AzTrials
AzTrials

Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)NCT03832868

Syngery-Evaluating the Impact of Decision Aid

A study testing Pre-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aid and Post-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aid in people with Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), run by Emory University at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to determine whether it is better to give patients an implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) decision aid before they have their first consultation with an implanting cardiac electrophysiologist or after the consult. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Pre-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aid and Post-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aid
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
20 Feb 2019to 6 Sep 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years old and older
  • evaluated for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Emory St. Joseph's Hospital

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Emory University Hospital Midtown

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Emory University Hospital

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluating the Impact of Decision Aid Timing on Mandatory Shared Decision Making for Defibrillator Implantation

The aim of this study is to determine whether it is better to give patients an implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) decision aid before they have their first consultation with an implanting cardiac electrophysiologist or after the consult.

Read the detailed description

There are many unanswered questions about how shared decision making should be executed and how decision aids should be employed. The aim of this study is to determine whether it is better to give patients an implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) decision aid before they have their first consultation with an implanting cardiac electrophysiologist or after the consult.

Being tested
Pre-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aid, Post-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aid
Keywords
Decision aid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pre-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aidBehavioural

    The intervention is the timing of receipt of the decision aid. The decision aid is designed to facilitate informing patients and helping to reach a decision.The implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) implantation decision aid presents treatment options, risks, and benefits in lay terms.It is currently utilized in all of the Emory cardiac electrophysiology clinics as part of usual clinical care.

  • Post-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aidBehavioural

    The intervention is the timing of receipt of the decision aid. The decision aid is designed to facilitate informing patients and helping to reach a decision.The implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) implantation decision aid presents treatment options, risks, and benefits in lay terms.It is currently utilized in all of the Emory cardiac electrophysiology clinics as part of usual clinical care.

Study groups in NCT03832868
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pre-visit decision aidExperimentalPatients receiving the decision aid pre-visit will be given a paper copy of the decision aid in the waiting room and will have a minimum of 15 minutes to review it - either in the waiting room or in the exam room while waiting for the electrophysiologist.
Receives: Behavioral: Pre-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aid
Post-visit decision aidExperimentalPatients receiving the decision aid after the encounter will meet with the electrophysiologist first and receive the aid afterward.
Receives: Behavioral: Post-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Decisional ICDs knowledge score among pre-visit arm participants compare to post-visit arm participants

    Patients will receive a survey including 11 questions to gauge decisional knowledge about ICDs. The survey is expected to take no more than 10-15 minutes to complete, which should allow adequate time for completion in the pre-procedure area without interrupting clinical workflow.

    Measured: Date of ICD implantation (up to 60 days from the date of receiving the decision aid)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Decision Conflict Scale score among pre-visit arm participants compare to post-visit arm participants

    Patients will receive a survey including 12 questions to measure decisional conflict. The surveys are expected to take no more than 10-15 minutes to complete, which should allow adequate time for completion in the pre-procedure area without interrupting clinical workflow.

    Measured: Date of ICD implantation (up to 60 days from the date of receiving the decision aid)

  2. Values-choice ICDs concordance score among pre-visit arm participants compare to post-visit arm participants

    Patients will receive a survey including 12 questions to measure values-choice concordance. The surveys are expected to take no more than 10-15 minutes to complete, which should allow adequate time for completion in the pre-procedure area without interrupting clinical workflow.

    Measured: Date of ICD implantation (up to 60 days from the date of receiving the decision aid)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Feb 2019
  2. Study start20 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion6 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion6 Sep 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Clinic sites will be block-randomized to eliminate contamination induced by individual-level randomization for a system-level intervention. Each site will rotate on a monthly basis whether the decision aid is administered pre- or post-office visit, and this will be applied to all ICD patients. Each site will have a minimum of 2 months exposure to each "arm." No blinding will occur.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03832868
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00107168
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
4 Feb 2019
Last updated
12 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data is being collected in REDCAP and is deidentified. The study team will have the tool to match subjects if needed. The team has no current plans to share data, but can if necessary (including the data dictionaries). All data can be shared after being deidentified.The study team can share the protocol, statistical plan, ICF, and survey tool. The decision tool is already available. Data will be available immediately following publication and for 3 years after. Those requesting access to data should contact the principal investigator (Dr. Faisal Merchant). Requests will be evaluated based on need and data usage agreement.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pre-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aid and Post-visit timing of receipt of the ICDs implantation decision aid in people with Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), run by Emory University at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Decisional ICDs knowledge score among pre-visit arm participants compare to post-visit arm participants (time frame: Date of ICD implantation (up to 60 days from the date of receiving the decision aid)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in