Frail Elderly SyndromefraXityNCT03883425
Frailty and Complexity Among Home Service Recipients
An observational study of Frail Elderly Syndrome, run by School of Health Sciences Geneva at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to develop frailty and complexity computation algorithms based on the French version of the interRAI-HC and, in doing so, to provide homecare nurses with valid and reliable screening tools for their routine practice. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Frail Elderly Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- interRAI-HC assessments
- How many people
- 231 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2018to 30 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Older adult
Study population: Community-dwelling older adults (aged 65 or older), fluent in French, living at home in Canton Geneva, Switzerland and volunteering to participate to the study.
Who may be able to join
- living in the community (private home)
- resident of Canton Geneva, Switzerland
- ability to hold a conversation in French (expression, comprehension)
- oriented in time and space
Who cannot join
- living in hospital / nursing home
- not resident of Canton Geneva, Switzerland
- not fluent in French
- disoriented in time and space
- person under tutorship
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Frailty and Complexity Among Home Service Recipients: a Case-control Longitudinal Study
The purpose of the study is to develop frailty and complexity computation algorithms based on the French version of the interRAI-HC and, in doing so, to provide homecare nurses with valid and reliable screening tools for their routine practice. By relying on a prospective observational case-control longitudinal study, the study intends to assess the predictive validity of the proposed indices with respect to undesirable health outcomes. Repeated measurement occasions, separated by 6-month intervals, will also allow for estimation of intra-individual change in frailty and complexity. In the study, elders living in the community and aged 65 or older are the target population, and three samples will be considered based on the a priori risks of adverse outcomes (case 1: formal home service recipients; case 2: formal home care recipients; control: free of formal home care or service). These groups will be compared on the observed rates of frailty and complexity and on their evolution over time. Results will allow for identification of subgroups of the aged population for whom early screening of frailty and complexity appears most relevant. Based on the findings, practice guideline will be proposed. They will entail the interpretation of the scores and recommendations for mounting adapted preventive strategies. Finally, the study will contribute to enhancing knowledge on the relation between frailty, a well-known concept in gerontology, and complexity, a concept increasingly referred to in the care literature but that still deserves operational and consensual definitions.
- Conditions
- Frail Elderly Syndrome
- Being tested
- interRAI-HC assessments
- Keywords
- Home Care Services, Geriatric Assessment, Aging, Frailty, Complexity, Nursing
- Medical subject headings
- Frailty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
interRAI-HC assessmentsOther
Standardized geriatric assessments done with the interRAI-HC instrument (Canadian French version 9.1) by trained nurses
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Case 1: formal home service recipients | Adults aged 65 or older living at home who receive formal home service (household, meal delivery, transportation, shopping) at least one a week Receives: Other: interRAI-HC assessments | |
| Case 2: formal home care recipients | Adults aged 65 or older living at home who receive formal home care (shower/bath nursing assistance, nursing care) at least once a week Receives: Other: interRAI-HC assessments | |
| Control: free of formal home care or home service | Adults aged 65 or older living at home who do not receive formal home care or home service. Receives: Other: interRAI-HC assessments |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frailty Index
Index with a value ranging from 0 to 100, computed as the sum of health deficits recorded with the interRAI-HC MDS divided by the number of deficits considered. Replication of Ludwig and Busnel, BMC, 2017 (REF2)
Measured: at baseline
Complexity Index
Index with a value ranging from 0 to 100, computed as the sum of complexity items recorded with the interRAI-HC MDS divided by the number of items considered.
Measured: at baseline
Change in frailty Index
Change in the frailty index value; Expressed as a proportion, with the frailty index value at baseline as denominator and the observed frailty value as numerator.
Measured: at 6 months and at 12 months
Change in complexity Index
Change in the complexity index value; Expressed as a proportion, with the complexity index value at baseline as denominator and the observed complexity value as numerator.
Measured: at 6 months and at 12 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Number of participants with falls
Number of participants with falls in the 6 months prior each follow-up assessment (yes/no; if yes, number of falls that occurred); recorded prospectively by means of a life history calendar.
Measured: at 6 month, at 12 months
Number of participants with hospitalizations
Number of participants with hospitalizations in the 6 months prior each follow-up assessment (yes/no; if yes, number of hospitalizations that occurred and lengths in days); recorded prospectively by means of a life history calendar.
Measured: at 6 month, at 12 months
Number of participants with physician visits
Number of participants with physician visits in the 6 months prior each follow-up assessment (yes/no; if yes, number of visits that occurred); recorded prospectively by means of a life history calendar.
Measured: at 6 month, at 12 months
Number of participants with emergency admissions
Number of participants with emergency admissions in the 6 months prior each follow-up assessment (yes/no; if yes, number of admissions that occurred); recorded prospectively by means of a life history calendar.
Measured: at 6 month, at 12 months
Mortality rate
Number of deaths (yes/no); collected from relatives or through public databases (www.hommages.ch).
Measured: at 6 month, at 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2019
- Study start1 Sep 2018
- Primary completion30 Nov 2020
- Study completion30 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Frail Elderly SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 231 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- School of Health Sciences Geneva
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Swiss National Science Foundation, Geneva institution for homecare and assistance (imad)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Catherine Ludwig, School of Health Sciences Geneva
- Investigators
- Catherine Ludwig, PhD, Principal investigator, School of Health Sciences Geneva
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03883425
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AGP 84770
- Acronym
- fraXity
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 18 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 2 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data and analytical codes will be shared in the form of computerized data files in SPSS format (\*.sav, \*.sps). Variable specification are written in SPSS syntaxes (\*.sps files). Syntaxes define for each variable (raw or recoded) its short name, its type (date, string, numerical), its label, its response values and labels, the values associated with missing data and the measurement scale. Whenever relevant, the syntax is annotated, providing, for example, the reference of the published guideline for recoding. All variable specifications are summarized in a codebook (generated by SPSS), which is completed by specifications on the data collection procedure and on the sources used as references for recoding. The dataset is free of individual personal information (named, dated of birth, addresses, etc.); unique numerical codes are used to identify participants.
Publications
Morris JN, Fries BE, Steel K, Ikegami N, Bernabei R, Carpenter GI, Gilgen R, Hirdes JP, Topinkova E. Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting: applicability of the MDS-HC. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Aug;45(8):1017-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02975.x.
PubMed 9256857Ludwig C, Busnel C. Derivation of a frailty index from the resident assessment instrument - home care adapted for Switzerland: a study based on retrospective data analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Sep 7;17(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0604-3.
PubMed 28882127Busnel C, Vallet F, Ashikali EM, Ludwig C. Assessing multidimensional complexity in home care: congruencies and discrepancies between patients and nurses. BMC Nurs. 2022 Jun 24;21(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00942-x.
PubMed 35751082Ludwig C, Busnel C. Protocol of a case-control longitudinal study (fraXity) assessing frailty and complexity among Swiss home service recipients using interRAI-HC assessments. BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1230-z.
PubMed 31382880
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Frailty and Complexity Among Home Service Recipients: a Case-control Longitudinal Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03883425
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- fraXity / AGP 84770
- Conditions
- Frail Elderly Syndrome
- Keywords
- Home Care Services, Geriatric Assessment, Aging, Frailty, Complexity, Nursing
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 231 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- School of Health Sciences GenevaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Swiss National Science Foundation, Geneva institution for homecare and assistance (imad)
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to develop frailty and complexity computation algorithms based on the French version of the interRAI-HC and, in doing so, to provide homecare nurses with valid and reliable screening tools for their routine practice. By relying on a prospective observational case-control longitudinal study, the study intends to assess the predictive validity of the proposed indices with respect to undesirable health outcomes. Repeated measurement occasions, separated by 6-month intervals, will also allow for estimation of intra-individual change in frailty and complexity. In the study, elders living in the community and aged 65 or older are the target population, and three samples will be considered based on the a priori risks of adverse outcomes (case 1: formal home service recipients; case 2: formal home care recipients; control: free of formal home care or service). These groups will be compared on the observed rates of frailty and complexity and on their evolution over time. Results will allow for identification of subgroups of the aged population for whom early screening of frailty and complexity appears most relevant. Based on the findings, practice guideline will be proposed. They will entail the interpretation of the scores and recommendations for mounting adapted preventive strategies. Finally, the study will contribute to enhancing knowledge on the relation between frailty, a well-known concept in gerontology, and complexity, a concept increasingly referred to in the care literature but that still deserves operational and consensual definitions.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Case 1: formal home service recipients | – | Other: interRAI-HC assessmentsAdults aged 65 or older living at home who receive formal home service (household, meal delivery, transportation, shopping) at least one a week |
| Case 2: formal home care recipients | – | Other: interRAI-HC assessmentsAdults aged 65 or older living at home who receive formal home care (shower/bath nursing assistance, nursing care) at least once a week |
| Control: free of formal home care or home service | – | Other: interRAI-HC assessmentsAdults aged 65 or older living at home who do not receive formal home care or home service. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Older adult
- Study population
- Community-dwelling older adults (aged 65 or older), fluent in French, living at home in Canton Geneva, Switzerland and volunteering to participate to the study.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- living in the community (private home)
- resident of Canton Geneva, Switzerland
- ability to hold a conversation in French (expression, comprehension)
- oriented in time and space
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- living in hospital / nursing home
- not resident of Canton Geneva, Switzerland
- not fluent in French
- disoriented in time and space
- person under tutorship
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| interRAI-HC assessmentsStandardized geriatric assessments done with the interRAI-HC instrument (Canadian French version 9.1) by trained nurses | Other | Case 1: formal home service recipients, Case 2: formal home care recipients, Control: free of formal home care or home service |
Primary outcome
Frailty Index
Time frame: at baseline
Index with a value ranging from 0 to 100, computed as the sum of health deficits recorded with the interRAI-HC MDS divided by the number of deficits considered. Replication of Ludwig and Busnel, BMC, 2017 (REF2)
Complexity Index
Time frame: at baseline
Index with a value ranging from 0 to 100, computed as the sum of complexity items recorded with the interRAI-HC MDS divided by the number of items considered.
Change in frailty Index
Time frame: at 6 months and at 12 months
Change in the frailty index value; Expressed as a proportion, with the frailty index value at baseline as denominator and the observed frailty value as numerator.
Change in complexity Index
Time frame: at 6 months and at 12 months
Change in the complexity index value; Expressed as a proportion, with the complexity index value at baseline as denominator and the observed complexity value as numerator.
5 secondary outcomes
Number of participants with falls
Time frame: at 6 month, at 12 months
Number of participants with hospitalizations
Time frame: at 6 month, at 12 months
Number of participants with physician visits
Time frame: at 6 month, at 12 months
Number of participants with emergency admissions
Time frame: at 6 month, at 12 months
Mortality rate
Time frame: at 6 month, at 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Dec 2020.
- Background: PubMed 9256857Morris JN, Fries BE, Steel K, Ikegami N, Bernabei R, Carpenter GI, Gilgen R, Hirdes JP, Topinkova E. Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting: applicability of the MDS-HC. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Aug;45(8):1017-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02975.x.
- Background: PubMed 28882127Ludwig C, Busnel C. Derivation of a frailty index from the resident assessment instrument - home care adapted for Switzerland: a study based on retrospective data analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Sep 7;17(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0604-3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35751082Busnel C, Vallet F, Ashikali EM, Ludwig C. Assessing multidimensional complexity in home care: congruencies and discrepancies between patients and nurses. BMC Nurs. 2022 Jun 24;21(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00942-x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31382880Ludwig C, Busnel C. Protocol of a case-control longitudinal study (fraXity) assessing frailty and complexity among Swiss home service recipients using interRAI-HC assessments. BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1230-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data and analytical codes will be shared in the form of computerized data files in SPSS format (*.sav, *.sps). Variable specification are written in SPSS syntaxes (*.sps files). Syntaxes define for each variable (raw or recoded) its short name, its type (date, string, numerical), its label, its response values and labels, the values associated with missing data and the measurement scale. Whenever relevant, the syntax is annotated, providing, for example, the reference of the published guideline for recoding. All variable specifications are summarized in a codebook (generated by SPSS), which is completed by specifications on the data collection procedure and on the sources used as references for recoding. The dataset is free of individual personal information (named, dated of birth, addresses, etc.); unique numerical codes are used to identify participants.
Related trials for Frail Elderly Syndrome
Recruiting
Comparıson of the Effıcacy of Conventıonal Exercıse and Pılates ın Pre-fraıl and Fraıl Older Adults
Frailty Syndrome, Prefrail Elderly
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Animation-Based Digital Education on Risk Knowledge and Frailty in Older Adults
Aging, Frail Elderly
Active, not recruiting
Implementing, Evaluating, and Scaling Up of the Strengthening a Palliative Approach in Long Term Care (SPA-LTC) Program
Frail Elderly Syndrome
Recruiting
Feasibility and Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training Combined With Blood Flow Restriction for Frail Older Adults
Frailty Syndrome, Older Adults
Recruiting
Involvement of Muscle Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Frailty in Older Adults. Role of Exercise
Diabetes Type 2, Frail Elderly Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Catherine Ludwig, PhD principal investigator
School of Health Sciences Geneva
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Frail Elderly Syndrome, run by School of Health Sciences Geneva at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frailty Index (time frame: at baseline). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03883425, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2020.