Shoulder Adhesive CapsulitisNCT03861923
Dry Needling for Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis
A study testing Dry needling and Therapeutic Exercise in people with Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis and Shoulder Pain, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the addition of dry needling to exercise as part of physical therapy for the treatment of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. There will be two groups. One will receive actual dry needling to the clinically determined shoulder / parascapular trigger points. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis, Shoulder Pain, Frozen Shoulder
- What is being tested?
- Dry needling and Therapeutic Exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Oct 2020to 18 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Primary complaint of shoulder pain and stiffness
- Gradual onset of symptoms
- Glenohumeral passive range of motion limited in multiple directions
- Glenohumeral passive range of motion decreases as the humerus is abducted from 45 degrees to 90 degrees
- Age 18 to 65 years
- Reports pain with normal activity greater than or equal to 2/10 on the numeric pain rating scale
- Read and speak English
Who cannot join
- Signs or symptoms of cervical radiculopathy, radiculitis, or referral from the cervical spine
- Clinical evidence as determined in the examination of an alternative shoulder diagnosis
- Normal passive shoulder range of motion
- Known radiographic evidence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis
- Known neurologic disease
- Received dry needling or acupuncture within the past 6 months
Show all 9Show fewer
- Fear of needling
- Currently being treated with anticoagulant medication
- Shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) score less than 10% or greater than 90%
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Duke Sports Science Institute
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Dry Needling on Pain and Function for the Management of Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
This study evaluates the addition of dry needling to exercise as part of physical therapy for the treatment of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. There will be two groups. One will receive actual dry needling to the clinically determined shoulder / parascapular trigger points. The other group will receive a sham needle treatment to the clinically determined areas.
Read the detailed description
Shoulder adhesive capsulitis is reported to affect 2% to 5% of the general population. The clinical course of adhesive capsulitis has been described in the literature ranging from 18-24 months, with persistent symptoms often lasting longer after range of motion has returned. Fifty percent of individuals will report having mild pain or stiffness at 7-year follow up. Treatment for adhesive capsulitis can be extensive with the average duration of treatment being 4.7 months. In general, adhesive capsulitis is often thought of as a self limiting diagnosis that significantly impacts a patients function and livelihood. Physical therapists often prescribe exercise for the management of adhesive capsulitis including stretching and strengthening. There is some support for exercise to provide moderate improvements in function, mobility, and decreased pain but impairments including pain and range of motion deficits persist even with exercise treatments.
Trigger point dry needling is a treatment approach often used by physical therapists that has been purported to be effective for reducing pain and improving range of motion along with improving function. Improvements in range of motion are associated with improvements in function for patients with adhesive capsulitis. While dry needling does not directly treat the tissues thought to be the primary factor in limiting range of motion, it does treat the surrounding tissues, including trigger points, that have been associated with painful shoulders including adhesive capsulitis. However, the direct investigation of dry needling for shoulder adhesive capsulitis has been minimally investigated. While published papers on dry needling for adhesive capsulitis exists, they are primarily case reports or case series. The growth in utilization of dry needling as a treatment option with minimal evidence creates a dilemma in practice.
This will be a single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing dry needling with exercise versus sham dry needling and exercise for subjects with shoulder pain consistent with adhesive capsulitis.
Patients undergoing physical therapy examination for adhesive capsulitis will be considered for participation in the study. If the evaluating/treating physical therapist deems that the patient may be appropriate for the study, he/she will approach the patient to gauge interest in participating in the study. If the patient expresses interest, he or she will be referred to a member of the study personnel (dry needling physical therapist) who will screen for the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study personnel will provide additional details regarding the study requirements. The consent process may be initiated at this time or deferred to a later time if the patient requests additional time to consider participation. After consenting, the patient will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. A digital coin flip (Siri) will be used for randomization procedures to determine the group allocation (dry needling and exercise or sham dry needling and exercise). Exercise prescription will be prescribed pragmatically. These will be based on the individual patient examination and re-examination findings by the treating physical therapists, and supported by best evidence. These exercises will address strength, flexibility and postural impairments based on the clinical examination. The treating physical therapist will be blinded to the dry needling treatment group assigned. The study personnel physical therapist will be blinded to the outcomes.
For subjects that are randomized to the group receiving trigger point dry needling, active and latent trigger points as described in previous protocols for dry needling of the shoulder will be used to determine the appropriate muscles to treat. The study personnel physical therapist will perform the dry needling (dry needling physical therapists). All dry needling physical therapists have had considerable and appropriate training in trigger point dry needling. Clean needle techniques will be applied including use of gloves by the physical therapist and chlorhexidine wipes (or alcohol wipes if a chlorhexidine allergy is known) for skin preparation. The dry needling procedure will involve using a sterile packaged Seirin ® 30-60 mm .25-.36 J-type monofilament needle. Palpation of the active or latent trigger point will direct the study personnel as to where to treat. The needle will be inserted using an insertion tube. Pistoning and twisting of the needle will be performed to elicit a local twitch response. The study personnel will document the muscle treated, if a local twitch response occurred, and if it was an active or latent trigger point. The frequency of dry needling sessions will be determined in part by the dry needling physical therapist as well as the subject. Subjects who defer subsuquent dry needling treatments will be noted accordingly in the database.
For subjects that are randomized to the group receiving sham dry needling group, the assessment procedure will be the same as the dry needling group. The same clean approach to needling will be performed in order to mimic the procedure of actual trigger point dry needling. Palpation of the active or latent trigger point will direct where to treat. The dry needling physical therapists will be trained by the principal investigator on the sham dry needling technique. A finishing nail cleaned with sterile alcohol swab will be inserted into a tube with the tip of the nail extended out the end of the tube. The physical therapist will use this sham needle over the area of the trigger point without skin penetration.
The finishing nail provides a minimal sharp sensation that is sometimes felt by patients receiving dry needling. It also matches the potential perception that a patient has regarding receiving any needle treatments. The force of the sham (finishing nail) treatment will be just enough to produce a slight sharp sensation. The tap provided is just enough so that the patient perceives a light sharp sensation. The procedure is set up similarly to actual dry needling in that the physical therapist uses the same finger and holding position of the tube. After the tap of the finishing nail, pseudo pistoning of the tube only (not the nail) will be performed to match the duration of treatment time of actual dry needling. This will range from 2 to 10 pistons varied per patient per muscle to match the approach of actual trigger point dry needling. Furthermore, the finishing nail will be held toward the base of the tube with firm pressure of the tube on the patient's skin to ensure consistent pressure is provided.
For both groups, the patient will be prone so that the patient remains blinded to the treatment. All set up procedures will take place after the patient has assumed the prone positon. After the patient has assumed the prone position, the treating physical therapist will prepare the treatment area as previously described. All materials associated with the intervention will be discarded and removed from the treatment area before the patient comes out of the prone position.
The duration of the total treatment program will be determined by the treating physical therapist based on the impairments and re-evaluation of the subjects status. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline. After one-month, or if the treating physical therapist deems the subject is appropriate for discharge (whichever comes first), all outcome measures will be reassessed. If the subject should need additional physical therapy after the one-month period, the physical therapist will document the types of interventions provided, and any additional healthcare utilization variables, including physical therapy utilization, and a final collection of outcomes. Follow up will be conducted at one-week, one-month (or discharge, whichever comes first) months and at 6 months to collect outcomes data.
- Conditions
- Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis, Shoulder Pain, Frozen Shoulder
- Being tested
- Dry needling, Sham Dry Needling, Therapeutic Exercise
- Keywords
- dry needling, physical therapy, trigger point
- Medical subject headings
- Bursitis, Shoulder Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dry needlingOther
Also called Trigger Point Dry Needling
Trigger point dry needling to trigger points in the shoulder or parascapular muscles using monofilament needle (i.e., acupuncture needle). Clean needle approach using sterile needles.
Sham Dry NeedlingOther
Sham needle approach using a finishing nail in a tube sheath. The finishing nail will be placed over the trigger point so that the patient perceives a sharp sensation. The tube (not the nail) will be moved up and down to mimic the action of needling.
Therapeutic ExerciseOther
Also called Exercise
Exercise including flexibility, range of motion, strengthening will be provided by the treating physical therapist based on the impairments identified.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dry needling and exercise | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Dry needling; Other: Therapeutic Exercise |
| Sham dry needling and exercise | Sham comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Sham Dry Needling; Other: Therapeutic Exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index Change
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire. Two dimensions are measured, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension includes five questions to determine the severity of an individual's pain. The functional activities are assessed with eight questions. The two dimensions are combined into one score. Scores range from 0 to 100 with scores closer to 0 indicating lower (or no) disability and scores closer to 100 indicating greater disability. It takes 5 to 10 minutes for a patient to complete.
Measured: 1-week, 1-month, 6-months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale Change
The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is an 11 point scale scored between "0" (no pain) and "10" (the most intense pain imaginable). Individuals select a value that is most in the with the intensity of pain they've experienced in the past 24 hours.
Measured: 1-week, 1-month, 6- months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2019
- Study start13 Oct 2020
- Primary completion18 Jan 2024
- Study completion18 Jan 2024
Why it stopped: Poor Accrual
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Shoulder Adhesive CapsulitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Derek Clewley, DPT, PhD, Principal investigator, Duke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03861923
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRO00101726
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Clewley D, Flynn TW, Koppenhaver S. Trigger point dry needling as an adjunct treatment for a patient with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Feb;44(2):92-101. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4915. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
PubMed 24261931Dempsey AL, Mills T, Karsch RM, Branch TP. Maximizing total end range time is safe and effective for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Sep;90(9):738-45. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318214ed0d.
PubMed 21430510Griggs SM, Ahn A, Green A. Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. A prospective functional outcome study of nonoperative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Oct;82(10):1398-407.
PubMed 11057467Hall ML, Mackie AC, Ribeiro DC. Effects of dry needling trigger point therapy in the shoulder region on patients with upper extremity pain and dysfunction: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2018 Jun;104(2):167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
PubMed 29439829Jewell DV, Riddle DL, Thacker LR. Interventions associated with an increased or decreased likelihood of pain reduction and improved function in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a retrospective cohort study. Phys Ther. 2009 May;89(5):419-29. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080250. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
PubMed 19270045Koppenhaver S, Embry R, Ciccarello J, Waltrip J, Pike R, Walker M, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Croy T, Flynn T. Effects of dry needling to the symptomatic versus control shoulder in patients with unilateral subacromial pain syndrome. Man Ther. 2016 Dec;26:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
PubMed 27497188Perez-Palomares S, Olivan-Blazquez B, Perez-Palomares A, Gaspar-Calvo E, Perez-Benito M, Lopez-Lapena E, de la Torre-Beldarrain ML, Magallon-Botaya R. Contribution of Dry Needling to Individualized Physical Therapy Treatment of Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jan;47(1):11-20. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.6698. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
PubMed 27937046Tejera-Falcon E, Toledo-Martel NDC, Sosa-Medina FM, Santana-Gonzalez F, Quintana-de la Fe MDP, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Pecos-Martin D. Dry needling in a manual physiotherapy and therapeutic exercise protocol for patients with chronic mechanical shoulder pain of unspecific origin: a protocol for a randomized control trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 18;18(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1746-3.
PubMed 28923050Sutlive TG, Golden A, King K, Morris WB, Morrison JE, Moore JH, Koppenhaver S. SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF TRIGGER POINT DRY NEEDLING ON PAIN AND DISABILITY IN SUBJECTS WITH PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jun;13(3):462-473.
PubMed 30038832
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Dry Needling on Pain and Function for the Management of Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03861923
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRO00101726
- Conditions
- Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis, Shoulder Pain, Frozen Shoulder
- Keywords
- dry needling, physical therapy, trigger point
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Poor Accrual
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the addition of dry needling to exercise as part of physical therapy for the treatment of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. There will be two groups. One will receive actual dry needling to the clinically determined shoulder / parascapular trigger points. The other group will receive a sham needle treatment to the clinically determined areas.
Detailed description
Shoulder adhesive capsulitis is reported to affect 2% to 5% of the general population. The clinical course of adhesive capsulitis has been described in the literature ranging from 18-24 months, with persistent symptoms often lasting longer after range of motion has returned. Fifty percent of individuals will report having mild pain or stiffness at 7-year follow up. Treatment for adhesive capsulitis can be extensive with the average duration of treatment being 4.7 months. In general, adhesive capsulitis is often thought of as a self limiting diagnosis that significantly impacts a patients function and livelihood. Physical therapists often prescribe exercise for the management of adhesive capsulitis including stretching and strengthening. There is some support for exercise to provide moderate improvements in function, mobility, and decreased pain but impairments including pain and range of motion deficits persist even with exercise treatments.
Trigger point dry needling is a treatment approach often used by physical therapists that has been purported to be effective for reducing pain and improving range of motion along with improving function. Improvements in range of motion are associated with improvements in function for patients with adhesive capsulitis. While dry needling does not directly treat the tissues thought to be the primary factor in limiting range of motion, it does treat the surrounding tissues, including trigger points, that have been associated with painful shoulders including adhesive capsulitis. However, the direct investigation of dry needling for shoulder adhesive capsulitis has been minimally investigated. While published papers on dry needling for adhesive capsulitis exists, they are primarily case reports or case series. The growth in utilization of dry needling as a treatment option with minimal evidence creates a dilemma in practice.
This will be a single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing dry needling with exercise versus sham dry needling and exercise for subjects with shoulder pain consistent with adhesive capsulitis.
Patients undergoing physical therapy examination for adhesive capsulitis will be considered for participation in the study. If the evaluating/treating physical therapist deems that the patient may be appropriate for the study, he/she will approach the patient to gauge interest in participating in the study. If the patient expresses interest, he or she will be referred to a member of the study personnel (dry needling physical therapist) who will screen for the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study personnel will provide additional details regarding the study requirements. The consent process may be initiated at this time or deferred to a later time if the patient requests additional time to consider participation. After consenting, the patient will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. A digital coin flip (Siri) will be used for randomization procedures to determine the group allocation (dry needling and exercise or sham dry needling and exercise). Exercise prescription will be prescribed pragmatically. These will be based on the individual patient examination and re-examination findings by the treating physical therapists, and supported by best evidence. These exercises will address strength, flexibility and postural impairments based on the clinical examination. The treating physical therapist will be blinded to the dry needling treatment group assigned. The study personnel physical therapist will be blinded to the outcomes.
For subjects that are randomized to the group receiving trigger point dry needling, active and latent trigger points as described in previous protocols for dry needling of the shoulder will be used to determine the appropriate muscles to treat. The study personnel physical therapist will perform the dry needling (dry needling physical therapists). All dry needling physical therapists have had considerable and appropriate training in trigger point dry needling. Clean needle techniques will be applied including use of gloves by the physical therapist and chlorhexidine wipes (or alcohol wipes if a chlorhexidine allergy is known) for skin preparation. The dry needling procedure will involve using a sterile packaged Seirin ® 30-60 mm .25-.36 J-type monofilament needle. Palpation of the active or latent trigger point will direct the study personnel as to where to treat. The needle will be inserted using an insertion tube. Pistoning and twisting of the needle will be performed to elicit a local twitch response. The study personnel will document the muscle treated, if a local twitch response occurred, and if it was an active or latent trigger point. The frequency of dry needling sessions will be determined in part by the dry needling physical therapist as well as the subject. Subjects who defer subsuquent dry needling treatments will be noted accordingly in the database.
For subjects that are randomized to the group receiving sham dry needling group, the assessment procedure will be the same as the dry needling group. The same clean approach to needling will be performed in order to mimic the procedure of actual trigger point dry needling. Palpation of the active or latent trigger point will direct where to treat. The dry needling physical therapists will be trained by the principal investigator on the sham dry needling technique. A finishing nail cleaned with sterile alcohol swab will be inserted into a tube with the tip of the nail extended out the end of the tube. The physical therapist will use this sham needle over the area of the trigger point without skin penetration.
The finishing nail provides a minimal sharp sensation that is sometimes felt by patients receiving dry needling. It also matches the potential perception that a patient has regarding receiving any needle treatments. The force of the sham (finishing nail) treatment will be just enough to produce a slight sharp sensation. The tap provided is just enough so that the patient perceives a light sharp sensation. The procedure is set up similarly to actual dry needling in that the physical therapist uses the same finger and holding position of the tube. After the tap of the finishing nail, pseudo pistoning of the tube only (not the nail) will be performed to match the duration of treatment time of actual dry needling. This will range from 2 to 10 pistons varied per patient per muscle to match the approach of actual trigger point dry needling. Furthermore, the finishing nail will be held toward the base of the tube with firm pressure of the tube on the patient's skin to ensure consistent pressure is provided.
For both groups, the patient will be prone so that the patient remains blinded to the treatment. All set up procedures will take place after the patient has assumed the prone positon. After the patient has assumed the prone position, the treating physical therapist will prepare the treatment area as previously described. All materials associated with the intervention will be discarded and removed from the treatment area before the patient comes out of the prone position.
The duration of the total treatment program will be determined by the treating physical therapist based on the impairments and re-evaluation of the subjects status. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline. After one-month, or if the treating physical therapist deems the subject is appropriate for discharge (whichever comes first), all outcome measures will be reassessed. If the subject should need additional physical therapy after the one-month period, the physical therapist will document the types of interventions provided, and any additional healthcare utilization variables, including physical therapy utilization, and a final collection of outcomes. Follow up will be conducted at one-week, one-month (or discharge, whichever comes first) months and at 6 months to collect outcomes data.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dry needling and exercise | Experimental | Other: Dry needling, Other: Therapeutic Exercise |
| Sham dry needling and exercise | Sham comparator | Other: Sham Dry Needling, Other: Therapeutic Exercise |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Primary complaint of shoulder pain and stiffness
- Gradual onset of symptoms
- Glenohumeral passive range of motion limited in multiple directions
- Glenohumeral passive range of motion decreases as the humerus is abducted from 45 degrees to 90 degrees
- Age 18 to 65 years
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Signs or symptoms of cervical radiculopathy, radiculitis, or referral from the cervical spine
- Clinical evidence as determined in the examination of an alternative shoulder diagnosis
- Normal passive shoulder range of motion
- Known radiographic evidence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis
- Known neurologic disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dry needlingAlso: Trigger Point Dry NeedlingTrigger point dry needling to trigger points in the shoulder or parascapular muscles using monofilament needle (i.e., acupuncture needle). Clean needle approach using sterile needles. | Other | Dry needling and exercise |
| Sham Dry NeedlingSham needle approach using a finishing nail in a tube sheath. The finishing nail will be placed over the trigger point so that the patient perceives a sharp sensation. The tube (not the nail) will be moved up and down to mimic the action of needling. | Other | Sham dry needling and exercise |
| Therapeutic ExerciseAlso: ExerciseExercise including flexibility, range of motion, strengthening will be provided by the treating physical therapist based on the impairments identified. | Other | Dry needling and exercise, Sham dry needling and exercise |
Primary outcome
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index Change
Time frame: 1-week, 1-month, 6-months
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire. Two dimensions are measured, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension includes five questions to determine the severity of an individual's pain. The functional activities are assessed with eight questions. The two dimensions are combined into one score. Scores range from 0 to 100 with scores closer to 0 indicating lower (or no) disability and scores closer to 100 indicating greater disability. It takes 5 to 10 minutes for a patient to complete.
1 secondary outcome
Numeric Pain Rating Scale Change
Time frame: 1-week, 1-month, 6- months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Poor Accrual). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 24261931Clewley D, Flynn TW, Koppenhaver S. Trigger point dry needling as an adjunct treatment for a patient with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Feb;44(2):92-101. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4915. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
- Background: PubMed 21430510Dempsey AL, Mills T, Karsch RM, Branch TP. Maximizing total end range time is safe and effective for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Sep;90(9):738-45. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318214ed0d.
- Background: PubMed 11057467Griggs SM, Ahn A, Green A. Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. A prospective functional outcome study of nonoperative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Oct;82(10):1398-407.
- Background: PubMed 29439829Hall ML, Mackie AC, Ribeiro DC. Effects of dry needling trigger point therapy in the shoulder region on patients with upper extremity pain and dysfunction: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2018 Jun;104(2):167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
- Background: PubMed 19270045Jewell DV, Riddle DL, Thacker LR. Interventions associated with an increased or decreased likelihood of pain reduction and improved function in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a retrospective cohort study. Phys Ther. 2009 May;89(5):419-29. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080250. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
- Background: PubMed 27497188Koppenhaver S, Embry R, Ciccarello J, Waltrip J, Pike R, Walker M, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Croy T, Flynn T. Effects of dry needling to the symptomatic versus control shoulder in patients with unilateral subacromial pain syndrome. Man Ther. 2016 Dec;26:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
- Background: PubMed 27937046Perez-Palomares S, Olivan-Blazquez B, Perez-Palomares A, Gaspar-Calvo E, Perez-Benito M, Lopez-Lapena E, de la Torre-Beldarrain ML, Magallon-Botaya R. Contribution of Dry Needling to Individualized Physical Therapy Treatment of Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jan;47(1):11-20. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.6698. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
- Background: PubMed 28923050Tejera-Falcon E, Toledo-Martel NDC, Sosa-Medina FM, Santana-Gonzalez F, Quintana-de la Fe MDP, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Pecos-Martin D. Dry needling in a manual physiotherapy and therapeutic exercise protocol for patients with chronic mechanical shoulder pain of unspecific origin: a protocol for a randomized control trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 18;18(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1746-3.
- Background: PubMed 30038832Sutlive TG, Golden A, King K, Morris WB, Morrison JE, Moore JH, Koppenhaver S. SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF TRIGGER POINT DRY NEEDLING ON PAIN AND DISABILITY IN SUBJECTS WITH PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jun;13(3):462-473.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Injection Combined With Spencer Technique on Painful Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder
RecruitingPhase 4
Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular vs Gluteal Intramuscular Corticosteroid Injection for Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
OMT for Adhesive Capsulitis
Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder, Frozen Shoulder
Recruiting
Maitland Mobilization With and Without Stroking Release Technique of Rotator Cuff Muscle in Frozen Shoulder
Adhesive Capsulitis
Not yet recruiting
Spencer's Technique Versus Mulligan's Technique for Stage II Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder, Adhesive Capsulitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Derek Clewley, DPT, PhD principal investigator
Duke University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dry needling and Therapeutic Exercise in people with Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis and Shoulder Pain, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Poor Accrual). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index Change (time frame: 1-week, 1-month, 6-months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03861923, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2026.