Peri-implant MucositisNCT03858959
A Topical Desiccant Agent in Association With Manual Debridement in the Treatment of Peri-implant Mucositis
A study testing topical agent in people with Peri-implant Mucositis, run by Universita di Verona at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
In patients presenting peri-implant mucositis, effective sub-mucosal debridement is crucial to prevent peri-implantitis. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the 3-month clinical and microbiological effects of a locally delivered liquid desiccant agent with molecular hygroscopic properties, in association with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 37 to 71 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Peri-implant Mucositis
- What is being tested?
- topical agent
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 23 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2018to 31 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 37 to 71 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- presence of at least one implant with a pocket probing depth (PPD) ≥ 4 mm, bleeding on probing (BOP) or pus on probing and no radiographically detectable bone loss (Qualifying site).
Who cannot join
- pregnant or lactating females;
- patients with severe systemic diseases, or with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus;
- assumption of agents affecting the periodontal status within 1 month prior to the study;
- use of systemic antibiotics within 3 months prior to the study;
- prophylactic antibiotics requirement;
- peri-implant specific treatments within 6 months prior to the study;
- allergy to sulphates and its derivatives.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Topical Desiccant Agent in Association With Manual Debridement in the Initial Treatment of Peri-implant Mucositis: a Clinical and Microbiological Pilot Study
In patients presenting peri-implant mucositis, effective sub-mucosal debridement is crucial to prevent peri-implantitis. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the 3-month clinical and microbiological effects of a locally delivered liquid desiccant agent with molecular hygroscopic properties, in association with sub-gingival manual debridement, in sites with peri-implant mucositis.
Twenty-three patients presenting at least one implant with no radiographically detectable bone loss, a pocket probing depth ≥ 4 mm and bleeding on probing, were included in a 3-month randomized, parallel-groups, single-blind, prospective study. At baseline (T0), patients were randomly assigned to receive a desiccant liquid agent with molecular hygroscopic properties before debridement (Test-Group), or a Chlorhexidine 1% disinfectant gel after debridement (Control-Group). Treatments were performed also after 7 and 14 days. Peri- implant soft tissues assessment (PPD, BOP, mBI, VPI, mPLI) and microbial sampling were assessed at baseline and at 3-month follow-up (T1).
Read the detailed description
A single-center, single-masked, parallel-groups, randomized clinical and microbiological study, was conducted between July and October 2018 at the Dentistry and Maxillo-facial Surgery Clinic, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology (DIPSCOMI), University of Verona, Verona, Italy. The experimental protocol (Protocol HX-GL-ITA13, approval date 20/11/2013) was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Verona. The study was conducted in accordance with the Ethical Principles of the 64th World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and was consistent with good clinical practices. All participants signed a written informed consent.
The subjects were enrolled among individuals examined through a survey on prevalence of peri- implant infections (mucositis and peri-implantitis) in single-crown plateau-design locking-taper implants with a 3-year follow-up period. Twenty-three patients, aged between 37 and 71 years, met the study criteria.
Patients were randomly assigned (using a predefined computer-generated randomization scheme) to the Test-Group, which received the administration of a desiccant liquid with molecular hygroscopic properties (HYBENX® Oral Tissue decontaminantTM, HBX) before SRP, or to the Control-Group, which received the administration of a disinfectant gel after SRP (Chlorhexidine Digluconate CorsodylTM Dental Gel 1%, CHX).
Chlorhexidine Digluconate CorsodylTM Dental Gel 1% is an antiseptic gel with cationic nature, effective against a wide range of Gram positive and negative bacteria, favourable to the plaque control and oral inflammation prevention. HYBENX® Oral Tissue decontaminantTM is a concentrated aqueous solution of sulfonated aromatics and free sulphates. Once placed onto susceptible organic material, the product instantly absorbs free and electrostatically bonded water, denaturing the molecular structure of the organic matter. Biofilm is expected to be especially sensitive to the disruptive action of HBX solution by virtue of its porous structure and high water content. On the Test-Group of this study, HBX was administered before the Teflon-curettes debridement and left in contact with supra and sub-gingival plaque biofilm for up to 60 seconds, then rinsed with water and evacuated.
At baseline (T0) subjects were randomly assigned to the Test-Group or to the Control-Group, in order to be examined for microbial sampling, peri-implant soft tissues assessment and radiographic bone levels. The implants were consequently treated with HBX, before a SRP professional session, or CHX, after a SRP professional session. The treatment, performed by the same operator, was then repeated on days 7 and 14.
- Conditions
- Peri-implant Mucositis
- Being tested
- topical agent
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
topical agentDevice
HBX protocol consisted in product application into the periodontal pocket (starting from the base) with a delivery syringe, second saline solution irrigation after 60 seconds to flush-out the product and Teflon-curettes debridement to remove the deposits.
CHX protocol consisted in Teflon-curettes debridement to remove the deposits, associated with a first saline solution irrigation, and product application into the periodontal pocket (starting from the base) with a delivery syringe.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HYBENX® Oral Tissue decontaminantTM (HBX) | Experimental | HYBENX® Oral Tissue decontaminantTM is a concentrated aqueous solution of sulfonated aromatics and free sulphates. Once placed onto susceptible organic material, the product instantly absorbs free and electrostatically bonded water, denaturing the molecular structure of the organic matter. Biofilm is expected to be especially sensitive to the disruptive action of HBX solution by virtue of its porous structure and high water content. Receives: Device: topical agent |
| Chlorhexidine Digluconate CorsodylTM (CHX) | Active comparator | Chlorhexidine Digluconate CorsodylTM Dental Gel 1% is an antiseptic gel with cationic nature, effective against a wide range of Gram positive and negative bacteria, favourable to the plaque control and oral inflammation prevention. Receives: Device: topical agent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pocket probing depth (PPD)
PPD is recorded in mm as the distance between the gingival margin and the base of the periodontal pocket. The possible scale range is from 1 to 10 mm. The higher is the measure, the worst is the value. The measure is assessed at baseline (T0) and at 3-month recall appointment (T1) using a periodontal probe (Florida Probe; Florida Probes Company, Gainesville, FL, US), applying a force of mild intensity on each of the six sites of the implant, three (mesial, central, distal) on the buccal side and three on the lingual/palatal side.
Measured: 2 minutes
Bleeding on probing (BOP)
BOP is recorded as 0 (no bleeding) or 1 (yes bleeding) after probing. It is a dichotomous dimensionless index with two possible values (0 and 1). It is assessed at baseline (T0) and at 3-month recall appointment (T1) using a periodontal probe (Florida Probe; Florida Probes Company, Gainesville, FL, US), applying a force of mild intensity on each of the six sites of the implant, three (mesial, central, distal) on the buccal side and three on the lingual/palatal side.
Measured: 2 minutes
Modified Bleeding Index (mBI)
mBI is recorded as 0, 1, 2, 3 according to Mombelli et al. It is a dimensionless index with four possible values and a scale range from 0 to 3 (3 is the most abundant bleeding and the worst value). It is assessed at baseline (T0) and at 3-month recall appointment (T1) using a periodontal probe (Florida Probe; Florida Probes Company, Gainesville, FL, US), applying a force of mild intensity on each of the six sites of the implant, three (mesial, central, distal) on the buccal side and three on the lingual/palatal side.
Measured: 2 minutes
Modified Plaque Index (mPLI)
mPLI is recorded as 0, 1, 2, 3 according to Mombelli et al. It is a dimensionless index with four possible values and a scale range from 0 to 3 (3 is the most abundant plaque and the worst value). It is assessed at baseline (T0) and at 3-month recall appointment (T1) using a periodontal probe (Florida Probe; Florida Probes Company, Gainesville, FL, US), applying a force of mild intensity on each of the six sites of the implant, three (mesial, central, distal) on the buccal side and three on the lingual/palatal side.
Measured: 2 minutes
Visible Plaque Index (VPI)
VPI is recorded as 0 (no plaque) or 1 (yes plaque) after probing. It is a dichotomous dimensionless index with two possible values (0 and 1). It is assessed at baseline (T0) and at 3-month recall appointment (T1) using a periodontal probe (Florida Probe; Florida Probes Company, Gainesville, FL, US), applying a force of mild intensity on each of the six sites of the implant, three (mesial, central, distal) on the buccal side and three on the lingual/palatal side.
Measured: 2 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
Bacterial count (aerobic and anaerobic)
The concentration of bacteria in the plaque is expressed as CFU / mg of plaque. After supra-gingival plaque removal, the deepest site was isolated with sterile cotton rolls in order to properly collect a plaque sample (1 mg ca), through two paper points inserted and left for 30 seconds at the base of the periodontal pocket. The collected plaque sample was put in an Eppendorf tube containing thioglycolate medium (BD Difco) for cultural investigations.Plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours under specific conditions (Columbia blood agar and Schaedler blood agar). Colonies that appeared were counted and results refer to CFU/mg (colony-forming units per mg of plaque).
Measured: 3 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2019
- Study start1 Jul 2018
- Primary completion25 Oct 2018
- Study completion31 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peri-implant MucositisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universita di Verona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Giorgio Lombardo, Universita di Verona
- Investigators
- Giorgio Lombardo, Principal investigator, Università di Verona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03858959
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UVerona
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Topical Desiccant Agent in Association With Manual Debridement in the Initial Treatment of Peri-implant Mucositis: a Clinical and Microbiological Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03858959
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UVerona
- Conditions
- Peri-implant Mucositis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universita di VeronaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In patients presenting peri-implant mucositis, effective sub-mucosal debridement is crucial to prevent peri-implantitis. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the 3-month clinical and microbiological effects of a locally delivered liquid desiccant agent with molecular hygroscopic properties, in association with sub-gingival manual debridement, in sites with peri-implant mucositis.
Twenty-three patients presenting at least one implant with no radiographically detectable bone loss, a pocket probing depth ≥ 4 mm and bleeding on probing, were included in a 3-month randomized, parallel-groups, single-blind, prospective study. At baseline (T0), patients were randomly assigned to receive a desiccant liquid agent with molecular hygroscopic properties before debridement (Test-Group), or a Chlorhexidine 1% disinfectant gel after debridement (Control-Group). Treatments were performed also after 7 and 14 days. Peri- implant soft tissues assessment (PPD, BOP, mBI, VPI, mPLI) and microbial sampling were assessed at baseline and at 3-month follow-up (T1).
Detailed description
A single-center, single-masked, parallel-groups, randomized clinical and microbiological study, was conducted between July and October 2018 at the Dentistry and Maxillo-facial Surgery Clinic, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology (DIPSCOMI), University of Verona, Verona, Italy. The experimental protocol (Protocol HX-GL-ITA13, approval date 20/11/2013) was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Verona. The study was conducted in accordance with the Ethical Principles of the 64th World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and was consistent with good clinical practices. All participants signed a written informed consent.
The subjects were enrolled among individuals examined through a survey on prevalence of peri- implant infections (mucositis and peri-implantitis) in single-crown plateau-design locking-taper implants with a 3-year follow-up period. Twenty-three patients, aged between 37 and 71 years, met the study criteria.
Patients were randomly assigned (using a predefined computer-generated randomization scheme) to the Test-Group, which received the administration of a desiccant liquid with molecular hygroscopic properties (HYBENX® Oral Tissue decontaminantTM, HBX) before SRP, or to the Control-Group, which received the administration of a disinfectant gel after SRP (Chlorhexidine Digluconate CorsodylTM Dental Gel 1%, CHX).
Chlorhexidine Digluconate CorsodylTM Dental Gel 1% is an antiseptic gel with cationic nature, effective against a wide range of Gram positive and negative bacteria, favourable to the plaque control and oral inflammation prevention. HYBENX® Oral Tissue decontaminantTM is a concentrated aqueous solution of sulfonated aromatics and free sulphates. Once placed onto susceptible organic material, the product instantly absorbs free and electrostatically bonded water, denaturing the molecular structure of the organic matter. Biofilm is expected to be especially sensitive to the disruptive action of HBX solution by virtue of its porous structure and high water content. On the Test-Group of this study, HBX was administered before the Teflon-curettes debridement and left in contact with supra and sub-gingival plaque biofilm for up to 60 seconds, then rinsed with water and evacuated.
At baseline (T0) subjects were randomly assigned to the Test-Group or to the Control-Group, in order to be examined for microbial sampling, peri-implant soft tissues assessment and radiographic bone levels. The implants were consequently treated with HBX, before a SRP professional session, or CHX, after a SRP professional session. The treatment, performed by the same operator, was then repeated on days 7 and 14.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HYBENX® Oral Tissue decontaminantTM (HBX) | Experimental | Device: topical agentHYBENX® Oral Tissue decontaminantTM is a concentrated aqueous solution of sulfonated aromatics and free sulphates. Once placed onto susceptible organic material, the product instantly absorbs free and electrostatically bonded water, denaturing the molecular structure of the organic matter. Biofilm is expected to be especially sensitive to the disruptive action of HBX solution by virtue of its porous structure and high water content. |
| Chlorhexidine Digluconate CorsodylTM (CHX) | Active comparator | Device: topical agentChlorhexidine Digluconate CorsodylTM Dental Gel 1% is an antiseptic gel with cationic nature, effective against a wide range of Gram positive and negative bacteria, favourable to the plaque control and oral inflammation prevention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 37 to 71 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- presence of at least one implant with a pocket probing depth (PPD) ≥ 4 mm, bleeding on probing (BOP) or pus on probing and no radiographically detectable bone loss (Qualifying site).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- pregnant or lactating females;
- patients with severe systemic diseases, or with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus;
- assumption of agents affecting the periodontal status within 1 month prior to the study;
- use of systemic antibiotics within 3 months prior to the study;
- prophylactic antibiotics requirement;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| topical agentHBX protocol consisted in product application into the periodontal pocket (starting from the base) with a delivery syringe, second saline solution irrigation after 60 seconds to flush-out the product and Teflon-curettes debridement to remove the deposits. CHX protocol consisted in Teflon-curettes debridement to remove the deposits, associated with a first saline solution irrigation, and product application into the periodontal pocket (starting from the base) with a delivery syringe. | Device | Chlorhexidine Digluconate CorsodylTM (CHX), HYBENX® Oral Tissue decontaminantTM (HBX) |
Primary outcome
Pocket probing depth (PPD)
Time frame: 2 minutes
PPD is recorded in mm as the distance between the gingival margin and the base of the periodontal pocket. The possible scale range is from 1 to 10 mm. The higher is the measure, the worst is the value. The measure is assessed at baseline (T0) and at 3-month recall appointment (T1) using a periodontal probe (Florida Probe; Florida Probes Company, Gainesville, FL, US), applying a force of mild intensity on each of the six sites of the implant, three (mesial, central, distal) on the buccal side and three on the lingual/palatal side.
Bleeding on probing (BOP)
Time frame: 2 minutes
BOP is recorded as 0 (no bleeding) or 1 (yes bleeding) after probing. It is a dichotomous dimensionless index with two possible values (0 and 1). It is assessed at baseline (T0) and at 3-month recall appointment (T1) using a periodontal probe (Florida Probe; Florida Probes Company, Gainesville, FL, US), applying a force of mild intensity on each of the six sites of the implant, three (mesial, central, distal) on the buccal side and three on the lingual/palatal side.
Modified Bleeding Index (mBI)
Time frame: 2 minutes
mBI is recorded as 0, 1, 2, 3 according to Mombelli et al. It is a dimensionless index with four possible values and a scale range from 0 to 3 (3 is the most abundant bleeding and the worst value). It is assessed at baseline (T0) and at 3-month recall appointment (T1) using a periodontal probe (Florida Probe; Florida Probes Company, Gainesville, FL, US), applying a force of mild intensity on each of the six sites of the implant, three (mesial, central, distal) on the buccal side and three on the lingual/palatal side.
Modified Plaque Index (mPLI)
Time frame: 2 minutes
mPLI is recorded as 0, 1, 2, 3 according to Mombelli et al. It is a dimensionless index with four possible values and a scale range from 0 to 3 (3 is the most abundant plaque and the worst value). It is assessed at baseline (T0) and at 3-month recall appointment (T1) using a periodontal probe (Florida Probe; Florida Probes Company, Gainesville, FL, US), applying a force of mild intensity on each of the six sites of the implant, three (mesial, central, distal) on the buccal side and three on the lingual/palatal side.
Visible Plaque Index (VPI)
Time frame: 2 minutes
VPI is recorded as 0 (no plaque) or 1 (yes plaque) after probing. It is a dichotomous dimensionless index with two possible values (0 and 1). It is assessed at baseline (T0) and at 3-month recall appointment (T1) using a periodontal probe (Florida Probe; Florida Probes Company, Gainesville, FL, US), applying a force of mild intensity on each of the six sites of the implant, three (mesial, central, distal) on the buccal side and three on the lingual/palatal side.
1 secondary outcome
Bacterial count (aerobic and anaerobic)
Time frame: 3 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Peri-implant Mucositis
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of 25(OH)D3 and LL-37 Levels in Periimplant Sulcus Fluid
Peri Implantitis, Peri Implant Mucositis
Recruiting
Home-Use Dual-Light Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy for Peri-Implant Mucositis in Full-Arch Implant Prostheses
Peri Implant Mucositis, Dental Implant Rehabilitation
Not yet recruiting
Adjunctive Diode Laser Therapy for Peri-Implant Mucositis
Peri-implant Mucositis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Short Versus Standard Dental Implants: Clinical and Biomarker Outcomes
Peri-Implant Mucositis
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Smoking on Immune Responses in Peri-implant Health and Disease
Peri-Implant Health, Peri Implant Mucositis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Giorgio Lombardo principal investigator
Università di Verona
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing topical agent in people with Peri-implant Mucositis, run by Universita di Verona at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pocket probing depth (PPD) (time frame: 2 minutes). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2019.