AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseNCT03863717

Investigation of the Effectiveness of Upper Limb Exercise in COPD Patients

A study testing Arm Endurance Exercise Training in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by European University Cyprus at 1 site in Cyprus.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy of upper limb exercise training in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients. For the purpose of the study, a controlled trial will be conducted within Respiratory Clinic of Nicosia General Hospital. The sample will be divided in two groups. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
What is being tested?
Arm Endurance Exercise Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteCyprus
Study dates
14 Dec 2017to 31 May 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of COPD confirmed by clinical examination and a pulmonary function test
  • Stable clinical condition (without recent respiratory system infections or any exacerbation of the disease)
  • Patients must be willing to re evaluate at the end of the study
  • Patients must be willing to give written consent for their participation in the study

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 years old
  • Unstable cardiac disease
  • Musculoskeletal and neurological diseases that could affect exercise performance or preclude exercise
  • Patients of COPD final stage or other serious disease final stage
  • Significant cognitive or psychiatric impairment that would lead to an inability to follow simple commands in a group setting

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Christos Karagiannis contact

0035799912547

c.karayiannis@euc.ac.cy

Cyprus1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Respiratory Clinic, Nicosia General Hospital

    Nicosia

    Andreas Georgiou

    Recruiting

Other trials in Cyprus

About this study

The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy of upper limb exercise training in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients. For the purpose of the study, a controlled trial will be conducted within Respiratory Clinic of Nicosia General Hospital. The sample will be divided in two groups. The intervention group will participate in a pulmonary rehabilitation program which includes upper and lower extremities exercises, with addition of arm ergometer. The second group (control group) will participate in the same program but without arm ergometer training.

The study's hypothesis is that the intervention group will improve the outcome measures significantly better than the control group.

Being tested
Arm Endurance Exercise Training, Control
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Arm Endurance Exercise TrainingOther

    Also called Pulmonary Rehabilitation

    Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program including Upper Limb Endurance Exercise Training with arm cycle ergometer

  • ControlOther

    Also called Pulmonary Rehabilitation

    Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program without Upper Limb Endurance Exercise Training

Study groups in NCT03863717
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm Endurance Exercise Training GroupExperimentalPulmonary Rehabilitation Program including Upper Limb Endurance Exercise Training with arm cycle ergometer
Receives: Other: Arm Endurance Exercise Training
Control GroupActive comparatorPulmonary Rehabilitation Program without Upper Limb Endurance Exercise Training
Receives: Other: Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Upper Limb Muscle Strength, biceps brachii

    Assess biceps brachii via hand-held dynamometer Micro FET2

    Measured: Before Intervention

  2. Upper Limb Muscle Strength, biceps brachii

    Assess biceps brachii via hand-held dynamometer Micro FET2

    Measured: At 3 months (at the end of intervention)

  3. Upper Limb Muscle Strength, biceps brachii

    Assess biceps brachii via hand-held dynamometer Micro FET2

    Measured: Change from Baseline Biceps Brachii Muscle Strength at 3 months

  4. Upper Limb Muscle Strength, triceps

    Assess triceps via hand-held dynamometer Micro FET2

    Measured: Before Intervention

  5. Upper Limb Muscle Strength, triceps

    Assess triceps via hand-held dynamometer Micro FET2

    Measured: At 3 months (at the end of intervention)

  6. Upper Limb Muscle Strength, triceps

    Assess triceps via hand-held dynamometer Micro FET2

    Measured: Change from Baseline Triceps Muscle Strength at 3 months

  7. Upper Limb Muscle Strength, hand-grip

    Assess via jamar hand dynamometer

    Measured: Before Intervention

  8. Upper Limb Muscle Strength, hand-grip

    Assess via jamar hand dynamometer

    Measured: At 3 months (at the end of intervention)

  9. Upper Limb Muscle Strength, hand-grip

    Assess via jamar hand dynamometer

    Measured: Change from Baseline Handgrip Muscle Strength at 3 months

  10. Dyspnea, modified Borg Scale

    Assess via modified Borg Scale 0 - 10, 0 = no dyspnea, 10 = maximal dyspnea

    Measured: Before Intervention

  11. Dyspnea, modified Borg Scale

    Assess via modified Borg Scale 0 - 10, 0 = no dyspnea, 10 = maximal dyspnea

    Measured: At 3 months (at the end of intervention)

  12. Dyspnea, modified Borg Scale

    Assess via modified Borg Scale 0 - 10, 0 = no dyspnea, 10 = maximal dyspnea

    Measured: Change from Baseline Dyspnea at 3 months

  13. Dyspnea, mMRC Scale

    Assess via modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale 0 - 4, 0 = breathless only with strenuous exercise, 4 = too breathless to leave the house or breathless when dressing

    Measured: Before Intervention

  14. Dyspnea, mMRC Scale

    Assess via modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale 0 - 4, 0 = breathless only with strenuous exercise, 4 = too breathless to leave the house or breathless when dressing

    Measured: At 3 months (at the end of intervention)

  15. Dyspnea, mMRC Scale

    Assess via modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale 0 - 4, 0 = breathless only with strenuous exercise, 4 = too breathless to leave the house or breathless when dressing

    Measured: Change from Baseline Dyspnea at 3 months

  16. Fatigue

    Assess via modified Borg Scale (0 - 10), 0 = no fatigue, 10 = maximal fatigue

    Measured: Before Intervention

  17. Fatigue

    Assess via modified Borg Scale (0 - 10), 0 = no fatigue, 10 = maximal fatigue

    Measured: At 3 months (at the end of intervention)

  18. Fatigue

    Assess via modified Borg Scale (0 - 10), 0 = no fatigue, 10 = maximal fatigue

    Measured: Change from Baseline Fatigue at 3 months

  19. Health-related Quality of Life, SGRQ

    Assess via Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire, A total score incorporates scores from each component of the SGRQ which ranges from 1 to 100, where 0 indicates best health and 100 indicates worst health

    Measured: Before Intervention

  20. Health-related Quality of Life, SGRQ

    Assess via Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire, A total score incorporates scores from each component of the SGRQ which ranges from 1 to 100, where 0 indicates best health and 100 indicates worst health

    Measured: At 3 months (at the end of intervention)

  21. Health-related Quality of Life, SGRQ

    Assess via Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire, A total score incorporates scores from each component of the SGRQ which ranges from 1 to 100, where 0 indicates best health and 100 indicates worst health

    Measured: Change from Baseline at 3 months

  22. Health-related Quality of Life, CAT

    Assess via COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Range of CAT scores from 0-40. Higher scores denote a more severe impact of COPD on a patient's life.

    Measured: Before Intervention

  23. Health-related Quality of Life, CAT

    Assess via COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Range of CAT scores from 0-40. Higher scores denote a more severe impact of COPD on a patient's life.

    Measured: At 3 months (at the end of intervention)

  24. Health-related Quality of Life, CAT

    Assess via COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Range of CAT scores from 0-40. Higher scores denote a more severe impact of COPD on a patient's life.

    Measured: Change from Baseline at 3 months

  25. Activities of Daily Living with Upper Limbs

    Assess via total time need to perform 3 daily activities: (i) simulating of window cleaning, (ii) dry 10 dishes and putting them on a shelf above shoulder level and (iii) putting three packages, each weighing 1000 g, on a shelf above shoulder level

    Measured: Before Intervention

  26. Activities of Daily Living with Upper Limbs

    Assess via total time need to perform 3 daily activities: (i) simulating of window cleaning, (ii) dry 10 dishes and putting them on a shelf above shoulder level and (iii) putting three packages, each weighing 1000 g, on a shelf above shoulder level

    Measured: At 3 months (at the end of intervention)

  27. Activities of Daily Living with Upper Limbs

    Assess via total time need to perform 3 daily activities: (i) simulating of window cleaning, (ii) dry 10 dishes and putting them on a shelf above shoulder level and (iii) putting three packages, each weighing 1000 g, on a shelf above shoulder level

    Measured: Change from Baseline time at 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Mar 2019
  2. Study start14 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion31 May 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03863717
Sponsor's protocol ID
ΕΕΒΚ/ΕΠ/2017/18
Status last verified
Jan 2020
First submitted
14 Feb 2019
Last updated
28 Jan 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Karagiannis C, Savva C, Korakakis V, Adamide T, Georgiou A, Matheou I, Prodromou A, Xanthos T. Effect of Strength Versus Strength and Endurance Upper Limb Exercise Training in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2021 Nov 1;41(6):426-431. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000620.

    PubMed 34117184

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Arm Endurance Exercise Training in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by European University Cyprus at 1 site in Cyprus.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Cyprus. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Christos Karagiannis (0035799912547, c.karayiannis@euc.ac.cy), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Upper Limb Muscle Strength, biceps brachii (time frame: Before Intervention). The study lists 27 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03863717, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in