AzTrials
AzTrials

Occlusions VeinCASSNCT03835559

Cyanoacrylate Closure Versus Surgical Stripping for Incompetent Saphenous Veins

A study testing Cyanoacrylate closure and Surgical stripping in people with Occlusions Vein and Chronic Venous Insufficiency, run by Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong at 2 sites in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the non-inferior, clinical outcomes after cyanoacrylate closure comparing the surgical stripping for incompetent saphenous veins. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Occlusions Vein, Chronic Venous Insufficiency
What is being tested?
Cyanoacrylate closure and Surgical stripping
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
146 participants
Where
2 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
10 Apr 2019to 1 Feb 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 and 80 years of age at the time of enrollment
  • Reflux in great saphenous vein greater than 0.5 seconds after distal compression and release or Valsalva's maneuver in the standing or reverse Trendelenburg position
  • Diameter of saphenous vein between 2mm to 20mm (with standing position)
  • One or more of the following symptoms related to the incompetent saphenous vein: aching, throbbing, heaviness, fatigue, pruritus, night cramps, restlessness, generalized pain or discomfort, swelling
  • Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Pathophysiologic classification of C2 through C5

Who cannot join

  • Previous treatment in targeted vein segment
  • Tortuous vein in which the delivery catheter cannot be inserted
  • Aneurysm of target vein segment >20 mm
  • Daily use of narcotic or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory pain medications to control pain associated with greater saphenous vein reflux
  • Known hypercoagulable disorder
  • Active malignancy
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Regular use of systemic anticoagulation
  • Current use of systemic anticoagulant
  • Previous deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism or active acute superficial thrombophlebitis
  • Unable to comply with the schedule and protocol evaluations
  • Unable to ambulate
  • Currently pregnant or breast feeding
  • Known sensitivity to cyanoacrylate adhesives
  • Symptomatic peripheral arterial disease with ankle-brachial index <0.9
  • Participation in another clinical study that has not reached primary endpoint within 30 days prior to enrollment
  • Any condition which in the opinion of the investigator could compromise subject safety or adherence to the protocol

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Jin Hyun Joh, MD, PhD contact

+82-2-440-6261

vascularjoh@gmail.com

South Korea2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • In-Mok Jung

    Seoul, Non US/Canada, 05278

    Jin H Joh, vascularjoh@gmail.com

    Recruiting
  • Jin Hyun Joh

    Seoul, Non US/Canada, 05278

    Jin H Joh, vascularjoh@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Clinical Outcomes After Cyanoacrylate Closure and Surgical Stripping for Incompetent Saphenous Veins

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the non-inferior, clinical outcomes after cyanoacrylate closure comparing the surgical stripping for incompetent saphenous veins.

Read the detailed description

Varicose veins are highly prevalent. In western countries, an estimated 23% of adults have varicose veins, and 6% have more advanced chronic venous disease, including skin changes and healed or active venous ulcers. There are several modalities to treat varicose veins. Open surgical treatment with ligation and stripping of the saphenous vein, combined with excision of large varicosities, has been the standard of care for many years. Endovenous thermal ablation by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) has been shown to be a safe and effective alternatives with high long-term target vein closure rates. Although both techniques have gained broad acceptance in many countries, one major disadvantage of these techniques is the requirement for use of tumescent anesthesia to avoid the thermal injury of the surrounding structures. Cyanoacrylate closure for varicose veins has recently been introduced for treatment of the incompetent saphenous vein.

Being tested
Cyanoacrylate closure, Surgical stripping
Keywords
varicose vein, stripping, endovenous, ablation, Occlusion, quality of life
Medical subject headings
Varicose Veins, Bites and Stings

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cyanoacrylate closureProcedure or surgery

    Also called Cyanoacrylate closure for incompetent Saphenous vein

    After successful access of target vein and insertion of guidewire under any type of anesthesia, the procedure of cyanoacrylate closure is performed. A 5 French introducer and catheter is advanced and positioned 5.0 cm caudal to the junction with proximal saphenous vein compression by the ultrasound probe, two injections of approximately 0.10 mL glue are given 1 cm apart, followed by a 3min period of compression, and then repeat injections and 30sec ultrasound probe and hand compression sequences until the entire length of the target vein is treated. The catheter is removed.

  • Surgical strippingProcedure or surgery

    Also called Surgical stripping for incompetent Saphenous vein

    All types of anesthesia (general, spinal, regional block, or local anesthesia) can be used. The surgical stripping is performed with a proper incision in the groin, with division and ligation of the saphenous vein and division of all tributaries. The saphenous vein is then removed using a stripper.

Study groups in NCT03835559
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cyanoacrylate closureActive comparatorAfter successful access of target vein and insertion of guidewire under any type of anesthesia, the procedure of cyanoacrylate closure for treatment of incompetent Saphenous Veins is performed. A 5 French introducer and catheter is advanced and positioned 5.0 cm caudal to the junction with proximal saphenous vein compression by the ultrasound probe, two injections of approximately 0.10 mL glue are given 1 cm apart, followed by a 3min period of compression, and then repeat injections and 30sec ultrasound probe and hand compression sequences until the entire length of the target vein is treated. The catheter is removed.
Receives: Procedure: Cyanoacrylate closure; Procedure: Surgical stripping
Surgical strippingActive comparatorFor treatment of incompetent Saphenous Veins, surgical stripping is performed with a proper incision in the groin, with division and ligation of the saphenous vein and division of all tributaries under all types of anesthesia (general, spinal, regional block, or local anesthesia). The saphenous vein is then removed using a stripper. Compression stocking is apply.
Receives: Procedure: Cyanoacrylate closure; Procedure: Surgical stripping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Closure rate of the target vein/ Absence of refluxing vein

    The primary endpoint of the study is to evaluate the complete closure of the target vein where complete closure is defined as Doppler ultrasound showing vein closure along entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5cm after cyanoacrylate closure and absence of refluxing vein or residual vein after surgical stripping as read by a qualified site technologist or investigator.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Perioperative pain with visual analog scale

    The subject will be asked to rate pain on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. (minimum-0 (best), maximum-10 (worst))

    Measured: 3 days

  2. Ecchymosis

    The investigator will score the subjects ipsilateral leg of the occurrence of ecchymosis along treated segment, rated on a 0- to 5-point graded scale (0, none; 1, involving <25% of the treatment area; 2, 25%-50%; 3, 50%-75%; 4, 75%-100%; 5, extension above or below the treatment segment)

    Measured: 3 days

  3. Venous Clinical Severity Score

    Severity score on a 0-30 numeric rating scale ((minimum-0 (best), maximum-30 (worst))

    Measured: 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment

  4. Acceptability of Quality of life score

    The quality of life scores are measured by the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and EuroQOL five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D).

    The AVVQs are scored using a questionnaire. The total score for the 13 questions ranges from 0 to 100 points, with 0 points indicating the best possible quality of life. The EuroQOL is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life. The EuroQOL descriptive system is a preference-based measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Respondents can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).

    Measured: 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment

  5. Satisfaction of the patients: satisfaction rate

    The subject will be asked to the satisfaction rate by five response categories (strongly agree, agree, uncertain, disagree, strongly disagree) after asking as following: I'm very satisfied with the medical care I receive.

    Measured: 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Feb 2019
  2. Study start10 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
146 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03835559
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-03-030-001
Acronym
CASS
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
1 Feb 2019
Last updated
16 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Study protocol

Publications

  • Kaplan RM, Criqui MH, Denenberg JO, Bergan J, Fronek A. Quality of life in patients with chronic venous disease: San Diego population study. J Vasc Surg. 2003 May;37(5):1047-53. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.168.

    PubMed 12756353
  • van den Bos R, Arends L, Kockaert M, Neumann M, Nijsten T. Endovenous therapies of lower extremity varicosities: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):230-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.06.030. Epub 2008 Aug 9.

    PubMed 18692348
  • Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S, Goldman M, King T, Weiss R, Cher D, Jones A. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;61(4):985-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.071. Epub 2015 Jan 31.

    PubMed 25650040
  • Kolluri R, Gibson K, Cher D, Madsen M, Weiss R, Morrison N. Roll-in phase analysis of clinical study of cyanoacrylate closure for incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Oct;4(4):407-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

    PubMed 27638993
  • Chan YC, Law Y, Cheung GC, Ting AC, Cheng SW. Cyanoacrylate glue used to treat great saphenous reflux: Measures of outcome. Phlebology. 2017 Mar;32(2):99-106. doi: 10.1177/0268355516638200. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

    PubMed 27052039

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cyanoacrylate closure and Surgical stripping in people with Occlusions Vein and Chronic Venous Insufficiency, run by Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong at 2 sites in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jin Hyun Joh, MD, PhD (+82-2-440-6261, vascularjoh@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Closure rate of the target vein/ Absence of refluxing vein (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03835559, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in