AsthmaNCT03864354
Asthma and Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
An observational study of Asthma, run by Des Moines University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) has been studied in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and children with asthma, however, to the authors' knowledge, no current studies have evaluated the non-immediate effects of OMT on pulmonary function in adults with chronic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Nov 2018to 10 Jan 2019
- How long will I take part?
- 8 Weeks
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants included members of the Des Moines University community.
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older
- previously diagnosed with asthma
Who cannot join
- Current smoker
- Diagnosed with any other respiratory disease besides asthma
- Receiving OMM from a licensed physician, chiropractic treatment, or massage therapy for 30 days prior to and during the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Immediate, Intermediate, and Long-Term Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Pulmonary Function in Adults With Asthma
The effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) has been studied in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and children with asthma, however, to the authors' knowledge, no current studies have evaluated the non-immediate effects of OMT on pulmonary function in adults with chronic asthma using spirometry. The objective of the current study was to quantify the immediate, intermediate, and long-term effects of OMT on adult patients with a history of asthma. The quantitative effects were measured with a spirometry device and include the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the forced vital capacity (FVC), the FEV1/FVC ratio, and the peak expiratory flow (PEF). These four values are used clinically in the diagnosis and management of asthma. The long-term, subjective effects were measured via the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)).
The study was conducted over a period of eight weeks. During week 0, participants completed the initial AQLQ and performed baseline spirometry testing. During weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the study, a standard OMT protocol was performed on each participant, followed by spirometry testing to measure the immediate effect. Spirometry testing was then performed again three days after each treatment to measure the intermediate effect of OMT. During week 7, participants completed the post-OMT AQLQ(S) and performed spirometry testing once more to measure the long-term effects of OMT. The OMT protocol performed on each patient included treatments to address somatic dysfunctions of the head, cervical spine, thoracic spine, ribs, and respiratory diaphragm. The authors hypothesized that OMT would improve pulmonary function, both subjectively and objectively. The authors predicted an increased overall mean AQLQ(S) score as well as an increased mean score within each domain, including symptoms, activity limitations, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. The authors also predicted a significant increase in the mean FEV1/FVC ratio, and PEF three days after each OMT session and a significant increase four weeks after the final OMT session, but no increase immediately after OMT.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
- Keywords
- osteopathic manipulative medicine, Spirometry, Respiratory, OMM, OMT, osteopathic manual medicine, osteopathic manipulative treatment, osteopathic manual treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Osteopathic Manipulative TreatmentProcedure or surgery
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) is a cost-effective, noninvasive treatment that is used to optimize the body's structure and function. By improving the biomechanical, autonomic, and circulatory mechanisms involved in the disease process of asthma, OMT can help maximize respiratory function. The specific OMT protocol used in this study included the following: supine OA joint myofascial release (MFR), supine cervical spine Still technique, supine thoracic inlet MFR, supine rib raising soft tissue, supine rib MFR, supine abdominal diaphragm MFR, seated thoracic spine Still technique, and seated posterior rib Still technique. Treatments were performed by Predoctoral Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) Fellows at Des Moines University (DMU) and supervised and checked by one of two board-certified OMM/NMM physicians from the OMM Department at DMU. The treatment lasted an average of 21 minutes and repeated three times, spaced one week apart.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Participants | Participants were adults with a diagnosis of asthma, treated using a standardized Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment protocol. Receives: Procedure: Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) measured in liters by a spirometer
Measured: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S))
The AQLQ asks about a participant's past 2 weeks as they relate to their symptoms, activity limitations, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Each item is a 7-point Likert scale, with 1 being severely impaired and 7 not impaired at all.
Measured: Participants completed the survey at baseline and four weeks after the last treatment to compare the change.
Forced vital capacity (FVC) measured in liters by a spirometer
Measured: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.
Forced expiratory flow in one second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1/FVC ratio) by a spirometer
Measured: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.
Peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured in liters per minute by a spirometer
Measured: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Mar 2019
- Study start5 Nov 2018
- Primary completion10 Jan 2019
- Study completion10 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 8 Weeks
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Des Moines University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03864354
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Asthma and OMT
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 20 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The investigator's study is a pilot study. If members of the OMM department at DMU choose to continue researching the effects of OMT on asthma in the future, then the data collected in the present study would be shared with those department members.
Publications
Bockenhauer SE, Julliard KN, Lo KS, Huang E, Sheth AM. Quantifiable effects of osteopathic manipulative techniques on patients with chronic asthma. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002 Jul;102(7):371-5; discussion 375.
PubMed 12138951McCracken JL, Veeranki SP, Ameredes BT, Calhoun WJ. Diagnosis and Management of Asthma in Adults: A Review. JAMA. 2017 Jul 18;318(3):279-290. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8372.
PubMed 28719697Thiadens HA, De Bock GH, Van Houwelingen JC, Dekker FW, De Waal MW, Springer MP, Postma DS. Can peak expiratory flow measurements reliably identify the presence of airway obstruction and bronchodilator response as assessed by FEV(1) in primary care patients presenting with a persistent cough? Thorax. 1999 Dec;54(12):1055-60. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.12.1055.
PubMed 10567623Guiney PA, Chou R, Vianna A, Lovenheim J. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment on pediatric patients with asthma: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005 Jan;105(1):7-12.
PubMed 15710659Noll DR, Degenhardt BF, Johnson JC, Burt SA. Immediate effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008 May;108(5):251-9.
PubMed 18519835Henderson AT, Fisher JF, Blair J, Shea C, Li TS, Bridges KG. Effects of rib raising on the autonomic nervous system: a pilot study using noninvasive biomarkers. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010 Jun;110(6):324-30.
PubMed 20606239Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jan;47(1):81-7. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90036-1.
PubMed 8283197
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Immediate, Intermediate, and Long-Term Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Pulmonary Function in Adults With Asthma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03864354
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Asthma and OMT
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Keywords
- osteopathic manipulative medicine, Spirometry, Respiratory, OMM, OMT, osteopathic manual medicine, osteopathic manipulative treatment, osteopathic manual treatment
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Des Moines UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) has been studied in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and children with asthma, however, to the authors' knowledge, no current studies have evaluated the non-immediate effects of OMT on pulmonary function in adults with chronic asthma using spirometry. The objective of the current study was to quantify the immediate, intermediate, and long-term effects of OMT on adult patients with a history of asthma. The quantitative effects were measured with a spirometry device and include the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the forced vital capacity (FVC), the FEV1/FVC ratio, and the peak expiratory flow (PEF). These four values are used clinically in the diagnosis and management of asthma. The long-term, subjective effects were measured via the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)).
The study was conducted over a period of eight weeks. During week 0, participants completed the initial AQLQ and performed baseline spirometry testing. During weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the study, a standard OMT protocol was performed on each participant, followed by spirometry testing to measure the immediate effect. Spirometry testing was then performed again three days after each treatment to measure the intermediate effect of OMT. During week 7, participants completed the post-OMT AQLQ(S) and performed spirometry testing once more to measure the long-term effects of OMT. The OMT protocol performed on each patient included treatments to address somatic dysfunctions of the head, cervical spine, thoracic spine, ribs, and respiratory diaphragm. The authors hypothesized that OMT would improve pulmonary function, both subjectively and objectively. The authors predicted an increased overall mean AQLQ(S) score as well as an increased mean score within each domain, including symptoms, activity limitations, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. The authors also predicted a significant increase in the mean FEV1/FVC ratio, and PEF three days after each OMT session and a significant increase four weeks after the final OMT session, but no increase immediately after OMT.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 8 Weeks
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Participants | – | Procedure: Osteopathic Manipulative TreatmentParticipants were adults with a diagnosis of asthma, treated using a standardized Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment protocol. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants included members of the Des Moines University community.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 18 years of age or older
- previously diagnosed with asthma
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Current smoker
- Diagnosed with any other respiratory disease besides asthma
- Receiving OMM from a licensed physician, chiropractic treatment, or massage therapy for 30 days prior to and during the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Osteopathic Manipulative TreatmentOsteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) is a cost-effective, noninvasive treatment that is used to optimize the body's structure and function. By improving the biomechanical, autonomic, and circulatory mechanisms involved in the disease process of asthma, OMT can help maximize respiratory function. The specific OMT protocol used in this study included the following: supine OA joint myofascial release (MFR), supine cervical spine Still technique, supine thoracic inlet MFR, supine rib raising soft tissue, supine rib MFR, supine abdominal diaphragm MFR, seated thoracic spine Still technique, and seated posterior rib Still technique. Treatments were performed by Predoctoral Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) Fellows at Des Moines University (DMU) and supervised and checked by one of two board-certified OMM/NMM physicians from the OMM Department at DMU. The treatment lasted an average of 21 minutes and repeated three times, spaced one week apart. | Procedure or surgery | Participants |
Primary outcome
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) measured in liters by a spirometer
Time frame: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S))
Time frame: Participants completed the survey at baseline and four weeks after the last treatment to compare the change.
The AQLQ asks about a participant's past 2 weeks as they relate to their symptoms, activity limitations, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Each item is a 7-point Likert scale, with 1 being severely impaired and 7 not impaired at all.
Forced vital capacity (FVC) measured in liters by a spirometer
Time frame: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.
Forced expiratory flow in one second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1/FVC ratio) by a spirometer
Time frame: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.
Peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured in liters per minute by a spirometer
Time frame: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2019.
- Background: PubMed 12138951Bockenhauer SE, Julliard KN, Lo KS, Huang E, Sheth AM. Quantifiable effects of osteopathic manipulative techniques on patients with chronic asthma. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002 Jul;102(7):371-5; discussion 375.
- Background: PubMed 28719697McCracken JL, Veeranki SP, Ameredes BT, Calhoun WJ. Diagnosis and Management of Asthma in Adults: A Review. JAMA. 2017 Jul 18;318(3):279-290. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8372.
- Background: PubMed 10567623Thiadens HA, De Bock GH, Van Houwelingen JC, Dekker FW, De Waal MW, Springer MP, Postma DS. Can peak expiratory flow measurements reliably identify the presence of airway obstruction and bronchodilator response as assessed by FEV(1) in primary care patients presenting with a persistent cough? Thorax. 1999 Dec;54(12):1055-60. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.12.1055.
- Background: PubMed 15710659Guiney PA, Chou R, Vianna A, Lovenheim J. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment on pediatric patients with asthma: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005 Jan;105(1):7-12.
- Background: PubMed 18519835Noll DR, Degenhardt BF, Johnson JC, Burt SA. Immediate effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008 May;108(5):251-9.
- Background: PubMed 20606239Henderson AT, Fisher JF, Blair J, Shea C, Li TS, Bridges KG. Effects of rib raising on the autonomic nervous system: a pilot study using noninvasive biomarkers. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010 Jun;110(6):324-30.
- Background: PubMed 8283197Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jan;47(1):81-7. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90036-1.
- Asthma Care Quick Reference: Diagnosing and Managing AsthmaLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The investigator's study is a pilot study. If members of the OMM department at DMU choose to continue researching the effects of OMT on asthma in the future, then the data collected in the present study would be shared with those department members.
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingObservational study
Asthma and Primary Arterial Hypertension: an Inflammatory Link?
Asthma Bronchial
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Severe Asthma
Asthma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Dose Range Finding Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab in Adults With Uncontrolled Asthma on Medium-to-High Dose Inhaled Corticosteroids
Asthma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating AMG 691 in Healthy Participants and Participants With Mild-to-Moderate Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Asthma, run by Des Moines University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) measured in liters by a spirometer (time frame: Measured during weeks 0 (at baseline), 1, 2, 3, and 7 of the study to assess the change over time. During weeks 1, 2, and 3, spirometry was performed immediately after the OMT protocol was completed as well as three days later.). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03864354, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2019.