AzTrials
AzTrials

SepsisNCT03847961

Efficacy and Safety Study of CA330 Hemoadsorption Device on IL-6 Removal in Septic Patients

A study testing hemoperfusion with cytokine adsorption column (CA330) in people with Sepsis, run by First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sepsis persists to be the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Moreover, the magnitude of health care resources utilized when managing septic patients is huge. All these hard facts call for constant efforts to optimize therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Sepsis
What is being tested?
hemoperfusion with cytokine adsorption column (CA330)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
144 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
17 Dec 2018to Oct 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hospitalized patients aged 18-75 years, regardless of gender;
  • Meet the clinical criteria of sepsis according to the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis;
  • The diagnosis of sepsis is established within last 48 hours.
  • Written informed consent is signed, and agreement to participate in all visits, examinations and treatments as required by the research program is achieved. If a patient is not able to give consent, the legal representative is asked to consent.

Who cannot join

  • End-stage renal disease that need maintenance hemodialysis treatment;
  • Congenital or acquired immunodeficiency disorders or those who had received organ transplantation within one year;
  • Prescription of immunosuppressive medications (tripterygium wilfordii, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, FK506, etc.) or prednisolone for more than 10 mg/day (or the same dose of other hormone therapy) within 30 days;
  • Coagulation dysfunction, severe bleeding tendency (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged significantly with bleeding, or fibrinogen less than 1.2 g/L with bleeding), active bleeding or uncontrolled acute massive bleeding within 24 hours;
  • Malignant tumors, consumptive diseases, site of infection cannot be cleared (ie surgical patients who cannot be operated on) or body weight less than 35kg;
  • A terminal state of organ failure (end stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary heart disease, heart dysfunction stage-IV, brain death or persistent vegetative state, chronic liver disease with hepatic encephalopathy, coagulation dysfunction, fluid retention and hepatocellular jaundice);
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Following results are detected during screening: platelet count < 50 *10^9/L, neutrophil count < 0.5 *10^9/L, hemoglobin < 70 g/L;
  • Despite of adequate volume resuscitation, vasopressors and hormones, the mean arterial blood cannot maintain above 65 mmHg;
  • Those who have been participating in or participated in another interventional clinical study within 30 days prior to enrollment, such as the clinical study of related drugs or medical devices affecting immunity (ie Xuebijing, ulinastatin, continuous renal replacement therapy, etc.);
  • Anaphylaxis to materials of cardiopulmonary bypass, anticoagulants and hemoperfusion or other serious allergic history;
  • Those who are not suitable for this clinical trial, which is determined by researchers, such as pregnant or lactating women, current drug addicts, patients with severe mental or neurological disorders, and those who have a history of alcohol abuse and cannot be terminated.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080

    Xiangdong Guan, PhD, +8613802925067, carlg@163.net

    Zhiyong Peng, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Safety Study of CA330 Hemoadsorption Device on IL-6 Removal in Septic Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Sepsis persists to be the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Moreover, the magnitude of health care resources utilized when managing septic patients is huge. All these hard facts call for constant efforts to optimize therapy. At present, the definitive therapy is adequate antibiotics and infectious source control. Fortunately, research has led to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis, in which the activation of multiple pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators plays a key role. This has led to the development of treatment strategies aimed at restoring a balanced immune response by eliminating/deactivating these inflammatory mediators. Whilst animal models of sepsis have provided encouraging results with strategies aiming at immune response modulation, clinical studies in patients using targeted pharmacological approaches have so far proved disappointing.

Besides of acute kidney injury (AKI), renal replacement therapy (RRT) is applied to remove inflammatory mediators extracorporeally. Across the different modalities, the application of adsorption may help deactivate and decrease the peak elevation of these mediators in earlier course of sepsis, when levels of endotoxins and cytokines are extremely high. Recently, attempts to improve the outcome of sepsis patients with such devices, ie CytoSorb cytokine hemoadsorption and polymyxin B (Toraymyxin) endotoxin adsorption, have seen a certain renaissance. However, the clinical evidence to date supporting hemoadsorption for removal of endotoxins and/or proinflammatory mediators in sepsis remains incompetent and controversial.

CA330 (Jafron Biomedical Co , Ltd, Zhuhai, China) is a hemoadsorption device containing hemocompatible, porous polymeric beads capable of removing cytokines and other mid-molecular weight toxins from blood by size exclusion and surface adsorption. Compared with HA330, improved resin synthesis technology makes CA330 a better performance in removing cytokines. This trial is the first to evaluate CA330 efficacy of cytokine reduction using the change in plasma interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations over time as a primary outcome. Although the trial was neither designed nor powered to evaluate outcome, we also evaluated organ function parameters as well as 28-day all-cause mortality.

Read the detailed description

Eligible patients are stratified by site and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either CA330 hemoperfusion plus conventional medical therapy group or conventional medical therapy group. The randomization is performed by researchers on the central randomization system, provided by the Department of Biostatistics, Southern Medical University. In this study, the center coded random number table is produced by stratified and sectional randomization method. Statistical Analysis System(SAS) 9.4 statistical software is used to generate random coding tables with serial numbers (001-144) according to the number of cases allocated in each center and the proportion of experimental group and control group (1:1). The length of selected sections (block) and random seed number are sealed together as confidential data . The random number table is provided by the statisticians of the Department of Biostatistics, Southern Medical University.

The experimental group receive routine treatment of sepsis combined with cytokine adsorption column (CA330) perfusion, and the control group receive routine treatment of sepsis only.

Hemoperfusion treatments are performed using a perfusion machine via centrally inserted standard dialysis catheters at a prescribed blood flow rate of 100-300ml/min. In the beginning, lower flow rate is recommended, if there is no discomfort, then gradually increases. Each patient received 2 hemoperfusion treatments within 24 hours with a target duration for each treatment of 120-180 minutes (minimum of 120 minutes). The shorter the interval between the two hemoperfusion is, the better. It is suggested that the second hemoperfusion be performed within 0-5 hours after the first one.

Anticoagulation was recommended with low-molecular-weight heparin in arterial line of the circuit at the dose of 60-80 international units (IU)/kg. No additional dose is required. The activity of anticoagulant factor α can be monitored at 60 minutes. It is suggested that the activity of anticoagulant factor α should be maintained at 500-1000units/L in subjects without bleeding tendency and 200-400units/L in subjects with bleeding tendency. If the clinical condition is limited, it is not mandatory to monitor this parameter.

Conditions
Sepsis
Being tested
hemoperfusion with cytokine adsorption column (CA330)
Keywords
sepsis, IL-6, hemoperfusion
Medical subject headings
Sepsis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • hemoperfusion with cytokine adsorption column (CA330)Device

    Hemoperfusion treatments are performed using a perfusion machine via centrally inserted standard dialysis catheters at a prescribed blood flow rate of 100-300ml/min. In the beginning, lower flow rate is recommended, if there is no discomfort, then gradually increases. Each patient received 2 hemoperfusion treatments within 24 hours with a target duration for each treatment of 120-180 minutes (minimum of 120 minutes). The shorter the interval between the two hemoperfusion is, the better. It is suggested that the second hemoperfusion be performed within 0-5 hours after the first one.

Study groups in NCT03847961
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control GroupNo interventionThe control group receive routine treatment of sepsis only. All sites agree, when feasible, to follow the tenets of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign clinical practice guidelines for management of sepsis.
Experimental GroupExperimentalThe experimental group receive routine treatment of sepsis combined with hemoperfusion with cytokine adsorption column (CA330).
Receives: Device: hemoperfusion with cytokine adsorption column (CA330)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the reduction rate of IL-6 serum concentration at the initiation of first adsorption and at the end of the second adsorption

    (1-Concentration IL-6 end of second adsorption/ Concentration IL-6 initiation of first adsorption) ×100%

    Measured: from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. the reduction rate of IL-10 serum concentration at the initiation of first adsorption and at the end of the second adsorption

    (1-Concentration IL-10 end of second adsorption/ Concentration IL-10 initiation of first adsorption) ×100%

    Measured: from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours

  2. the reduction rate of lactic acid serum concentration at the initiation of first adsorption and at the end of the second adsorption

    (1-Concentration lactic acid end of second adsorption/ Concentration lactic acid initiation of first adsorption) ×100%

    Measured: from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours

  3. the reduction rate of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) serum concentration at the initiation of first adsorption and at the end of the second adsorption

    (1-Concentration TNF-α end of second adsorption/ Concentration TNF-α initiation of first adsorption) ×100%

    Measured: from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours

  4. the dynamic change of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score

    The maximum APACHE II score is 71, while the minimum score is 0. The higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: from Day0 to Day28

  5. ventilation time

    scale: hour

    Measured: from Day0 to Day28

  6. oxygenation index

    partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2)

    Measured: from Day0 to Day28

  7. 24hour urinary output

    scale: ml/24h

    Measured: from Day0 to Day28

  8. length of vasopressors

    scale: hour

    Measured: from Day0 to Day28

  9. catecholamine index

    (dopamine dose*1)+(dobutamine dose*1)+(adrenaline dose*100)+(noradrenaline dose*100)+(phenylephrine dose*100), wherein all doses are expressed as µg/kg/min.

    Measured: from Day0 to Day28

  10. RRT incidency

    the percentages of patients who receive RRT in two groups

    Measured: from Day0 to Day28

  11. total length of renal replacement therapy

    scale: hour

    Measured: from Day0 to Day28

  12. ICU and hospital length of stay

    scale: day

    Measured: from Day0 to Day28

  13. 28-day all-cause mortality

    the 28-day all-cause mortality in two groups

    Measured: from Day0 to Day28

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Feb 2019
  2. Study start17 Dec 2018
  3. Primary completionFeb 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Eligible patients are stratified by site and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either CA330 hemoperfusion plus conventional medical therapy group or conventional medical therapy group.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
144 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03847961
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-030-02
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
13 Feb 2019
Last updated
22 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing hemoperfusion with cytokine adsorption column (CA330) in people with Sepsis, run by First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zimeng Liu, PhD (+8618925002766 ext. 18826471751, sumslzm@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the reduction rate of IL-6 serum concentration at the initiation of first adsorption and at the end of the second adsorption (time frame: from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in