Pelvic Floor Myofascial PainNCT03885791
Randomized Controlled Trial of Vaginal Cryotherapy for Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain
A study testing vaginal cryotherapy in people with Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain and Pelvic Pain, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial to investigate the role of vaginal cryotherapy on pelvic floor myofascial pain in women. This study involves randomizing patients who are found to have pelvic floor myofascial pain on examination into one of two treatment groups: transvaginal cryotherapy or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain, Pelvic Pain, Myofascial Pain
- What is being tested?
- vaginal cryotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 165 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Mar 2019to 24 Jul 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult (>18yo)
- Women
- Patients found to have pelvic floor myofascial pain of at least 4/10 in severity at any of the four sites (right obturator internus, right levator ani, left levator ani, left obturator internus)
Who cannot join
- Age <18
- Non-English speaking
- Current diagnosis of dementia
- Limited physical mobility that would prevent full participation in pelvic floor PT.
- Prior use of vaginal cryotherapy
- Chief complaint or known history of pelvic pain
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Center for Outpatient Health/Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
This is a placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial to investigate the role of vaginal cryotherapy on pelvic floor myofascial pain in women. This study involves randomizing patients who are found to have pelvic floor myofascial pain on examination into one of two treatment groups: transvaginal cryotherapy or transvaginal application of a room-temperature tube. Patients will be followed up at two different time points in order to assess response to treatment. Follow-up times include immediately after application (Specific Aim #1) and two weeks following use of the intervention alone (Specific Aim #2). Patients will receive verbal and written instructions on using the intravaginal tubes by the research assistant who will not be blinded to treatment allocation. Patients will not be blinded to their treatment assignment but will not be given information on the alternative treatment. Patients will be referred to pelvic floor PT, which is considered the standard of care for treatment of pelvic floor myofascial pain at this time. As it typically takes 2-3 weeks to get in to see one of the pelvic floor PT providers at Wash U, follow up for this study will be completed prior to their attendance at pelvic floor PT. Patients will complete validated questionnaires assessing their pain, other pelvic floor symptoms, and acceptance of the intervention as a treatment option at the follow up time points.
- Conditions
- Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain, Pelvic Pain, Myofascial Pain
- Being tested
- vaginal cryotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Pelvic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
vaginal cryotherapyDevice
Both groups will be given the same instructions for use, which will include intravaginal placement of one tube for 10 minutes while resting in a supine position. A lubricant may be used for comfort with insertion.
Patients will perform their first intervention in the office with a repeat examination within 10 minutes of completing therapy. Patients participating in Specific Aims #2 will perform the intervention once daily at home. Patients will be asked to complete a short diary for each session, which will include the time of day, duration of application, pain score prior to and after application, and presence of any pelvic floor disorder symptoms prior to and after application.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vaginal cryotherapy - intervention | Experimental | The intervention group will be provided with one vaginal cryotherapy tube, filled with a mixture of isopropyl alcohol (2ml) and water (8ml) that has been kept in the freezer. This mixture results in a "slushy" consistency and prevents the solution from freezing solid thus decreases the risk of discomfort or injury due to the temperature of the tube. Patients will insert this tube into the vagina to a comfortable depth. A lubricant will be provided for comfort with tube insertion, if necessary. At the conclusion of the treatment, this tube will be washed thoroughly and given to the patient in a clean plastic baggie for use at home. They will be instructed to store these tubes in their home freezer. Receives: Device: vaginal cryotherapy |
| Vaginal cryotherapy - control | Placebo comparator | The control group will be provided with an identical tube that is empty. An empty tube was chosen as the control because a tube with room-temperature liquid may still be perceived as cold. Patients will insert this tube into the vagina to a comfortable depth. A lubricant will be provided for comfort with tube insertion, if necessary. At the conclusion of the treatment, this tube will be washed thoroughly and given to the patient in a clean plastic baggie for use at home. They will be instructed to store these tubes in their home at room temperature. Receives: Device: vaginal cryotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
change in myofascial pain score
Primary outcome is change in pelvic floor myofascial pain scores at each site (bilateral OI and LA) as measured on a 0-10 visual pain rating scale where 0 indicates no pain on palpation and 10 indicates 'worst pain imaginable' on palpation.
Measured: 10-15 minutes (Pre- to post-treatment)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20
Short form of the validated questionnaire to assess presence and degree of bother of common pelvic floor symptoms
Measured: 2 weeks
Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7
Short form of the validated questionnaire to assess impact of pelvic floor symptoms on daily activities
Measured: 2 weeks
Prolapse and Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire
Short form of the validated questionnaire to assess the impact of pelvic floor symptoms on sexual activity
Measured: 2 weeks
Urogenital Distress Inventory
Validated questionnaire to assess presence and degree of bother of lower urinary tract symptoms
Measured: 2 weeks
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Tool
Validated questionnaire to assess lower urinary tract symptoms
Measured: 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Mar 2019
- Study start22 Mar 2019
- Primary completion24 Jul 2024
- Study completion24 Jul 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pelvic Floor Myofascial PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Washington University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 165 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03885791
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201901209
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sexton CC, Coyne KS, Kopp ZS, Irwin DE, Milsom I, Aiyer LP, Tubaro A, Chapple CR, Wein AJ; EpiLUTS Team. The overlap of storage, voiding and postmicturition symptoms and implications for treatment seeking in the USA, UK and Sweden: EpiLUTS. BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103 Suppl 3:12-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08369.x.
PubMed 19302498Adams K, Gregory WT, Osmundsen B, Clark A. Levator myalgia: why bother? Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Oct;24(10):1687-93. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2089-8. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
PubMed 23575699Pastore EA, Katzman WB. Recognizing myofascial pelvic pain in the female patient with chronic pelvic pain. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012 Sep-Oct;41(5):680-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01404.x. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
PubMed 22862153Spitznagle TM, Robinson CM. Myofascial pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014 Sep;41(3):409-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
PubMed 25155122Borg-Stein J, Iaccarino MA. Myofascial pain syndrome treatments. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014 May;25(2):357-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
PubMed 24787338Bedaiwy MA, Patterson B, Mahajan S. Prevalence of myofascial chronic pelvic pain and the effectiveness of pelvic floor physical therapy. J Reprod Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;58(11-12):504-10.
PubMed 24568045Nadler SF, Weingand K, Kruse RJ. The physiologic basis and clinical applications of cryotherapy and thermotherapy for the pain practitioner. Pain Physician. 2004 Jul;7(3):395-9.
PubMed 16858479Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78. doi: 10.1002/nau.10052. No abstract available.
PubMed 11857671Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, Reilly K, Kopp Z, Herschorn S, Coyne K, Kelleher C, Hampel C, Artibani W, Abrams P. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006 Dec;50(6):1306-14; discussion 1314-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.09.019. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
PubMed 17049716Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, Milsom I, Abrams P. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(7):1132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09993.x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
PubMed 21231991Kalder M, Pantazis K, Dinas K, Albert US, Heilmaier C, Kostev K. Discontinuation of treatment using anticholinergic medications in patients with urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):794-800. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000468.
PubMed 25198276Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gulmezoglu M, Khan KS. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health. 2006 Jul 6;6:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-177.
PubMed 16824213Sedighimehr N, Manshadi FD, Shokouhi N, Baghban AA. Pelvic musculoskeletal dysfunctions in women with and without chronic pelvic pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Jan;22(1):92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 3.
PubMed 29332764Peters KM, Carrico DJ. Frequency, urgency, and pelvic pain: treating the pelvic floor versus the epithelium. Curr Urol Rep. 2006 Nov;7(6):450-5. doi: 10.1007/s11934-006-0053-6.
PubMed 17052440Moldwin RM, Fariello JY. Myofascial trigger points of the pelvic floor: associations with urological pain syndromes and treatment strategies including injection therapy. Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Oct;14(5):409-17. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0360-7.
PubMed 23943509
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Vaginal Cryotherapy for Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03885791
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201901209
- Conditions
- Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain, Pelvic Pain, Myofascial Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 165 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jul 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial to investigate the role of vaginal cryotherapy on pelvic floor myofascial pain in women. This study involves randomizing patients who are found to have pelvic floor myofascial pain on examination into one of two treatment groups: transvaginal cryotherapy or transvaginal application of a room-temperature tube. Patients will be followed up at two different time points in order to assess response to treatment. Follow-up times include immediately after application (Specific Aim #1) and two weeks following use of the intervention alone (Specific Aim #2). Patients will receive verbal and written instructions on using the intravaginal tubes by the research assistant who will not be blinded to treatment allocation. Patients will not be blinded to their treatment assignment but will not be given information on the alternative treatment. Patients will be referred to pelvic floor PT, which is considered the standard of care for treatment of pelvic floor myofascial pain at this time. As it typically takes 2-3 weeks to get in to see one of the pelvic floor PT providers at Wash U, follow up for this study will be completed prior to their attendance at pelvic floor PT. Patients will complete validated questionnaires assessing their pain, other pelvic floor symptoms, and acceptance of the intervention as a treatment option at the follow up time points.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vaginal cryotherapy - intervention | Experimental | Device: vaginal cryotherapyThe intervention group will be provided with one vaginal cryotherapy tube, filled with a mixture of isopropyl alcohol (2ml) and water (8ml) that has been kept in the freezer. This mixture results in a "slushy" consistency and prevents the solution from freezing solid thus decreases the risk of discomfort or injury due to the temperature of the tube. Patients will insert this tube into the vagina to a comfortable depth. A lubricant will be provided for comfort with tube insertion, if necessary. At the conclusion of the treatment, this tube will be washed thoroughly and given to the patient in a clean plastic baggie for use at home. They will be instructed to store these tubes in their home freezer. |
| Vaginal cryotherapy - control | Placebo comparator | Device: vaginal cryotherapyThe control group will be provided with an identical tube that is empty. An empty tube was chosen as the control because a tube with room-temperature liquid may still be perceived as cold. Patients will insert this tube into the vagina to a comfortable depth. A lubricant will be provided for comfort with tube insertion, if necessary. At the conclusion of the treatment, this tube will be washed thoroughly and given to the patient in a clean plastic baggie for use at home. They will be instructed to store these tubes in their home at room temperature. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult (>18yo)
- Women
- Patients found to have pelvic floor myofascial pain of at least 4/10 in severity at any of the four sites (right obturator internus, right levator ani, left levator ani, left obturator internus)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age <18
- Non-English speaking
- Current diagnosis of dementia
- Limited physical mobility that would prevent full participation in pelvic floor PT.
- Prior use of vaginal cryotherapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| vaginal cryotherapyBoth groups will be given the same instructions for use, which will include intravaginal placement of one tube for 10 minutes while resting in a supine position. A lubricant may be used for comfort with insertion. Patients will perform their first intervention in the office with a repeat examination within 10 minutes of completing therapy. Patients participating in Specific Aims #2 will perform the intervention once daily at home. Patients will be asked to complete a short diary for each session, which will include the time of day, duration of application, pain score prior to and after application, and presence of any pelvic floor disorder symptoms prior to and after application. | Device | Vaginal cryotherapy - control, Vaginal cryotherapy - intervention |
Primary outcome
change in myofascial pain score
Time frame: 10-15 minutes (Pre- to post-treatment)
Primary outcome is change in pelvic floor myofascial pain scores at each site (bilateral OI and LA) as measured on a 0-10 visual pain rating scale where 0 indicates no pain on palpation and 10 indicates 'worst pain imaginable' on palpation.
5 secondary outcomes
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20
Time frame: 2 weeks
Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7
Time frame: 2 weeks
Prolapse and Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire
Time frame: 2 weeks
Urogenital Distress Inventory
Time frame: 2 weeks
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Tool
Time frame: 2 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Feb 2026.
- Background: PubMed 19302498Sexton CC, Coyne KS, Kopp ZS, Irwin DE, Milsom I, Aiyer LP, Tubaro A, Chapple CR, Wein AJ; EpiLUTS Team. The overlap of storage, voiding and postmicturition symptoms and implications for treatment seeking in the USA, UK and Sweden: EpiLUTS. BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103 Suppl 3:12-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08369.x.
- Background: PubMed 23575699Adams K, Gregory WT, Osmundsen B, Clark A. Levator myalgia: why bother? Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Oct;24(10):1687-93. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2089-8. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
- Background: PubMed 22862153Pastore EA, Katzman WB. Recognizing myofascial pelvic pain in the female patient with chronic pelvic pain. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012 Sep-Oct;41(5):680-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01404.x. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
- Background: PubMed 25155122Spitznagle TM, Robinson CM. Myofascial pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014 Sep;41(3):409-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
- Background: PubMed 24787338Borg-Stein J, Iaccarino MA. Myofascial pain syndrome treatments. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014 May;25(2):357-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 24568045Bedaiwy MA, Patterson B, Mahajan S. Prevalence of myofascial chronic pelvic pain and the effectiveness of pelvic floor physical therapy. J Reprod Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;58(11-12):504-10.
- Background: PubMed 16858479Nadler SF, Weingand K, Kruse RJ. The physiologic basis and clinical applications of cryotherapy and thermotherapy for the pain practitioner. Pain Physician. 2004 Jul;7(3):395-9.
- Background: PubMed 11857671Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78. doi: 10.1002/nau.10052. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17049716Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, Reilly K, Kopp Z, Herschorn S, Coyne K, Kelleher C, Hampel C, Artibani W, Abrams P. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006 Dec;50(6):1306-14; discussion 1314-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.09.019. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
- Background: PubMed 21231991Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, Milsom I, Abrams P. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(7):1132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09993.x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
- Background: PubMed 25198276Kalder M, Pantazis K, Dinas K, Albert US, Heilmaier C, Kostev K. Discontinuation of treatment using anticholinergic medications in patients with urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):794-800. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000468.
- Background: PubMed 16824213Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gulmezoglu M, Khan KS. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health. 2006 Jul 6;6:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-177.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Shockwave Therapy and Apuncture for Chronic Pelvic Pain
Chronic Pain Syndromes
Not yet recruiting
Measuring Pelvic Floor Muscle Fitness Before and After Treatment
Myofacial Pain, Pelvic Pain
Recruiting
Transvaginal Electrical Stimulation for Myofascial Pelvic Pain
Myofascial Pelvic Pain
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Bruxism, Pelvic Pain, Erectile Dysfunction, and Anxiety in Young Adult Men
Bruxism, Pelvic Pain
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Bruxism and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Young Women
Bruxism, Pelvic Floor Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing vaginal cryotherapy in people with Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain and Pelvic Pain, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
change in myofascial pain score (time frame: 10-15 minutes (Pre- to post-treatment)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03885791, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2026.