AzTrials
AzTrials

AgingTrainStimNCT03838211

Brain Stimulation and Cognitive Training in Healthy Older Adults

A study testing Anodal tDCS and Intensive cognitive training in people with Aging, run by University Medicine Greifswald at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to investigate whether a tDCS-accompanied intensive cognitive training of working memory leads to performance improvement in healthy older individuals. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Aging
What is being tested?
Anodal tDCS and Intensive cognitive training
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
56 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
1 Oct 2018to 25 Mar 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Older adults (65 - 80 years);
  • Right handedness;
  • Unobtrusive neuropsychological screening

Who cannot join

  • Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia; other neurodegenerative neurological disorders; epilepsy; previous stroke;
  • Severe and untreated medical conditions that precludes participation in the training, as determined by responsible physician;
  • History of severe alcoholism or use of drugs;
  • Severe psychiatric disorders such as depression (if not in remission) or psychosis;
  • Contraindication for MRI (claustrophobia, metallic implants, ferromagnetic metals in the body, disorders of thermoregulation, pregnant women)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • University Medicine Greifswald

    Greifswald, 17475

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: tDCS-accompanied Cognitive Training Effects in Healthy Older Adults - Randomised, Sham Controlled, Interventional Study

The aim of this study is to investigate whether a tDCS-accompanied intensive cognitive training of working memory leads to performance improvement in healthy older individuals.

Read the detailed description

The goal of the present study is to assess behavioral (primary) and neural effects of a multi-session cognitive training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Many studies to date have found tDCS to be an efficient method to enhance various cognitive functions by modulating cortical excitability in young adults, but its behavioral impact and underlying mechanisms in aging still need to be elucidated. Healthy older adults will participate in a three-week cognitive training with concurrent online tDCS application. Cognitive performance (primary), as well as structural and functional imaging data will be examined before, during and after the intervention. In order to draw conclusions about the effect of tDCS in addition to cognitive training, a control group, receiving sham stimulation during training, will be assessed. Furthermore, to assess neural correlates of performance improvement, functional and structural parameters will be measured with MRI before and after training. Follow-up sessions to assess long-term effects are planned four weeks and six months after the post assessment. The results of the study will offer valuable insights into efficacy of combined tDCS and cognitive training, as compared to training alone, in older adults. Moreover, improved understanding of tDCS effects on cognitive training performance and underlying neural correlates may help to develop novel approaches for cognitive decline in healthy and pathological aging.

Conditions
Aging
Being tested
Anodal tDCS, Intensive cognitive training
Keywords
memory, brain stimulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anodal tDCSDevice

    Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), 9 sessions with 20 minutes stimulation each (current intensity of 1mA)

  • Intensive cognitive trainingBehavioural

    Intensive cognitive training of a letter memory updating task and a 3-stage Markov decision making task, 9 sessions

Study groups in NCT03838211
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
stimulation groupExperimentalAnodal tDCS + intensive cognitive Training
Receives: Device: Anodal tDCS; Behavioral: Intensive cognitive training
sham groupSham comparatorSham tDCS + intensive cognitive Training
Receives: Behavioral: Intensive cognitive training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Working memory training performance (Letter Updating task)

    Performance in a memory training task (Letter updating) under anodal tDCS compared to sham condition;operationalized by working Memory Updating performance assessed with number of correctly recalled letter lists in the letter updating task, analyzed immediately after training period (anodal condition versus sham)

    Measured: 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Working memory training performance (Markov task)

    Performance in second memory training task (Markov decision making) under anodal tDCS compared to sham condition, analyzed immediately after training period (anodal condition versus sham)

    Measured: 3 weeks

  2. Transfer outcomes

    Performance in cognitive transfer tasks, comparing performance immediately before and after training period (anodal condition versus sham)

    Measured: 3 weeks

  3. Long-term outcomes

    Long-term performance in training and transfer tasks, comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 6-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)

    Measured: 4 weeks after training, 6 months after 4-week follow-up

  4. Neural correlates

    Structural and functional neural correlates of the intervention, as measured by structural, functional resting-state and diffusion weighted MRI, immediately before and after the intervention and 6 months after follow-up (anodal condition versus sham)

    Measured: 3 weeks, 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Feb 2019
  2. Study start1 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion25 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03838211
Sponsor's protocol ID
TrainStim3
Acronym
TrainStim
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
1 Feb 2019
Last updated
3 May 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Thams F, Li SC, Floel A, Antonenko D. Functional Connectivity and Microstructural Network Correlates of Interindividual Variability in Distinct Executive Functions of Healthy Older Adults. Neuroscience. 2023 Aug 21;526:61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.06.005. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

    PubMed 37321368
  • Antonenko D, Fromm AE, Thams F, Grittner U, Meinzer M, Floel A. Microstructural and functional plasticity following repeated brain stimulation during cognitive training in older adults. Nat Commun. 2023 Jun 2;14(1):3184. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38910-x.

    PubMed 37268628
  • Antonenko D, Thams F, Uhrich J, Dix A, Thurm F, Li SC, Grittner U, Floel A. Effects of a Multi-Session Cognitive Training Combined With Brain Stimulation (TrainStim-Cog) on Age-Associated Cognitive Decline - Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Phase IIb (Monocenter) Trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 Aug 16;11:200. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00200. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31474848

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Anodal tDCS and Intensive cognitive training in people with Aging, run by University Medicine Greifswald at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Working memory training performance (Letter Updating task) (time frame: 3 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03838211, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in