Idiopathic Parkinson DiseasePhase 4NCT03841604
Effect of Safinamide on Parkinson's Disease Related Chronic Pain
A Phase 4 study testing Safinamide Methanesulfonate in people with Idiopathic Parkinson Disease, run by Zambon SpA at 45 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
Primary objective: To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 mg once daily (OD), compared with placebo, as add-on therapy for PD-related chronic pain Secondary objectives: Percentage of pain responders Clinical Global Impression for pain Patient Global Impression for pain Reduction in use of pain drugs Mood… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Idiopathic Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- Safinamide Methanesulfonate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 94 participants
- Where
- 45 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- 9 Apr 2019to 3 May 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant must be 30 years of age or older, at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Diagnosed with IPD by using the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank criteria for more than 5 years duration.
- Receiving treatment with a stable dose of oral L-Dopa (including controlled release [CR], immediate release [IR] or a combination of CR/IR), with and without benserazide/carbidopa, with or without addition of a catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor and may be receiving concomitant treatment with stable doses of a dopamine agonist, an anticholinergic and/or amantadine for at least 4 weeks prior to the randomisation (baseline visit).
- Hoehn and Yahr stage between 2-3 (inclusive) during the "ON" phase at the screening visit.
- Experiencing motor fluctuations following optimum titration of treatment medications and within the 4 weeks immediately prior to randomisation.
- Experiencing chronic pain (i.e. ongoing for ≥3 months prior to screening visit); the Investigator must consider chronic pain directly related to PD and not explained by any other health problem (e.g. peripheral neuropathy, organ disease or arthritis pain) OR consider the intensity of chronic pain specifically aggravated by PD.
Show all 11Show fewer
- If taking regular analgesics, the treatment regimen should be stable in the 4 weeks prior to the randomisation visit.
- Able to maintain an accurate and complete electronic diary with the help of a caregiver.
- Male or female
- •A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: i.Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) OR ii.A WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance
- Capable of giving signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Any form of Parkinsonism other than IPD.
- Diagnosis of chronic migraine (>15 days per month) or cancer pain.
- History of bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder requiring treatment with neuroleptics.
- History of dementia or cognitive dysfunction.
- Severe, peak dose or biphasic dyskinesia.
- Unpredictable or widely swinging fluctuations.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Ophthalmologic history including any of the following conditions: albinism, uveitis, retinitis pigmentosa, retinal degeneration, active retinopathy, severe progressive diabetic retinopathy, inherited retinopathy or family history of hereditary retinal disease.
- Moderate or severe liver failure using the Child-Pugh classification score.
- History of drug and/or alcohol abuse within 12 months prior to screening as defined by the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
- Allergy/sensitivity, intolerance or contraindications to Safinamide.
- Treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), levodopa infusion, pethidine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine less than 4 weeks prior to the randomisation visit
- Use of any investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to screening or 5 half-lives, whichever is the longest
- Previous treatment with Safinamide in the 9 months before the screening visit
- Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) total score <24 at screening.
- NRS score ≤ 4 points at randomization visit.
- Any clinically significant condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would not be compatible with study participation or represent a risk for participants while in the study
Trial locations and contacts
45 sites in 5 countries.
45 sites in 5 countries
Spain16 sites
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón - PPDS
Barcelona, 08035
C.A.U de Burgos - Hospital Universitario de Burgos
Burgos, 09006
Hospital Puerta del Mar
Cadiz, 11009
Hospital Universitario de Donostia
Donostia / San Sebastian, 20014
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Madrid, 28006
Hospital Universitario La Paz - PPDS
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda
Madrid, 28222
Hospital HM Puerta del Sur
Móstoles, 28938
Clinica Universidad Navarra
Pamplona, 31008
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
Pamplona, 31008
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville, 41009
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville, 41013
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe de Valencia
Valencia, 46026
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, 50009
Italy11 sites
Zambon Investigative Site
Chieti, 66013
Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, 20122
Centro per la Malattia di Parkinson e i Disturbi del Movimento
Milan, 20126
Ospedale San Raffaele S.r.l. - PPDS
Milan, 20133
Azienda Ospedaliera Di Perugia
Perugia
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, 56124
Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed
Pozzilli, 86077
Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata
Roma, 00133
Ospedale San Giovanni Battista - ACISMOM
Roma, 00148
IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana
Roma, 00163
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio Ruggi d'Aragona
Salerno, 84084
Germany10 sites
St. Joseph Krankenhaus Berlin
Berlin, 13088
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden
Dresden, 01307
Katholische Kliniken Ruhrhalbinsel GmbH
Essen, 45257
Neurologische Praxis
Gera, 07551
University Medicine Göttingen Germany
Göttingen, 37075
Klinik Haag i. OB
Haag, 83527
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH
Marburg, 35043
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, 48149
NeuroPoint Akademie
Ulm, 89073
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, 89081
France6 sites
Hopital Gabriel Montpied
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
CHU de GRENOBLE
Grenoble, 38700
Hopitaux de La Timone
Marseille, 13385
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes
Nîmes, 30900
Hopital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, 67200
Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet
Toulouse, 31300
Austria2 sites
Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck
Innsbruck, 6020
Institut für Neuroimmunologische und Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
Vienna, 1220
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide 100mg Once Daily, as add-on Therapy, in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD) Patients With Motor Fluctuations and PD Related Chronic Pain
Primary objective:
- To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 mg once daily (OD), compared with placebo, as add-on therapy for PD-related chronic pain
Secondary objectives:
- Percentage of pain responders
- Clinical Global Impression for pain
- Patient Global Impression for pain
- Reduction in use of pain drugs
- Mood
- Motor and non-motor symptoms
Safety Objectives:
- Safety and tolerability
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase IV, international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) patients, experiencing motor fluctuations and PD-related chronic pain while on stable doses of levodopa (L-Dopa), to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide 100 mg Once Daily, as Add-On Therapy.
The study consisted of:
- A screening period of up to 1 to 2 weeks.
- A treatment period of 16 weeks.
- A telephone follow-up call at 1 week after the end of treatment. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2:1 to receive either safinamide (50 mg or 100 mg) or matching placebo. At Day 1, eligible subjects entered the treatment period to receive safinamide 50 mg (from Day 1 to Day 7) and then 100 mg (from Day 8 onwards) orally OD. After completion of all baseline assessments, subjects received the first dose of study drug at the study center and, thereafter, study drug was to be taken at home each morning along with their first morning dose of L-DOPA and other (if any) PD medications. On Day 8, the dose of study drug was increased, at home, to 100 mg OD. Each subject received treatment for 16 weeks, with visits at Week 0/Day 1 (baseline) and at Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (or early termination). From Day 1 onwards, subjects recorded the use of as-needed (PRN) medications along with indicating the worst pain they experienced on a daily basis.
- Conditions
- Idiopathic Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- Safinamide Methanesulfonate, Safinamide methanesulfonate matching placebo
- Keywords
- Parkinson disease, Safinamide
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Safinamide MethanesulfonateDrug
Also called Xadago
50 mg, 100 mg
Safinamide methanesulfonate matching placeboOther
Also called Placebo
50 mg, 100 mg
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Safinamide methanesulfonate film coated tablets once daily, 50 mg and 100 mg. Safinamide methanesulfonate 50 mg and 100 mg tablets was administered orally, OD, with or without food, at breakfast time when the subject was taking their morning dose of L-DOPA.
Subjects received study drug 50 mg (from Day 1 to Day 7) and then 100 mg (from Day 8 onwards). The dose of 100 mg/day (titrated from 50 mg/day after 1 week) was selected based on the results of previous studies in patients with PD and from the results of a post hoc analysis that investigated the effects of safinamide on pain. Receives: Drug: Safinamide Methanesulfonate |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Safinamide methanesulfonate matching placebo film coated tablets once daily. The matching placebo was administered orally, OD, in tablets, with or without food, at breakfast time when the subject was taking their morning dose of L-DOPA. Receives: Other: Safinamide methanesulfonate matching placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity (NRS-11 Scale) - Full Analysis Set
To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 (mg od), compared to placebo, as add-on therapy, for change pain severity ("average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days"), as assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity (NRS-11 Scale) - Per Protocol Set
To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 (mg od), compared to placebo, as add-on therapy, for change pain severity ("average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days"), as assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Secondary outcomes (9)
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of ≥2 Points in Pain Severity at Week 16, Compared to Baseline
Reduction in pain severity (based on the "average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days") of ≥ 2 points was assessed by an 11-point NRS (numerical rating scale), compared to baseline. Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Measured: Week 16
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Score for Pain
CGI-C (Clinical Global Impression - Change) score for pain is a seven-point scale that indicates the patient's impression of change for relevant symptoms. It ranges from "substantial improvement" to "substantial worsening":
- = substantial improvement;
- = moderate improvement;
- = minimum improvement;
- = No change;
- = Minimum worsening;
- = moderate worsening;
- = substantial worsening. of course the higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
The Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score for Pain at Week 16
The CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression - Severity) score is a seven-point scale which asks the clinician one question: "considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" which is rated as follow:
- = normal, not at all ill;
- = borderline mentally ill;
- = mildly ill;
- = moderately ill;
- = markedly ill;
- = severely ill;
- = among the most severely ill patients. of course the higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score for Pain
The Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) scale is designed to capture the subject's perception of change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, an overall quality of life. These areas are captured using a 7- point scale, indicating:
- = no change (or condition has got worse);
- = almost the same, hardly any change at all;
- = a little better, but not noticeable change;
- = somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference;
- = moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change;
- = better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference;
- = a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference.
Of course, the higher the score, the better the outcome.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Subjects With Concomitant Use of Pain Drugs at Different Timepoints
This outcome describes the number of subjects which had concomitant assumption of pain drugs at different timepoints.
Measured: Baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 16
Amount of PRN PD Pain Medication: Count of Subjects Who Used PRN PD Pain Medication in the 7 Days Preceding Visits
Total count of patients who used PRN (meaning "when necessary") Parkinson's Disease Pain Medications was expressed both in number and in percentage.
The analysis of amount of concomitant PRN PD pain medications as reported in the subject diary was summarized:
- as the number of subjects who were taking pain medication in the 7 days preceding visits at different timepoints;
- in the number of days on which PRN PD pain medication was taken at different timepoints.
Measured: at Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 16
Amount of PRN PD Pain Medication: Number of Days on Which PRN PD Pain Medication Was Taken at Different Timepoints
The analysis of amount of concomitant PRN PD pain medications as reported in the subject diary was summarized:
- as the number of days on which PRN PD pain medication was taken at different timepoints.
- as the number of subjects who were taking pain medication in the 7 days preceding visits at different timepoints.
Measured: At Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was devised to measure anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients through a unique questionnaire which takes 2-5 min to be completed. The questionnaire consists of a total of 14 items: seven items for the anxiety subscale (HADS Anxiety) and seven items for the depression subscale (HADS Depression). HADS Anxiety focus mainly on symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder and HADS Depression is focused on anhedonia, the main symptom of depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for anxiety subscale and the same for depression subscale, where:
0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case). 11-21 = Abnormal (case) The two subscores are then summed up to obtain a total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The total scale range is 0-42. The higher the score, the worse the anxiety/depression status.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in MDS-UPDRS
Change in the MDS-UPDRS = Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale The MDS-UPDRS is defined by 4 Parts, each composed by a different number of items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 to 4); Part I (non-motor experiences of daily living; 13 items) Part II (motor experiences of daily living;13 items) Part III (motor examination; 33 items) Part IV (motor complications; 6 items) The MDS-UPDRS has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 260. The higher the score, the more severe the impairment.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Feb 2019
- Study start9 Apr 2019
- Primary completion30 Apr 2021
- Study completion3 May 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Idiopathic Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zambon SpA
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Charlotte Keywood, MD, Study director, Zambon SpA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03841604
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Z7219M01
- Other IDs
- 2017-002426-20, 2017
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 30 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 22 May 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide 100mg Once Daily, as add-on Therapy, in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD) Patients With Motor Fluctuations and PD Related Chronic Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03841604
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Z7219M01
- Conditions
- Idiopathic Parkinson Disease
- Keywords
- Parkinson disease, Safinamide
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zambon SpAIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 9 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 22 May 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary objective:
- To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 mg once daily (OD), compared with placebo, as add-on therapy for PD-related chronic pain
Secondary objectives:
- Percentage of pain responders
- Clinical Global Impression for pain
- Patient Global Impression for pain
- Reduction in use of pain drugs
- Mood
- Motor and non-motor symptoms
Safety Objectives:
- Safety and tolerability
Detailed description
This is a Phase IV, international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) patients, experiencing motor fluctuations and PD-related chronic pain while on stable doses of levodopa (L-Dopa), to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide 100 mg Once Daily, as Add-On Therapy.
The study consisted of:
- A screening period of up to 1 to 2 weeks.
- A treatment period of 16 weeks.
- A telephone follow-up call at 1 week after the end of treatment. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2:1 to receive either safinamide (50 mg or 100 mg) or matching placebo. At Day 1, eligible subjects entered the treatment period to receive safinamide 50 mg (from Day 1 to Day 7) and then 100 mg (from Day 8 onwards) orally OD. After completion of all baseline assessments, subjects received the first dose of study drug at the study center and, thereafter, study drug was to be taken at home each morning along with their first morning dose of L-DOPA and other (if any) PD medications. On Day 8, the dose of study drug was increased, at home, to 100 mg OD. Each subject received treatment for 16 weeks, with visits at Week 0/Day 1 (baseline) and at Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (or early termination). From Day 1 onwards, subjects recorded the use of as-needed (PRN) medications along with indicating the worst pain they experienced on a daily basis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Drug: Safinamide MethanesulfonateSafinamide methanesulfonate film coated tablets once daily, 50 mg and 100 mg. Safinamide methanesulfonate 50 mg and 100 mg tablets was administered orally, OD, with or without food, at breakfast time when the subject was taking their morning dose of L-DOPA. Subjects received study drug 50 mg (from Day 1 to Day 7) and then 100 mg (from Day 8 onwards). The dose of 100 mg/day (titrated from 50 mg/day after 1 week) was selected based on the results of previous studies in patients with PD and from the results of a post hoc analysis that investigated the effects of safinamide on pain. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Safinamide methanesulfonate matching placeboSafinamide methanesulfonate matching placebo film coated tablets once daily. The matching placebo was administered orally, OD, in tablets, with or without food, at breakfast time when the subject was taking their morning dose of L-DOPA. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Participant must be 30 years of age or older, at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Diagnosed with IPD by using the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank criteria for more than 5 years duration.
- Receiving treatment with a stable dose of oral L-Dopa (including controlled release [CR], immediate release [IR] or a combination of CR/IR), with and without benserazide/carbidopa, with or without addition of a catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor and may be receiving concomitant treatment with stable doses of a dopamine agonist, an anticholinergic and/or amantadine for at least 4 weeks prior to the randomisation (baseline visit).
- Hoehn and Yahr stage between 2-3 (inclusive) during the "ON" phase at the screening visit.
- Experiencing motor fluctuations following optimum titration of treatment medications and within the 4 weeks immediately prior to randomisation.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Any form of Parkinsonism other than IPD.
- Diagnosis of chronic migraine (>15 days per month) or cancer pain.
- History of bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder requiring treatment with neuroleptics.
- History of dementia or cognitive dysfunction.
- Severe, peak dose or biphasic dyskinesia.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Safinamide MethanesulfonateAlso: Xadago50 mg, 100 mg | Drug | Experimental |
| Safinamide methanesulfonate matching placeboAlso: Placebo50 mg, 100 mg | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity (NRS-11 Scale) - Full Analysis Set
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 (mg od), compared to placebo, as add-on therapy, for change pain severity ("average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days"), as assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity (NRS-11 Scale) - Per Protocol Set
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 (mg od), compared to placebo, as add-on therapy, for change pain severity ("average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days"), as assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
9 secondary outcomes
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of ≥2 Points in Pain Severity at Week 16, Compared to Baseline
Time frame: Week 16
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Score for Pain
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
The Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score for Pain at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score for Pain
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Subjects With Concomitant Use of Pain Drugs at Different Timepoints
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 16
Amount of PRN PD Pain Medication: Count of Subjects Who Used PRN PD Pain Medication in the 7 Days Preceding Visits
Time frame: at Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 16
Amount of PRN PD Pain Medication: Number of Days on Which PRN PD Pain Medication Was Taken at Different Timepoints
Time frame: At Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in MDS-UPDRS
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 May 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Idiopathic Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Observation of Neurodegeneration in Parkinson's Disease Using Molecular Imaging and Blood Biomarkers
Idiopathic Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruiting
Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease
Idiopathic Parkinson Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Study and Open-Label Extension of NEU-411 in Companion Diagnostic-Positive Participants With Early Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease, Parkinson
Recruiting
MediPD: An Online Mediterranean Diet Program for People Living With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease, Idiopathic
Recruiting
Ginger-PD: Ginger as a Modifier of Ghrelin Levels and Gut Function in Parkinson's Disease
REM Sleep Behavior Disorder, Parkinson s Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charlotte Keywood, MD study director
Zambon SpA
45 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Safinamide Methanesulfonate in people with Idiopathic Parkinson Disease, run by Zambon SpA at 45 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 45 sites in Spain, Italy, Germany, France, Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 May 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity (NRS-11 Scale) - Full Analysis Set (time frame: Baseline and Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2023.