AzTrials
AzTrials

Trigeminal NeuralgiaPhase 2NCT03865940

Efficacy of Guanfacine and Lidocaine Combination in Trigeminal Nerve Block for Pain Management in Trigeminal Neuropathy

A Phase 2 study testing Lidocaine and Guanfacine in people with Trigeminal Neuralgia, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) identified an association between a loss of function variant in the human alpha 2B adrenergic receptor gene and trigeminal nerve disorders. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Trigeminal Neuralgia
What is being tested?
Lidocaine and Guanfacine
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
37 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 Nov 2019to 31 Jan 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ability to understand and read English
  • History of painful trigeminal neuropathy with persistent background facial pain severity > 5/10 on VAS
  • Experience pain with a score of greater than 5 on a 0-10 scale (VAS) in the previous 24 hours before procedural treatment and at the time of procedural treatment.
  • Eligible for trigeminal nerve block procedure and have not had a trigeminal nerve block procedure for pain management prior to the enrollment in the current study.
  • Able to provide informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of a significant structural lesion (e.g., tumor) as the cause of pain as shown in at least one neuroimaging study.
  • Current diagnosis of fibromyalgia, temporomandibular disorders (TMD), odontogenic pain or other orofacial pain deemed unrelated to the trigeminal nerve as the origin.
  • Allergy or any other hypersensitivity reactions to guanfacine or lidocaine or local anesthetic of the amide type, or to both iodinated contrast and gadolinium contrast.
  • Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding and/or plan to become pregnant or to breastfeed during study participation.
  • Participation in another investigational drug study within 30 days before randomization.
  • Inability to understand the requirements of the study, inability to abide by the study restrictions, inability to fill out the questionnaires, or inability to return for the required treatments.
  • Any clinically significant medical or surgical condition that in the investigator's opinion could interfere with the administration of study drug, interpretation of study results, or compromise the safety or well-being of the subject (i.e. infection, unable to stop anticoagulants).
  • No reliable access to telephone service to allow for contact with study personnel.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, 2-Way Crossover Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Guanfacine and Lidocaine Combination Versus Lidocaine Alone in Trigeminal Nerve Block for Pain Management in Painful Trigeminal Neuropathy Patients

A phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) identified an association between a loss of function variant in the human alpha 2B adrenergic receptor gene and trigeminal nerve disorders. Guanfacine is the oldest alpha-2 adrenergic agonist in clinical use and is approved for hypertension and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. We hypothesize that guanfacine will be an effective adjunct to lidocaine for the treatment of neuropathic pain by enhancing and prolonging pain relief due to its activation of alpha-2 adrenergic receptors. The objectives of the study will be to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guanfacine in combination with lidocaine for trigeminal nerve block procedures for pain management in trigeminal neuralgia patients. This study will evaluate the efficacy of guanfacine in reducing acute pain and extending duration of pain relief when delivered in combination with lidocaine as a trigeminal nerve block, measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) data collected at specific time points after each injection.

Being tested
Lidocaine, Guanfacine
Medical subject headings
Trigeminal Neuralgia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LidocaineDrug

    Also called Xylocaine

    6 mL of 1% lidocaine

  • GuanfacineDrug

    250 mcg

Study groups in NCT03865940
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lidocaine then Lidocaine + GuanfacineExperimentalTrigeminal nerve block will be performed with injection of 6 mL of 1% lidocaine (Day 1). Patient will return between Day 15-28 and trigeminal nerve block will be performed with injection of 6 mL of 1% lidocaine + 250 mcg guanfacine.
Receives: Drug: Lidocaine; Drug: Guanfacine
Lidocaine + Guanfacine then LidocaineExperimentalTrigeminal nerve block will be performed with injection of 6 mL of 1% lidocaine + 250 mcg guanfacine (Day 1). Patient will return between Day 15-28 and trigeminal nerve block will be performed with injection of 6 mL of 1% lidocaine.
Receives: Drug: Lidocaine; Drug: Guanfacine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Return to Baseline Pain After Injection.

    Time (hours) until pain returns to baseline number.

    Measured: up to 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Pain Intensity in Follow-Up

    Pain Intensity after treatment measured throughout the 8-hour follow-up period on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, where 0 is the least pain and 10 is the most pain.

    Measured: 8 hours

  2. Quality of Life, Physical Health

    Participant Quality of Life as measured by the PROMIS Global Health -10 SF during the 14-day follow-up. The scores reported are T-scores. The T-score rescales the raw sum score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean and a person with a T-score of 60 is one SD above the mean.

    For the Physical Health subscale, raw scores are converted into t-scores ranging from 16.2 to 67.7 and higher t-scores are indicative of better overall physical health.

    Measured: 14 days

  3. Quality of Life, Mental Health

    Participant Quality of Life as measured by the PROMIS Global Health -10 SF during the 14-day follow-up. The scores reported are T-scores. The T-score rescales the raw sum score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean and a person with a T-score of 60 is one SD above the mean.

    In this Mental Health subscale, raw scores are converted into t-scores ranging from 21.2 to 67.6, where higher t-scores are indicative of better overall physical health.

    Measured: 14 days

  4. Frequency of Nerve Pain Attacks

    Frequency of nerve pain attacks during the 14-day follow-up period. Pain frequency was recorded numerically as 0 - None (no pain), 1 - Weekly, 2 - Daily, 3 - Hourly, and 4 - Constant pain. Data was not collected at baseline, only at Day 7 and Day 14.

    Measured: 14 days

  5. Rescue Medication Use

    Number of participants using rescue medication during the 8-hour follow-up period

    Measured: 8 hours

  6. Time to First Rescue Medication

    Time, in hours, to use of first rescue medication in the follow-up period following the injection.

    Measured: 14 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Mar 2019
  2. Study start4 Nov 2019
  3. Primary completion4 Oct 2023
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
37 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03865940
Sponsor's protocol ID
TN
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
1 Mar 2019
Last updated
30 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Meier SE, Orr MB, Shotwell MS, Jerome RN, Shirey-Rice JK, Pulley JM, Edwards DA, Toye AD, Mishra P, Kesayan T. Enhanced pain relief with guanfacine as an adjuvant for trigeminal nerve blocks: insights from a PheWAS-guided randomized controlled study. Pain Med. 2025 Oct 1;26(10):643-654. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaf054.

    PubMed 40326696

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Lidocaine and Guanfacine in people with Trigeminal Neuralgia, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Return to Baseline Pain After Injection. (time frame: up to 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03865940, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in