Dental ImplantsNCT03837158
Titanium Zirconium (TiZr) Mini Implants
A study testing early loading and immediate loading in people with Dental Implants, run by University of Bern at 2 sites in Switzerland.
Trial summary
H0: "Within the first year post-placement, four interforaminally placed, immediately loaded 2.4 mm narrow-diameter one-piece TiZr implants with miniaturized stud-type attachments show improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) compared to two interforaminally placed, early loaded, TiZr two-piece implants with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Implants
- What is being tested?
- early loading and immediate loading
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2019to Aug 2033
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At patient level:
- Written informed consent
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Sufficient complete dentures (Marxkors and Ferger, 1989) not older than 1 year
- Patient is unsatisfied with mandibular denture to the degree that he/she seeks treatment
- At site level:
Show all 10Show fewer
- Healed edentulous mandible (minimum 8 weeks since last extraction)
- Minimal ridge dimensions 5.5 mm (width) by 12 mm (height) in the anterior (interforaminal) area, allowing the placement of 3.3 (endosseous diameter) by 10 mm (length) implants
- Opposing dentition: complete denture on a edentulous maxilla
- Physical status (PS) 1 and 2 (American Society of Anesthesiologists)
Who cannot join
- At patient level
- Any physical or mental disorder that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene or the capability of providing written informed consent and compliance to the protocol
- Any disorder that would interfere with wound healing or represent a contraindication for oral surgery such as, but not limited to, uncontrolled diabetes or conditions resulting in or requiring immunosuppression, radiation, chemotherapy, frequent use of antibiotics or antiresorptive medication such as bisphosphonates
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Heavy smoking habit with > 20 cig/d
- Severe bruxism or clenching habits, present oro-facial pain
- At site level:
- Ridge defects requiring staged bone augmentation procedures (simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) within the ridge contour allowed)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Switzerland2 sites
University of Bern
Bern, 3010
Private Practice Dr. B. Wallkamm
Langenthal, Canton of Bern, 4900
About this study
Official title: Is the Stabilization of a Mandibular Overdenture Employing Four Novel One-piece Immediately Loaded TiZr Implants With Miniaturized Stud-type Attachments a Feasible Alternative to Two Two-piece Early Loaded Tissue-level Implants With Regular Stud-type Attachments?
H0: "Within the first year post-placement, four interforaminally placed, immediately loaded 2.4 mm narrow-diameter one-piece TiZr implants with miniaturized stud-type attachments show improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) compared to two interforaminally placed, early loaded, TiZr two-piece implants with stud-type attachments to retain a mandibular overdenture."The specific aim is to compare both treatment alternatives to evaluate which one may be recommended for elderly edentulous patients.
- Conditions
- Dental Implants
- Being tested
- early loading, immediate loading
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
early loadingProcedure or surgery
two TiZr implants on SLA surface
immediate loadingProcedure or surgery
four TiZr implants on SLA surface
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control-group | Experimental | Two Tissue Level TiZr Sand blasted long grit acid-etched (SLA) implants placed in positions 33 and 43 (diameter 3.3mm, length ≥10mm), early loading Receives: Procedure: early loading |
| Experimental-group | Experimental | Four narrow-diameter implants (NDI) TiZr SLA implants in positions 34, 32, 42, and 44 (diameter 2.4mm, length ≥10mm), immediate loading Receives: Procedure: immediate loading |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI)
Change from baseline questionnaires in Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL).
Scores 0-60: higher values represent lower OHRQoL
Measured: One-year follow-up
Secondary outcomes (12)
Additional Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulism (OHIP-EDENT)
Change from baseline questionnaires
Measured: Follow-up (up to 365 days)
Additional PROM Denture Satisfaction Index (DSI)
Change in Denture Satisfaction higher values represent better satisfaction (0-1200mm)
Measured: Baseline, follow-up (up to 365 days)
Implant Survival
Survival (yes/no)
Measured: at implant loading (at 24 hours for arm B, at 6-8 weeks for arm A), at the one-year follow-up
Implant Success
Success according to Misch (2007) Misch criteria scores 1-4: higher values represent better success
Measured: at implant loading (at 24 hours for arm B, at 6-8 weeks for arm A), at the one-year follow-up
Prosthetic Survival
Prosthetic Survival (yes/no): is the denture still in place?
Measured: Baseline, follow-up (up to 365 days)
Chewing Efficiency
Color mixing test
Measured: Baseline, follow-up (up to 365 days)
Plaque Index
Plaque Index Scores 0-3 3= thick plaque is visible along gingival margin 2= plaque is visible along gingival margin, with or without air drying
1= following air drying, plaque is not visible but can be wiped off with an explorer 0= following air drying, plaque is not visible nor can be wiped off with an explorer
Measured: at implant loading (at 24 hours for arm B, at 6-8 weeks for arm A), at the one-year follow-up
Bleeding Index
Bleeding Index Scores 0-3 0= Healthy gingival
- Gingival look inflamed, but don't bleed when probed
- Gingival look inflamed and bleed when probed
- Ulceration and spontaneous bleeding
Measured: at implant loading (at 24 hours for arm B, at 6-8 weeks for arm A), at the one-year follow-up
Pocket Probing depth
depth measured in mm
Measured: at implant loading (at 24 hours for arm B, at 6-8 weeks for arm A), at the one-year follow-up
Time-Cost-Analysis
Total treatment time will be collected and added. Total treatment cost will be evaluated and a ratio will be calculated. The groups will be compared on the base of this ration
Measured: After surgery, after implants loading, after follow-up (up to 365 days)
Cost Effectiveness and Willingness to Pay
Cost effectiveness wil be calculated as a ratio of treatment cost in relation to change of GOHAI sum score. This will allow to evaluate how much monetary item is needed to achieve a change in GOHAI
Measured: Total change and time at 1y follow-up
In-vivo evaluated loss of retentive force
Measurement with a hand-held digital force gauge
Measured: after implant loading (expected to be after 6 weeks on average) and at follow-up (up to 365 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2019
- Study start1 Sep 2019
- Primary completion10 Sep 2024
- Study completionAug 2033 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dental ImplantsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Beat Wallkamm, Dr, Principal investigator, Private PracticeMartin Schimmel, Prof, Study director, University of Bern
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03837158
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Mini 1286_2018
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: It is not planned to use the data of this study for future research.
Publications
Schimmel M, Leles CR, Schenk N, Janner SFM, Wallkamm B, Suter VGA, Abou-Ayash S, Raabe C. Mandibular Overdentures on Four Immediately Loaded Mini-Implants Versus Two-Delayed Loaded Regular Implants: 1-Year, Two-Center RCT on Patient-Reported Outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2026 Aug;37(8):983-993. doi: 10.1111/clr.70143. Epub 2026 Jun 1.
PubMed 42226346
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Is the Stabilization of a Mandibular Overdenture Employing Four Novel One-piece Immediately Loaded TiZr Implants With Miniaturized Stud-type Attachments a Feasible Alternative to Two Two-piece Early Loaded Tissue-level Implants With Regular Stud-type Attachments?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03837158
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Mini 1286_2018
- Conditions
- Dental Implants
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2033 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
H0: "Within the first year post-placement, four interforaminally placed, immediately loaded 2.4 mm narrow-diameter one-piece TiZr implants with miniaturized stud-type attachments show improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) compared to two interforaminally placed, early loaded, TiZr two-piece implants with stud-type attachments to retain a mandibular overdenture."The specific aim is to compare both treatment alternatives to evaluate which one may be recommended for elderly edentulous patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control-group | Experimental | Procedure: early loadingTwo Tissue Level TiZr Sand blasted long grit acid-etched (SLA) implants placed in positions 33 and 43 (diameter 3.3mm, length ≥10mm), early loading |
| Experimental-group | Experimental | Procedure: immediate loadingFour narrow-diameter implants (NDI) TiZr SLA implants in positions 34, 32, 42, and 44 (diameter 2.4mm, length ≥10mm), immediate loading |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- At patient level:
- At site level:
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- At patient level
- At site level:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| early loadingtwo TiZr implants on SLA surface | Procedure or surgery | Control-group |
| immediate loadingfour TiZr implants on SLA surface | Procedure or surgery | Experimental-group |
Primary outcome
Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI)
Time frame: One-year follow-up
Change from baseline questionnaires in Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL). Scores 0-60: higher values represent lower OHRQoL
12 secondary outcomes
Additional Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulism (OHIP-EDENT)
Time frame: Follow-up (up to 365 days)
Additional PROM Denture Satisfaction Index (DSI)
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up (up to 365 days)
Implant Survival
Time frame: at implant loading (at 24 hours for arm B, at 6-8 weeks for arm A), at the one-year follow-up
Implant Success
Time frame: at implant loading (at 24 hours for arm B, at 6-8 weeks for arm A), at the one-year follow-up
Prosthetic Survival
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up (up to 365 days)
Chewing Efficiency
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up (up to 365 days)
Plaque Index
Time frame: at implant loading (at 24 hours for arm B, at 6-8 weeks for arm A), at the one-year follow-up
Bleeding Index
Time frame: at implant loading (at 24 hours for arm B, at 6-8 weeks for arm A), at the one-year follow-up
Pocket Probing depth
Time frame: at implant loading (at 24 hours for arm B, at 6-8 weeks for arm A), at the one-year follow-up
Time-Cost-Analysis
Time frame: After surgery, after implants loading, after follow-up (up to 365 days)
Cost Effectiveness and Willingness to Pay
Time frame: Total change and time at 1y follow-up
In-vivo evaluated loss of retentive force
Time frame: after implant loading (expected to be after 6 weeks on average) and at follow-up (up to 365 days)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42226346Schimmel M, Leles CR, Schenk N, Janner SFM, Wallkamm B, Suter VGA, Abou-Ayash S, Raabe C. Mandibular Overdentures on Four Immediately Loaded Mini-Implants Versus Two-Delayed Loaded Regular Implants: 1-Year, Two-Center RCT on Patient-Reported Outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2026 Aug;37(8):983-993. doi: 10.1111/clr.70143. Epub 2026 Jun 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. It is not planned to use the data of this study for future research.
Related trials for Dental Implants
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Effect of Povidone Iodine on the Dental Implant Internal Surface Microbiome
Dental Implant
Recruiting
The Application of a Biphasic Calcium Sulfate Graft Material in Sinus Floor Elevation
Alveolar Bone Loss, Edentulism Nos
RecruitingObservational study
Changes in Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) During Full Arch Implant Treatment
Edentulous Mouth, Quality of Life
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Plaque and Bleeding on Probing Around Implants Supporting Fixed Full-Arch Dental Prostheses
Peri-Implant Health
Enrolling by invitation
Investigation of the Effect of Horizontal Platelet Rich Fibrin Placed in Tooth Extraction Sockets on Bone Formation
Tooth Loss, Dental Implant Failed
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Beat Wallkamm, Dr principal investigator
Private Practice
Martin Schimmel, Prof study director
University of Bern
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing early loading and immediate loading in people with Dental Implants, run by University of Bern at 2 sites in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) (time frame: One-year follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03837158, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2026.