Hemodialysis ComplicationEXPANDNCT03874819
Effect of a Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer - Medical Device on ESA Resistance in 110 Hemodialysis Patients (EXPAND)
A study testing Medium cut-off dialyzer and High-flux dialyzer in people with Hemodialysis Complication, run by Carlo Maria Guastoni.
Trial summary
It is hypothesized that a consistent use of Medium cut-off membrane (Theranova) increased clearance of pro-inflammatory molecules in a broad molecular weight range attenuates the chronic inflammatory state in patients with poor response to ESA therapy and absence of absolute iron deficiency and that this leads to an… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemodialysis Complication
- What is being tested?
- Medium cut-off dialyzer and High-flux dialyzer
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 Jul 2019to 15 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ESRD treated with chronic HD for at least 3 months
- Treatment with high flux dialyzers for at least 3 months
- Age ≥18 years
- Receiving intravenous short acting ESA to treat anemia for at least 3 months
- Impaired ESA responsiveness as indicated by EPO resistance index >median of patients in study center
- transferrin saturation (TSAT) ≥20% (last routine value prior to randomization)
- serum ferritin ≥100 ng/ml (last routine value prior to randomization)
- Signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Acute infection ≤4 weeks prior to randomization
- HIV or hepatitis infection
- Central Venous Catheter (with the history of infections in the latest 3 months)
- chronic liver disease
- active cancer
- known blood dyscrasia (paraprotein abnormalities)
Show all 14Show fewer
- known bleeding disorders
- Bleeding episode ≤12 weeks prior to randomization
- Blood/red cell transfusion ≤12 weeks prior to randomization
- hypoalbuminemia defined as serum albumin concentration below 35 g/L
- (last routine value prior to randomization)
- Participation in another clinical interventional investigation
- Pregnancy
- Inability to give informed consent.
About this study
Official title: Effect of an eXtended Permeability DiAlysis MembraNe on ESA Resistance in HemoDialysis Patients
It is hypothesized that a consistent use of Medium cut-off membrane (Theranova) increased clearance of pro-inflammatory molecules in a broad molecular weight range attenuates the chronic inflammatory state in patients with poor response to ESA therapy and absence of absolute iron deficiency and that this leads to an improvement in ESA responsiveness (EPO resistance index).
Read the detailed description
Hemodialysis Patients present chronic inflammation caused by multiple inflammatory stimuli. Chronic inflammation is linked to clinical signs and symptoms and cardiovascular mortality in these patients. Inflamed dialysis patients show impaired response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) mainly related to a reduced iron utilization (functional iron deficiency) with a greater need for ESA to meet hemoglobin targets. If absolute iron deficiency can been excluded, EPO resistance is likely related to 'inflammatory block'.
The high molecular permeability of the Theranova Medium cut-off membrane allows for significant clearance of medium molecular toxins and we know that a number of uremic solutes have been identified as pro-inflammatory, including several with a molecular weight in the size range of 20-45 kDa (cytokines, kappa/lambda free light chains and hepcidine). The EPO index has been previously used in clinical trials to measure EPO responsiveness [2,3] and is associated with mortality of ESRD patients [4-7].
All AE, SAE and other safety issues will be collected and described. The even review committee could be consulted in case of Safety event, and give recommendations.
Data entry to be carried out into an electronic CRF hosted database. This database allows the follow-up of any modifications made during data entry and monitoring. Data consistency will be checked on line according to the procedure described in the Data Management Plan (DMP), as part of the Study Master File. Each eCRF follows the study schedule structure. It is divided in sections for each visits or specific forms.
Eligible patients will be consecutively randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the standard dialysis or to dialysis with MCO dialyzer. The random sequence will be centrally generated in the CRF tool. The randomization procedure will be stratified per centre. Size of block is only known by the statistician to keep the investigator blinded regarding group allocation for the next patient.
Each patient must be identified on the CRF with his initials and identification number. Investigators must keep the list of all the patients, including identification numbers, full names and last known addresses.
Patients must be informed that the results obtained will be computer-stored and analyzed, that local laws must be applied, that patient's confidentiality must be preserved, and that they are entitled to obtain any information concerning the data stored and analyzed by a computerized system.
The investigator must give the Study Monitor direct access to relevant hospital or clinical records to confirm their consistency with the CRF entries. No information in these records about the identity of the subjects will leave the study site. Standards requirement is full verification for the presence of informed consent, adherence to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, documentation of SAEs and the recording of primary efficacy and safety variables. Additional checks of the consistency of the source data with the CRFs are performed according to the study-specific monitoring plan.
The final statistical analysis will be described in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), which will be prepared and signed prior to clean file. The SAP will include detailed information regarding the analysis of safety and efficacy. Per protocol dataset will be defined by Endpoint Review Board.
Considering these assumptions, it is estimated that 55 patients per group will be required for a mean follow- up period of 48 weeks. A total number of 110 patients is required.
Continuous variables will be analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measurements. Data will be expressed as mean standard deviation if normally distributed or as percentile of the distribution elsewhere for continuous variables and as proportion for dichotomous variables.
The investigators must keep essential study documents (including all original raw data together with the patients' identification list and signed informed consents) minimum 5 years after product commercialization is stopped and should be retained for a longer period however if required by the applicable regulatory requirements or by an agreement with the sponsor.
Patient medical files have to be kept as much as possible at each investigation site.
Investigators will be informed by Sponsor when documents related to the study could be deleted. Prior to destroying study-related documentation, the investigator shall make sure with the Sponsor, which it does not need to be kept any longer.
Results of this clinical study will be submitted to a respected international peer-reviewed journal. They may also be submitted as abstracts to a scientific congress for oral or poster communication.
- Conditions
- Hemodialysis Complication
- Being tested
- Medium cut-off dialyzer, High-flux dialyzer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Medium cut-off dialyzerDevice
Treatment using a Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer
High-flux dialyzerDevice
Treatment using a high-flux dialyzer
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Active comparator | Conventional Hemodialysis using a high-flux dialyzer Receives: Device: High-flux dialyzer |
| Experimental group | Experimental | Conventional Hemodialysis using a medium cut-of dialyzer Receives: Device: Medium cut-off dialyzer |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of the "Erythropoietin Responsiveness factor" (EPO index)
EPO index will be calculated as the average weekly EPO dose in IU per kg BW in the preceding 4 weeks divided by the last measured Hb
Measured: Up to 48 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Inflammation status
Evaluation of predialysis plasma values every 8 weeks of: FLCs (kappa and lambda), CRP, Hepcidin.
Measured: Up to 48 weeks
Metabolic diseases
Evaluation of predialysis plasma values every 8 weeks of: urea, beta 2 microglobulin, myoglobin and albumin
Measured: Up to 48 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2019
- Study start15 Jul 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion15 Mar 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Mar 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hemodialysis ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Carlo Maria Guastoni
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Carlo Maria Guastoni, Azienda Ospedaliera, Ospedale Civile di Legnano
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03874819
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EXPAND
- Acronym
- EXPAND
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of an eXtended Permeability DiAlysis MembraNe on ESA Resistance in HemoDialysis Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03874819
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EXPAND / EXPAND
- Conditions
- Hemodialysis Complication
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Carlo Maria GuastoniUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jul 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Mar 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It is hypothesized that a consistent use of Medium cut-off membrane (Theranova) increased clearance of pro-inflammatory molecules in a broad molecular weight range attenuates the chronic inflammatory state in patients with poor response to ESA therapy and absence of absolute iron deficiency and that this leads to an improvement in ESA responsiveness (EPO resistance index).
Detailed description
Hemodialysis Patients present chronic inflammation caused by multiple inflammatory stimuli. Chronic inflammation is linked to clinical signs and symptoms and cardiovascular mortality in these patients. Inflamed dialysis patients show impaired response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) mainly related to a reduced iron utilization (functional iron deficiency) with a greater need for ESA to meet hemoglobin targets. If absolute iron deficiency can been excluded, EPO resistance is likely related to 'inflammatory block'.
The high molecular permeability of the Theranova Medium cut-off membrane allows for significant clearance of medium molecular toxins and we know that a number of uremic solutes have been identified as pro-inflammatory, including several with a molecular weight in the size range of 20-45 kDa (cytokines, kappa/lambda free light chains and hepcidine). The EPO index has been previously used in clinical trials to measure EPO responsiveness [2,3] and is associated with mortality of ESRD patients [4-7].
All AE, SAE and other safety issues will be collected and described. The even review committee could be consulted in case of Safety event, and give recommendations.
Data entry to be carried out into an electronic CRF hosted database. This database allows the follow-up of any modifications made during data entry and monitoring. Data consistency will be checked on line according to the procedure described in the Data Management Plan (DMP), as part of the Study Master File. Each eCRF follows the study schedule structure. It is divided in sections for each visits or specific forms.
Eligible patients will be consecutively randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the standard dialysis or to dialysis with MCO dialyzer. The random sequence will be centrally generated in the CRF tool. The randomization procedure will be stratified per centre. Size of block is only known by the statistician to keep the investigator blinded regarding group allocation for the next patient.
Each patient must be identified on the CRF with his initials and identification number. Investigators must keep the list of all the patients, including identification numbers, full names and last known addresses.
Patients must be informed that the results obtained will be computer-stored and analyzed, that local laws must be applied, that patient's confidentiality must be preserved, and that they are entitled to obtain any information concerning the data stored and analyzed by a computerized system.
The investigator must give the Study Monitor direct access to relevant hospital or clinical records to confirm their consistency with the CRF entries. No information in these records about the identity of the subjects will leave the study site. Standards requirement is full verification for the presence of informed consent, adherence to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, documentation of SAEs and the recording of primary efficacy and safety variables. Additional checks of the consistency of the source data with the CRFs are performed according to the study-specific monitoring plan.
The final statistical analysis will be described in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), which will be prepared and signed prior to clean file. The SAP will include detailed information regarding the analysis of safety and efficacy. Per protocol dataset will be defined by Endpoint Review Board.
Considering these assumptions, it is estimated that 55 patients per group will be required for a mean follow- up period of 48 weeks. A total number of 110 patients is required.
Continuous variables will be analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measurements. Data will be expressed as mean standard deviation if normally distributed or as percentile of the distribution elsewhere for continuous variables and as proportion for dichotomous variables.
The investigators must keep essential study documents (including all original raw data together with the patients' identification list and signed informed consents) minimum 5 years after product commercialization is stopped and should be retained for a longer period however if required by the applicable regulatory requirements or by an agreement with the sponsor.
Patient medical files have to be kept as much as possible at each investigation site.
Investigators will be informed by Sponsor when documents related to the study could be deleted. Prior to destroying study-related documentation, the investigator shall make sure with the Sponsor, which it does not need to be kept any longer.
Results of this clinical study will be submitted to a respected international peer-reviewed journal. They may also be submitted as abstracts to a scientific congress for oral or poster communication.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Active comparator | Device: High-flux dialyzerConventional Hemodialysis using a high-flux dialyzer |
| Experimental group | Experimental | Device: Medium cut-off dialyzerConventional Hemodialysis using a medium cut-of dialyzer |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- ESRD treated with chronic HD for at least 3 months
- Treatment with high flux dialyzers for at least 3 months
- Age ≥18 years
- Receiving intravenous short acting ESA to treat anemia for at least 3 months
- Impaired ESA responsiveness as indicated by EPO resistance index >median of patients in study center
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Acute infection ≤4 weeks prior to randomization
- HIV or hepatitis infection
- Central Venous Catheter (with the history of infections in the latest 3 months)
- chronic liver disease
- active cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medium cut-off dialyzerTreatment using a Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer | Device | Experimental group |
| High-flux dialyzerTreatment using a high-flux dialyzer | Device | Control group |
Primary outcome
Change of the "Erythropoietin Responsiveness factor" (EPO index)
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
EPO index will be calculated as the average weekly EPO dose in IU per kg BW in the preceding 4 weeks divided by the last measured Hb
2 secondary outcomes
Inflammation status
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
Metabolic diseases
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2019.
Related trials for Hemodialysis Complication
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin in Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease
Not yet recruiting
Manual Acupuncture for Intradialytic Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis
Intradialytic Nausea and Vomiting, Chronic Kidney Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Bupropion for Fatigue in End-stage Kidney Disease Patients on Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease, Fatigue
Active, not recruiting
Group Exercise Program Supported By Audiovisual Media During Hemodialysis
Chronic Kidney Failure, Hemodialysis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Management of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients
Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA), ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Medium cut-off dialyzer and High-flux dialyzer in people with Hemodialysis Complication, run by Carlo Maria Guastoni.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of the "Erythropoietin Responsiveness factor" (EPO index) (time frame: Up to 48 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2019.