to adopt; (ii) to estimate the budget impact on the French National Health Insurance of the generalization of the cost-effective strategy. Finally, this study will allow to assess and compare accurately the erectile dysfunction after both treatment modalities.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Radiation by brachytherapy, Radiation by SBRT
- Keywords
- SBRT, brachytherapy, localized low-risk and intermediate risk prostate cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Radiation by brachytherapyRadiation
Brachytherapy by Iodine 125 delivering 144 Gy to the prostate
Radiation by SBRTRadiation
SBRT delivers 7.25 Gy per fraction, in five fractions, corresponding to a total dose of 36.25 Gy to the prostate. Fiducials are implanted in the prostate.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Brachytherapy | Active comparator | radiation by brachytherapy: brachytherapy by Iodine 125 delivering 144 Gy to the prostate Receives: Radiation: Radiation by brachytherapy |
| stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) | Experimental | radiation by SBRT: SBRT delivers 7.25 Gy per fraction, in five fractions, corresponding to a total dose of 36.25 Gy to the prostate. Fiducials are implanted in the prostate. The prostate can be tracked/localized/treated thanks to the Cyberknife or a conventional linac equipped with an ExacTrac or a Calypso4D system. Receives: Radiation: Radiation by SBRT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cost-utility analysis of SBRT compared to "standard" Iodine 125 brachytherapy
The cost-utility analysis is expressed in cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
Measured: 3 years after treatment.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Cost-utility analysis of SBRT compared to "standard" iodine-125 brachytherapy
The cost-utility analysis is expressed in cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
Measured: 5 years after treatment
Cost-utility analysis of avoided erectile dysfunction cost
Measured: 3 and 5 years after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2019
- Study start4 Oct 2019
- Primary completion4 Apr 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion4 Apr 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Center Eugene Marquis
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Renaud De Crevoisier, PR, Principal investigator, Centre Eugène Marquis
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03830788
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016-2-10-003
- Acronym
- TEMPOS
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Erectile Dysfunction in Good Prognosis Prostate Cancer: a Phase III Medico-economic Study Comparing Brachytherapy to Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03830788
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TEMPOS / 2016-2-10-003
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- SBRT, brachytherapy, localized low-risk and intermediate risk prostate cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Center Eugene MarquisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Apr 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 4 Apr 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The TEMPOS-GEniToUrinary Group (GETUG) study is a multicenter, medico-economic study comparing brachytherapy to SBRT in low and intermediate risk prostate cancer, particularly focused on the issue of erectile dysfunction. A total of 240 potent patients are randomized in two arms. The experimental arm consists of SBRT delivering 7.25 Gy per fraction, in five fractions, corresponding to a total dose of 36.25 Gy to the prostate. The control arm consists of brachytherapy by Iodine 125 delivering 144 Gy to the prostate. The main objective of this health economics study is to perform a cost-utility analysis of SBRT compared to "standard" Iodine 125 brachytherapy in low-risk prostate cancer, 3 years after treatment. The endpoint is the Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) between SBRT and brachytherapy as primary criterion, expressed in cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Cost-effectiveness analyses are performed as secondary objective with Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) expressed as cost per erectile dysfunction avoided and cost per Life Year Gained. A long term evaluation is also performed, including a cost-utility, cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis at 5 years, a comprehensive assessment of the erectile dysfunction up to 5 years after treatment, an evaluation of acute and late genito-urinary (GU) and Gastro-Intestinal (GI) toxicities, and of quality of life up to 5 years after treatment.
Eight patients/year/center are expected to be recruited in 2 years in about twenty participating centers.
In total, to our knowledge, this study will be the first health economic evaluation which compares SBRT versus Iodine 125 brachytherapy in low risk and intermediate risk prostate cancer. Both cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses will also provide useful and complementary information to decision makers in order (i) to recommend the best strategy to adopt; (ii) to estimate the budget impact on the French National Health Insurance of the generalization of the cost-effective strategy. Finally, this study will allow to assess and compare accurately the erectile dysfunction after both treatment modalities.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Brachytherapy | Active comparator | Radiation: Radiation by brachytherapyradiation by brachytherapy: brachytherapy by Iodine 125 delivering 144 Gy to the prostate |
| stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) | Experimental | Radiation: Radiation by SBRTradiation by SBRT: SBRT delivers 7.25 Gy per fraction, in five fractions, corresponding to a total dose of 36.25 Gy to the prostate. Fiducials are implanted in the prostate. The prostate can be tracked/localized/treated thanks to the Cyberknife or a conventional linac equipped with an ExacTrac or a Calypso4D system. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation by brachytherapyBrachytherapy by Iodine 125 delivering 144 Gy to the prostate | Radiation | Brachytherapy |
| Radiation by SBRTSBRT delivers 7.25 Gy per fraction, in five fractions, corresponding to a total dose of 36.25 Gy to the prostate. Fiducials are implanted in the prostate. | Radiation | stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) |
Primary outcome
Cost-utility analysis of SBRT compared to "standard" Iodine 125 brachytherapy
Time frame: 3 years after treatment.
The cost-utility analysis is expressed in cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
2 secondary outcomes
Cost-utility analysis of SBRT compared to "standard" iodine-125 brachytherapy
Time frame: 5 years after treatment
Cost-utility analysis of avoided erectile dysfunction cost
Time frame: 3 and 5 years after treatment
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
The COSMYC Trial (COmbined Suppression of MYC)
Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-101556143 With Best Supportive Care in Participants With Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
PULSE Registry: for Patients Receiving Lutetium (177Lu) Vipivotide Tetraxetan
Metastatic Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Relugolix and Enzalutamide in Combination With Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Very High Risk Prostate Cancer, OPTIMAL Trial
Prostate Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Renaud De Crevoisier, PR principal investigator
Centre Eugène Marquis
20 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Radiation by brachytherapy and Radiation by SBRT in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Center Eugene Marquis at 20 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 20 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Martine Gestin, PhD (+33(0)299253036, m.gestin@rennes.unicancer.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cost-utility analysis of SBRT compared to "standard" Iodine 125 brachytherapy (time frame: 3 years after treatment.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2025.