Loss of Control EatingDBSLOCNCT03868670
Responsive Neurostimulation For Loss Of Control Eating
A study testing responsive neurostimulation in people with Loss of Control Eating and Obesity, Morbid, run by University of Pennsylvania at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this trial is to assess device function and safety, with secondary objectives including the feasibility. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Loss of Control Eating, Obesity, Morbid
- What is being tested?
- responsive neurostimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Apr 2019to 1 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- BMI 35-60 kg/m2
- Failure of at least one pharmacological agent intended for weight loss or binge eating disorder (select glucagon-like-peptide 1 [GLP-1] receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, which induce clinically meaningful weight loss [i.e., >2% baseline weight], qualify as agents intended for weight loss, as do glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP]/GLP-1 agonists)
- Failure of at least one form of behavioral therapy, such as weight loss therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy (minimum cumulative trial of 6 months)
- Failure of gastric bypass surgery or sleeve gastrectomy surgery
- Assessment by the study site's bariatric surgeon to rule out technical explanations for suboptimal outcome with an upper GI series within 6 months prior to consent (i.e. a pre-study referral assessment) or prior to surgery during the screening phase.
- Presence of LOC over eating (≥4 LOC episodes per week or ≥16 episodes per month (i.e. 28 days)), as reported on the ELOCS or the EDE interview
Show all 15Show fewer
- Any medical (including psychiatric) conditions must be monitored actively by appropriate discipline and stable for the past 6 months. Related therapies or medications should be held stable for the study duration.
- Surgical suitability confirmed by a psychiatric examination.
- Subject is able to attend all scheduled clinic appointments on their own or with a caregiver.
- Subject is willing and able to complete signaled EMA assessments.
- Adequate social support (e.g. stable housing, identified family member or close friend as emergency contact) without acute or subacute psychosocial stressors based on screening interview
- Premenopausal women must agree to use acceptable methods of birth control.
- Participants provide voluntary, decisionally capable, and appropriately informed consent. - Subject is able to comply w/ all testing and follow-up requirements defined by the study protocol.
- Participant has no immediate plan for relocation beyond 6 hours of the study site.
- Proficiency with the English language.
Who cannot join
- Subject has an implanted medical device that delivers electrical energy to the brain.
- Subject has an implantable cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or neurostimulator.
- Subject requires diathermy treatments.
- Subject requires transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or electroconvulsive therapy.
- Subject is likely to require repeat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after implant of the RNS Neurostimulator and Leads.
- Subject is unable to fit into Computerized Tomography (CT) scanner (500lb upper weight limit for CT scanner).
Show all 22Show fewer
- Subject is pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the course of the study.
- Subject is participating in a therapeutic investigational drug or device study.
- Subject has medical contraindications for surgery including but not limited to severe cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, liver, hematological disease, severe coagulopathy, or an acute infectious process.
- Subject has evidence of neurological disorders, e.g. seizure disorder, multiple sclerosis, severe acquired brain injury, severe brain atrophy, subdural hematoma, history of hemorrhagic stroke, or other clinically relevant abnormality on preoperative imaging.
- Subject has a current physical or medical condition that could affect eating behavior (e.g., cancer, pregnancy).
- Subject is actively using medication known to affect eating (e.g., appetite suppressants).
- Subject has a clinically significant or unstable psychiatric condition based on psychiatric screening interview.
- Subject has a clinical diagnosis (past or present) of severe anxiety disorder, severe major depression, psychosis, or anorexia based on diagnostic interview.
- Subject has any lifetime history of suicide attempt, intent or engagement in other forms of self-harm behaviors (e.g. cutting).
- Subject has a history of drug abuse or dependence, including nicotine and alcohol, within the preceding 24 months.
- Subject has current use of alcohol at the rate of > 14 drinks per week or > 4 drinks per occasion or any diagnosis of substance abuse/dependence disorder based on DSM-5.
- There is evidence of incipient dementia or cognitive impairment on Neuropsychological assessment by any score on memory, executive functioning, intellectual functioning, language, or visuospatial domains falling 2SD below the normative mean.
- There is evidence of comprehension difficulties (Token Test <36).
- Subject is unable to provide informed consent to treatment.
- Obesity is secondary to another medical condition, a medication side effect, or a genetic syndrome.
- Subject is a candidate for revision of their bariatric surgery due to anatomical or medical co-morbidities that could be addressed. Of note, revision of a sleeve gastrectomy to a gastric bypass for to reverse weight regain alone is less frequently considered a worthwhile effort as the average weight loss of such a revision is about a 10% weight loss. Thus, patients who have a sleeve and meet the Reinhold classification will be included in this study.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94301
About this study
The primary objective of this trial is to assess device function and safety, with secondary objectives including the feasibility.
Read the detailed description
This is a single site, early feasibility study to support development of a novel therapeutic approach for utilizing the NeuroPace RNS® System for nucleus accumbens responsive neurostimulation (NAc- RNS) to ameliorate loss of control over (LOC) eating in persons with treatment-refractory obesity, specifically those who have failed gastric bypass surgery or sleeve gastrectomy surgery. The primary objectives are to assess the safety \& feasibility \& potential efficacy of the medical device named the NeuroPace RNS® System.
- Conditions
- Loss of Control Eating, Obesity, Morbid
- Being tested
- responsive neurostimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Morbid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
responsive neurostimulationDevice
The RNS® System is a novel, implantable therapeutic device that delivers responsive neurostimulation, an advanced technology designed to continuously monitor brain electrical activity, detect abnormal electrical activity and respond by delivering imperceptible levels of electrical stimulation to normalize that activity before an individual experiences seizures. This is an Early Feasibility Study determining the safety and efficacy of NAc-RNS in the treatment of LOC eating in treatment-refractory obesity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Responsive Neurostimulation | Experimental | Surgical arm. Patients expected to receive treatment. Receives: Device: responsive neurostimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Related Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Safety of the RNS System and NAc stimulation through evaluation of AE's graded as "related" (vs. not related) to the intervention that will be graded based on severity.
Grade 1 Mild AE Grade 2 Moderate AE Grade 3 Severe AE Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5 Death related to AE
Measured: 5 years
Count of Participants Exhibiting Overall Decrease in Loss of Control Episodes Per Week
The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed by at least 50% of subjects exhibiting a decrease in the number of LOC episodes per week. LOC episodes will be assessed by the EDE Interview.
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Mar 2019
- Study start10 Apr 2019
- Primary completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Loss of Control EatingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PennsylvaniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- NeuroPace
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03868670
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-46563
- Acronym
- DBSLOC
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Shivacharan RS, Rolle CE, Barbosa DAN, Cunningham TN, Feng A, Johnson ND, Safer DL, Bohon C, Keller C, Buch VP, Parker JJ, Azagury DE, Tass PA, Bhati MT, Malenka RC, Lock JD, Halpern CH. Pilot study of responsive nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation for loss-of-control eating. Nat Med. 2022 Sep;28(9):1791-1796. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01941-w. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
PubMed 36038628
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Responsive Neurostimulation For Loss Of Control Eating
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03868670
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DBSLOC / IRB-46563
- Conditions
- Loss of Control Eating, Obesity, Morbid
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PennsylvaniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- NeuroPace
- Study start
- 10 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this trial is to assess device function and safety, with secondary objectives including the feasibility.
Detailed description
This is a single site, early feasibility study to support development of a novel therapeutic approach for utilizing the NeuroPace RNS® System for nucleus accumbens responsive neurostimulation (NAc- RNS) to ameliorate loss of control over (LOC) eating in persons with treatment-refractory obesity, specifically those who have failed gastric bypass surgery or sleeve gastrectomy surgery. The primary objectives are to assess the safety \& feasibility \& potential efficacy of the medical device named the NeuroPace RNS® System.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Responsive Neurostimulation | Experimental | Device: responsive neurostimulationSurgical arm. Patients expected to receive treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- BMI 35-60 kg/m2
- Failure of at least one pharmacological agent intended for weight loss or binge eating disorder (select glucagon-like-peptide 1 [GLP-1] receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, which induce clinically meaningful weight loss [i.e., >2% baseline weight], qualify as agents intended for weight loss, as do glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP]/GLP-1 agonists)
- Failure of at least one form of behavioral therapy, such as weight loss therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy (minimum cumulative trial of 6 months)
- Failure of gastric bypass surgery or sleeve gastrectomy surgery
- Assessment by the study site's bariatric surgeon to rule out technical explanations for suboptimal outcome with an upper GI series within 6 months prior to consent (i.e. a pre-study referral assessment) or prior to surgery during the screening phase.
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Subject has an implanted medical device that delivers electrical energy to the brain.
- Subject has an implantable cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or neurostimulator.
- Subject requires diathermy treatments.
- Subject requires transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or electroconvulsive therapy.
- Subject is likely to require repeat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after implant of the RNS Neurostimulator and Leads.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| responsive neurostimulationThe RNS® System is a novel, implantable therapeutic device that delivers responsive neurostimulation, an advanced technology designed to continuously monitor brain electrical activity, detect abnormal electrical activity and respond by delivering imperceptible levels of electrical stimulation to normalize that activity before an individual experiences seizures. This is an Early Feasibility Study determining the safety and efficacy of NAc-RNS in the treatment of LOC eating in treatment-refractory obesity. | Device | Responsive Neurostimulation |
Primary outcome
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Related Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time frame: 5 years
Safety of the RNS System and NAc stimulation through evaluation of AE's graded as "related" (vs. not related) to the intervention that will be graded based on severity. Grade 1 Mild AE Grade 2 Moderate AE Grade 3 Severe AE Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5 Death related to AE
Count of Participants Exhibiting Overall Decrease in Loss of Control Episodes Per Week
Time frame: 5 years
The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed by at least 50% of subjects exhibiting a decrease in the number of LOC episodes per week. LOC episodes will be assessed by the EDE Interview.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36038628Shivacharan RS, Rolle CE, Barbosa DAN, Cunningham TN, Feng A, Johnson ND, Safer DL, Bohon C, Keller C, Buch VP, Parker JJ, Azagury DE, Tass PA, Bhati MT, Malenka RC, Lock JD, Halpern CH. Pilot study of responsive nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation for loss-of-control eating. Nat Med. 2022 Sep;28(9):1791-1796. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01941-w. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Loss of Control Eating
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of a 10-week Multicomponent Intervention Combined With Parent Education on Binge Eating Behavior in Children and Adolescents
Binge Eating Disorder, Binge Eating
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Effects of Brain Stimulation on Food Intake and Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment
Electric Stimulation Therapy, Obesity
Not yet recruiting
Biobehavioral Mechanisms of Activity and Loss of Control Eating in Children
Binge Eating Behaviour, Eating Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Time-Restricted Eating and Staple Food Reduction Combined With App-Supported Exercise for Weight and Glycemic Control
Obesity; Impaired Glucose Regulation; Prediabetes; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Recruiting
HALO-TRIAL: High, Medium And LOw Intensity Psychotherapy for Binge Eating Disorder
Binge Eating Disorder, Binge Eating Episodes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing responsive neurostimulation in people with Loss of Control Eating and Obesity, Morbid, run by University of Pennsylvania at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Related Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] (time frame: 5 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03868670, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2026.