AzTrials
AzTrials

Social Anxiety DisorderSoREALNCT03845101

CBT Versus CBT With Virtual Reality Exposure for Social Anxiety Disorder and Agoraphobia

A study testing CBT with virtual reality exposure therapy and CBT in vivo in people with Social Anxiety Disorder and Agoraphobia, run by Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital at 5 sites in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Introduction: Anxiety disorders have a high lifetime prevalence, early-onset, and long duration or chronicity. Exposure therapy is considered one of the most effective elements in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety, but in vivo exposure can be challenging to access and control, and is sometimes rejected by… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Social Anxiety Disorder, Agoraphobia
What is being tested?
CBT with virtual reality exposure therapy and CBT in vivo
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
302 participants
Where
5 sitesDenmark
Study dates
19 Feb 2019to 9 Apr 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Fulfilling diagnostic criteria for social anxiety disorder (ICD-code: F40.1) and/or Agoraphobia (ICD-code: 40.0)
  • Age 18-75 years
  • Sufficient knowledge of the Danish language
  • Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Alcohol or drug dependence (ICD-code: F10-19.20-26).

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

Denmark5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Ambulatorium for Angst og Tvangssygdomme

    Aalborg, 9000

    Benjamin Arnfred, 21630878 ext. +45, barn0006@regionh.dk

    Recruiting
  • Psykoterapeutisk Ambulatorium

    Brøndby, Copenhagen, 2605

    Benjamin Arnfred, 21 63 08 78 ext. +45, barn0006@regionh.dk

    Recruiting
  • Psykoterapeutisk Klinik, Nannasgade

    Copenhagen, Captial Region of Denmark, 2200

    Benjamin Arnfred, 45 21 63 08 78, benjamin.alexander.thorup.arnfred@regionh.dk

    Recruiting
  • Psykoterapeutisk klinik, Frederiksberg

    Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, 2000

    Benjamin Arnfred, 21630878 ext. +45, barn0006@regionh.dk

    Recruiting
  • Psykoterapeutisk Center Stolpegård

    Gentofte Municipality, Copenhagen, 2820

    Benjamin Arnfred, 31724603, benjamin.ata@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: SoREAL- a Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction: Anxiety disorders have a high lifetime prevalence, early-onset, and long duration or chronicity. Exposure therapy is considered one of the most effective elements in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety, but in vivo exposure can be challenging to access and control, and is sometimes rejected by patients because they consider it too aversive. Virtual reality allows flexible and controlled exposure to challenging situations in an immersive and protected environment.

Aim: The SoREAL-trial aims to investigate the effect of group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-in vivo) versus group cognitive behavioral therapy with virtual reality exposure (CBT-in virtuo) for patients diagnosed with social anxiety disorder and/or agoraphobia, in mixed groups.

Read more

Methods \& Analysis: The design is an investigator-initiated randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-group and superiority-designed clinical trial. Three hundred two patients diagnosed with social anxiety disorder and/or agoraphobia will be included from the regional mental health centers of Copenhagen and North Sealand and the Northern Region of Denmark. All patients will be offered a manual-based 14-week cognitive behavioral group treatment program, including eight sessions with exposure therapy. Therapy groups will be centrally randomized with concealed allocation sequence to either CBT-in virtuo or CBT-in vivo. Patients will be assessed at baseline, post-treatment and one-year follow-up by treatment blinded researchers and research assistants. The primary outcome will be diagnosis-specific symptoms measured with the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for patients with social anxiety disorder and the Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia for patients with agoraphobia. Secondary outcome measures will include depression symptoms, social functioning, and patient satisfaction. Exploratory outcomes will be substance and alcohol use, working alliance and quality of life.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial has been approved by the research ethics committee in the Capital Region of Denmark. All results, positive, negative as well as inconclusive, will be published as quickly as possible and still in concordance with Danish law on the protection of confidentially and personal information. Results will be presented at national and international scientific conferences.

Being tested
CBT with virtual reality exposure therapy, CBT in vivo
Keywords
Social anxiety, Virtual Reality, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy, RCT, Social Phobia, Agoraphobia
Medical subject headings
Phobia, Social, Agoraphobia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CBT with virtual reality exposure therapyBehavioural

    The patients receiving the in virtuo exposure will be immersed using an Oculus Go head-mounted display, enabling viewing of 360° spherically camera recorded VR environments. The VR scenarios will thus be high-resolution 360° stereoscopic films, that are played around the viewer. For ease of use, the individual videos will be administered from an app that has been designed to be as intuitive to operate as possible. The patient will only have to put on the headset, adjust the focus and choose the desired environment by looking at it in the app. 360° video was chosen because it gives the most photorealistic visuals, while also being the cheapest to produce. The downside is that it does not allow direct user-interaction (e.g. the viewer cannot affect the environment in any way). To circumvent this, there are multiple junctions throughout the films where the actors will talk directly and unsolicited to the viewer while also allowing time for the viewer to respond.

  • CBT in vivoBehavioural

    The therapeutic intervention is manual-based cognitive-behavioral CBT group therapy adapted from the approach of Turk, Heimberg \& Magee and Graske \& Barlow with worksheets from Arendt \& Rosenberg and inspiration from Bouchard et al. The treatment will consist of 14 weekly two-hour group sessions following the manual to ensure equal and uniform treatment for every patient throughout the study. Concurrent psychopharmacological treatment is allowed in both intervention arms.

Study groups in NCT03845101
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CBT in virtuoExperimentalReceives CBT in group format with Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy
Receives: Behavioral: CBT with virtual reality exposure therapy
CBT in vivoActive comparatorActive comparator, receives CBT in group format. Treatment as usual.
Receives: Behavioral: CBT in vivo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in symptom severity of primary diagnosis

    Total scores on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) for patients with social anxiety disorder and the Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia (MIA) for patients with Agoraphobia measured pre-treatment, post-treatment and at one-year follow-up converted to the 'Percentage of Maximum Possible Score' (POMP) and averaged within treatment arms. POMP calculations can bring differently measured items to the same metric and do not change the multivariate distribution and covariance matrix of the transformed variables.

    Ranges from 0 to 100. Higher is worse.

    Measured: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 6 item score

    Measures symptoms of depression for the last 3 days.Total score will be measured. Ranges from 0 to 22. Higher is worse.

    Measured: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

  2. Change in Brief Version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale score

    Self-report, total score is measured, ranging from 12 to 60. Higher is worse.

    Measured: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

  3. Change in Work and Social Adjustment Scale score

    Self-report. Total score is measured, ranging from 0 to 40. Higher is better.

    Measured: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

  4. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Measures satisfaction with treatment. Total score is measured, ranging from 8 to 32. Higher is better. Self-report.

    Measured: Measured between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends

  5. Change in WHO Well-Being Index 5 items, score

    Measures overall quality of life. Total score is measured. Ranges from 0 to 25. Higher is better. Self-report.

    Measured: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

  6. Treatment response on social anxiety disorder symptoms

    Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale total score below 50 or a 15 points drop.

    Ranges from 0 to 144. Higher is worse.

    Measured: Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

  7. Treatment response on agoraphobia symptoms

    Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia total score below 2 or a 0.5 points drop

    Ranges from 0 to 5. Higher is worse.

    Measured: Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

  8. Remission from social anxiety disorder

    Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale total score below 25 and not qualifying for social anxiety disorder as measured using the MINI-7.

    Ranges from 0 to 144. Higher is worse.

    Measured: Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

  9. Remission from agoraphobia

    MIA total score below 1.5 and not qualifying for agoraphobia as measured using the MINI-7.

    Ranges from 0 to 5. Higher is worse.

    Measured: Between 0 and 14 day(s) after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Feb 2019
  2. Study start19 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion9 Apr 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion9 Apr 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
302 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03845101
Sponsor's protocol ID
NNF17OC0027780
Acronym
SoREAL
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
21 Jan 2019
Last updated
28 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: After completed analyses and publication, all depersonalised individual patient data will be transferred to The Danish National Archives and made available for other researchers upon reasonable request and with permission of The Danish National Archives.

Publications

  • Turk CL, Heimberg RG, Magee L. Social anxiety disorder. In: Barlow DH, editor. Clin Handb Psychol Disord A step-by-step Treat Man. London: Guilford Press; 2008. p. 123-63.

  • Graske MG, Barlow DH. Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia. In: Barlow DH, editor. Clin Handb Psychol Disord. 4th ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008. p. 1-65.

  • Rosenberg NK, Mørck MM, Arendt M. Kognitiv terapi. Nyeste udvikling. Kogn Ter Nyeste Udvikl. 2012.

  • Bouchard S, Robillard G, Larouche S, Loranger C. Description of a treatment manual for in virtuo exposure with specific phobia. Virtual Real Psychol Med Pedagog Appl. 2012;81-108.

  • Arnfred B, Bang P, Hjorthoj C, Christensen CW, Stengaard Moeller K, Hvenegaard M, Agerskov L, Krog Gausboel U, Soe D, Wiborg P, Smith CIS, Rosenberg N, Nordentoft M. Group cognitive behavioural therapy with virtual reality exposure versus group cognitive behavioural therapy with in vivo exposure for social anxiety disorder and agoraphobia: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):e051147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051147.

    PubMed 35110313

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CBT with virtual reality exposure therapy and CBT in vivo in people with Social Anxiety Disorder and Agoraphobia, run by Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital at 5 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Benjamin Arnfred (21630878 ext. +45, benjamin.alexander.thorup.arnfred@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in symptom severity of primary diagnosis (time frame: Between 30 to 1 day(s) before treatment, between 0 and 14 days after treatment ends and between 365 to 395 days after first assesment.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03845101, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in