AzTrials
AzTrials

CancerNCT03878940

A Feasibility Study of Direct Access to an Abdominal ´Yes-No´ Pathway for Primary Care Patients

A study testing Abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway in people with Cancer and Primary Health Care, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background To optimise cancer outcome in Denmark, cancer diagnostic pathways should, beside cancer patient pathways (CPP) for alarm symptoms, also include a pathway for patients with vague and non-specific symptoms. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cancer, Primary Health Care
What is being tested?
Abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
27 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
1 Apr 2019to 31 Mar 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • GPs in the municipality of Silkeborg can refer patients with the following criteria to Silkeborg Regional Hospital:
  • Men and women ≥30 years old presenting with vague and non-specific abdominal symptoms for at least 3-4 weeks

Who cannot join

  • Men or women who fulfil access criteria for the CPPs.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region

    Silkeborg

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: A Feasibility Study of Direct Access to a Newly Developed Abdominal ´Yes-No´ Pathway for Primary Care Patients With Vague and Non-specific Abdominal Symptoms

Background To optimise cancer outcome in Denmark, cancer diagnostic pathways should, beside cancer patient pathways (CPP) for alarm symptoms, also include a pathway for patients with vague and non-specific symptoms. Research has demonstrated that 50% of all cancers do not qualify for specific CPPs, although the majority of patients initially present symptoms in general practice.

Hypothesis Direct access to an abdominal 'yes-no' pathway is feasible in general practice. Aim The aim of this study is to assess the implementation and clinical implications of direct access to an abdominal 'yes-no' pathway for primary care patients with vague and non-specific abdominal symptoms Materials and methods The study is a feasibility study in which all general practitioners (GPs) in the municipality of Silkeborg in Central Denmark Region are offered direct access to a newly developed abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway for both men and women aged 30 years or above, who present vague and non-specific abdominal symptoms in primary care. The abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway consists of: 1) Medical and objective examination, 2) Selected blood samples and a Fecal Immunochemical test (FIT), and 3) Abdominal ultrasound (US) and transvaginal US (TVUS) (for women).

Perspectives This study will provide important knowledge on how to improve abdominal cancer diagnostics in general practice.

Read the detailed description

Background Danish cancer patients have poorer cancer outcome compared to other European cancer patients. Earlier cancer diagnosis is a pivotal step to improve the prognosis, and there seems to be opportunity for improvement, as e.g. colon cancer is more often diagnosed at an advanced stage in Denmark than in other countries.

In Denmark, more than 11,500 abdominal cancers are registered yearly, which corresponds to 31% of all newly diagnosed cancers. The majority (75-85%) of cancer patients initially present symptoms to their GP. But only half of the patients present an alarm symptom, while 20% present serious non-specific symptoms, and 30% present vague non-specific symptoms. Site-specific CPPs for alarm symptoms were implemented in Denmark in 2008/2009 to optimise the diagnostic route for cancer. In 2012, a new Danish CPP was implemented to target patients with serious non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer (NSSC-CPP). No pathway exists for patients with vague abdominal symptoms.

Presenting in general practice with abdominal symptoms is very common. Most abdominal symptoms presented in general practice can be signs of serious disease in the abdomen and the pelvic region. However, in most cases, the symptoms are benign, self-limiting and harmless. Still, more than ten different cancer types can cause these symptoms, but clinically it is often difficult to distinguish between the symptoms.

For patients presenting vague symptoms to the GP, the ideal strategy could be easy and direct access to relevant investigations rather than a wait-and-see approach or referral to a CPP.

Aim The study sets out to investigate the need for an abdominal 'yes-no' pathway for primary care patients with vague and non-specific abdominal symptoms, how it could be clinically organised and integrated, and whether such pathway is feasible.

Material and methods Prior to the current intervention, a developmental part was conducted in 2018. It consisted of focus group meetings with 16 selected specialist, with expertise regarding patients with abdominal symptoms in general practice and abdominal cancers and other abdominal diseases.

The investigators assembled two focus groups during autumn 2017, each comprising the following experts: two GPs, a physician with expertise in gastroenterology, an abdominal surgeon, a radiologist, a gynecologist, a microbiologist and a physician in clinical biochemistry. The focus groups aimed to develop and agree on an abdominal 'yes-no' pathway using the following criteria: 1) reduce the time to diagnosis, 2) avoid unnecessary tests, 3) increase patient safety and minimise missed opportunities, 4) order the specific investigations temporally, 5) place responsibility and develop a structure and 6) illustrate an optimal pathway.

From January to September 2018, the investigators completed two meetings in each focus group, after which the investigators compared the results and gathered the groups in a common session. From the literature and the preliminary results of an yet unpublished register study, the investigators were able to present the clinical challenges to the participants during the meetings. Moreover, the possible access to investigations was presented (laboratory tests, imaging, endoscopies and access to specialist advice). Based on discussions during the meetings, the investigators developed an abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway. The abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway consists of three steps; 1) Medical and objective examination, 2) Selected blood samples and a FIT, and 3) Abdominal US and TVUS. The GP continues to hold responsibility for follow-up, while hospital examinations are performed on an outpatient basis with direct access from general practice. After finished investigation, the results from the tests will all return electronically to the referring GP.

The intervention is planned to initiate as a feasibility study at Silkeborg Regional Hospital from 1 April 2019. Agreements have been made with the hospital management, and an information meeting has taken place in March 2019 at the hospital. All GPs in the municipality of Silkeborg were invited to participate. An illustration, to hand out for involved GPs has been developed. Prior to investigation, all patients referred to the abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway will receive a consent form with information of the study. The inclusion period is 6 months from 1 April 2019 to 30 September 2019, after which the investigators will monitor the patients for up to 6 months.

The study has been approved and is registered in the Record of Processing Activities at the Research Unit of General Practice in Aarhus in accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The Central Denmark Region Committees on Health Research Ethics has concluded that the study can be conducted without an approval from the Committees (Request 16/2019). Further, The committee on multi-practice studies under the Danish College of General Practitioners (DSAM) and the Organisation of General Practitioners in Denmark (PLO) have been asked to recommend GPs to participate in the study.

The analyses will be descriptive with frequencies and incidence rates of use of the pathway corrected for practice population. An overview of all findings in the abdominal 'yes-no' pathway will be provided, and possible side effects will be assessed.

Perspectives The study will provide new important knowledge of patients with vague and non-specific abdominal symptoms, who do not fulfil access criteria for the CPPs, but for whom the diagnosis of an abdominal cancer should not be missed. This may improve the diagnostics of abdominal cancers or other serious abdominal disease in the future, aiming to reduce time to diagnosis.

Being tested
Abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Abdominal ´yes-no´ pathwayDiagnostic test

    A set of blood samples, a FIT, and an abdominal US (and a TVUS in women)

Study groups in NCT03878940
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Primary care patientsOtherAll GPs in the municipality of Silkeborg will be invited to participate. Any patient can be referred to the abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway, independently of their willingness to give one´s consent.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The proportion of general practices using the abdominal 'yes-no' pathway

    In the municipality of Silkeborg, 23 general practices will be offered direct access to the abdominal 'yes-no' pathway.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Number of patients referred to the abdominal 'yes-no' pathway

    The number of patients referred to the abdominal 'yes-no' pathway, both overall from all 23 general practices in the municipality of Silkeborg, and per general practice. We expect one eligible patient from each GP every third week.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Indications used for requesting the abdominal 'yes-no' pathway

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Health care use within 6 months of intervention

    'Health care use´ is defined as consultations, imaging and endoscopies performed in both primary and secondary care. Data will be collected through the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish National Health Service Register.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Number of patients with a diagnosis of cancer or another serious disease in the abdomen

    Data from The Danish Pathology Register will be used to investigate for cancer diagnoses and other serious diseases up to 6 months after the diagnostics performed through the abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Number of patients with unintended side effects

    Number of patients with unintended side effect in consequence of the diagnostics performed in and caused by the abdominal 'yes-no' pathway.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Mar 2019
  2. Study start1 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
27 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03878940
Sponsor's protocol ID
16/2019
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
27 Feb 2019
Last updated
16 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Abdominal ´yes-no´ pathway in people with Cancer and Primary Health Care, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The proportion of general practices using the abdominal 'yes-no' pathway (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in