AgingAHIITATENCT03840330
High-intensity Training for Improving Physical Performance of Aged Women
A study testing Experimental: High-intensity interval training group and Experimental: Moderate-intensity interval training group in people with Aging and Healthy, run by Universidad de Almeria.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the adaptations on the functional capacity and cardiovascular in elderly after a physical activity program circuit training. The participants were divided into three groups: Circuit training based on high-intensity interval training group (HIICT), Circuit training at moderate intensity group… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 90 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Aging, Healthy, Cardiovascular Risk Factor
- What is being tested?
- Experimental: High-intensity interval training group and Experimental: Moderate-intensity interval training group
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 20 Dec 2015to 20 Jun 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 90 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Having 50 - 90 years old.
- Not suffering chronic heart, respiratory or joint disease, taking medication or having a deteriorated level of mental health that could interfere in carrying out exercise programs.
- Having 0 or 1 responses positive in the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (ParQ). Only item 6, related to mild vascular diseases.
- Being physically independent according to the scales Lawton and Brody, and Katz.
Who cannot join
- Having uncontrolled arterial hypertension.
- Having practiced during the previous 3 months or practicing at present a similar exercise to the one proposed in the study.
- Attending sessions less than 80%.
About this study
Official title: Effects of High-intensity Interval Circuit Training (HIICT) on the Cardiovascular and Functional Parameters of Aged Women
This study evaluates the adaptations on the functional capacity and cardiovascular in elderly after a physical activity program circuit training. The participants were divided into three groups: Circuit training based on high-intensity interval training group (HIICT), Circuit training at moderate intensity group (MICT) and Control group (CG).
Read the detailed description
Three groups of participants (circuit training based on high-intensity interval training, circuit training at moderate intensity and not training group) will enter the study. The intervention will consist of a physical exercise program in day centers.
Intensity progression will be encouraged according to the rate of perceived exertion. Progression of exertion will be "very hard", "extremely hard" and "maximal exertion" for HIT group, and "light", "somewhat hard" and "hard" for group. Assessment will be undertaken at two-time points: baseline and after 16 weeks of exercise training.
Assessment will include VO2 peak, functional capacity, health-related quality of life, cognitive state and daily physical activity.
- Conditions
- Aging, Healthy, Cardiovascular Risk Factor, Physical Activity
- Being tested
- Experimental: High-intensity interval training group, Experimental: Moderate-intensity interval training group
- Keywords
- High-intensity interval training, Circuit training, Elderly, Functional capacity, VO2 max, Cardiovascular parameters
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental: High-intensity interval training groupOther
16 weeks of High-intensity interval training
Experimental: Moderate-intensity interval training groupOther
16 weeks of Moderate-intensity interval training
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High-intensity interval training group | Experimental | Frequency: 2 days/weeks; Intensity: 16-18 Börg/85-100%VO2max; Recovery: Active; Duration: 1 hour. Receives: Other: Experimental: High-intensity interval training group |
| Moderate-intensity interval training group | Experimental | Frequency: 2 days/weeks; Intensity: 12-14 Börg/60-70% VO2max; Recovery: Active; Duration: 1 hour. Receives: Other: Experimental: Moderate-intensity interval training group |
| Control group | No intervention | Maintain their normal daily activities throughout the sixteen-week experimental period. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Analyses changes in maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max).
A modified Balke treadmill protocol will be used to estimate aerobic capacity (VO2max).
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
Analyses changes in maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max).
VO2max was assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test. The participant should walk the longest distance possible in 6 minutes by walking continuously the 42 metres indicated on the floor. It measures the distance in meters
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
Secondary outcomes (11)
Analyses changes in heart rate reached in ergometry.
Analyses during modified Balke treadmill protocol
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
Analyses changes in blood pressure reached in ergometry.
Analyses during modified Balke treadmill protocol
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
Analyses changes in maximum speed reached in ergometry.
Analyses during modified Balke treadmill protocol
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
Analyses changes in duration test reached in ergometry.
Analyses during modified Balke treadmill protocol
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
Analyses changes in fat percentage.
Fat percentage (%) was assessed using bioimpedance analysis (OMROM BF-306).
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in body mass index (BMI).
BMI was assessed using bioimpedance analysis (OMROM BF-306).
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in gait.
Gait was assessed using the Timed Up and Go Test. To stand up from a standard arms chair, walk 3 meters, turn back the cone walk back and sit down to the chair. The time in seconds is record.
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in balance.
Balance was assessed using the One Leg Standing Test. This test consist in maintain one leg stance for as long as possible. The test was considered normal if the one leg standing time reached 30 seconds.
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in lower body strength.
Lower body strength was assessed using the Sit To Stand 30. For the Sit To Stand 30, the participant consist in measures how many repetition the participant can to stand up and sit down during 30 seconds.
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in upper body strength.
Upper body strength was assessed using the Arm Curl Test (30). For this test, the participant consist in measures how many repetition the participant can to curl up and curl down during 30 seconds.
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in maximal handgrip strength.
To measure the amount of strength developed by each hand in kg.
Measured: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Feb 2019
- Study start20 Dec 2015
- Primary completion1 Feb 2016
- Study completion20 Jun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AgingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- HIT; MIT; GC
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de Almeria
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, María Carrasco Poyatos, Universidad de Almeria
- Investigators
- Ismael Ballesta García, PhD. Student, Principal investigator, Universidad de AlmeriaMaría Carrasco Poyatos, PhD., Principal investigator, Universidad de Almeria
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03840330
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HIICT-OW/16
- Acronym
- AHIITATE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 5 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Wisloff U, Stoylen A, Loennechen JP, Bruvold M, Rognmo O, Haram PM, Tjonna AE, Helgerud J, Slordahl SA, Lee SJ, Videm V, Bye A, Smith GL, Najjar SM, Ellingsen O, Skjaerpe T. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation. 2007 Jun 19;115(24):3086-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675041. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
PubMed 17548726Guiraud T, Juneau M, Nigam A, Gayda M, Meyer P, Mekary S, Paillard F, Bosquet L. Optimization of high intensity interval exercise in coronary heart disease. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Mar;108(4):733-40. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1287-z.
PubMed 19915859Huang SC, Wong MK, Lin PJ, Tsai FC, Fu TC, Wen MS, Kuo CT, Wang JS. Modified high-intensity interval training increases peak cardiac power output in patients with heart failure. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Sep;114(9):1853-62. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2913-y. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
PubMed 24880226Ballesta Garcia I, Rubio Arias JA, Ramos Campo DJ, Martinez Gonzalez-Moro I, Carrasco Poyatos M. High-intensity Interval Training Dosage for Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Cardiac Rehabilitation. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Mar;72(3):233-243. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Apr 9. English, Spanish.
PubMed 29650445
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of High-intensity Interval Circuit Training (HIICT) on the Cardiovascular and Functional Parameters of Aged Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03840330
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AHIITATE / HIICT-OW/16
- Conditions
- Aging, Healthy, Cardiovascular Risk Factor, Physical Activity
- Keywords
- High-intensity interval training, Circuit training, Elderly, Functional capacity, VO2 max, Cardiovascular parameters
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de AlmeriaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the adaptations on the functional capacity and cardiovascular in elderly after a physical activity program circuit training. The participants were divided into three groups: Circuit training based on high-intensity interval training group (HIICT), Circuit training at moderate intensity group (MICT) and Control group (CG).
Detailed description
Three groups of participants (circuit training based on high-intensity interval training, circuit training at moderate intensity and not training group) will enter the study. The intervention will consist of a physical exercise program in day centers.
Intensity progression will be encouraged according to the rate of perceived exertion. Progression of exertion will be "very hard", "extremely hard" and "maximal exertion" for HIT group, and "light", "somewhat hard" and "hard" for group. Assessment will be undertaken at two-time points: baseline and after 16 weeks of exercise training.
Assessment will include VO2 peak, functional capacity, health-related quality of life, cognitive state and daily physical activity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- HIT; MIT; GC
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High-intensity interval training group | Experimental | Other: Experimental: High-intensity interval training groupFrequency: 2 days/weeks; Intensity: 16-18 Börg/85-100%VO2max; Recovery: Active; Duration: 1 hour. |
| Moderate-intensity interval training group | Experimental | Other: Experimental: Moderate-intensity interval training groupFrequency: 2 days/weeks; Intensity: 12-14 Börg/60-70% VO2max; Recovery: Active; Duration: 1 hour. |
| Control group | No intervention | –Maintain their normal daily activities throughout the sixteen-week experimental period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 90 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Having 50 - 90 years old.
- Not suffering chronic heart, respiratory or joint disease, taking medication or having a deteriorated level of mental health that could interfere in carrying out exercise programs.
- Having 0 or 1 responses positive in the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (ParQ). Only item 6, related to mild vascular diseases.
- Being physically independent according to the scales Lawton and Brody, and Katz.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Having uncontrolled arterial hypertension.
- Having practiced during the previous 3 months or practicing at present a similar exercise to the one proposed in the study.
- Attending sessions less than 80%.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: High-intensity interval training group16 weeks of High-intensity interval training | Other | High-intensity interval training group |
| Experimental: Moderate-intensity interval training group16 weeks of Moderate-intensity interval training | Other | Moderate-intensity interval training group |
Primary outcome
Analyses changes in maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max).
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
A modified Balke treadmill protocol will be used to estimate aerobic capacity (VO2max).
Analyses changes in maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max).
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
VO2max was assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test. The participant should walk the longest distance possible in 6 minutes by walking continuously the 42 metres indicated on the floor. It measures the distance in meters
11 secondary outcomes
Analyses changes in heart rate reached in ergometry.
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
Analyses changes in blood pressure reached in ergometry.
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
Analyses changes in maximum speed reached in ergometry.
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
Analyses changes in duration test reached in ergometry.
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention
Analyses changes in fat percentage.
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in body mass index (BMI).
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in gait.
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in balance.
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in lower body strength.
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in upper body strength.
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Analyses changes in maximal handgrip strength.
Time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 17548726Wisloff U, Stoylen A, Loennechen JP, Bruvold M, Rognmo O, Haram PM, Tjonna AE, Helgerud J, Slordahl SA, Lee SJ, Videm V, Bye A, Smith GL, Najjar SM, Ellingsen O, Skjaerpe T. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation. 2007 Jun 19;115(24):3086-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675041. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 19915859Guiraud T, Juneau M, Nigam A, Gayda M, Meyer P, Mekary S, Paillard F, Bosquet L. Optimization of high intensity interval exercise in coronary heart disease. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Mar;108(4):733-40. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1287-z.
- Results publication: PubMed 24880226Huang SC, Wong MK, Lin PJ, Tsai FC, Fu TC, Wen MS, Kuo CT, Wang JS. Modified high-intensity interval training increases peak cardiac power output in patients with heart failure. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Sep;114(9):1853-62. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2913-y. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 29650445Ballesta Garcia I, Rubio Arias JA, Ramos Campo DJ, Martinez Gonzalez-Moro I, Carrasco Poyatos M. High-intensity Interval Training Dosage for Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Cardiac Rehabilitation. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Mar;72(3):233-243. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Apr 9. English, Spanish.
- Carrasco, M., Navarro, M.D., Martínez, I., Reche-Orenes, D. (2016). Daily physical activity impact in old women bone density and grip strength. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 33(6), 1305-1311.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Carrasco, M., Martínez, I., Navarro, M.D. (2015). Daily physical activity and bone mineral density in older women. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 21(1), 22-26.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Aging
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
RecruitingPhase 2
Metformin as an add-on or Monotherapy in Treatment of Aging People With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Multiple Sclerosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Validation & Intervention Testing for Aging, Longevity and Healthspan
Aging, Functional Decline
RecruitingObservational study
Effects of Obesity on Physical Abilities and Daily Living Activities in Elderly Adults
Obesity, Sarcopenic Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ismael Ballesta García, PhD. Student principal investigator
Universidad de Almeria
María Carrasco Poyatos, PhD. principal investigator
Universidad de Almeria
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental: High-intensity interval training group and Experimental: Moderate-intensity interval training group in people with Aging and Healthy, run by Universidad de Almeria.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Analyses changes in maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max). (time frame: Pre and post after sixteen weeks of intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03840330, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2019.