Parkinson's DiseaseDUMP-investNCT03837067
Use and Misuse of Domperidone in Parkinson's Disease in France - Dump Investigation
An observational study of Parkinson's Disease, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Parkinson disease is the second most frequent neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer disease and affect 1% of the population over 60 years. The treatment of PD is based on dopamine replacement therapies (DRT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson's Disease
- How many people
- 2,300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 17 Jul 2018to 1 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All neurologists in France
Who may be able to join
- All neurologists in France
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Parkinson disease is the second most frequent neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer disease and affect 1% of the population over 60 years. The treatment of PD is based on dopamine replacement therapies (DRT). Nausea is the most frequent adverse event whatever the drug, occurring in 30-40% of patients at the initiation of DRT.
Domperidone, a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist with antiemetic properties, does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, allowing its used in PD. Domperidone may prolong the duration of the QT interval in predisposed patients, and has been associated with proarrhythmia and arrhythmic deaths. Arrhythmias, sudden death and cardiac arrest were reported with high intravenous doses which has led to withdraw of the parenteral form of the drug in 1984. Two case control studies found an increased risk of sudden death associated with domperidone use. In these reports, the increased risk was depending on age, dose, and the use of domperidone in combination with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Following the discussion created by this alert, the PRAC of the EMA has issued recommendations restricting domperidone use to patients younger than 60 years at doses below 30 mg/day and for a short period (7 days).
Read more
Because there is no alternative antiemetic drug to be used in PD, domperidone is commonly prescribed as a preventive therapy in most PD patients initiating DRT. In this population, usually older than 60 years, doses of 60 or 80 mg/day are commonly prescribed, for at least 2 months of the DRT escalating dose period or longer. A particular "niche" of domperidone misuse might be patients treated with continuous subcutaneous administration of apomorphine, a second line therapy in PD, inducing severe and prolonged nausea in almost all patients. Little is known about the use of domperidone in PD in France, but misuse of domperidone in PD patients is probably very high. Data collected from two French PD cohorts, COPARK and DIGPD, showed that 8-14% of PD patients were treated with domperidone.
The aim of this proposal is to investigate the practices and beliefs of French neurologists regarding use and misuse of domperidone in PD, by a qualitative approach.
Read the detailed description
Parkinson disease is the second most frequent neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer disease and affect 1% of the population over 60 years (150 to 170 000 patients in France). The treatment of PD is based on dopamine replacement therapies (DRT). Nausea is the most frequent adverse event whatever the drug, occurring in 30-40% of patients at the initiation of DRT.
Domperidone is a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist with antiemetic properties. Domperidone does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, allowing its used in PD. Domperidone may prolong the duration of the QT interval in predisposed patients, and has been associated with proarrhythmia and arrhythmic deaths. Arrhythmias, sudden death and cardiac arrest were reported with high intravenous doses which has led to withdraw of the parenteral form of the drug in 1984. More recently, two case control studies found an increased risk of sudden death associated with domperidone use. In these reports, the increased risk was depending on age, dose, and the use of domperidone in combination with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Following the discussion created by this alert, the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has issued recommendations restricting domperidone use to patients younger than 60 years at doses below 30 mg/day and for a short period (7 days).
Because there is no alternative antiemetic drug to be used in PD, domperidone is commonly prescribed as a preventive therapy in most PD patients initiating DRT since more than 30 years. In this population, usually older than 60 years, doses of 60 or 80 mg/day are commonly prescribed, for at least 2 months of the DRT escalating dose period or longer. A particular "niche" of domperidone misuse might be patients treated with continuous subcutaneous administration of apomorphine, a second line therapy in PD, inducing severe and prolonged nausea in almost all patients. Little is known about the use of domperidone in PD in France in clinical practice, but misuse of domperidone in PD patients is probably very high. Data collected from two French PD cohorts, COPARK and DIGPD, showed that 8-14% of PD patients were treated with domperidone, extrapolating 10,000 to 20,000 potentially exposed patients at particularly high risk of sudden death.
The aim of this proposal is to investigate the practices and beliefs of French neurologists regarding use and misuse of domperidone in PD, by a qualitative approach. Practices of domperidone prescription by neurologists (from university and general hospitals and private offices) will be evaluated using a semi-structured questionnaire survey. This qualitative study will provide insights from the neurologists on their need for domperidone, therapeutic alternatives and their perceived efficacy, and on the domperidone management and safety procedures that are applied to PD patients before and after domperidone prescription.
The results of this survey on regular practices of neurologists on the use and misuse of domperidone will provide information of the current opinions about the drug, the indications for which it is prescribed, how contra-indications are evaluated, and their feedback on tolerance and efficacy. This information will help Regulatory Authorities to communicate about the safety profile of the drug.
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease
- Keywords
- Domperidone
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Practices of domperidone prescription by neurologists
Practices of domperidone prescription by neurologists : use and misuse of domperidone evaluated using a semi-structured questionnaire survey
Measured: day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2019
- Study start17 Jul 2018
- Primary completion1 Nov 2018
- Study completion1 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Parkinson's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 2,300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03837067
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DUMP
- Acronym
- DUMP-invest
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 12 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 11 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use and Misuse of Domperidone in Parkinson's Disease in France - Dump Investigation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03837067
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DUMP-invest / DUMP
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease
- Keywords
- Domperidone
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Parkinson disease is the second most frequent neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer disease and affect 1% of the population over 60 years. The treatment of PD is based on dopamine replacement therapies (DRT). Nausea is the most frequent adverse event whatever the drug, occurring in 30-40% of patients at the initiation of DRT.
Domperidone, a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist with antiemetic properties, does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, allowing its used in PD. Domperidone may prolong the duration of the QT interval in predisposed patients, and has been associated with proarrhythmia and arrhythmic deaths. Arrhythmias, sudden death and cardiac arrest were reported with high intravenous doses which has led to withdraw of the parenteral form of the drug in 1984. Two case control studies found an increased risk of sudden death associated with domperidone use. In these reports, the increased risk was depending on age, dose, and the use of domperidone in combination with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Following the discussion created by this alert, the PRAC of the EMA has issued recommendations restricting domperidone use to patients younger than 60 years at doses below 30 mg/day and for a short period (7 days).
Because there is no alternative antiemetic drug to be used in PD, domperidone is commonly prescribed as a preventive therapy in most PD patients initiating DRT. In this population, usually older than 60 years, doses of 60 or 80 mg/day are commonly prescribed, for at least 2 months of the DRT escalating dose period or longer. A particular "niche" of domperidone misuse might be patients treated with continuous subcutaneous administration of apomorphine, a second line therapy in PD, inducing severe and prolonged nausea in almost all patients. Little is known about the use of domperidone in PD in France, but misuse of domperidone in PD patients is probably very high. Data collected from two French PD cohorts, COPARK and DIGPD, showed that 8-14% of PD patients were treated with domperidone.
The aim of this proposal is to investigate the practices and beliefs of French neurologists regarding use and misuse of domperidone in PD, by a qualitative approach.
Detailed description
Parkinson disease is the second most frequent neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer disease and affect 1% of the population over 60 years (150 to 170 000 patients in France). The treatment of PD is based on dopamine replacement therapies (DRT). Nausea is the most frequent adverse event whatever the drug, occurring in 30-40% of patients at the initiation of DRT.
Domperidone is a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist with antiemetic properties. Domperidone does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, allowing its used in PD. Domperidone may prolong the duration of the QT interval in predisposed patients, and has been associated with proarrhythmia and arrhythmic deaths. Arrhythmias, sudden death and cardiac arrest were reported with high intravenous doses which has led to withdraw of the parenteral form of the drug in 1984. More recently, two case control studies found an increased risk of sudden death associated with domperidone use. In these reports, the increased risk was depending on age, dose, and the use of domperidone in combination with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Following the discussion created by this alert, the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has issued recommendations restricting domperidone use to patients younger than 60 years at doses below 30 mg/day and for a short period (7 days).
Because there is no alternative antiemetic drug to be used in PD, domperidone is commonly prescribed as a preventive therapy in most PD patients initiating DRT since more than 30 years. In this population, usually older than 60 years, doses of 60 or 80 mg/day are commonly prescribed, for at least 2 months of the DRT escalating dose period or longer. A particular "niche" of domperidone misuse might be patients treated with continuous subcutaneous administration of apomorphine, a second line therapy in PD, inducing severe and prolonged nausea in almost all patients. Little is known about the use of domperidone in PD in France in clinical practice, but misuse of domperidone in PD patients is probably very high. Data collected from two French PD cohorts, COPARK and DIGPD, showed that 8-14% of PD patients were treated with domperidone, extrapolating 10,000 to 20,000 potentially exposed patients at particularly high risk of sudden death.
The aim of this proposal is to investigate the practices and beliefs of French neurologists regarding use and misuse of domperidone in PD, by a qualitative approach. Practices of domperidone prescription by neurologists (from university and general hospitals and private offices) will be evaluated using a semi-structured questionnaire survey. This qualitative study will provide insights from the neurologists on their need for domperidone, therapeutic alternatives and their perceived efficacy, and on the domperidone management and safety procedures that are applied to PD patients before and after domperidone prescription.
The results of this survey on regular practices of neurologists on the use and misuse of domperidone will provide information of the current opinions about the drug, the indications for which it is prescribed, how contra-indications are evaluated, and their feedback on tolerance and efficacy. This information will help Regulatory Authorities to communicate about the safety profile of the drug.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All neurologists in France
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All neurologists in France
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Practices of domperidone prescription by neurologists
Time frame: day 1
Practices of domperidone prescription by neurologists : use and misuse of domperidone evaluated using a semi-structured questionnaire survey
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2021.
Related trials for Parkinson's Disease
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Parkinson's Disease, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Practices of domperidone prescription by neurologists (time frame: day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2021.