AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokePAPASéPANCT03865173

Post-stroke Pathway: Analysis and Link With One Year Sequelae in a French Cohort of Stroke Patients

An observational study of Stroke and Stroke Sequelae, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 13 sites in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The link between post-stroke pathways and patient sequelae have not yet been clearly defined. The main purpose is to identify the post-stroke life pathways components associated with sequalae at 3 months and 1 year after the acute stroke episode. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Stroke Sequelae
What is being tested?
Telephone Interview
How many people
1,138 participants
Where
13 sitesFrance
Study dates
18 Nov 2019to 18 Nov 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients diagnosed with a confirmed ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke included in the Aquitaine Observatory of Stroke (ObA2) cohort and managed in the 13 participants centers and voluntary to participate

Who may be able to join

  • Patient being over 18 years of age living in metropolitan France;
  • Patient with recent stroke (not before 2019) whose diagnosis confirmed by a neuro-vascular physician;
  • Patient managed for stroke in one of the 13 participating hospitals of the Aquitaine region;
  • Patient giving consent to participate to PAPASéPA;
  • Patient to be alive at the end of the acute management hospital stay

Who cannot join

  • Patient refuse to participate to PAPASéPA
  • Patient died during the initial stay

Trial locations and contacts

13 sites in 1 country.

13 sites in 1 country

France13 sites
  • CH Agen

    Agen, 47 923

  • CH Blaye

    Blaye, 33 394

  • CHU Bordeaux

    Bordeaux, 33 076

  • CH Arcachon

    La Teste-de-Buch, 33 164

  • CH Sud Gironde - Langon

    Langon, 33 212

  • Clinique Mutualiste Lesparre Médoc

    Lesparre-Médoc, 33 340

  • CH Libourne

    Libourne, 33 505

  • CHIC Marmande-Tonneins

    Marmande, 47 207

  • CH Mont de Marsan - site Layné

    Mont-de-Marsan, 40 024

  • CH Oloron

    Oloron-Sainte-Marie, 64 400

  • CH Orthez

    Orthez, 64 301

  • CH Pau

    Pau, 64 000

  • Pôle de Santé du Villeneuvois

    Villeneuve-sur-Lot, 47 305

Other trials in France

About this study

The link between post-stroke pathways and patient sequelae have not yet been clearly defined. The main purpose is to identify the post-stroke life pathways components associated with sequalae at 3 months and 1 year after the acute stroke episode.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is a serious health event, involving the entire health care system and generating considerable socioeconomic weight for society. Knowledge of the components, the diversity and the scalability of post-stroke life pathways is currently not sufficient. Moreover the link between post-stroke pathways and patient sequelae have not yet been clearly defined.

The main purpose is to identify the post-stroke life pathways components associated with sequalae at 3 months and 1 year after the acute stroke episode. The secondary objectives are: 1) To define a typology of the life pathways of stroke patients, , 2) To analyze the social and geographical inequalities in the management of stroke, 4) To estimate the cost of the pathway elements of stroke management; 5) Measure the sequelae of stroke patients at three months and one year after the acute episode.

The design is a prospective multicenter cohort study with a follow up to 1 year after the acute episode, managed in several hospitals in the Aquitaine region (France).

Being tested
Telephone Interview
Keywords
Stroke, Pathways, Sequelae, Health services research
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Telephone InterviewOther

    Telephone Interview

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score

    Activity limitations post-stroke measure. Minimum score : 0 "No symptoms at all " Maximum score : 6 "Dead"

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score

    Activity limitations post-stroke measure Minimum score : 0 "no symptom" Maximum score : 6 "death"

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status Modified (TICS) Score

    Cognitive disorders post-stroke measure Score from 0 to 43

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status Modified (TICS) Score

    Cognitive disorders post-stroke measure Score from 0 to 43

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) Score

    Depression and anxiety disorders post-stroke measure Scores ranged from 0 (minimum) to 21 (maximum) for anxiety and 0 (minimum) to 21 (maximum) for depression.

    Total score from 0 to 42

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) Score

    Depression and anxiety disorders post-stroke measure Scores ranged from 0 (minimum) to 21 (maximum) for anxiety and 0 (minimum) to 21 (maximum) for depression.

    Total score from 0 to 42

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score

    The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is designed to differentiate fatigue from clinical depression, since both share some of the same symptoms. Essentially, the FSS consists of answering a short questionaire that requires the subject to rate his or her own level of fatigue. The subject is asked to read each statem ent and circle a number from 1 to 7, depending on how appropriate they felt the statement applied to them over the preceding week. A low value indicates that the statement is not very appropriate whereas a high value indicates agreement. The scoring is done by calculating the average response to the questions (adding up all the answers and dividing by nine).

    People with depression alone score about 4.5. People with fatigue average about 6.5.

    Measured: 3 months

  6. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score

    The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is designed to differentiate fatigue from clinical depression, since both share some of the same symptoms. Essentially, the FSS consists of answering a short questionaire that requires the subject to rate his or her own level of fatigue. The subject is asked to read each statem ent and circle a number from 1 to 7, depending on how appropriate they felt the statement applied to them over the preceding week. A low value indicates that the statement is not very appropriate whereas a high value indicates agreement. The scoring is done by calculating the average response to the questions (adding up all the answers and dividing by nine).

    People with depression alone score about 4.5. People with fatigue average about 6.5.

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Barthel Index (BI) Score

    Functional outcome post-stroke measure The original 10-item form of the BI consists of 10 common ADL activities including: feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, toileting, chair transfer, ambulation and stair climbing. Items are rated in terms of whether individuals can perform activities independently, with some assistance, or are dependent (scored as 10, 5 or 0). Items are weighted according to the level of nursing care required.

    Total score from 0 to 100

    Measured: 3 months

  8. Barthel Index (BI) Score

    Functional outcome post-stroke measure The original 10-item form of the BI consists of 10 common ADL activities including: feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, toileting, chair transfer, ambulation and stair climbing. Items are rated in terms of whether individuals can perform activities independently, with some assistance, or are dependent (scored as 10, 5 or 0). Items are weighted according to the level of nursing care required.

    Total score from 0 to 100

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ-R) Score

    Participation restrictions post-stroke measure Score from 0 to 35

    Measured: 3 months

  10. Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ-R) Score

    Participation restrictions post-stroke measure Score from 0 to 35

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Mar 2019
  2. Study start18 Nov 2019
  3. Primary completion18 Nov 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion18 Nov 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,138 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03865173
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHUBX 2016/30
Acronym
PAPASéPA
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
22 Feb 2019
Last updated
31 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Broussy S, Rouanet F, Lesaine E, Domecq S, Kret M, Maugeais M, Aly F, Dehail P, Benard A, Wittwer J, Salamon R, Sibon I, Saillour-Glenisson F. Post-stroke pathway analysis and link with one year sequelae in a French cohort of stroke patients: the PAPASePA protocol study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 29;19(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4522-2.

    PubMed 31665006

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stroke and Stroke Sequelae, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 13 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 13 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03865173, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in