AzTrials
AzTrials

Mandible FractureNCT03839368

Stability of Angle Fracture Fixation With (K) Shaped Titanium Miniplates Versus Two Miniplates

A study testing fixation of angle fracture in people with Mandible Fracture, run by Cairo University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In patients with angle fracture , will the (K) shaped titanium miniplates provide more stable fixation than two conventional miniplates? Many studies have been conducted to compare between different techniques of fixation used in angle fracture fixation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Mandible Fracture
What is being tested?
fixation of angle fracture
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Apr 2020to Apr 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with unilateral angle fracture.
  • Patients free from any systemic disease \& bone metabolism diseases.
  • No sex predilection
  • Age range ( 15-70)

Who cannot join

  • Comminuted fragmented \& infected angle fractures.
  • Bilateral angle fracture.
  • Systemic diseases.
  • bone metabolism diseases

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Hagar A Mohamed, BDS contact

01016799911

hagar_elsherif92@yahoo.com

About this study

Official title: Stability of Angle Fracture Fixation With (K) Shaped Titanium Miniplates Versus Two Conventional Miniplates: Randomized Clinical Trial

In patients with angle fracture , will the (K) shaped titanium miniplates provide more stable fixation than two conventional miniplates? Many studies have been conducted to compare between different techniques of fixation used in angle fracture fixation. The driving force behind this study was to design a new plate that would overcome the disadvantages of the other plating techniques but has the advantages \& simplicity of the Champy technique (simple intraoral approach and few major complications). This new miniplate gives more biomechanical stability than the conventional Champy plate. More over the placement of a 3D miniplate or two separate miniplates for fixing angle fractures is more difficult and mostly will require a transbuccal approach , with increased surgical trauma, longer operation time unlike the new plate that could provide the clinician with a simple and reliable solution.

Read the detailed description

In the past two decades, rigid internal fixation with miniplate has become the standard treatment modality in the management of mandibular fracture.

The optimal management of mandibular angle fractures remains controversial, thus continuous experimental \& clinical studies are being conducted to determine the best miniplate design which will provide the best postoperative stability \& resistance to mechanical function.

Since Michelet et al.\& Champy et al. recommended the use of a single (4-6 holes) monocortical plate , it become an acceptable method for angle fractures fixation.

Several surgeons have documented low complication rates with (Champy technique).But, according to the most recent experimental \& clinical studies, the stability provided by the miniplate fixation has become a point of debate among surgeons.Many researchers have argued that internal fixation with a passive miniplate along the external oblique line, following Champy's ideal osteosynthesis line principle, produces a tension effect that may yield a failure of osteosynthesis \& gap at inferior border of the mandible.And that pushed researches to conduct more studies to evaluate many plate \& screw systems and even suggest new designs for better stable postoperative results.

In 2014, B.T.Suer et al, designed a new noncompression 3D miniplates , basically it has one straight section and two lateral extensions. The straight section of this new design, which has four holes, was adapted to the superior border of the external oblique ridge \& provides similar advantages to the Champy technique (an intraoral approach, a single miniplate, \& the use of monocortical screws) .And the two lateral extensions, with one hole each, were then bent over to adapt to the buccal cortex of the ascending ramus along the external oblique ridge to resist lateral \& torsional forces.

Fresh, frozen cadavers of 15 healthy sheep were obtained for this study, sheep were used in this study owing to the similarities in size \& thickness to the human mandible. All of the mandibles were stripped of their soft tissues \& sectioned through the midline, between the central incisors. 30 hemimandibles were randomly divided into two groups , these groups were then fixed with two different plating techniques (the new design \& one conventional miniplates). And they were all examined for stability and resistance to mechanical forces (vertical, lateral, or tensile).

The driving force behind this study was to design a new plate that would overcome the disadvantages of the other plating techniques but has the advantages \& simplicity of the Champy technique (simple intraoral approach and few major complications). This new miniplate gives more biomechanical stability than the conventional Champy plate. These findings are correlated to those of in vitro biomechanical study done by Alkan et al. that showed that Champy technique has less favourable biomechanical behaviour than biplanar fixation and 3D strut plate. In addition the new plate provide greater stability when subjected to lateral displacing forces.

More over the placement of a 3D miniplate or two separate miniplates for fixing angle fractures is more difficult and mostly will require a transbuccal approach , with increased surgical trauma, longer operation time unlike the new plate that could provide the clinician with a simple and reliable solution.

Being tested
fixation of angle fracture
Keywords
angle fracture
Medical subject headings
Mandibular Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • fixation of angle fractureProcedure or surgery

    open reduction and internal fixation of angle fracture

Study groups in NCT03839368
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
K plateExperimentalfixation of angle fracture using K plate versus two miniplates
Receives: Procedure: fixation of angle fracture
Conventional two miniplatesActive comparatorfixation of angle fracture using K plate versus two miniplates
Receives: Procedure: fixation of angle fracture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Stability of angle fracture fixation

    Inter-ramus distance (fixed position at the lingual), inter-mental distance will be obtained from the immediate postoperative facial bone CT \& after 3 months. Comparison between the 2 records will be done to assess the stability of fixation technique.

    Bone density will be measured by Hounsfield unit at fracture site immediate postoperative \& after 3 months using F.B.CT.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Feb 2019
  2. Study startApr 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion11 Apr 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
12 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03839368
Sponsor's protocol ID
CEBD-CU-2019-02-03
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
11 Feb 2019
Last updated
4 Jun 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Suer BT, Kocyigit ID, Kaman S, Tuz HH, Tekin U, Atil F. Biomechanical evaluation of a new design titanium miniplate for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;43(7):841-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

    PubMed 24582290
  • El-Sherif HM, Ali S, Talaat M, Mubarak F. Stability and Clinical Outcomes of Angle Fracture Fixation Using Sagittal Split Plate (SSOP) Versus Two Miniplates: Randomized Clinical Trial. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Feb;23(1):107-113. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01817-z. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

    PubMed 38312972

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing fixation of angle fracture in people with Mandible Fracture, run by Cairo University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hagar A Mohamed, BDS (01016799911, hagar_elsherif92@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Stability of angle fracture fixation (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03839368, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in