AzTrials
AzTrials

ScarsNFWHSFNCT03850119

Nanofat on Wound Healing and Scar Formation

A study testing Nanofat injection in people with Scars and Delayed Wound Healing, run by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intradermal injection of Nanofat on wound healing and scar formation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Scars, Delayed Wound Healing, Hypertrophic Scar
What is being tested?
Nanofat injection
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
15 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Mar 2019to 1 Mar 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • scheduled for DIEP-flap breast reconstruction surgery at our department

Who cannot join

  • smokers
  • use of cortisone or other immunsuppressants
  • diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2
  • age
  • connective tissue disease

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Moustapha Hamdi, MD, PhD contact

+ 32 24749400

moustapha.hamdi@uzbrussel.be

About this study

Official title: Nanofat on Wound Healing and Scar Formation: a Randomized, Split-scar, Double Blind Trial

This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intradermal injection of Nanofat on wound healing and scar formation.

Read the detailed description

In this monocentric, randomized, controlled, double-blinded prospective interventional study, twenty patients will be included. Each patient will be his/her own control.

Patients undergoing DIEPflap breast reconstruction will be included in this study. During the surgery, the abdominal incision will be divided in two equal sides with the umbilicus as midline reference. The sides will be randomized in a treatment side and control side. The treatment side will receive intradermal nanofat injections after the subcutaneous and right before the intradermal sutures.

The patient and investigators will be blinded for the treatment protocol. The effects on wound healing, adverse events, scar formation and pigmentation will be evaluated up to one year after the surgery.

Being tested
Nanofat injection
Keywords
adipose derived stem cells, stromal vascular fraction, wound healing, scar formation, donor site morbidity, nanofat
Medical subject headings
Cicatrix, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic, Hyperpigmentation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nanofat injectionProcedure or surgery

    Lipoaspirate, harvested during the surgery, is centrifuged for 1 minute at 2000 rpm to discard infiltration fluid. The residual fat is passed back and forth between two 10cc syringes interlocked with Tulip connecting pieces (2.4, 1.4 and 1.2 diameter, each 10 passes for a total of 30 passes). This is injected intradermally before the intradermal sutures are placed. The donor site is always entirely sutured (both sides) by the same person.

Study groups in NCT03850119
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intradermal NanofatExperimentalThis side of the scar received intradermal injection of nanofat during the closure of the donor site.
Receives: Procedure: Nanofat injection
ControlNo interventionThis side of the scar received no injection.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical outcome of the abdominal scar by the use of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale

    The abdominal scar will be evaluated clinically by the patient and observer scar assessment scale, starting from one month after the surgery

    Measured: one year

  2. Clinical assessment of the time to healing of the abdominal wound

    The time for the abdominal wound to heal will be registered. Wound healing is considered a closed and non-dehiscent wound witout signs of inflammation or infection.

    Measured: one month

  3. Evaluation of histological parameters on tissue biopsy from both sides of the abdominal scar.

    Evaluation of the histological differences of the treatment arm vs. control, by evaluating scar properties on tissue biopsy. Scar thickness, collagen arrangement and angiogenesis will be evaluated.

    Measured: six months

  4. Pigmentation Index of the two sides of the scar, measured with a Mexameter

    Evaluation of the Pigmentation Index difference in the treatment arm vs. control arm will be measured by the use of a mexameter, starting from one month after the procedure (after wound healing is complete).

    Measured: one year

  5. Patient satisfaction of abdominal scar appearance measured by a Visual Analog Scale

    Evaluation of patient satisfaction over the entire course of the study by filling in a Visual Analog Scale, with 1 being very unsatisfied and 10 being very satisfied.

    Measured: one year

  6. Rate of adverse events

    Registration of the rate of adverse events appearing at the abdominal wound/abdominal scar

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2019
  2. Study start1 Mar 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
monocentric randomized controlled double-blinded prospective interventional study
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
15 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03850119
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019-044
Acronym
NFWHSF
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
18 Feb 2019
Last updated
21 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nanofat injection in people with Scars and Delayed Wound Healing, run by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Moustapha Hamdi, MD, PhD (+ 32 24749400, moustapha.hamdi@uzbrussel.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical outcome of the abdominal scar by the use of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (time frame: one year). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in