Occupational HealthNCT03855163
Effects of Regulatory Tools on Work Environment and Employee Health
A study testing Inspection visits, Guidance workshops and Online risk assessment tool in people with Occupational Health and Sick Leave, run by National Institute of Occupational Health, Norway at 130 sites in Norway.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the effects of the Labour Inspection Authority's regulatory tools on workplace exposures to prevent employee ill health. Norwegian municipal enterprises with employees in the home care sector have been randomized to three different experimental groups and to one control group. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 67 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Occupational Health, Sick Leave, Occupational Exposure
- What is being tested?
- Inspection visits, Guidance workshops and Online risk assessment tool
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,555 participants
- Where
- 130 sitesNorway
- Study dates
- 5 Mar 2019to 25 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 67 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All employees in municipal enterprises that provide home care services with a minimum of 20 employees and a maximum of 100 employees.
Who cannot join
- Employees in municipal enterprises that have received an inspection from the Labour Inspectorate in the years 2017 and 2018.
Trial locations and contacts
130 sites in 1 country.
130 sites in 1 country
Norway130 sites
Hjemmetjenesten i Ål kommune
Ål, 3570
Hjemmetjenesten i Giske kommune
Ålesund, Valderøya, 6050
Hjemmetjenesten i Åmli kommune
Åmli, 4865
Hjemmetjenesten i Åmot kommune
Åmot, Rena, 2450
Hjemmetjenesten i Andøy kommune
Andenes, 8483
Hjemmetjenesten i Årdal kommune
Årdalstangen, 6885
Hjemmetjenesten i Askvoll kommune
Askvoll, 6988
Hjemmetjenesten i Åsnes kommune
Åsnes, Flisa, 2270
Hjemmetjenesten i Aure kommune
Aure, 6689
Hjemmetjenesten i Aurland kommune
Aurland, 1421
Hjemmetjenesten i Ballangen kommune
Ballangen, 8540
Hjemmetjenesten i Aurskog Høland kommune
Bjørkelangen, 1940
Hjemmetjenesten i Bø
Bø, 3833
Hjemmetjenesten i Kvæfjord kommune
Borkenes, 9475
Hjemmetjenesten i Haram kommune
Brattvåg, 6270
Hjemmetjenesten i Hasvik kommune
Breivikbotn, 9593
Hjemmetjenesten i Time kommune
Bryne, 4349
Hjemmetjenesten i Kvænangen kommune
Burfjord, 9161
Hjemmetjenesten i Nordre Land kommune
Dokka, 2882
Hjemmetjenesten i Dønna kommune
Dønnes, Dønna, 8820
Hjemmetjenesten i Drammen kommune
Drammen, 3015
Hjemmetjenesten i Drangedal kommune
Drangedal, 3750
Hjemmetjenesten i Frogn kommune
Drøbak, 1443
Hjemmetjenesten i Eide kommune
Eide, 6490
Hjemmetjenesten i Gulen kommune
Eivindvik, 5966
Hjemmetjenesten i Elverum kommune
Elverum, 2408
Hjemmetjenesten i Evenes kommune
Evenes, Bogen, 8539
Hjemmetjenesten i Skånland kommune
Evenskjer, 9439
Hjemmetjenesten i Evje og Hornnes kommune
Evje, 4735
Hjemmetjenesten i Nord-Aurdal kommune
Fagernes, 2900
Hjemmetjenesten i Fauske kommune
Fauske, 8200
Hjemmetjenesten i Fedje kommune
Fedje, 5947
Hjemmetjenesten i Flekkefjord kommune
Flekkefjord, 4400
Hjemmetjenesten i Herøy kommune
Fosnavåg, 6699
Hjemmetjenesten i Fyresdal kommune
Fyresdal, 3870
Hjemmetjenesten i Gjerstad kommune
Gjerstad, 4980
Hjemmetjenesten i Gol kommune
Gol, 3550
Hjemmetjenesten i Hareid kommune
Hareid, 6060
Hjemmetjenesten i Øvre Eiker kommune
Hokksund, 3301
Hjemmetjenesten i Ringerike kommune
Hønefoss, 3502
Hjemmetjenesten i Søndre Land kommune
Hov, 2860
Hjemmetjenesten i Iveland kommune
Iveland, 4724
Hjemmetjenesten i Ullensaker kommune
Jessheim, 2051
Hjemmetjenesten i Jevnaker kommune
Jevnaker, 3520
Hjemmetjenesten i Strand kommune
Jørpeland, 4100
Hjemmetjenesten i Grue kommune
Kirkenær, 2661
Hjemmetjenesten i Klepp kommune
Kleppe, 4352
Hjemmetjenesten i Hemnes kommune
Korgen, 8646
Hjemmetjenesten i Kragerø kommune
Kragerø, 3791
Hjemmetjenesten i Kvinesdal kommune
Kvinesdal, 4480
Hjemmetjenesten i Lærdal kommune
Lærdal, 6886
Hjemmetjenesten i Bamble kommune
Langesund, 3993
Hjemmetjenesten i Sande kommune Møre og Romsdal
Larsnes, 6084
Hjemmetjenesten i Leikanger kommune
Leikanger, 6863
Hjemmetjenesten i Steigen kommune
Leinesfjorden, 8283
Hjemmetjenesten i Leirfjord kommune
Leirfjord, 8890
Hjemmetjenesten i Stord kommune
Leirvik, Stord, 5402
Hjemmetjenesten i Vestvågøy kommune
Leknes, 8376
Hjemmetjenesten i Lesja kommune
Lesja, 2665
Hjemmetjenesten i Lillesand
Lillesand, 4790
Hjemmetjenesten i Lindesnes kommune
Linnes, Vest-Agder, 4524
Hjemmetjenesten i Osterøy kommune
Lonevåg, 5282
Hjemmetjenesten i Løten kommune
Løten, 2341
Hjemmetjenesten i Luster kommune
Luster, Gaupne, 6868
Hjemmetjenesten i Midsund kommune
Midsund, 6475
Hjemmetjenesten i Rana kommune
Mo i Rana, 8622
Hjemmetjenesten i Målselv kommune
Moen, 9321
Hjemmetjenesten i Vefsen kommune
Mosjøen, 8657
Hjemmetjenesten i Råde kommune
Moss, Råde, 1640
Hjemmetjenesten i Trøgstad kommune
Mysen, Trøgstad, 1860
Hjemmetjenesten i Eidsberg kommune
Mysen, 1850
Hjemmetjenesten i Nes kommune Buskerud
Nesbyen, 3540
Hjemmetjenesten i Songdalen kommune
Nodeland, 4685
Hjemmetjenesten i Vega kommune
Nordland, Vega, 8980
Hjemmetjenesten i Kvam kommune
Norheimsund, 5600
Hjemmetjenesten i Notodden kommune
Notodden, 3672
Hjemmetjenesten i Odda kommune
Odda, 5750
Hjemmetjenesten i Vindafjord kommune
Ølen, 5580
Hjemmetjenesten i Marker kommune
Ørje, 1870
Hjemmetjenesten i Meløy kommune
Ørnes, 8150
Hjemmetjenesten i Gausdal kommune
Østre Gausdal, 2651
Hjemmetjenesten i Sel kommune
Otta, 2670
Hjemmetjenesten i Øyer kommune
Øyer, 2636
Hjemmetjenesten i Sigdal kommune
Prestfoss, 3350
Hjemmetjenesten i Rakkestad kommune
Rakkestad, 1891
Randaberg kommune
Randaberg, 4070
Hjemmetjenesten i Re kommune
Re, 3164
Hjemmetjenesten i Rendalen kommune
Redalen, Rendalen, 2484
Hjemmetjenesten i Risør kommune
Risør, 4952
Hjemmetjenesten i Tinn kommune
Rjukan, 3661
Hjemmetjenesten i Lunner kommune
Røa, 2740
Hjemmetjenesten i Nore og Uvdal kommune
Rødberg, 3630
Hjemmetjenesten i Kvinnherad kommune
Rosendal, 5470
Hjemmetjenesten i Hole kommune
Røyse, 3530
Hjemmetjenesten i Nord-Odal kommune
Sagstua, 2120
Hjemmetjenesten i Suldal kommune
Sand, 4230
Hjemmetjenesten i Sauda kommune
Sauda, 4200
Hjemmetjenesten i Hjartdal kommune
Sauland, 3692
Hjemmetjenesten i Selje kommune
Selje, 6740
Hjemmetjenesten i Seljord kommune
Seljord, 3840
Hjemmetjenesten i Skjåk kommune
Skår, Skjåk, 2690
Hjemmetjenesten i Sør-Odal kommune
Skarnes, 2100
Hjemmetjenesten i Hvaler kommune
Skjærhalden, 1680
Hjemmetjenesten i Smøla kommune
Smørås, Smøla, 6570
Hjemmetjenesten i Sola kommune
Sola, 4097
Hjemmetjenesten i Sørreisa kommune
Sørreisa, 9310
Hjemmetjenesten i Spydeberg kommune
Spydeberg, 1820
Hjemmetjenesten i Stordal kommune
Stordal, 6250
Hjemmetjenesten i Storfjord kommune
Storfjord, Oteren, 9046
Hjemmetjenesten i Nordreisa kommune
Storslett, 9156
Hjemmetjenesten i Sørfold kommune
Straumen, 8226
Hjemmetjenesten i Bø kommune Nordland
Straumsjøen, 8475
Hjemmetjenesten i Sund kommune
Sund, Skogsvåg, 5371
Hjemmetjenesten i Sunndal kommune
Sunndalsøra, 6601
Hjemmetjenesten i Sveio kommune
Sveio, 5559
Hjemmetjenesten i Vågan kommune
Svolvær, 8300
Hjemmetjenesten i Sykkylven kommune
Sykkylven, 6230
Hjemmetjenesten i Nannestad kommune
Teigebyen, Nannestad, 2030
Hjemmetjenesten i Tvedestrand kommune
Tvedestrand, 4901
Hjemmetjenesten i Tynset kommune
Tynset, 2500
Hjemmetjenesten i Samnanger kommune
Tysse, 5660
Hjemmetjenesten i Tysvær kommune
Tysvær, Aksdal, 5575
Hjemmetjenesten i Tysnes kommune
Uggdal, 5686
Hjemmetjenesten i Vang kommune
Vang, Valdres, 2975
Hjemmetjenesten i Averøy kommune
Vebenstad, Averøy, 6530
Hjemmetjenesten i Vennesla kommune
Vennesla, 4701
Hjemmetjenesten i Gloppen kommune
Vereide, Sandane, 6823
Hjemmetjenesten i Vinje kommune
Vinje, 3890
Hjemmetjenesten i Nord-Fron kommune
Vinstra, 2640
Hjemmetjenesten i Volda kommune
Volda, 6100
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of the Labour Inspection Authority's Regulatory Tools on Work Environment and Employee Health - Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Among Norwegian Home-care Workers
This study evaluates the effects of the Labour Inspection Authority's regulatory tools on workplace exposures to prevent employee ill health. Norwegian municipal enterprises with employees in the home care sector have been randomized to three different experimental groups and to one control group. We hypothesize a significant lower level of work environmental exposures and health complaints, after adjusting for pre-intervention measures, in the experimental groups compared to the control group.
Read the detailed description
A variety of work environmental exposures are shown to cause ill health. Compliance with occupational health and safety legislation and regulation is assumed to prevent work-related ill health. The Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority oversees that enterprises comply with the requirements of the working environment laws and regulations. The agency possesses two key regulatory tools to ensure compliance, i.e. inspections and guidance.
Inspections are used to check whether enterprises meet legal requirements. If inspectors reveal violations to legal requirements, the Labour Inspection Authority may respond with orders, coercive fines, and shutdown of operations and in worst-case report enterprises to the police.
Guidance are used to notify the enterprises of the legal requirements pertaining to work environmental standards, and to advice the employers and employee representatives concerning the most effective means of realizing compliance with the legal requirements.
Enterprises randomized to the experimental groups will receive one of three different intervention activities from the Labour Inspection Authority, i.e. targeted inspection visits, participation on a one-day workshop led by two inspectors on how to reach compliance with occupational health and safety (OHS) standards, or participation in an online risk assessment course for conducting written objectives in relation to health, environment and safety activities.
The interventions will be carried out at the organizational level (enterprise), whereas the effects of the interventions on working environment and health complaints will be measured at the individual level (employee). Two months before the Labour Inspection Authority perform their interventions, a baseline questionnaire assessing self-reported organizational, psychosocial and mechanical work factors and health complaints will be sent to all home-care workers employed in the included municipal enterprises. The effects of the different interventions on work environment and employee health will be evaluated through questionnaire measurements 6, 12 and 20 months post interventions.
- Conditions
- Occupational Health, Sick Leave, Occupational Exposure
- Being tested
- Inspection visits, Guidance workshops, Online risk assessment tool
- Keywords
- Mental Distress, Musculoskeletal Pain, Work-related, Cluster Randomized Trial, Effect Evaluation
- Medical subject headings
- Musculoskeletal Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Inspection visitsBehavioural
Normative intervention aimed at enforcing compliance with legal occupational health and safety requirements
Guidance workshopsBehavioural
Pedagogical intervention aimed to motivate managers and employee representatives to comply with legal occupational health and safety requirements
Online risk assessment toolBehavioural
Pedagogical intervention aimed to motivate managers and employee representatives to comply with legal occupational health and safety requirements
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Inspection visits | Experimental | Regulatory tool to ensure enterprise compliance with legal requirements Receives: Behavioral: Inspection visits |
| Guidance workshops | Experimental | Regulatory tool applied to inform and advise enterprises on legal requirements and how to realize compliance with such requirements Receives: Behavioral: Guidance workshops |
| Online risk assessment tool | Experimental | Regulatory tool applied to aid enterprises in conducting written objectives concerning health, environment and safety activities Receives: Behavioral: Online risk assessment tool |
| Control group | No intervention | The Labour Inspection Authority will not preform any intervention activities in enterprises assign to the control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in self reported occupational exposures
Psychosocial, organizational and mechanical factors at work will be assessed by the General Nordic Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work (QPSNordic) and with items adapted from the following questionnaire developed by Statistics Norway: "Working environment, survey on living conditions". The wording of the questions are typically: "how often in your job do you have to … " (e.g. suppress emotions in order to appear neutral on the outside?), or "In the course of your work" ... (e.g. do you need to squat or kneel?). Level of exposure is assessed by frequency scoring on a five-point scale ranging from "1 = very seldom or never" to "5 = very often or always"
Measured: Self-Reported Occupational Exposures will be assessed 2 months prior to the interventions and 12 months post interventions
Changes in psychological distress HSCL-5
Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-5), is a self-administered 5-item instrument, each item is on a four-point scale ranging from 1="not at all" to 4="extremely". Participants are asked to assess symptoms during the past 2 weeks prior to answering the questionnaire. The average item score is calculated by dividing the total score of the number of items answered (ranging between 1.00 and 4.00).
Measured: Psychological Distress will be assessed 2 months prior to the interventions and 12 months post interventions
Changes in musculoskeletal pain
Self-reported intensity of pain in five anatomic sites; neck, shoulder, back, arm, and leg. Each question is phrased: "Have you been troubled by… (e.g. neck pain) the last 4 weeks? Response alternatives are: 1) "not troubled", 2) "a little troubled", 3) "rather intensely troubled" and 4)" very intensely troubled"
Measured: Musculoskeletal Pain will be assessed 2 months prior to the interventions and 12 months post interventions
Changes in physician-certified absence from work, number of events (17 days or more) per 100 employee-years
Data from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration's sickness benefit register. This register provides complete registrations of all sickness absence episodes-including the length and medical diagnosis-which are compensated by the national insurance sickness benefit. As a general rule, everybody working or living in Norway is covered by the Norwegian national social insurance.
Measured: The absence rate will be assessed during the one year prior to the interventions and during the one year after the interventions
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2019
- Study start5 Mar 2019
- Primary completion30 Nov 2020
- Study completion25 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Occupational HealthStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- cluster-randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2,555 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Occupational Health, Norway
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Håkon A Johannessen, PhD, Principal investigator, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH/CDC)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03855163
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201700498
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 6 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data for all primary outcome measures will be made available
Publications
M. Dallner, A.-L. Elo, F. Gamberale, V. Hottinen, S. Knardahl, K. Lindström, A. Skogstad, E. Ørhede. Validation of the General Nordic Questionnaire (QPSNordic) for psychological and social factors at work. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen (2000)
Christensen JO, Nielsen MB, Finne LB, Knardahl S. Comprehensive profiles of psychological and social work factors as predictors of site-specific and multi-site pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 May 1;44(3):291-302. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3706. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
PubMed 29325179Andersen JH, Malmros P, Ebbehoej NE, Flachs EM, Bengtsen E, Bonde JP. Systematic literature review on the effects of occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions at the workplace. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Mar 1;45(2):103-113. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3775. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
PubMed 30370910Mischke C, Verbeek JH, Job J, Morata TC, Alvesalo-Kuusi A, Neuvonen K, Clarke S, Pedlow RI. Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD010183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010183.pub2.
PubMed 23996220Strand BH, Dalgard OS, Tambs K, Rognerud M. Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(2):113-8. doi: 10.1080/08039480310000932.
PubMed 12745773Stromholm T, Pape K, Ose SO, Krokstad S, Bjorngaard JH. Psychosocial working conditions and sickness absence in a general population: a cohort study of 21,834 workers in Norway (The HUNT Study). J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Apr;57(4):386-92. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000362.
PubMed 25851186Knutsen RH, Nielsen MB, Fostervold KI, Johannessen HA. Associations between workplace aggression and subsequent mental distress and sick leave among home care workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2025 Dec;98(9-10):899-911. doi: 10.1007/s00420-025-02183-2. Epub 2025 Nov 13.
PubMed 41233599Knutsen RH, Nielsen MB, Lunde LK, Fostervold KI, Johannessen HA. Sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: A prospective cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jul 6;9:100376. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100376. eCollection 2025 Dec.
PubMed 40851813Johannessen HA, Knardahl S, Emberland JS, Skare O, Finnanger Garshol B. Do regulatory tools instigate measures to prevent work-related psychosocial and ergonomic risk factors? A process evaluation of a Labour inspection authority trial in the Norwegian home-care services. BMC Res Notes. 2022 Nov 18;15(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06244-4.
PubMed 36401320Finnanger Garshol B, Knardahl S, Emberland JS, Skare O, Johannessen HA. Effects of the Labour Inspectorate Authority's regulatory tools on psychosocial and biomechanical work factors in Norwegian home care services: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2022 Dec;79(12):807-815. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108470. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
PubMed 36167785Indregard AR, Knardahl S, Emberland JS, Skare O, Johannessen HA. Effectiveness of the Labour Inspection Authority's regulatory tools for work environment and employee health: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial among Norwegian home-care workers. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 26;9(11):e031226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031226.
PubMed 31772092
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of the Labour Inspection Authority's Regulatory Tools on Work Environment and Employee Health - Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Among Norwegian Home-care Workers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03855163
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201700498
- Conditions
- Occupational Health, Sick Leave, Occupational Exposure
- Keywords
- Mental Distress, Musculoskeletal Pain, Work-related, Cluster Randomized Trial, Effect Evaluation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,555 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Occupational Health, NorwayOther government
- Collaborators
- Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority
- Study start
- 5 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the effects of the Labour Inspection Authority's regulatory tools on workplace exposures to prevent employee ill health. Norwegian municipal enterprises with employees in the home care sector have been randomized to three different experimental groups and to one control group. We hypothesize a significant lower level of work environmental exposures and health complaints, after adjusting for pre-intervention measures, in the experimental groups compared to the control group.
Detailed description
A variety of work environmental exposures are shown to cause ill health. Compliance with occupational health and safety legislation and regulation is assumed to prevent work-related ill health. The Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority oversees that enterprises comply with the requirements of the working environment laws and regulations. The agency possesses two key regulatory tools to ensure compliance, i.e. inspections and guidance.
Inspections are used to check whether enterprises meet legal requirements. If inspectors reveal violations to legal requirements, the Labour Inspection Authority may respond with orders, coercive fines, and shutdown of operations and in worst-case report enterprises to the police.
Guidance are used to notify the enterprises of the legal requirements pertaining to work environmental standards, and to advice the employers and employee representatives concerning the most effective means of realizing compliance with the legal requirements.
Enterprises randomized to the experimental groups will receive one of three different intervention activities from the Labour Inspection Authority, i.e. targeted inspection visits, participation on a one-day workshop led by two inspectors on how to reach compliance with occupational health and safety (OHS) standards, or participation in an online risk assessment course for conducting written objectives in relation to health, environment and safety activities.
The interventions will be carried out at the organizational level (enterprise), whereas the effects of the interventions on working environment and health complaints will be measured at the individual level (employee). Two months before the Labour Inspection Authority perform their interventions, a baseline questionnaire assessing self-reported organizational, psychosocial and mechanical work factors and health complaints will be sent to all home-care workers employed in the included municipal enterprises. The effects of the different interventions on work environment and employee health will be evaluated through questionnaire measurements 6, 12 and 20 months post interventions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- cluster-randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Inspection visits | Experimental | Behavioral: Inspection visitsRegulatory tool to ensure enterprise compliance with legal requirements |
| Guidance workshops | Experimental | Behavioral: Guidance workshopsRegulatory tool applied to inform and advise enterprises on legal requirements and how to realize compliance with such requirements |
| Online risk assessment tool | Experimental | Behavioral: Online risk assessment toolRegulatory tool applied to aid enterprises in conducting written objectives concerning health, environment and safety activities |
| Control group | No intervention | –The Labour Inspection Authority will not preform any intervention activities in enterprises assign to the control group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 67 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All employees in municipal enterprises that provide home care services with a minimum of 20 employees and a maximum of 100 employees.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Employees in municipal enterprises that have received an inspection from the Labour Inspectorate in the years 2017 and 2018.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Inspection visitsNormative intervention aimed at enforcing compliance with legal occupational health and safety requirements | Behavioural | Inspection visits |
| Guidance workshopsPedagogical intervention aimed to motivate managers and employee representatives to comply with legal occupational health and safety requirements | Behavioural | Guidance workshops |
| Online risk assessment toolPedagogical intervention aimed to motivate managers and employee representatives to comply with legal occupational health and safety requirements | Behavioural | Online risk assessment tool |
Primary outcome
Changes in self reported occupational exposures
Time frame: Self-Reported Occupational Exposures will be assessed 2 months prior to the interventions and 12 months post interventions
Psychosocial, organizational and mechanical factors at work will be assessed by the General Nordic Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work (QPSNordic) and with items adapted from the following questionnaire developed by Statistics Norway: "Working environment, survey on living conditions". The wording of the questions are typically: "how often in your job do you have to … " (e.g. suppress emotions in order to appear neutral on the outside?), or "In the course of your work" ... (e.g. do you need to squat or kneel?). Level of exposure is assessed by frequency scoring on a five-point scale ranging from "1 = very seldom or never" to "5 = very often or always"
Changes in psychological distress HSCL-5
Time frame: Psychological Distress will be assessed 2 months prior to the interventions and 12 months post interventions
Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-5), is a self-administered 5-item instrument, each item is on a four-point scale ranging from 1="not at all" to 4="extremely". Participants are asked to assess symptoms during the past 2 weeks prior to answering the questionnaire. The average item score is calculated by dividing the total score of the number of items answered (ranging between 1.00 and 4.00).
Changes in musculoskeletal pain
Time frame: Musculoskeletal Pain will be assessed 2 months prior to the interventions and 12 months post interventions
Self-reported intensity of pain in five anatomic sites; neck, shoulder, back, arm, and leg. Each question is phrased: "Have you been troubled by… (e.g. neck pain) the last 4 weeks? Response alternatives are: 1) "not troubled", 2) "a little troubled", 3) "rather intensely troubled" and 4)" very intensely troubled"
Changes in physician-certified absence from work, number of events (17 days or more) per 100 employee-years
Time frame: The absence rate will be assessed during the one year prior to the interventions and during the one year after the interventions
Data from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration's sickness benefit register. This register provides complete registrations of all sickness absence episodes-including the length and medical diagnosis-which are compensated by the national insurance sickness benefit. As a general rule, everybody working or living in Norway is covered by the Norwegian national social insurance.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2022.
- BackgroundM. Dallner, A.-L. Elo, F. Gamberale, V. Hottinen, S. Knardahl, K. Lindström, A. Skogstad, E. Ørhede. Validation of the General Nordic Questionnaire (QPSNordic) for psychological and social factors at work. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen (2000)
- Background: PubMed 29325179Christensen JO, Nielsen MB, Finne LB, Knardahl S. Comprehensive profiles of psychological and social work factors as predictors of site-specific and multi-site pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 May 1;44(3):291-302. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3706. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
- Background: PubMed 30370910Andersen JH, Malmros P, Ebbehoej NE, Flachs EM, Bengtsen E, Bonde JP. Systematic literature review on the effects of occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions at the workplace. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Mar 1;45(2):103-113. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3775. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
- Background: PubMed 23996220Mischke C, Verbeek JH, Job J, Morata TC, Alvesalo-Kuusi A, Neuvonen K, Clarke S, Pedlow RI. Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD010183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010183.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 12745773Strand BH, Dalgard OS, Tambs K, Rognerud M. Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(2):113-8. doi: 10.1080/08039480310000932.
- Background: PubMed 25851186Stromholm T, Pape K, Ose SO, Krokstad S, Bjorngaard JH. Psychosocial working conditions and sickness absence in a general population: a cohort study of 21,834 workers in Norway (The HUNT Study). J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Apr;57(4):386-92. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000362.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41233599Knutsen RH, Nielsen MB, Fostervold KI, Johannessen HA. Associations between workplace aggression and subsequent mental distress and sick leave among home care workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2025 Dec;98(9-10):899-911. doi: 10.1007/s00420-025-02183-2. Epub 2025 Nov 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40851813Knutsen RH, Nielsen MB, Lunde LK, Fostervold KI, Johannessen HA. Sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: A prospective cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jul 6;9:100376. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100376. eCollection 2025 Dec.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36401320Johannessen HA, Knardahl S, Emberland JS, Skare O, Finnanger Garshol B. Do regulatory tools instigate measures to prevent work-related psychosocial and ergonomic risk factors? A process evaluation of a Labour inspection authority trial in the Norwegian home-care services. BMC Res Notes. 2022 Nov 18;15(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06244-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36167785Finnanger Garshol B, Knardahl S, Emberland JS, Skare O, Johannessen HA. Effects of the Labour Inspectorate Authority's regulatory tools on psychosocial and biomechanical work factors in Norwegian home care services: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2022 Dec;79(12):807-815. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108470. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31772092Indregard AR, Knardahl S, Emberland JS, Skare O, Johannessen HA. Effectiveness of the Labour Inspection Authority's regulatory tools for work environment and employee health: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial among Norwegian home-care workers. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 26;9(11):e031226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031226.
- Statistics Norway, Working environment, survey on living conditionsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data for all primary outcome measures will be made available
Related trials for Occupational Health
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Collection and Distribution of Samples From Healthy Donors for In Vitro Research at the NCI-Frederick
Healthy Donors
Active, not recruiting
Online Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for the Mental Health of Healthcare Professionals
Occupational Stress or Workplace Stress, Burnout, Professionals
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Circadian Clock Proteins in Gingival Crevicular Fluid of Individuals With and Without Circadian Rhythm Disruption
Gingivitis, Circadian Rhythm Disruption
Recruiting
Development & Validation of a Life Balance Program for Parents of Preschoolers: A Pilot Study
Parenting Stress, Mental Health
Not yet recruiting
The Health Literacy for Healthier Mind Study
Health Literacy, Occupational Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Håkon A Johannessen, PhD principal investigator
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH/CDC)
130 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Inspection visits, Guidance workshops and Online risk assessment tool in people with Occupational Health and Sick Leave, run by National Institute of Occupational Health, Norway at 130 sites in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 130 sites in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in self reported occupational exposures (time frame: Self-Reported Occupational Exposures will be assessed 2 months prior to the interventions and 12 months post interventions). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03855163, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2022.