AzTrials
AzTrials

Validation Fugl Meyer Scale in ItalianFMINCT03855618

Translation and Validation Fugl-Meyer in Italian Language

An observational study of Validation Fugl Meyer Scale in Italian, run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS at 1 site in Italy.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to carry out a transcultural translation of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale, both for the upper and lower limb, in Italian, and to perform a cultural validation of the translation on a group of post-stroke patients admitted to the SOR Neurological Foundation don Gnocchi ONLUS Istituto di… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Validation Fugl Meyer Scale in Italian
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
15 Mar 2019to 30 Dec 2025
How long will I take part?
1 Day
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Post-stroke patients in intensive rehabilitation treatment.

Who may be able to join

  • consecutive 10 post-stroke patients in intensive rehabilitation treatment are expected, with an acute event occurring no later than 15 days from admission to the SOR Neurological Foundation don Gnocchi ONLUS IRCCS.
  • -

Who cannot join

  • disorders of the visus and / or hearing, amputation of a limb (sup. Or inf.), cerebellar stroke; previous stroke (relapse), cognitive decline (MMSE<21).
  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Italy1 site
  • Fondazione don Gnocchi

    Florence, firenze, 50143

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Translation and Validation of the Evaluation Scale Fugl-Meyer in Italian Language

The aim of the study is to carry out a transcultural translation of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale, both for the upper and lower limb, in Italian, and to perform a cultural validation of the translation on a group of post-stroke patients admitted to the SOR Neurological Foundation don Gnocchi ONLUS Istituto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS).

As a research group the purpose is to translate the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale into Italian in order to allow immediate clinical use.

Read the detailed description

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a specific instrument for evaluation of post-stroke patients. Introduced for the first time by Axl Fugl-Meyer and collaborators as a standardized assessment for hemiparetic patient and originally published in both English and Swedish. It represented the first quantitative assessment tool for the hemiplegic patient.

The FMA is a valid, reliable, responsive and most widely used standardized clinical scale for evaluation of the degree of sensory and motor impairment of the hemiplegic patient, and is considered to date one of the most used tools worldwide. Extensive research has shown that FMA is easy to use, does not require special equipment and has excellent validity, reliability and responsiveness, which makes this scale particularly suitable for different types of clinical settings around the world.

There are many currently translation and cultural validation studies in several languages (Danish, Norwegian, Spanish, French), but an official version validated in Italian is not available to date.

This study aims to perform and develop a transcultural validation of the FMA both for the upper and lower limbs in Italian, following a methodological approach already validated for the process of translation and cultural adaptation, including formal involvement with the University of Gothenburg, which holds the rights on the original scale.

The process of translation and cultural validation follows a standardized translation protocol, approved by the University of Goteborg which holds the rights on the official version of the scale in Swedish and in English. A phase of forward translation, revision and backward translation and final revision is planned to determine the conceptual, semantic and operational equivalence of the FMA scale.

A multistep structure is used for the revision and cultural and linguistic adaptation of the drafting.

The use of mother tongue translators, both English and Italian, and a interdisciplinary team of fiosterapists, physicians, speech therapists and neuropsychologists, with experience of Stroke rehabilitation in clinical and research fields, all employees or collaborators of IRCCS Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation, which will review the translations.

The translated version in Italian is subsequently tested, through a pilot study, by three physiotherapists at SOR Neurological Foundation don Gnocchi ONLUS IRCCS, in order to identify lingual and conceptual inconsistencies that could influence the score, the understanding, the interpretation and the cultural equivalence of the scale.

Keywords
Translation., Transcultural validation., Post-Stroke.

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03855618
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1 case groupConsecutive 10 post-stroke patients in intensive rehabilitation treatment with an acute event occurring no later than 15 days from admission to the SOR Neurological Foundation don Gnocchi ONLUS IRCCS; age 18-90. It is required to sign an informed consent to the patient's participation in the study or if unable to sign, of the proxy.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment

    Sensorimotor recovery assessment after stroke, total score from 0 to 64, subscore upper limb 36, lower limb 28.

    Higher scores represent better outcomes

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Feb 2019
  2. Study start15 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion15 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
10 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Day
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03855618
Sponsor's protocol ID
Fugl-Meyer Italian
Acronym
FMI
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
24 Feb 2019
Last updated
21 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.

    PubMed 1135616
  • Barbosa NE, Forero SM, Galeano CP, Hernandez ED, Landinez NS, Sunnerhagen KS, Alt Murphy M. Translation and cultural validation of clinical observational scales - the Fugl-Meyer assessment for post stroke sensorimotor function in Colombian Spanish. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Sep;41(19):2317-2323. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1464604. Epub 2018 Apr 24.

    PubMed 29688080
  • Lundquist CB, Maribo T. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 May;39(9):934-939. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1163422. Epub 2016 Apr 10.

    PubMed 27062881
  • Santisteban L, Teremetz M, Bleton JP, Baron JC, Maier MA, Lindberg PG. Upper Limb Outcome Measures Used in Stroke Rehabilitation Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. PLoS One. 2016 May 6;11(5):e0154792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154792. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27152853
  • Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P; ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):94-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.

    PubMed 15804318
  • Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.

    PubMed 20874835
  • Schuster C, Hahn S, Ettlin T. Objectively-assessed outcome measures: a translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure applied to the Chedoke McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Nov 29;10:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-106.

    PubMed 21114807
  • Michaelsen SM, Rocha AS, Knabben RJ, Rodrigues LP, Fernandes CG. Translation, adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the administration manual for the Fugl-Meyer assessment. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 Jan-Feb;15(1):80-8.

    PubMed 21519719
  • See J, Dodakian L, Chou C, Chan V, McKenzie A, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Oct;27(8):732-41. doi: 10.1177/1545968313491000. Epub 2013 Jun 17.

    PubMed 23774125
  • Sanchez R, Echeverry J. [Validating scales used for measuring factors in medicine]. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2004 Sep-Dec;6(3):302-18. Spanish.

    PubMed 15656069
  • Svensson E. Different ranking approaches defining association and agreement measures of paired ordinal data. Stat Med. 2012 Nov 20;31(26):3104-17. doi: 10.1002/sim.5382. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

    PubMed 22714677
  • Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968 Oct;70(4):213-20. doi: 10.1037/h0026256. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19673146
  • Kazdin AE. Artifact, bias, and complexity of assessment: the ABCs of reliability. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Spring;10(1):141-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-141.

    PubMed 16795543

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Validation Fugl Meyer Scale in Italian, run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fugl-Meyer Assessment (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03855618, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in