Dry EyePhase 4NCT03888183
Effect of Preservative-free Low-dose Hyaluronic Acid-containing Salt Solution on Dry Eye Disease
A Phase 4 study testing salt solution without 0.15% HA and preservative-free 0.15% HA in people with Dry Eye, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
This trial is a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) on dry eye disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dry Eye
- What is being tested?
- salt solution without 0.15% HA and preservative-free 0.15% HA
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 334 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 17 Apr 2019to 22 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female subjects aged greater than or equal to 20 years (>= 20 years).
- The symptom criterium of ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score > 13.
- One of the two following examination criteria:
- Central tear meniscus height (TMHc) < 0.20 mm,
- Noninvasive tear-break time (NITBUT) < 6 s, for at least one eye.
- Informed consent form (ICF) signed by the participant or a legal guardian.
Who cannot join
- Male or female subjects aged less than 20 years (<20 years).
- The symptom criterium of ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score < 13.
- Central tear meniscus height (TMHc) > 0.20 mm and Noninvasive tear-break time (NITBUT) > 6 s for each eye.
- Acute inflammatory eye diseases.
- Receive ocular or eyelid surgeries before 6 months (except cataract surgery).
- Allergy to HA
- Pregnancy
- Conditions judged by the investigator as unsuitable for this trial.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City
Ing-Chou Lai, MD
About this study
Official title: Short-term Supplemental Effect of Preservative-free Low-dose Hyaluronic Acid-containing Salt Solution on Dry Eye Disease - A Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Controlled Trial
This trial is a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) on dry eye disease.
Read the detailed description
This trial is a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to compare intervention treatment (Per-Young Eye Drops: preservative-free 0.15% HA) against control treatment (AIM Artificial Tears: salt solution without 0.15% HA). All participants will be received Per-Young Eye Drops (4 to 8 times per day) or AIM Artificial Tears (4 to 8 times per day) with 12 weeks. Two drugs are identical in appearance and order of administration will be double-blind randomized.
Primary endpoint:
To compare the central tear meniscus height (TMHc) of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA at 4 weeks.
- Conditions
- Dry Eye
- Being tested
- salt solution without 0.15% HA, preservative-free 0.15% HA
- Keywords
- hyaluronic acid, salt solution, dry eye disease, ocular surface disease
- Medical subject headings
- Dry Eye Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
salt solution without 0.15% HADrug
Also called AIM Artificial Tears
received AIM Artificial Tears (4 to 8 times per day) with 12 weeks
preservative-free 0.15% HADrug
Also called Per-Young Eye Drops
received Per-Young Eye Drops (4 to 8 times per day) with 12 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| salt solution without 0.15% HA | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: salt solution without 0.15% HA |
| preservative-free 0.15% HA | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: preservative-free 0.15% HA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Tear meniscus height
To compare the TMHc after blink of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA at 4 weeks.
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
Tear meniscus height
To compare the TMHc of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA .
Measured: 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score
To compare the OSDI score of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA. It was ranged from 0-100, in which higher score related to more severe symptom. It was subgroup into normal (0-12), mild (13-22), moderate(23-32), and severe (33-100).
Measured: 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Redness score
To compare the redness score of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA. It was obtained by Keratograph® 5M, Oculus. The redness score, including total redness score, temporal and nasal bulbar scores, temporal and nasal limbal redness scores, showing the severity of dry eye. The higher redness area imply more severity of dry eye.
Measured: 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Lipid layer thickness
To compare the lipid layer thickness of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA.
Measured: 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Tear film dynamics
To compare the tear film dynamics of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA.
Measured: 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT)
To compare the NITBUT of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA.
Measured: 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Tear fern test
To compare the tear fern test of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA.
Measured: 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Ocular surface staining
To compare the ocular surface staining of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA. The ocular surface staining will be graded according to the Oxford Scheme. Fluorescein stain is applied on the ocular surface, and then corneal and conjunctival staining are evaluated under absorption filters. Staining will be labeled by punctate dots on a series of panels in order of increasing severity and score ranges from 0 to 5 for the treatment eye.
Measured: 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2019
- Study start17 Apr 2019
- Primary completion22 Jan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion22 Mar 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dry EyeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chang Gung Memorial HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 334 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ing-Chou Lai, MD, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Investigators
- Ing-Chou Lai, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03888183
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201801577A3C601
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
PubMed 28736335Lemp MA, Crews LA, Bron AJ, Foulks GN, Sullivan BD. Distribution of aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye in a clinic-based patient cohort: a retrospective study. Cornea. 2012 May;31(5):472-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318225415a.
PubMed 22378109Cho WH, Lai IC, Fang PC, Chien CC, Tseng SL, Lai YH, Huang YT, Kuo MT. Meibomian Gland Performance in Glaucomatous Patients With Long-term Instillation of IOP-lowering Medications. J Glaucoma. 2018 Feb;27(2):176-183. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000841.
PubMed 29240600Ho RW, Fang PC, Chao TL, Chien CC, Kuo MT. Increase lipid tear thickness after botulinum neurotoxin A injection in patients with blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. Sci Rep. 2018 May 30;8(1):8367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26750-5.
PubMed 29849166Wang CY, Ho RW, Fang PC, Yu HJ, Chien CC, Hsiao CC, Kuo MT. The function and morphology of Meibomian glands in patients with thyroid eye disease: a preliminary study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 12;18(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0763-9.
PubMed 29649988
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Short-term Supplemental Effect of Preservative-free Low-dose Hyaluronic Acid-containing Salt Solution on Dry Eye Disease - A Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03888183
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201801577A3C601
- Conditions
- Dry Eye
- Keywords
- hyaluronic acid, salt solution, dry eye disease, ocular surface disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 334 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 22 Mar 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial is a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) on dry eye disease.
Detailed description
This trial is a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to compare intervention treatment (Per-Young Eye Drops: preservative-free 0.15% HA) against control treatment (AIM Artificial Tears: salt solution without 0.15% HA). All participants will be received Per-Young Eye Drops (4 to 8 times per day) or AIM Artificial Tears (4 to 8 times per day) with 12 weeks. Two drugs are identical in appearance and order of administration will be double-blind randomized.
Primary endpoint:
To compare the central tear meniscus height (TMHc) of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA at 4 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| salt solution without 0.15% HA | Placebo comparator | Drug: salt solution without 0.15% HA |
| preservative-free 0.15% HA | Active comparator | Drug: preservative-free 0.15% HA |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female subjects aged greater than or equal to 20 years (>= 20 years).
- The symptom criterium of ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score > 13.
- One of the two following examination criteria:
- Informed consent form (ICF) signed by the participant or a legal guardian.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Male or female subjects aged less than 20 years (<20 years).
- The symptom criterium of ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score < 13.
- Central tear meniscus height (TMHc) > 0.20 mm and Noninvasive tear-break time (NITBUT) > 6 s for each eye.
- Acute inflammatory eye diseases.
- Receive ocular or eyelid surgeries before 6 months (except cataract surgery).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| salt solution without 0.15% HAAlso: AIM Artificial Tearsreceived AIM Artificial Tears (4 to 8 times per day) with 12 weeks | Drug | salt solution without 0.15% HA |
| preservative-free 0.15% HAAlso: Per-Young Eye Dropsreceived Per-Young Eye Drops (4 to 8 times per day) with 12 weeks | Drug | preservative-free 0.15% HA |
Primary outcome
Tear meniscus height
Time frame: 4 weeks
To compare the TMHc after blink of treatment with preservative-free 0.15% HA to the treatment with salt solution without 0.15% HA at 4 weeks.
8 secondary outcomes
Tear meniscus height
Time frame: 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score
Time frame: 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Redness score
Time frame: 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Lipid layer thickness
Time frame: 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Tear film dynamics
Time frame: 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT)
Time frame: 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Tear fern test
Time frame: 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Ocular surface staining
Time frame: 8 weeks, 12 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2019.
- Background: PubMed 28736335Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 22378109Lemp MA, Crews LA, Bron AJ, Foulks GN, Sullivan BD. Distribution of aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye in a clinic-based patient cohort: a retrospective study. Cornea. 2012 May;31(5):472-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318225415a.
- Background: PubMed 29240600Cho WH, Lai IC, Fang PC, Chien CC, Tseng SL, Lai YH, Huang YT, Kuo MT. Meibomian Gland Performance in Glaucomatous Patients With Long-term Instillation of IOP-lowering Medications. J Glaucoma. 2018 Feb;27(2):176-183. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000841.
- Background: PubMed 29849166Ho RW, Fang PC, Chao TL, Chien CC, Kuo MT. Increase lipid tear thickness after botulinum neurotoxin A injection in patients with blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. Sci Rep. 2018 May 30;8(1):8367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26750-5.
- Background: PubMed 29649988Wang CY, Ho RW, Fang PC, Yu HJ, Chien CC, Hsiao CC, Kuo MT. The function and morphology of Meibomian glands in patients with thyroid eye disease: a preliminary study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 12;18(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0763-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dry Eye
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Autologous Transplantation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium for Geographic Atrophy Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ing-Chou Lai, MD principal investigator
Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing salt solution without 0.15% HA and preservative-free 0.15% HA in people with Dry Eye, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ing-Chou Lai, MD (886-9-75056482, lai1@cgmh.org.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Tear meniscus height (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03888183, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2019.