Diabetes MellitusSCPINCT03863561
The Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI)
An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, run by LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd. at 7 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
The LMC Skills, Confidence and Preparedness Index (SCPI) is a tool that was developed by diabetes specialists to individualize the education/support that a healthcare provider delivers to patients with diabetes. It has been shown to have high reliability, validity and generalizability. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Diabetes self-management education (DSME) program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 486 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 11 Oct 2017to 3 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Waiting room cohort: adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes attending their usual visit with their LMC healthcare provider DSME cohort: patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes with a recent A1C ≥ 8.0%
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Ability to read English
- Duration of diabetes ≥ 6 months (DSME cohort only)
- A1C ≥ 8.0% (DSME cohort only)
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
Canada7 sites
LMC Barrie
Barrie, Ontario
LMC Brampton
Brampton, Ontario, L6S 0C9
LMC Etobicoke
Etobicoke, Ontario
LMC Oakville
Oakville, Ontario
LMC Thornhill
Thornhill, Ontario
LMC Scarborough
Toronto, Ontario, M1R 0B1
LMC Bayview
Toronto, Ontario
About this study
Official title: The Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI) Version 3.0: An Online Version of the SCPI to Evaluate Self-Efficacy of Diabetes Management
The LMC Skills, Confidence and Preparedness Index (SCPI) is a tool that was developed by diabetes specialists to individualize the education/support that a healthcare provider delivers to patients with diabetes. It has been shown to have high reliability, validity and generalizability. This study assessed the validity and reliability of a revised, final version of the SCPI in a large sample of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, as well as the clinical responsiveness of the SCPI to a diabetes self-management education intervention in a smaller cohort of patients with poor glycemic control.
Read the detailed description
Canadian experts in diabetes care developed the Skills, Confidence \& Preparedness Index (SCPI) to assess diabetes self-management in patients. The SCPI is web-based, gives immediate feedback to the healthcare provider, and is associated with glycemia. The SCPI was designed to allow a healthcare provider to individualize the education/support by assessing the three critical dimensions of self-management: knowledge of a skill; confidence in ability to change a behavior; and preparedness to begin implementing the behavior change. Two previous validation studies showed that the SCPI has high internal consistency, reliability, generalizability, and external validity.
Following further focus groups with healthcare providers and patients, the SCPI questions and response scale were edited to further optimize clarity. This study assessed the validity and reliability of a revised, final version of the LMC SCPI in a large sample of diabetes patients, as well as clinical responsiveness of the SCPI to a diabetes self-management education (DSME) program intervention.
This study recruited type 1 and type 2 patients from the waiting rooms of seven LMC Diabetes \& Endocrinology specialist clinics in Ontario, Canada. Patients completed the SCPI electronically and their demographic and health information was retrieved from their electronic medical records. A smaller cohort of patients with uncontrolled glycemia were enrolled into a DSME program. Participants completed the SCPI at their baseline visit and their individual results were incorporated into the care paths that were then customized for that participant. The DSME program provided five to seven visits with a diabetes educator over three to four months. Patients completed the SCPI again at their final visit.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Diabetes self-management education (DSME) program
- Keywords
- self-management, questionnaire, diabetes education
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diabetes self-management education (DSME) programBehavioural
Also called DSME
Diabetes educators customized care paths for their patients based on their individual responses to the SCPI questions. Patients met with an educator five to seven times over the course of three to four months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Waiting room sample | Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes attending an LMC Diabetes \& Endocrinology specialist clinic in Ontario completed the SCPI in the waiting room while attending their usual appointment with their healthcare provider. | |
| DSME Intervention | Patients with poor glycemic control (A1C >8.0%) were enrolled into a diabetes self-management education (DSME) program. The SCPI was completed at their first and last visit and and their individual results were incorporated into the care paths that were then customized for that participant. The patient met with a diabetes educator five to seven times over the course of three to four months. Receives: Behavioral: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Internal consistency of the SCPI (Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index)
Cronbach's alpha score for the total SCPI score (minimum score 1, maximum score 7) and the three subscales (minimum score 1, maximum score 7) in the waiting room sample. A higher score indicates greater diabetes self-management.
Measured: 24-hours
Validity of the SCPI with HbA1c
Correlation between the total SCPI score (minimum score 1, maximum score 7) and the three subscale scores (minimum score 1, maximum score 7) with HbA1c in the waiting room sample.
A higher SCPI score indicates greater diabetes self-management.
Measured: 24-hours
Secondary outcomes (8)
Validity of the SCPI with demographic and diabetes variables
Correlation between the total SCPI score (minimum score 1, maximum score 7) and age, gender, education, ethnicity, duration of diabetes and diabetes therapy in the waiting room sample.
A higher SCPI score indicates greater diabetes self-management.
Measured: 24-hours
Test-retest reliability
Applicable to patients from the waiting room sample who completed the SCPI in the clinic and again one week later. Correlation between the first total SCPI score (minimum score 1, maximum score 7) and the second total SCPI scores.
Measured: one week
Floor/ceiling effect of the total SCPI score
Assessment of a floor effect (>15% of patients with a minimum score of 1) or a ceiling effect (>15% of patients with a maximum score of 7)
Measured: 24-hours
SCPI completion time
Mean number of minutes it took for patients to complete the SCPI
Measured: 24-hours
Change in SCPI score
Mean change in SCPI total score between the baseline visit and follow-up visit in the DSME cohort
Measured: 3 to 4 months
Change in HbA1c
Mean change in HbA1c between the baseline visit and the follow-up visit in the DSME cohort
Measured: 3 to 4 months
Association between total SCPI score and HbA1c
Correlation between SCPI score at baseline and HbA1c at baseline in the DSME cohort
Measured: Baseline
Responsiveness of the total SCPI score to an intervention
Correlation between change in SCPI score and change in HbA1c in the DSME cohort
Measured: 3 to 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Mar 2019
- Study start11 Oct 2017
- Primary completion3 Dec 2018
- Study completion3 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 486 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ronnie Aronson, MD, FRCPC, FACE, Principal investigator, LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03863561
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SCPI
- Acronym
- SCPI
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mbuagbaw L, Aronson R, Walker A, Brown RE, Orzech N. The LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI): development and evaluation of a novel tool for assessing self-management in patients with diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jan 31;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0606-z.
PubMed 28143548Aronson R, Brown RE, Jiandani D, Walker A, Orzech N, Mbuagbaw L. Assessment of self-management in patients with diabetes using the novel LMC Skills, Confidence and Preparedness Index (SCPI). Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;137:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
PubMed 29097289Aronson R, Orzech N, Ye C, Brown RE, Goldenberg R, Brown V. Specialist-Led Diabetes Registries and Prevalence of Poor Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: The Diabetes Registry Outcomes Project for A1C Reduction (DROP A1C). Diabetes Care. 2016 Oct;39(10):1711-7. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2666. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
PubMed 27515966Aronson R, Orzech N, Ye C, Goldenberg R, Brown V. Specialist-led diabetes registries and predictors of poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: Insights into the functionally refractory patient from the LMC Diabetes Registry database. J Diabetes. 2016 Jan;8(1):76-85. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12257. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
PubMed 25565383Aronson R, Li A, Brown RE, Walker A, Lyons A, Orzech N. Optimizing Diabetes Self-management Using the Novel Skills, Confidence, and Preparedness Index (SCPI). Diabetes Care. 2019 Oct;42(10):1873-1878. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0699. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
PubMed 31399439
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI) Version 3.0: An Online Version of the SCPI to Evaluate Self-Efficacy of Diabetes Management
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03863561
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCPI / SCPI
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- self-management, questionnaire, diabetes education
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 486 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd.University, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The LMC Skills, Confidence and Preparedness Index (SCPI) is a tool that was developed by diabetes specialists to individualize the education/support that a healthcare provider delivers to patients with diabetes. It has been shown to have high reliability, validity and generalizability. This study assessed the validity and reliability of a revised, final version of the SCPI in a large sample of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, as well as the clinical responsiveness of the SCPI to a diabetes self-management education intervention in a smaller cohort of patients with poor glycemic control.
Detailed description
Canadian experts in diabetes care developed the Skills, Confidence \& Preparedness Index (SCPI) to assess diabetes self-management in patients. The SCPI is web-based, gives immediate feedback to the healthcare provider, and is associated with glycemia. The SCPI was designed to allow a healthcare provider to individualize the education/support by assessing the three critical dimensions of self-management: knowledge of a skill; confidence in ability to change a behavior; and preparedness to begin implementing the behavior change. Two previous validation studies showed that the SCPI has high internal consistency, reliability, generalizability, and external validity.
Following further focus groups with healthcare providers and patients, the SCPI questions and response scale were edited to further optimize clarity. This study assessed the validity and reliability of a revised, final version of the LMC SCPI in a large sample of diabetes patients, as well as clinical responsiveness of the SCPI to a diabetes self-management education (DSME) program intervention.
This study recruited type 1 and type 2 patients from the waiting rooms of seven LMC Diabetes \& Endocrinology specialist clinics in Ontario, Canada. Patients completed the SCPI electronically and their demographic and health information was retrieved from their electronic medical records. A smaller cohort of patients with uncontrolled glycemia were enrolled into a DSME program. Participants completed the SCPI at their baseline visit and their individual results were incorporated into the care paths that were then customized for that participant. The DSME program provided five to seven visits with a diabetes educator over three to four months. Patients completed the SCPI again at their final visit.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Waiting room sample | – | –Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes attending an LMC Diabetes \& Endocrinology specialist clinic in Ontario completed the SCPI in the waiting room while attending their usual appointment with their healthcare provider. |
| DSME Intervention | – | Behavioral: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) programPatients with poor glycemic control (A1C >8.0%) were enrolled into a diabetes self-management education (DSME) program. The SCPI was completed at their first and last visit and and their individual results were incorporated into the care paths that were then customized for that participant. The patient met with a diabetes educator five to seven times over the course of three to four months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Waiting room cohort: adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes attending their usual visit with their LMC healthcare provider DSME cohort: patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes with a recent A1C ≥ 8.0%
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Ability to read English
- Duration of diabetes ≥ 6 months (DSME cohort only)
- A1C ≥ 8.0% (DSME cohort only)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetes self-management education (DSME) programAlso: DSMEDiabetes educators customized care paths for their patients based on their individual responses to the SCPI questions. Patients met with an educator five to seven times over the course of three to four months. | Behavioural | DSME Intervention |
Primary outcome
Internal consistency of the SCPI (Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index)
Time frame: 24-hours
Cronbach's alpha score for the total SCPI score (minimum score 1, maximum score 7) and the three subscales (minimum score 1, maximum score 7) in the waiting room sample. A higher score indicates greater diabetes self-management.
Validity of the SCPI with HbA1c
Time frame: 24-hours
Correlation between the total SCPI score (minimum score 1, maximum score 7) and the three subscale scores (minimum score 1, maximum score 7) with HbA1c in the waiting room sample. A higher SCPI score indicates greater diabetes self-management.
8 secondary outcomes
Validity of the SCPI with demographic and diabetes variables
Time frame: 24-hours
Test-retest reliability
Time frame: one week
Floor/ceiling effect of the total SCPI score
Time frame: 24-hours
SCPI completion time
Time frame: 24-hours
Change in SCPI score
Time frame: 3 to 4 months
Change in HbA1c
Time frame: 3 to 4 months
Association between total SCPI score and HbA1c
Time frame: Baseline
Responsiveness of the total SCPI score to an intervention
Time frame: 3 to 4 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2019.
- Background: PubMed 28143548Mbuagbaw L, Aronson R, Walker A, Brown RE, Orzech N. The LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI): development and evaluation of a novel tool for assessing self-management in patients with diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jan 31;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0606-z.
- Background: PubMed 29097289Aronson R, Brown RE, Jiandani D, Walker A, Orzech N, Mbuagbaw L. Assessment of self-management in patients with diabetes using the novel LMC Skills, Confidence and Preparedness Index (SCPI). Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;137:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
- Background: PubMed 27515966Aronson R, Orzech N, Ye C, Brown RE, Goldenberg R, Brown V. Specialist-Led Diabetes Registries and Prevalence of Poor Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: The Diabetes Registry Outcomes Project for A1C Reduction (DROP A1C). Diabetes Care. 2016 Oct;39(10):1711-7. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2666. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
- Background: PubMed 25565383Aronson R, Orzech N, Ye C, Goldenberg R, Brown V. Specialist-led diabetes registries and predictors of poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: Insights into the functionally refractory patient from the LMC Diabetes Registry database. J Diabetes. 2016 Jan;8(1):76-85. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12257. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31399439Aronson R, Li A, Brown RE, Walker A, Lyons A, Orzech N. Optimizing Diabetes Self-management Using the Novel Skills, Confidence, and Preparedness Index (SCPI). Diabetes Care. 2019 Oct;42(10):1873-1878. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0699. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ronnie Aronson, MD, FRCPC, FACE principal investigator
LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd.
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, run by LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd. at 7 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Internal consistency of the SCPI (Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index) (time frame: 24-hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03863561, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2019.